AzTrials
AzTrials

Eyelid TumorPhase 4NCT05294640

Bacteriostatic Saline as a Local Anesthetic in Minor Eyelid Procedures

A Phase 4 study testing 0.9% Bacteriostatic Local Anesthetic Injection, 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Local Anesthetic Injection and Eyelid Lesion Removal in people with Eyelid Tumor and Eyelid Bump, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators aim to assess whether bacteriostatic saline provides the same level of anesthesia as traditional local anesthesia while reducing pain associated with medication infusion in minor eyelid procedures Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 110 years
Conditions the study is for
Eyelid Tumor, Eyelid Bump, Eyelid Deformity
What is being tested?
0.9% Bacteriostatic Local Anesthetic Injection, 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Local Anesthetic Injection and Eyelid Lesion Removal
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
95 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 May 2022to 21 Feb 2023
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >=18 years old
  • Undergoing clinic-based periocular procedure

Who cannot join

  • Any other topical, oral or intravenous sedating medications given alongside procedure
  • Allergy to saline, lidocaine or epinephrine
  • Unable to provide consent due to cognitive impairment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California at San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94158

Other trials in United States

About this study

The investigators aim to assess whether bacteriostatic saline provides the same level of anesthesia as traditional local anesthesia while reducing pain associated with medication infusion in minor eyelid procedures

Read the detailed description

Benzoyl alcohol is an aromatic alcohol that has been used in healthcare primarily as an antibacterial preservative agent in bacteriostatic saline. It has also been shown to have anesthetic properties, and has been demonstrated to cause less pain with infusion compared to lidocaine, while maintaining adequate pain relief. The use of bacteriostatic saline alone as an anesthetic for incisional procedures in the periocular area has not yet been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether bacteriostatic saline provides an adequate level of anesthesia for minor in-office eyelid procedures while allowing for reducing pain associated with medication infusion compared with traditional local anesthetic agents. To assess this, the investigators will recruit 150 patients aged 18 or older undergoing minor eyelid procedures including eyelid biopsies, chalazion removal from outpatient oculoplastics clinics at University of California, San Francisco. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to undergo local anesthetic with either 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 0.9% bacteriostatic saline. Primary outcome measure will be pain level on a scale of 1-10 with regards to injection and procedure itself. These will be compared between the two groups. The investigators hypothesize that bacteriostatic saline is superior to lidocaine with epinephrine in terms of pain with injection, but will result in a similar pain level during the procedure.

Being tested
0.9% Bacteriostatic Local Anesthetic Injection, 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Local Anesthetic Injection, Eyelid Lesion Removal
Keywords
Oculoplastics, Local Anesthesia, Eyelid Anesthesia, Periocular Anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Eyelid Neoplasms, Hordeolum

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 0.9% Bacteriostatic Local Anesthetic InjectionDrug

    Following research and procedural consent, local anesthetic injection will be carried out using a standard 1 cc of local anesthetic corresponding to the study arm (0.9% bacteriostatic saline or 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine). Prior to anesthetic administration, the procedure site will be cleaned using standard measures. A 30 gauge needle on a 3 centimeter cubed volume syringe will be utilized. Five minutes will be given for local anesthetic to take effect.

  • 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Local Anesthetic InjectionDrug

    Following research and procedural consent, local anesthetic injection will be carried out using a standard 1 cc of local anesthetic consisting of a commercially available mixture of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Prior to anesthetic administration, the procedure site will be cleaned using standard measures. A 30 gauge needle on a 3 centimeter cubed volume syringe will be utilized. Five minutes will be given for local anesthetic to take effect.

  • Eyelid Lesion RemovalProcedure or surgery

    Following anesthesia administration, patient will proceed with recommended eyelid lesion removal. The procedure site will be cleaned according to standard protocol, and standard technique for lesion removal will be performed, which will vary according to type of lesion but may involve use of Westcott scissors, forceps, #15 or #11 blades or other oculoplastics administration. The exact procedural details will be at the discretion of the surgeon.

Study groups in NCT05294640
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bacteriostatic Saline as Local AnesthesiaExperimentalPatients receiving bacteriostatic saline as local anesthesia for in-office minor eyelid procedures at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, Oculoplastics department
Receives: Drug: 0.9% Bacteriostatic Local Anesthetic Injection; Procedure: Eyelid Lesion Removal
Lidocaine with Epinephrine as Local AnesthesiaActive comparatorPatients receiving lidocaine with epinephrine as local anesthesia for in-office minor eyelid procedures at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, Oculoplastics department
Receives: Drug: 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Local Anesthetic Injection; Procedure: Eyelid Lesion Removal

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain on Injection

    Pain on a scale of 0-10 during injection process (0 being no pain, 10 being worst pain ever experienced). These will be patient-reported verbally and recorded immediately after injection.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  2. Pain of Procedure

    Pain on a scale of 0-10 during procedure (0 being no pain, 10 being worst pain ever experienced). These will be patient-reported verbally and recorded immediately after procedure.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of Lesions That Needed Additional Anesthesia to Complete Procedure

    Number of Lesions that Needed Additional Anesthesia to Complete Procedure

    Measured: 10 minutes

  2. Bleeding Level

    Physician-assessed level of bleeding after procedure (mild, moderate, severe). These will be physician-reported verbally and recorded immediately after procedure.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2022
  2. Study start17 May 2022
  3. Primary completion21 Feb 2023
  4. Study completion21 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
95 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05294640
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-36276
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
8 Mar 2022
Last updated
8 Jul 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wilson L, Martin S. Benzyl alcohol as an alternative local anesthetic. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 May;33(5):495-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70335-5.

    PubMed 10216324
  • Minogue SC, Sun DA. Bacteriostatic saline containing benzyl alcohol decreases the pain associated with the injection of propofol. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):683-686. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148617.98716.EB.

    PubMed 15728052
  • Patterson P, Hussa AA, Fedele KA, Vegh GL, Hackman CM. Comparison of 4 analgesic agents for venipuncture. AANA J. 2000 Feb;68(1):43-51.

    PubMed 10876451
  • Miller L, Jensen MP, Stenchever MA. A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Apr;87(4):600-4. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00463-7.

    PubMed 8602315
  • Kruse RC, Kindle BJ, Wisniewski S, Presley J, Smith J, Sellon JL. Local Anesthesia Prior to Ultrasound-Guided Hip Joint Injections: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Bacteriostatic Saline versus Buffered Lidocaine. PM R. 2021 Aug;13(8):811-818. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12489. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

    PubMed 32935453
  • Kwiat DM, Bersani TA, Bersani A. Increased patient comfort utilizing botulinum toxin type a reconstituted with preserved versus nonpreserved saline. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 May;20(3):186-9. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000129012.09632.49.

    PubMed 15167724
  • Hunt SV, Malhotra R. Bacteriostatic preserved saline for pain-free periocular injections: review. Eye (Lond). 2022 Aug;36(8):1546-1552. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01925-z. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

    PubMed 35017698
  • Yuen VH, Dolman PJ. Comparison of three modified lidocaine solutions for use in eyelid anesthesia. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Mar;15(2):143-7. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199903000-00017.

    PubMed 10189646
  • Lugo-Janer G, Padial M, Sanchez JL. Less painful alternatives for local anesthesia. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993 Mar;19(3):237-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1993.tb00342.x.

    PubMed 8383150
  • Oman KS, Fink R, Kleiner C, Makic MB, Wenger B, Hoffecker L, Mancuso M, Schmiege S, Cook P. Intradermal lidocaine or bacteriostatic normal saline to decrease pain before intravenous catheter insertion: a meta-analysis. J Perianesth Nurs. 2014 Oct;29(5):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2013.12.008.

    PubMed 25261140

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing 0.9% Bacteriostatic Local Anesthetic Injection, 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine Local Anesthetic Injection and Eyelid Lesion Removal in people with Eyelid Tumor and Eyelid Bump, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain on Injection (time frame: 5 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05294640, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in