AzTrials
AzTrials

PainNCT05312502

Effect of Using a Birth Ball on Birth Satisfaction and Pain in Pregnant Women During Labor

A study testing Birth Ball in people with Pain and Labor Pain, run by Selcuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

H0: There is no difference between birth satisfaction and pain levels of pregnant women who used and did not use a birth ball during labor. H1: There is a difference between birth satisfaction and pain levels of pregnant women who used and did not use a birth ball during the birth process. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 47 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Labor Pain, Satisfaction
What is being tested?
Birth Ball
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
111 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Mar 2020to 1 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 47 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • the consent of the pregnant women to participate in the study,
  • have signed the informed consent form,
  • be over the age of 18,
  • Vaginal opening was determined as 4 cm

Who cannot join

  • Having a psychologically diagnosed disorder
  • Pregnant women diagnosed with risky pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Dr. Ali Kemal Belviranlı Gynecology and Pediatrics Hospital

    Konya

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effect of Using a Birth Ball on Birth Satisfaction and Pain in Pregnant Women During Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

H0: There is no difference between birth satisfaction and pain levels of pregnant women who used and did not use a birth ball during labor.

H1: There is a difference between birth satisfaction and pain levels of pregnant women who used and did not use a birth ball during the birth process.

Being tested
Birth Ball
Keywords
Birth ball, birth satisfaction, pain, midwifery care
Medical subject headings
Pain, Labor Pain, Personal Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Birth BallOther

    During labour, the pregnant woman was positioned using a birth ball.

Study groups in NCT05312502
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental: Birth BallExperimentalIn the second stage, the birth ball application was made and followed. Pregnant women with a vaginal opening of 4 cm admitted to the delivery room were instructed to sit on the delivery ball for a total of 30 minutes. A stopwatch clock was used to determine these 30 minutes. The pregnant woman was not asked to sit on the ball all the time, and she could take a break for rest or other needs. The birth ball, which is suitable for women's use, was preferred in 45 cm dimensions, and the pilates circle was used as a stabilizer. Under the supervision of the researcher, the pregnant women sat upright on the ball and began to rock back and forth. Meanwhile, the researcher held the pregnant woman's hand. In order for the pregnant woman not to lose her balance, the birth ball was placed on a pilates circle and she was supported by the researcher in making the movements.
Receives: Other: Birth Ball
ControlNo interventionA routine care was performed.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Introductory Information Form

    The form consisting of 13 questions was prepared by the researcher in order to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and current health status of women.

    Measured: pre-intervention

  2. Birth Process Follow-up Form

    It was created by the researcher in order to obtain information about the progress of birth and the characteristics of the fetus during the birth process of the pregnant. In the form, there are questions including the hour and subsequent follow-up hours when the vaginal opening is 4 cm, dilatation, fetal heartbeat, whether there is oxytocin administration, the duration and frequency of contractions, and the characteristics of the amniotic fluid.

    Measured: during the intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    It is a measurement usually used to evaluate pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). A 10 cm vertical form was used in the study. Pain level was evaluated with VAS during each follow-up of the pregnant woman.

    Measured: during the intervention

  2. Birth Satisfaction Scale-Short Form (DME-F)

    The short form of the scale was revised by Martin et al. in 2016 to evaluate the birth satisfaction levels of women (Martin et al., 2016). The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Serhatlıoğlu et al. in 2018 (Göncü Serhatlıoğlu et al., 2018). The scale consists of 10 items and a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 40 points can be obtained. The items of the scale are in a 5-point Likert type and are scored as Strongly agree (4 points)-Strongly Disagree (0 points).

    Measured: in the first hour in postpartum period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2022
  2. Study start1 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The sample size was 106 pregnant women, 53 in each group, with a known score using the G\*Power 3.1.7 program (intervention group=29.19±5.86-control group=26.51±5.13) with 85% power, 0.48 effect size and 0.15 error. was calculated as. Considering data loss, it is planned to reach 10% more pregnant women. Intervention group=57, control group=54 pregnants, and the study was terminated. The women were divided into two groups using the random numbers table in the simple random sampling method. Single blinding was performed on the women participating in the study. However, in order to prevent bias, the researcher who collected the data gave codes to the questionnaire forms of the pregnant women.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
111 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05312502
Sponsor's protocol ID
0000-0002
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
21 Mar 2022
Last updated
25 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kilic S, Dereli Yilmaz S. Virtual Reality Headset Simulating a Nature Environment to Improve Health Outcomes in Pregnant Women: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Nov;32(8):1104-1114. doi: 10.1177/10547738231184923. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

    PubMed 37408298

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Birth Ball in people with Pain and Labor Pain, run by Selcuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Introductory Information Form (time frame: pre-intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05312502, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in