AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac ArrhythmiaWEAR-TECH ECGNCT05298553

Diagnostic Accuracy of WEARable TECHnology Single-lead ECG in Detecting Cardiac Arrhythmias

A study testing Group A and Group B in people with Cardiac Arrhythmia and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia (irregular heart rhythm), affecting 1-2 million people in the UK. AF significantly increases the risk of an AF-related stroke, heart failure and dementia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Group A and Group B
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
18 Apr 2022to 1 Apr 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
  • Male or female aged 18 years or above.
  • Indication for 12-lead ECG.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to comply with instructions.
  • Tattoos in the wrists or fingers where the device will be placed.
  • Severe skin allergy to silicone (Apple Watch wrist band) or nickel allergies.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom3 sites
  • University Hospital Birmingham

    Birmingham

  • Oxford Univeristy Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX89DU

  • University Hospital Southampton

    Southampton

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Accuracy of WEARable TECHnology Single-lead ECG in Detecting Cardiac Arrhythmias: WEAR-TECH ECG

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia (irregular heart rhythm), affecting 1-2 million people in the UK. AF significantly increases the risk of an AF-related stroke, heart failure and dementia. A significant proportion of people will have no symptoms, and they may only be found to have AF after suffering an AF-related stroke.

An electrocardiogram (ECG) uses sensors placed on the skin to record the heart's electrical activity. A 12-lead ECG uses 10 sensors and is the gold-standard (best available test) to detect any abnormal heart rhythm disturbances. Until recently, a 12-lead ECG showing an irregular heart rhythm was required to make a diagnosis of AF but as AF episodes are often short and unpredictable it may be missed. Therefore, a small device that continuously records heartbeat and heart rhythm could make the diagnosis of arrhythmias and AF much quicker and easier.

Read more

Accessories such as watches or rings - referred to as wearable devices - have extremely good sensors that measure pulse rate by detecting small changes in skin colour during each heartbeat and can perform a single-lead ECG. Algorithms built in the wearable devices can identify irregular heart rhythms, such as atrial fibrillation.

The purpose of this study is to test two new wearable devices - the Skylabs CART-I ring and the Apple Watch - in detecting abnormal heart rhythm recording and recording ECGs. The investigators plan to recruit 500 patients attending Cardiology Departments in several hospitals in the UK and will ask them to wear the Apple Watch and the CART-I and perform 12-lead ECG with each device (two in total). No extra follow-up visits are required. At the end of the study, the investigators will compare interpretation by two cardiologists of the wearable devices' ECGs and the 12-lead ECGs and look at their ability to automatically detect abnormal rhythms.

Being tested
Group A, Group B
Keywords
Apple Watch;, Skylabs CART-I Ring, Wearable Devices
Medical subject headings
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group ADevice

    Participants will be asked to perform a simultaneous 30-seconds 12-lead ECG and single-lead ECG for each wearable device: Skylab CART-I ring followed by Apple Watch.

  • Group BDevice

    they will be asked to perform a simultaneous 30-seconds 12-lead ECG and single-lead ECG for each wearable device: Apple Watch followed by the Skylab CART-I ring.

Study groups in NCT05298553
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1ExperimentalThe order in which the wearable devices being investigated will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion. Simultaneous 12-lead ECG and single-lead ECG with the SkyLabs CART-I ring followed by the Apple Watch.
Receives: Device: Group A
Group 2ExperimentalThe order in which the wearable devices being investigated will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion. Simultaneous 12-lead ECG and single-lead ECG with the Apple Watch followed by the SkyLabs CART-I ring.
Receives: Device: Group B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare the Diagnostic Performance of Physician Rhythm Interpretation of 1-lead ECG Generated by SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard) for Atrial Fibrillation

    Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of SkyLabs CART-I ring and Apple Watch 1-lead ECGs interpretation for for atrial fibrillaiton compared with a 12-lead ECG (gold-standard).

    Measured: 1 Day

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Compare the Accuracy of Automatic AF Detection of the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus a Cardiologist Interpretation of a 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard)

    Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of the AF detection algorithm of the Skylab CART-I ring and Apple Watch compared to a 12-lead ECG (gold-standard).

    Measured: 1 Day

  2. Compare the Accuracy of ECG Interval Measurement for the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch to a 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard)

    Level of agreement of measured interval duration between the SkyLabs CART-I ring, Apple Watch 1-lead ECG and a 12-lead ECG.

    Measured: 1 Day

  3. Compare the Accuracy of Heart Rate Detection of the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch 1-lead ECG to a 30-second 12-lead ECG

    Correlation coefficient between the mean heart rate from simultaneous single lead and 12 lead ECG acquisitions.

    Measured: 1 Day

  4. Compare the Accuracy of Rhythm Interpretation of SkyLabs CART-I Ring 1-lead ECG to Combined PPG (Plethosysmography) Signal and 1-lead ECG.

    Assessmen of diagnostic accuracy of the Skylab CART-I ring if a PPG signal is added.

    Measured: 1 Day

  5. Compare the Accuracy of Automatic AF Detection of the SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus a Cardiologist Interpretation of a 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard) - Unclassified Excluded

    Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of the AF detection algorithm of the Skylab CART-I ring and Apple Watch compared to a 12-lead ECG (gold-standard) with Unclassified SL-ECG were excluded

    Measured: 1 Day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Mar 2022
  2. Study start18 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2023
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05298553
Sponsor's protocol ID
15487
Acronym
WEAR-TECH ECG
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
12 Dec 2021
Last updated
1 Jun 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Group A and Group B in people with Cardiac Arrhythmia and Atrial Fibrillation, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare the Diagnostic Performance of Physician Rhythm Interpretation of 1-lead ECG Generated by SkyLabs CART-I Ring and Apple Watch Versus 12-lead ECG (Gold-standard) for Atrial Fibrillation (time frame: 1 Day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in