SalpingectomyNCT05300711
Preventing Ovarian Cancer Through Oportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Colorectal Surgery
A study testing Bilateral salpingectomy and Colorectal surgery in people with Salpingectomy and Colorectal Surgery, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS-the removal of the fallopian tubes) at the time of colorectal surgery to prevent ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer is the fifth cause of cancer-related mortality in females in Canada. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Salpingectomy, Colorectal Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Bilateral salpingectomy and Colorectal surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 20 Jun 2022to Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals with intact fallopian tubes.
- Individuals undergoing one of the following open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery: total colectomy, right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, anterior resection, low anterior resection, small bowel resection and appendectomy.
- Individuals who finished with childbearing.
Who cannot join
- Presence of BRCA 1 or 2 mutation.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
- Not yet recruiting
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
About this study
Official title: Preventing Ovarian Cancer Through the Expansion of Opportunistic Salpingectomy: Uptake, Safety and Cost-effectiveness at the Time of Colorectal Surgery
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS-the removal of the fallopian tubes) at the time of colorectal surgery to prevent ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer is the fifth cause of cancer-related mortality in females in Canada. OS can prevent the most common and lethal type of ovarian cancer, high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). OS during gynecologic surgery (hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation) is safe and effective. However, rates of hysterectomies and tubal sterilization are decreasing. This research team aims to extend the prevention of ovarian cancer by expanding to offer OS during other surgeries in the pelvis where fallopian tubes are accessible, beginning with colorectal surgery. This study will examine: 1) the feasibility of OS at the time of colorectal surgery; 2) the safety of OS at the time of colorectal surgery; 3) the cost-effectiveness of OS at the time of colorectal surgery.
The hypothesis is that OS will be well accepted by individuals with fallopian tubes undergoing colorectal surgery, and that the vast majority (around 90 percent) of attempts to remove both fallopian tubes will be successful. It is expected that there will be 10-20 minutes additional operating room time for completing OS and that there will be no increased risk of complications when OS is included in a colorectal surgery. The researchers also hypothesize that OS at the time of colorectal surgery will be cost-effective because of the reduced number of ovarian cancer cases and associated treatment costs.
Read the detailed description
Research design:
120 eligible participants will be enrolled and consented to undergo OS at the time of colorectal surgery. As a control group, 120 participants undergoing colorectal surgery without OS will be included. When eligible participants decline OS, they will be approached to participate as a control, and once 120 participants have consented to OS, participants will be enrolled as controls until there are 120 patients in the control group.
Methods and analysis:
The research coordinator will contact participants to consent them to undergo OS or to participate as a control participant at a preoperative visit prior to their colorectal surgery. The research coordinator will walk them through the informed consent form and answer any questions about the study. This will occur either at St Paul's Hospital, or over the phone or via telehealth video conference.
Information will be collected regarding all participants who were approached to consent for OS. For those who agree to participate in the study, a short questionnaire will be applied to collect some additional information that would not be available in the chart. Those who decline OS will be asked about their reasons for not participating to better understand the patient perspective, inform future research and develop lay communication materials around OS. The percentage of participants who consented to OS will be calculated, as well as those who successfully had both fallopian tubes removed during their colorectal surgery.
To calculate how much additional operating room (OR) time is required when OS is performed concurrently with colorectal surgery, the research coordinator will attend the OR and record the amount of time taken for both fallopian tubes to be removed or for the attempt to be abandoned (in rare cases where both tubes are not removed).
To assess the safety of providing OS at the time of colorectal surgery, postoperative complications will be addressed, including duration of hospital stay and 30-day hospital readmission rate, blood transfusion and surgical site infection. All participants will receive standard post-operative care. All data on perioperative complications are available in the participant's medical chart. The research coordinator will access this information for the research team. Perioperative complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, which uses a grading approach. Grade 1 represents any deviation from the normal postoperative course that does not require the need for additional treatment beyond the use of antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, diuretics, electrolytes and physiotherapy. Grade 2 represents complications that require pharmacologic treatment beyond what is included for grade 1 complications and includes blood transfusions. Grade 3 includes complications that require surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention, Grade 4 includes life threatening complications requiring admission to intensive care and Grade 5 is death of the patient.
To determine the cost effectiveness of OS at the time of colorectal surgery, the data generated regarding additional OR time and any additional complications will be used to conduct Markov Monte Carlo simulation models. Monte Carlo simulations will estimate the number of people who will be diagnosed with HGSC in the future after OS compared to those not having this procedure, based on the effectiveness data generated from OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal ligation. Direct and indirect health care costs will be derived from previously existing sources, including patient cost estimators from the Canadian Institute for Health Information that includes provincial cost estimates for colorectal surgeries by province. Lifetime risks of HGSC will be modeled from the Canadian Cancer Statistics. Competing mortality risks that are age and sex dependent will be derived from Canadian Life Tables. The researchers will use published costs for treatment of HGSC and compare the direct HGSC-related costs (costs associated with either prevention or treatment of HGSC) across the groups.
Reporting for adverse events:
All potential side effects related to study interventions will be recorded. Adverse events will be monitored on an ongoing basis by the research coordinator, and frequencies will be reported to investigators bimonthly.
Any Clavien-Dindo complication of 3, 4, or 5 (more serious) will be immediately reviewed. The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2 complications will be reviewed at interim analyses, which will be conducted when 1/3 of participants have been recruited and again when 2/3rd have been recruited.
If the study shows that adverse events, serious or not, are occurring at a higher rate for people undergoing OS compared to baseline expected rates the study may be stopped early. If unanticipated adverse events are discovered, the study may be stopped early. In either case, there would be no further recruitment.
In the case of study stoppage, all colorectal surgeons at St Paul hospital will be immediately notified in writing. The research coordinator will no longer recruit and consent patients at St Paul's hospital.
- Conditions
- Salpingectomy, Colorectal Surgery
- Being tested
- Bilateral salpingectomy, Colorectal surgery
- Keywords
- Salpingectomy, Colorectal Surgery, Ovarian Neoplasms, Primary Prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bilateral salpingectomyProcedure or surgery
Removal of both fallopian tubes.
Colorectal surgeryProcedure or surgery
Colorectal surgery as indicated by attending surgeon.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunistic salpingectomy | Experimental | The participating surgeons will attempt to perform bilateral salpingectomy in addition to the colorectal surgery. Receives: Procedure: Bilateral salpingectomy; Procedure: Colorectal surgery |
| Colorectal surgery only | Active comparator | Participants will receive the standard of care, that is colorectal surgery. Receives: Procedure: Colorectal surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The percentage of participants who consented to OS
The percentage of participants who were approached who ultimately consented
Measured: When the patient is approached and asked to consent and when they decline or consent (~2-4 weeks)
The percentage of the participants who consented to OS who had both fallopian tubes removed.
The percentage of participants who consented and underwent removal of both fallopian tubes at the time of their surgery.
Measured: During the surgical intervention (~2 hours for surgical intervention)
The number of additional minutes in the OR required to attempt or complete opportunistic salpingectomy during colorectal surgery (on average)
Average number of minutes spent removing fallopian tubes or attempting to remove fallopian tubes in the situation where removal of both tubes is unsuccessful.
Measured: During the surgical intervention, a stopwatch will be started when fallopian removal begins and stopped when it is complete (~20 minutes)
Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events as assessed by the Clavien Dindo Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications.
Rate of surgical complications among participants undergoing OS at the time of colorectal surgery compared with a control group of patients undergoing colorectal surgery without OS.
Measured: These will be assessed during the surgical intervention and the 30 days following the surgical intervention.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cost-effectiveness of OS as measured by the cost per quality adjusted life year
We will calculate the cost per quality adjusted life year of performing OS at the time of colorectal surgery.
Measured: Following study completion; an average of 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2022
- Study start20 Jun 2022
- Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SalpingectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gillian Hanley, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Gillian Hanley, PhD, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaHeather Stuart, MD, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaCarl Brown, MD, Principal investigator, St. Paul's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05300711
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H22-003399
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preventing Ovarian Cancer Through the Expansion of Opportunistic Salpingectomy: Uptake, Safety and Cost-effectiveness at the Time of Colorectal Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05300711
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H22-003399
- Conditions
- Salpingectomy, Colorectal Surgery
- Keywords
- Salpingectomy, Colorectal Surgery, Ovarian Neoplasms, Primary Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 20 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS-the removal of the fallopian tubes) at the time of colorectal surgery to prevent ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer is the fifth cause of cancer-related mortality in females in Canada. OS can prevent the most common and lethal type of ovarian cancer, high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). OS during gynecologic surgery (hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation) is safe and effective. However, rates of hysterectomies and tubal sterilization are decreasing. This research team aims to extend the prevention of ovarian cancer by expanding to offer OS during other surgeries in the pelvis where fallopian tubes are accessible, beginning with colorectal surgery. This study will examine: 1) the feasibility of OS at the time of colorectal surgery; 2) the safety of OS at the time of colorectal surgery; 3) the cost-effectiveness of OS at the time of colorectal surgery.
The hypothesis is that OS will be well accepted by individuals with fallopian tubes undergoing colorectal surgery, and that the vast majority (around 90 percent) of attempts to remove both fallopian tubes will be successful. It is expected that there will be 10-20 minutes additional operating room time for completing OS and that there will be no increased risk of complications when OS is included in a colorectal surgery. The researchers also hypothesize that OS at the time of colorectal surgery will be cost-effective because of the reduced number of ovarian cancer cases and associated treatment costs.
Detailed description
Research design:
120 eligible participants will be enrolled and consented to undergo OS at the time of colorectal surgery. As a control group, 120 participants undergoing colorectal surgery without OS will be included. When eligible participants decline OS, they will be approached to participate as a control, and once 120 participants have consented to OS, participants will be enrolled as controls until there are 120 patients in the control group.
Methods and analysis:
The research coordinator will contact participants to consent them to undergo OS or to participate as a control participant at a preoperative visit prior to their colorectal surgery. The research coordinator will walk them through the informed consent form and answer any questions about the study. This will occur either at St Paul's Hospital, or over the phone or via telehealth video conference.
Information will be collected regarding all participants who were approached to consent for OS. For those who agree to participate in the study, a short questionnaire will be applied to collect some additional information that would not be available in the chart. Those who decline OS will be asked about their reasons for not participating to better understand the patient perspective, inform future research and develop lay communication materials around OS. The percentage of participants who consented to OS will be calculated, as well as those who successfully had both fallopian tubes removed during their colorectal surgery.
To calculate how much additional operating room (OR) time is required when OS is performed concurrently with colorectal surgery, the research coordinator will attend the OR and record the amount of time taken for both fallopian tubes to be removed or for the attempt to be abandoned (in rare cases where both tubes are not removed).
To assess the safety of providing OS at the time of colorectal surgery, postoperative complications will be addressed, including duration of hospital stay and 30-day hospital readmission rate, blood transfusion and surgical site infection. All participants will receive standard post-operative care. All data on perioperative complications are available in the participant's medical chart. The research coordinator will access this information for the research team. Perioperative complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications, which uses a grading approach. Grade 1 represents any deviation from the normal postoperative course that does not require the need for additional treatment beyond the use of antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, diuretics, electrolytes and physiotherapy. Grade 2 represents complications that require pharmacologic treatment beyond what is included for grade 1 complications and includes blood transfusions. Grade 3 includes complications that require surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention, Grade 4 includes life threatening complications requiring admission to intensive care and Grade 5 is death of the patient.
To determine the cost effectiveness of OS at the time of colorectal surgery, the data generated regarding additional OR time and any additional complications will be used to conduct Markov Monte Carlo simulation models. Monte Carlo simulations will estimate the number of people who will be diagnosed with HGSC in the future after OS compared to those not having this procedure, based on the effectiveness data generated from OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal ligation. Direct and indirect health care costs will be derived from previously existing sources, including patient cost estimators from the Canadian Institute for Health Information that includes provincial cost estimates for colorectal surgeries by province. Lifetime risks of HGSC will be modeled from the Canadian Cancer Statistics. Competing mortality risks that are age and sex dependent will be derived from Canadian Life Tables. The researchers will use published costs for treatment of HGSC and compare the direct HGSC-related costs (costs associated with either prevention or treatment of HGSC) across the groups.
Reporting for adverse events:
All potential side effects related to study interventions will be recorded. Adverse events will be monitored on an ongoing basis by the research coordinator, and frequencies will be reported to investigators bimonthly.
Any Clavien-Dindo complication of 3, 4, or 5 (more serious) will be immediately reviewed. The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2 complications will be reviewed at interim analyses, which will be conducted when 1/3 of participants have been recruited and again when 2/3rd have been recruited.
If the study shows that adverse events, serious or not, are occurring at a higher rate for people undergoing OS compared to baseline expected rates the study may be stopped early. If unanticipated adverse events are discovered, the study may be stopped early. In either case, there would be no further recruitment.
In the case of study stoppage, all colorectal surgeons at St Paul hospital will be immediately notified in writing. The research coordinator will no longer recruit and consent patients at St Paul's hospital.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunistic salpingectomy | Experimental | Procedure: Bilateral salpingectomy, Procedure: Colorectal surgeryThe participating surgeons will attempt to perform bilateral salpingectomy in addition to the colorectal surgery. |
| Colorectal surgery only | Active comparator | Procedure: Colorectal surgeryParticipants will receive the standard of care, that is colorectal surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Individuals with intact fallopian tubes.
- Individuals undergoing one of the following open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery: total colectomy, right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, anterior resection, low anterior resection, small bowel resection and appendectomy.
- Individuals who finished with childbearing.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presence of BRCA 1 or 2 mutation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral salpingectomyRemoval of both fallopian tubes. | Procedure or surgery | Opportunistic salpingectomy |
| Colorectal surgeryColorectal surgery as indicated by attending surgeon. | Procedure or surgery | Colorectal surgery only, Opportunistic salpingectomy |
Primary outcome
The percentage of participants who consented to OS
Time frame: When the patient is approached and asked to consent and when they decline or consent (~2-4 weeks)
The percentage of participants who were approached who ultimately consented
The percentage of the participants who consented to OS who had both fallopian tubes removed.
Time frame: During the surgical intervention (~2 hours for surgical intervention)
The percentage of participants who consented and underwent removal of both fallopian tubes at the time of their surgery.
The number of additional minutes in the OR required to attempt or complete opportunistic salpingectomy during colorectal surgery (on average)
Time frame: During the surgical intervention, a stopwatch will be started when fallopian removal begins and stopped when it is complete (~20 minutes)
Average number of minutes spent removing fallopian tubes or attempting to remove fallopian tubes in the situation where removal of both tubes is unsuccessful.
Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events as assessed by the Clavien Dindo Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications.
Time frame: These will be assessed during the surgical intervention and the 30 days following the surgical intervention.
Rate of surgical complications among participants undergoing OS at the time of colorectal surgery compared with a control group of patients undergoing colorectal surgery without OS.
1 secondary outcome
Cost-effectiveness of OS as measured by the cost per quality adjusted life year
Time frame: Following study completion; an average of 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Salpingectomy
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Recruiting
HYbrid RObotic Surgery in Gynecology
Hysterectomy, Hysterectomy and Salpingectomy
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Opportunistic Salpingectomy During Bariatric Surgery for Ovarian Cancer Prevention
Ovarian Cancer, Bariatric Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Preventing Ovarian Cancer Through Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Salpingectomy, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Not yet recruiting
Menopausal Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention
Menopause, Opportunistic Salpingectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gillian Hanley, PhD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Heather Stuart, MD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Carl Brown, MD principal investigator
St. Paul's Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bilateral salpingectomy and Colorectal surgery in people with Salpingectomy and Colorectal Surgery, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gillian Hanley, PhD (778-888-5822, Gillian.Hanley@vch.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The percentage of participants who consented to OS (time frame: When the patient is approached and asked to consent and when they decline or consent (~2-4 weeks)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.