AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT05279417

ATI-450 Plus Methotrexate (MTX) Versus Placebo Plus MTX in Participants With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

A Phase 2 study testing ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID, Methotrexate and ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. at 50 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates ATI-450 plus MTX versus placebo plus MTX in participants with moderate to severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID, Methotrexate and ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
251 participants
Where
50 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 11 Oct 2023
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to comprehend and be willing to sign the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved participant ICF prior to administration of any study-related procedures.
  • Diagnosis of adult-onset RA as defined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria.
  • Have active moderate to severe RA at Screening.
  • A minimum of 12 weeks on MTX with a stable MTX dose.

Who cannot join

  • Current acute or chronic immunoinflammatory disease other than RA which may impact the course or assessment of RA.
  • Uncontrolled non-immunoinflammatory disease that may place the participant at increased risk during the study or impact the interpretation of results (eg, previous malignancy, recurrent infection, previous venous thromboembolism).
  • Participant has experience with > 2 biologics, > 1 JAK inhibitor, or a combination of 1 biologic experience and 1 JAK inhibitor.
  • Currently receiving corticosteroids at doses > 10 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of corticosteroids within 2 weeks of screening.

Trial locations and contacts

50 sites in 4 countries.

50 sites in 4 countries

Poland23 sites
  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-351

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-297

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-879

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Dąbrówka, 62-069

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Elblag, Warm.Maz., 82-300

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Mzowieckie, 05-825

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-282

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-002

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Krakow, 30-363

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-362

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Lublin, 20-607

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Nadarzyn, Masovian Voivodeship, 05-830

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Nowa Sól, 67-100

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Olsztyn, Warmińsko-Mazurskien, 10-117

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Poznan, Wielkopolska, 61-113

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Poznan, 60-218

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Poznan, 60-446

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Poznan, 61-397

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Sochaczew, 96-500

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Tomaszów Lubelski, Lubelski, 22-600

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Torun, 87-100

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 04-141

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Wroclaw, 52-442

Other trials in Poland

United States11 sites
  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Cypress, Texas, 77429

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    El Cajon, California, 92020

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Encino, California, 91436

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    La Jolla, California, 92093

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Palm Desert, California, 92260

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

Other trials in United States

Bulgaria9 sites
  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Pleven, 5800

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Plovdiv, 4000

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Plovdiv, 4001

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Plovdiv, 4002

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Plovdiv, 4004

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1336

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1431

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Sofia, 1606

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Varna, 9000

Other trials in Bulgaria

Czechia7 sites
  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Brno, 615 00

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Hlučín, 748 01

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Ostrava, 702 00

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Pardubice, 530 02

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Prague, 128 50

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Prague, 140 00

  • Aclaris Investigational Site

    Uherské Hradiště, 686 01

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: Phase 2b, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Doses of ATI-450 Plus Methotrexate (MTX) Versus Placebo Plus MTX in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to MTX Alone

This study evaluates ATI-450 plus MTX versus placebo plus MTX in participants with moderate to severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX alone.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2b, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, dose ranging study to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of ATI-450 plus MTX versus placebo plus MTX in participants with moderate to severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX alone.

Being tested
ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID, Placebo oral tablet, Methotrexate, ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID
Keywords
Rheumatoid, Arthritis, RA
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BIDDrug

    Also called zunsemetinib

    Oral, small molecule MK2 inhibitor

  • Placebo oral tabletDrug

    Placebo tablet manufactured to match ATI-450 in appearance

  • MethotrexateDrug

    15 mg to 25 mg weekly

  • ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BIDDrug

    Also called zunsemetinib

    Oral, small molecule MK2 inhibitor

Study groups in NCT05279417
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ATI-450 20 mg BID plus MethotrexateExperimentalATI-450 20 mg oral tablet twice daily (BID) with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID
ATI-450 50 mg BID plus MethotrexateExperimentalATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID; Drug: Methotrexate
Placebo plus MethotrexatePlacebo comparatorPlacebo oral tablet BID with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Placebo oral tablet; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 at Week 12

    Participants achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 (responders) were defined as having ≥20% improvement in both the number of swollen and tender joints (66/68 joint counts) and ≥20% improvement in ≥3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP.

    Model-based estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were produced.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 at Week 12

    Participant achieving ACR50 (responders) were defined as having ≥50% improvement in both the number of swollen and tender joints (66/68 joint counts) and ≥50% improvement in ≥3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), HAQ-DI, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP.

    Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 at Week 12

    Participants achieving ACR70 (responders) were defined as having ≥70% improvement in both the number of swollen and tender joints (66/68 joint counts) and ≥70% improvement in ≥3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), HAQ-DI, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP.

    Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12

    The DAS28-CRP consists of a composite score of the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, CRP (hsCRP was used for the purposes of this study), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Interpretation of the DAS28-CRP is on a scale of 0 to 9.4, where <2.6 is considered remission, ≥2.6 to <3.2 is considered low/minimal disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1 is considered moderate disease activity, and >5.1 is considered high/severe disease activity.

    The least square (LS) mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 was estimated from the Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Remission (Score <2.6) at Week 12

    The Disease Activity Score using 28 Joint Count-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) consists of a composite score of the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, CRP (hsCRP is used for the purposes of this study), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Interpretation of the DAS28-CRP is on a scale of 0 to 9.4, where <2.6 is considered remission, ≥2.6 to <3.2 is considered low/minimal disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1 is considered moderate disease activity, and >5.1 is considered high/severe disease activity.

    Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Low Disease Activity (Score ≤ 3.2) at Week 12

    The DAS28-CRP consists of a composite score of the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, CRP (hsCRP is used for the purposes of this study), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Interpretation of the DAS28-CRP is on a scale of 0 to 9.4, where <2.6 is considered remission, ≥2.6 to <3.2 is considered low/minimal disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1 is considered moderate disease activity, and >5.1 is considered high/severe disease activity.

    Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.

    Measured: Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week12

    The HAQ-DI (standard disability method calculation) was utilized to assess the participant's physical function or disability according to the participant. The HAQ-DI is a 20-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities [errands and chores]). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a ask in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of category scores and divided by the number of categories answered, ranging from 0 to 3. A lower score demonstrated less disability.

    LS mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12

    The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was the sum of 4 outcome parameters:

    • Tender joint count out of 28 joints (TJC28)
    • Swollen joint count out of 28 joints (SJC28)
    • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; and
    • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity.

    Interpretation of the CDAI disease activity was measured on a scale of 0 to 76, where ≤2.8 was considered remission, >2.8 to ≤10 was considered low/minimal disease activity, >10 to ≤22 was considered moderate disease activity, and >22.0 was considered high/severe disease activity.

    LS mean change from baseline in CDAI score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission (Score ≤ 2.8)

    The CDAI was the sum of 4 outcome parameters:

    • Tender joint count out of 28 joints (TJC28)
    • Swollen joint count out of 28 joints (SJC28)
    • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; and
    • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity.

    Interpretation of the CDAI disease activity was measured on a scale of 0 to 76, where ≤2.8 was considered remission, >2.8 to ≤10 was considered low/minimal disease activity, >10 to ≤22 was considered moderate disease activity, and >22.0 was considered high/severe disease activity.

    Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.

    Measured: Week 12

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in hsCRP Level at Week 12

    Blood samples were evaluated to measure levels of hsCRP.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12

    The PCS is composed of 4 scales of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) version 2 assessing physical function, role limitations caused by physical problems, bodily pain, and general health. The range of the SF-36 PCS is between 0 and 100, where higher scores represent better physical functioning.

    A 2.5 to 5-point change from baseline is established as the minimum clinically-important difference for the PCS in RA participants.

    LS mean change from baseline in SF-36 PCS score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  11. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 12

    The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue is measured on a 4 point Likert scale (4 = not at all fatigued to 0 = very much fatigued). The total score range is from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the lower the fatigue level.

    LS mean change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  12. ATI-450 and Metabolite (CDD-2164) Concentrations

    Measured: 2 hours postdose on Days 1, 8, and 85

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2022
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion5 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion11 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
251 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05279417
Sponsor's protocol ID
ATI-450-RA-202
Other IDs
2021-002860-31
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
18 Feb 2022
Last updated
28 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in