Osteoarthritis, HipNO-DOLOR2NCT05275244
Evaluate Clinical Benefit of Local Treatment With KD Intra-Articular® Gel in Patients With Osteoarthritis (NO-DOLOR2)
An observational study of Osteoarthritis, Hip and Osteoarthritis Thumb, run by Procare Health Iberia S.L. at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Prospective observational, national, multicentre, open study with a class III medical device with EC marking. Study to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD intra-articular® gel in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle or base of the thumb. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis Thumb, Osteoarthritis Ankle
- What is being tested?
- KD Intra-Articular® gel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 17 Mar 2022to 14 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The participation of 80 patients is expected (20 in each joint), diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle or base of the thumb thanks to the collaboration of the rheumatology service of the public or private Spanish hospitals. The patients to be included in the study must meet all the above-mentioned screening criteria.
Who may be able to join
- Age equal to or greater than 18 years.
- Patients who come to a control consultation for single or preferential symptomatic osteoarthritis, primary in the case of the hip, shoulder or base of the thumb, or secondary post-traumatic in the case of the ankle.
- Patients who meet the ACR diagnostic criteria for osteoarthritis of the hip and base of the thumb. Patients who meet the AOFAS diagnostic criteria for ankle osteoarthritis and those for shoulder osteoarthritis defined in the literature.
- Patients with pain equal to or greater than 4 on the VAS pain scale.
- Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III patients in an X-ray performed within 18 months prior to inclusion.
- Patients in whom viscosupplementation is indicated regardless of their inclusion in the study.
- Patients able to read and understand the Patient Information Sheet and sign, if accepted, the Informed Consent Form.
- Patients able, at the discretion of the investigator, to comply with the requirements of the study and without impediments to follow the instructions and assessments throughout the study.
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to sodium hyaluronate or other study treatment components.
- Previous trauma or surgical intervention in the affected joint (except in ankle osteoarthritis).
- Participation in any other clinical trial or use of any drug or experimental device, currently or in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion in the study.
- Swelling, exacerbation, or significant effusion in the affected joint.
- Septic and aseptic arthritis.
- Skin disorder or infection at the site of infiltration.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients requiring intra-articular infiltration in two joints.
- Viscosupplementation of the affected joint within 6 months prior to the start of treatment.
- Infiltration of steroids in the affected joint in the 3 months prior to the start of treatment.
- History of autoimmune, microcrystalline rheumatological diseases or connective tissue diseases.
- Coagulation disorders and/or anticoagulant medication that contraindicates infiltration.
- Women who are pregnant, suspected of being pregnant or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL BENEFIT OF LOCAL TREATMENT WITH KD Intra-Articular® GEL (PRONOLIS® HD), IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE SHOULDER, HIP, ANKLE OR BASE OF THE THUMB
Prospective observational, national, multicentre, open study with a class III medical device with EC marking. Study to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD intra-articular® gel in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle or base of the thumb. The study will be conducted in the Rheumatology Service of Spanish Hospitals under the usual medical conditions, in accordance with routine clinical practice and following the internationally recognised precepts of good clinical practice of ICH and Declaration of Helsinki. The objective is to evaluate the evolution of pain in patients diagnosed with single or preferential symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder or hip treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2.2%), and ankle or base of the thumb treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%).
Eighty patients will be included among about 6 Spanish Sites. The study comprises a maximum of 6 visits per protocol. At visit 0, informed consent will be obtained, the patient will be checked for fulfil the selection criteria. A pain assessment will also be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the corresponding questionnaire will be completed depending on the affected joint. According to the usual clinical practice of the site, the study treatment will be administered. A week after the first infiltration the second visit (V1) will be applied, and the VAS will be repeated. The patient's global clinical impression of change will also be assessed, and along with the Likert scale of satisfaction will be collected. The next visit (V2) will be carried out a week after the second infiltration and the procedures will be the same as those of the previous visit (V1). At 4 (V3), 12 (V4) and 24 (V5) weeks after receiving the third infiltration (V2), follow-up visits will be carried out where the assessment procedures will be the same as in visit 0, in addition to the GCI -C, the Likert scale of satisfaction and the collection of potential AEs and changes in concomitant medication. At each visit, the patient will be given a diary, where they will collect the rescue medication they have needed since the previous visit. In the electronic case report form (eCRF), the rescue medication (analgesics and NSAIDs) that you have needed since the previous visit (V0-V2) or in the month prior to the study visit (V3-V6) will be collected.
Read the detailed description
Prospective observational, national, multicenter, open study with a class III medical device with EC marking. Study to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD intra-articular® gel in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle, or base of the thumb. The objective is to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2, 2%), in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder or hip and with KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%) in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle or base of the thumb.
The study comprises a maximum of 6 visits per protocol. At visit 0, informed consent will be obtained, the patient will be checked for compliance with all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria in the study, and a medical history and physical examination will be carried out. A pain assessment will also be carried out using a VAS and the corresponding questionnaire will be completed depending on the joint to be treated (WOMAC, FAOS, ASES or DASH) and if it is the base of the thumb, the hand dynamometer test will be performed to obtain baseline results. According to the usual clinical practice of the center, the study treatment will be administered, or you will be summoned for administration at a later visit. A week after the first infiltration (V0) the second will be applied, and the VAS will be repeated (V1). The GCI-C evaluation by the patient and the Likert scale of satisfaction will also be carried out. AEs will be collected, if any, and if there have been changes in concomitant medication. The next visit (V2) will be carried out a week after the second infiltration has been placed and the procedures will be the same as those of the previous visit (V1). At 4 (V3), 12 (V4) and 24 (V5) weeks after receiving the third infiltration (V2), follow-up visits will be carried out where the assessment procedures will be the same as in visit 0, in addition to the GCI -C, the Likert scale of satisfaction and the collection of potential AEs and changes in concomitant medication.
At each visit, the patient will be given a diary, where they will collect the rescue medication they have needed since the previous visit. In the eCRF, the rescue medication (analgesics and NSAIDs) that you have needed since the previous visit (V0-V2) or in the month prior to the study visit (V3-V6) will be collected.
The study will be conducted under routine clinical practice conditions, with no restrictions being imposed on the participating doctor prescribing the drug(s) and no interference in normal clinical practice. Except for the scales and/or questionnaires used as measurement instruments in this study and a patient diary where the necessary rescue medication will be collected, the patients included will not be given any intervention, either diagnostic or follow-up, that is not the usual practice in clinical practice.
- Being tested
- KD Intra-Articular® gel
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
KD Intra-Articular® gelDevice
Depending on the joint, 3 injections will be administrated to the patient: KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2.2%) in the case of shoulder and hip, or KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%) in the case of the ankle and base of the thumb. The administration of the infiltrations will be with an interval of one week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Osteoarthritis Group | The patients diagnosed with single or preferential symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder or hip treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2.2%), and ankle or base of the thumb treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%). Each patient will be administrated three injections, one per week. Receives: Device: KD Intra-Articular® gel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in ankle osteoarthritis pain.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in ankle osteoarthritis pain, the Foot and Ankle Output Score (FAOS) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
Measured: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in shoulder osteoarthritis pain.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in shoulder osteoarthritis pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
Measured: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in pain in base of thumb.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in pain in base of thumb, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
Measured: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in hip osteoarthritis pain.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in pain in base of thumb, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Assessment of the Need for Rescue Analgesic Medication.
To assess the change in the need for rescue analgesic medication at each follow-up visit vs. baseline visit, the percentage of patients who have increased/maintained/decreased the use of analgesics or NSAIDs with respect to the baseline visit.
Measured: 24 weeks
Assessment of the Clinical Evolution by the Patient (1/2).
To assess the percentage of patients presenting improvement, > 20% improvement in the different domains of pain at the 24-week visits, the patients will be classified according to the percentage of improvement (relative change in the total score [if applicable] and in the scores of the domains other than pain) following the following cut-off points: > 0%, and > 20%. Additionally, these percentages of patients with improvement will be compared between both treatments.
Measured: 24 weeks
Assessment of the Clinical Evolution by the Patient (2/2).
To assess the percentage of patients presenting improvement, > 50% improvement in the different domains of pain at the 24-week visits, the patients will be classified according to the percentage of improvement (relative change in the total score [if applicable] and in the scores of the domains other than pain) following the following cut-off points: > 0%, and > 50%. Additionally, these percentages of patients with improvement will be compared between both treatments.
Measured: 24 weeks
Assessment of the Change in Grip Strength in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Base of the Thumb.
To assess the evolution in grip strength, in patients with osteoarthritis of the base of the thumb, the mean test score obtained by the dynamometer at each follow-up visit will be described. In addition, the changes produced in this measurement between the 24-week visit and the baseline visit will be studied continuously (absolute change and relative change).
Measured: 24 weeks
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment.
To assess the degree of patient satisfaction, the score obtained in the responses according to the Likert-type satisfaction scale at the 4-, 12- and 24-week visits will be described. Additionally, the results between both treatments will be compared.
Measured: 24 weeks
Evaluation of Tolerability and Safety
To evaluate the tolerability of hyaluronic acid treatment, the percentage of patients who present AE to treatment during the observation period will be described, and a description of each of them will be presented.
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2022
- Study start17 Mar 2022
- Primary completion1 Sep 2022
- Study completion14 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Procare Health Iberia S.L.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05275244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NO-DOLOR-2-2021-02
- Acronym
- NO-DOLOR2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 May;34(5):505-14. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340502.
PubMed 2025304Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Gray R, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Nov;33(11):1601-10. doi: 10.1002/art.1780331101.
PubMed 2242058Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, Gartsman GM, Guyatt G, Kirkley A. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1947-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02854.
PubMed 16140808Domsic RT, Saltzman CL. Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Jul;19(7):466-71. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900708.
PubMed 9694125Lin W, Liu Z, Kampf N, Klein J. The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Cartilage Boundary Lubrication. Cells. 2020 Jul 2;9(7):1606. doi: 10.3390/cells9071606.
PubMed 32630823
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL BENEFIT OF LOCAL TREATMENT WITH KD Intra-Articular® GEL (PRONOLIS® HD), IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE SHOULDER, HIP, ANKLE OR BASE OF THE THUMB
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05275244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NO-DOLOR2 / NO-DOLOR-2-2021-02
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Procare Health Iberia S.L.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective observational, national, multicentre, open study with a class III medical device with EC marking. Study to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD intra-articular® gel in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle or base of the thumb. The study will be conducted in the Rheumatology Service of Spanish Hospitals under the usual medical conditions, in accordance with routine clinical practice and following the internationally recognised precepts of good clinical practice of ICH and Declaration of Helsinki. The objective is to evaluate the evolution of pain in patients diagnosed with single or preferential symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder or hip treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2.2%), and ankle or base of the thumb treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%).
Eighty patients will be included among about 6 Spanish Sites. The study comprises a maximum of 6 visits per protocol. At visit 0, informed consent will be obtained, the patient will be checked for fulfil the selection criteria. A pain assessment will also be carried out using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the corresponding questionnaire will be completed depending on the affected joint. According to the usual clinical practice of the site, the study treatment will be administered. A week after the first infiltration the second visit (V1) will be applied, and the VAS will be repeated. The patient's global clinical impression of change will also be assessed, and along with the Likert scale of satisfaction will be collected. The next visit (V2) will be carried out a week after the second infiltration and the procedures will be the same as those of the previous visit (V1). At 4 (V3), 12 (V4) and 24 (V5) weeks after receiving the third infiltration (V2), follow-up visits will be carried out where the assessment procedures will be the same as in visit 0, in addition to the GCI -C, the Likert scale of satisfaction and the collection of potential AEs and changes in concomitant medication. At each visit, the patient will be given a diary, where they will collect the rescue medication they have needed since the previous visit. In the electronic case report form (eCRF), the rescue medication (analgesics and NSAIDs) that you have needed since the previous visit (V0-V2) or in the month prior to the study visit (V3-V6) will be collected.
Detailed description
Prospective observational, national, multicenter, open study with a class III medical device with EC marking. Study to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD intra-articular® gel in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle, or base of the thumb. The objective is to evaluate the clinical benefit of local treatment with KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2, 2%), in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder or hip and with KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%) in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle or base of the thumb.
The study comprises a maximum of 6 visits per protocol. At visit 0, informed consent will be obtained, the patient will be checked for compliance with all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria in the study, and a medical history and physical examination will be carried out. A pain assessment will also be carried out using a VAS and the corresponding questionnaire will be completed depending on the joint to be treated (WOMAC, FAOS, ASES or DASH) and if it is the base of the thumb, the hand dynamometer test will be performed to obtain baseline results. According to the usual clinical practice of the center, the study treatment will be administered, or you will be summoned for administration at a later visit. A week after the first infiltration (V0) the second will be applied, and the VAS will be repeated (V1). The GCI-C evaluation by the patient and the Likert scale of satisfaction will also be carried out. AEs will be collected, if any, and if there have been changes in concomitant medication. The next visit (V2) will be carried out a week after the second infiltration has been placed and the procedures will be the same as those of the previous visit (V1). At 4 (V3), 12 (V4) and 24 (V5) weeks after receiving the third infiltration (V2), follow-up visits will be carried out where the assessment procedures will be the same as in visit 0, in addition to the GCI -C, the Likert scale of satisfaction and the collection of potential AEs and changes in concomitant medication.
At each visit, the patient will be given a diary, where they will collect the rescue medication they have needed since the previous visit. In the eCRF, the rescue medication (analgesics and NSAIDs) that you have needed since the previous visit (V0-V2) or in the month prior to the study visit (V3-V6) will be collected.
The study will be conducted under routine clinical practice conditions, with no restrictions being imposed on the participating doctor prescribing the drug(s) and no interference in normal clinical practice. Except for the scales and/or questionnaires used as measurement instruments in this study and a patient diary where the necessary rescue medication will be collected, the patients included will not be given any intervention, either diagnostic or follow-up, that is not the usual practice in clinical practice.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Osteoarthritis Group | – | Device: KD Intra-Articular® gelThe patients diagnosed with single or preferential symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder or hip treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2.2%), and ankle or base of the thumb treated with KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%). Each patient will be administrated three injections, one per week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The participation of 80 patients is expected (20 in each joint), diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the shoulder, hip, ankle or base of the thumb thanks to the collaboration of the rheumatology service of the public or private Spanish hospitals. The patients to be included in the study must meet all the above-mentioned screening criteria.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age equal to or greater than 18 years.
- Patients who come to a control consultation for single or preferential symptomatic osteoarthritis, primary in the case of the hip, shoulder or base of the thumb, or secondary post-traumatic in the case of the ankle.
- Patients who meet the ACR diagnostic criteria for osteoarthritis of the hip and base of the thumb. Patients who meet the AOFAS diagnostic criteria for ankle osteoarthritis and those for shoulder osteoarthritis defined in the literature.
- Patients with pain equal to or greater than 4 on the VAS pain scale.
- Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III patients in an X-ray performed within 18 months prior to inclusion.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to sodium hyaluronate or other study treatment components.
- Previous trauma or surgical intervention in the affected joint (except in ankle osteoarthritis).
- Participation in any other clinical trial or use of any drug or experimental device, currently or in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion in the study.
- Swelling, exacerbation, or significant effusion in the affected joint.
- Septic and aseptic arthritis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| KD Intra-Articular® gelDepending on the joint, 3 injections will be administrated to the patient: KD Intra-Articular® gel 2.2% - 44 mg in 2 ml - (Pronolis® HD one 2.2%) in the case of shoulder and hip, or KD Intra-Articular® gel 1.6% - 16 mg in 1 ml - (Pronolis® HD mini 1.6%) in the case of the ankle and base of the thumb. The administration of the infiltrations will be with an interval of one week. | Device | Osteoarthritis Group |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the evolution of the change in ankle osteoarthritis pain.
Time frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in ankle osteoarthritis pain, the Foot and Ankle Output Score (FAOS) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in shoulder osteoarthritis pain.
Time frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in shoulder osteoarthritis pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in pain in base of thumb.
Time frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in pain in base of thumb, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
To evaluate the evolution of the change in hip osteoarthritis pain.
Time frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the evolution of the change in pain in base of thumb, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire will be used. The mean questionnaire score at the 24-week visit versus baseline will be described.
6 secondary outcomes
Assessment of the Need for Rescue Analgesic Medication.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Assessment of the Clinical Evolution by the Patient (1/2).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Assessment of the Clinical Evolution by the Patient (2/2).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Assessment of the Change in Grip Strength in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Base of the Thumb.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Evaluation of Tolerability and Safety
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2024.
- Background: PubMed 2025304Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 May;34(5):505-14. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340502.
- Background: PubMed 2242058Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Gray R, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Nov;33(11):1601-10. doi: 10.1002/art.1780331101.
- Background: PubMed 16140808Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M, Gartsman GM, Guyatt G, Kirkley A. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):1947-56. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02854.
- Background: PubMed 9694125Domsic RT, Saltzman CL. Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Jul;19(7):466-71. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900708.
- Background: PubMed 32630823Lin W, Liu Z, Kampf N, Klein J. The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Cartilage Boundary Lubrication. Cells. 2020 Jul 2;9(7):1606. doi: 10.3390/cells9071606.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Hip
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Effects of EDUcation and EXercise Compared to Education Alone on Clinical and Physiological Outcomes in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis
Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Osteoarthritis, Hip and Osteoarthritis Thumb, run by Procare Health Iberia S.L. at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the evolution of the change in ankle osteoarthritis pain. (time frame: 24 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05275244, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2024.