Carious TeethNCT05281861
Marginal Evaluation of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Restoration of Egyptian Posterior Teeth.
A study testing Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration and Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration in people with Carious Teeth and Adaptation, run by Al-Azhar University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Objective: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of the zirconia reinforced lithium disilicate (VITA AMBRIA) glass ceramic Inlay/Onlay compared with lithium disilicate(IPS emax Press) glass ceramic Inlay/Onlay in decayed posterior teeth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Carious Teeth, Adaptation
- What is being tested?
- Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration and Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2022to 1 Oct 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is healthy.
- 18-50 years old.
- Normal occlusion.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Tooth with complete root apex.
- Tooth with moderate coronal decay.
Who cannot join
- Patient Incapable of self-care, mental illness, undergoing radiotherapy, diabetic patient, allergy to one of the materials used, pregnancy, smoker, parafunctional habits, poor oral hygiene, severe periodontitis, tooth need vital pulp therapy or surgical crown lengthening or marginal elevation, tooth with enamel or dentin hypoplasia or hypocalcification, Mallaligned or malformed teeth and adjacent or opposing teeth are missed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Onlay Restorations Constructed From Two Types of Glass Ceramics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Objective: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of the zirconia reinforced lithium disilicate (VITA AMBRIA) glass ceramic Inlay/Onlay compared with lithium disilicate(IPS emax Press) glass ceramic Inlay/Onlay in decayed posterior teeth.
Read the detailed description
A randomized controlled clinical trial, a double-blind (patient and examiner) is conducted by one trained and calibrated operators who perform all restorative procedures. The restorations will be evaluated by a blind and calibrated two examiner using the FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. A total of 25 subject will be randomly assigned to each group for a total of 50 subject. The randomization sequence will be generated (www.randomlists.com/team-generator) and to ensure the confidentiality of the allocation, this will be used opaque, sealed and numbered envelopes in series. These will be kept with an independent researcher for the moment of inclusion of the subjects.
Both groups will receive Inlay/Onlay preparation . Digital impression will be taken, wax pattern for the Inlay/Onlay restoration will be designed and milled using CAD/CAM(computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) software. After that, the wax pattern will be invested and final Inlay/Onlay restoration will be constructed from VITA AMBRIA and IPS e.max press ingots according to manufacturing instructions.
- Conditions
- Carious Teeth, Adaptation
- Being tested
- Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration, Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration
- Keywords
- Inlay, Onlay, Partial coverage,
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restorationOther
In experimental group, Participants will be restored with onlay ceramic restorations constructed from zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) glass ceramic
Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restorationOther
In control group, Participants will be restored with onlay ceramic restorations constructed from Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) glass ceramic
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration | Experimental | The onlays will be constructed from Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) glass ceramic system Receives: Other: Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration |
| Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration | Active comparator | The onlays will be constructed from Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) glass ceramic system Receives: Other: Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Marginal Adaptation
Measuring device: visual and probe.
According to FDI standard(Grade 1-5), which has been defined as follows:
Grade 1. Harmonious outline, no gaps, no white or discolored lines. Grade 2. Marginal gap (> 50 μm and < 150 μm), white lines; small marginal fracture removable by polishing; slight ditching, slight step /flashes, minor irregularities Grade 3. Gap (> 150 μm and < 250 μm) not removable; several small marginal fractures; major irregularities, ditching or flash, steps.
Grade 4. Gap (> 250 μm) dentine/base exposed, chip fracture damaging margins, Notable enamel, or dentine wall fracture.
Grade 5. Restoration is loose but in situ.
Measured: 1 year follow up
Secondary outcomes (3)
Restoration Fracture and retention
Fracture and retention of the onlay restoration will be evaluated. Measuring device: visual and probe.
According to FDI standard (Grade 1-5), which has been defined as follows:
Grade 1: Restoration is present with no fractures, cracks or chipping. Grade 2:Small hairline cracks are visible. Grade 3:Several hairline cracks are present and/or limited chipping of material without damage to marginal quality or proximal contacts.
Grade 4: Fractures affect marginal quality and/or proximal contacts; bulk fractures with probable gap > 250 μm with or without partial loss of less than half the restoration.
Grade 5:Loss of restoration or bulk fracture with probable gap > 250 μm with partial loss of the restoration.
Measured: 1 year follow up
Effect of the restoration on the periodontium
inflammation will be evaluated. Measuring device: visual and probe according to
FDI standard (Grade 1-5), which has been defined as follows:
Grade 1: No plaque, no inflammation of the gingival papilla. Grade 2: Minimal plaque is present, PBI equivalent to baseline. Grade 3: Difference up to one grade in severity of PBI compared to baseline and in comparison to control tooth.
Grade 4: Difference of more than one grade of PBI worsening in comparison to control tooth or increase in pocket depth > 1 mm requiring major intervention.
Grade 5: Severe/ acute gingivitis or periodontitis if related to the restoration requiring immediate replacement of the restoration.
Measured: 1 year follow up
Tooth cracks and fractures
Measuring device: visual and probe according to FDI standard (Grade 1-5) Grade 1: Complete integrity of the restored tooth. Grade 2: Minor marginal crack < 150 μm wide or a hairline crack which cannot be probed. The patient has no clinical symptoms.
Grade 3:
(Grade 3.1) Marginal split in the enamel < 250 μm wide. Not possible to remove by polishing without compromising the shape of the tooth surface or damaging the tooth and is left untreated as not expected to cause further damage. (Grade 3.2)Crack < 250 μm. Patient has no or minimal discomfort.
Grade 4:
(Grade 4.1) Major marginal split > 250 μm that requires repair and/or dentin or base exposed . (Grade 4.2):A 250-μm probe/explorer can be inserted into a crack Grade 5: A cusp or major tooth fracture requiring immediate replacement.
Measured: 1 year follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2022
- Study start1 Apr 2022
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carious TeethStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Al-Azhar UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Walid Awad Abdelhady, Al-Azhar University
- Investigators
- Mohamed FA Metwally, BDS, Study director, Lecturer of Crown and Bridge Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University. Khaled MO Haggag, Professor, Study chair, Professor of Crown and Bridge Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05281861
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- V.Ambria Adaptation(679/272)
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Falahchai M, Babaee Hemmati Y, Neshandar Asli H, Neshandar Asli M. Marginal adaptation of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate overlays with different preparation designs. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Dec;32(8):823-830. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12642. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
PubMed 32810388Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
PubMed 24161516Bastos NA, Bitencourt SB, Carneiro RF, Ferrairo BM, Strelhow SSF, Dos Santos DM, Bombonatti JFS. Marginal and internal adaptation of lithium disilicate partial restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Oct-Dec;20(4):338-344. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_112_20. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
PubMed 33487960
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Onlay Restorations Constructed From Two Types of Glass Ceramics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05281861
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- V.Ambria Adaptation(679/272)
- Conditions
- Carious Teeth, Adaptation
- Keywords
- Inlay, Onlay, Partial coverage,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Al-Azhar UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of the zirconia reinforced lithium disilicate (VITA AMBRIA) glass ceramic Inlay/Onlay compared with lithium disilicate(IPS emax Press) glass ceramic Inlay/Onlay in decayed posterior teeth.
Detailed description
A randomized controlled clinical trial, a double-blind (patient and examiner) is conducted by one trained and calibrated operators who perform all restorative procedures. The restorations will be evaluated by a blind and calibrated two examiner using the FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. A total of 25 subject will be randomly assigned to each group for a total of 50 subject. The randomization sequence will be generated (www.randomlists.com/team-generator) and to ensure the confidentiality of the allocation, this will be used opaque, sealed and numbered envelopes in series. These will be kept with an independent researcher for the moment of inclusion of the subjects.
Both groups will receive Inlay/Onlay preparation . Digital impression will be taken, wax pattern for the Inlay/Onlay restoration will be designed and milled using CAD/CAM(computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) software. After that, the wax pattern will be invested and final Inlay/Onlay restoration will be constructed from VITA AMBRIA and IPS e.max press ingots according to manufacturing instructions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration | Experimental | Other: Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restorationThe onlays will be constructed from Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) glass ceramic system |
| Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration | Active comparator | Other: Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restorationThe onlays will be constructed from Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) glass ceramic system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The patient is healthy.
- 18-50 years old.
- Normal occlusion.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Tooth with complete root apex.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patient Incapable of self-care, mental illness, undergoing radiotherapy, diabetic patient, allergy to one of the materials used, pregnancy, smoker, parafunctional habits, poor oral hygiene, severe periodontitis, tooth need vital pulp therapy or surgical crown lengthening or marginal elevation, tooth with enamel or dentin hypoplasia or hypocalcification, Mallaligned or malformed teeth and adjacent or opposing teeth are missed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restorationIn experimental group, Participants will be restored with onlay ceramic restorations constructed from zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) glass ceramic | Other | Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration |
| Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restorationIn control group, Participants will be restored with onlay ceramic restorations constructed from Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) glass ceramic | Other | Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration |
Primary outcome
Marginal Adaptation
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Measuring device: visual and probe. According to FDI standard(Grade 1-5), which has been defined as follows: Grade 1. Harmonious outline, no gaps, no white or discolored lines. Grade 2. Marginal gap (> 50 μm and < 150 μm), white lines; small marginal fracture removable by polishing; slight ditching, slight step /flashes, minor irregularities Grade 3. Gap (> 150 μm and < 250 μm) not removable; several small marginal fractures; major irregularities, ditching or flash, steps. Grade 4. Gap (> 250 μm) dentine/base exposed, chip fracture damaging margins, Notable enamel, or dentine wall fracture. Grade 5. Restoration is loose but in situ.
3 secondary outcomes
Restoration Fracture and retention
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Effect of the restoration on the periodontium
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Tooth cracks and fractures
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32810388Falahchai M, Babaee Hemmati Y, Neshandar Asli H, Neshandar Asli M. Marginal adaptation of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate overlays with different preparation designs. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Dec;32(8):823-830. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12642. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 24161516Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
- Background: PubMed 33487960Bastos NA, Bitencourt SB, Carneiro RF, Ferrairo BM, Strelhow SSF, Dos Santos DM, Bombonatti JFS. Marginal and internal adaptation of lithium disilicate partial restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Oct-Dec;20(4):338-344. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_112_20. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Related trials for Carious Teeth
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohamed FA Metwally, BDS study director
Lecturer of Crown and Bridge Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University
. Khaled MO Haggag, Professor study chair
Professor of Crown and Bridge Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Zirconia reinforced Lithium disilicate (Vita Ambria) ceramic onlay restoration and Lithium disilicate (IPS e-max press) ceramic onlay restoration in people with Carious Teeth and Adaptation, run by Al-Azhar University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Marginal Adaptation (time frame: 1 year follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05281861, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2024.