AzTrials
AzTrials

Plaque PsoriasisPhase 3VISIBLENCT05272150

Study of Guselkumab in Skin of Color Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque and/or Scalp Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab in people with Plaque Psoriasis and Scalp Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 94 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment versus placebo in skin of color participants with predominant moderate-to-severe body psoriasis or predominant moderate-to-severe scalp psoriasis by assessing improvements in the signs and symptoms of psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Plaque Psoriasis, Scalp Psoriasis
What is being tested?
Guselkumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
211 participants
Where
94 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
13 Jul 2022to 30 May 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis [PsA]) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug
  • Self-identify as non-white or non-caucasian
  • Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis
  • Have an involved body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=) 10 percent (%), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12, investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and at baseline (Cohort A), or have a scalp surface area >=30%, psoriasis scalp severity index (PSSI) >=12, scalp specific investigator global assessment (ss-IGA) >=3, and one plaque outside of the scalp at screening and at baseline (Cohort B)
  • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 12 weeks after the last administration of study intervention
  • Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination during the study, and within 12 weeks after the last administration of study intervention

Who cannot join

  • Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example: erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Has received ustekinumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, or brodalumab within 12 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to guselkumab or its excipients
  • Has or has had a serious infection (example: sepsis, pneumonia or pyelonephritis), or has been hospitalized or received intravenous antibiotics for an infection during the 2 months before screening

Trial locations and contacts

94 sites in 2 countries.

94 sites in 2 countries

United States79 sites
  • Hamilton Dermatology Atlanta Dermatology, Vein & Research Center, LLC

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022-1160

  • David Fivenson MD, Dermatology

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103

  • Arlington Center for Dermatology

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Advanced Medical Research

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30328

  • Allcutis Research

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Stoll Dermatology

    Beverly Hills, California, 90212

  • Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35203

  • Cahaba Research Inc

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35244

  • Advanced Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center

    Boardman, Ohio, 44512

  • Skin Care Research

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Metro Boston Clinical Partners

    Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135

  • Accellacare Research of Cary

    Cary, North Carolina, 27511

  • Dermatology and Laser Center of Charleston

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • Darst Dermatology

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277

  • Dermatology Specialists

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277

  • Driven Research LLC

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33134

  • Florida Academic Dermatology Centers

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33134

  • Dermatology Treatment & Research Center, PA

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Modern Research Associates PLLC

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • University Dermatology and Vein Clinic

    Darien, Illinois, 60561

  • Wright State Physicians Health Center

    Dayton, Ohio, 45324

  • Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • California Dermatology & Clinical Research Institute

    Encinitas, California, 92024

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group 1

    Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341

  • University of Connecticut Health Center

    Farmington, Connecticut, 06030

  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group PLLC

    Forest Hills, New York, 11375

  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC

    Fountain Inn, South Carolina, 29644

  • First OC Dermatology

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Community Regional Medical Center

    Fresno, California, 93701

  • Callender Center for Clinical Research

    Glenn Dale, Maryland, 20769

  • Hudson Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center

    Hoboken, New Jersey, 07030

  • Hollywood Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery

    Hollywood, Florida, 33021

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Suzanne Bruce and Associates - The Center for Skin Research

    Houston, Texas, 77056-4132

  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256

  • Paul Wallace MD

    Ladera Heights, California, 90056

  • The Grimes Center for Medical and Aesthetic Dermatology

    Los Angeles, California, 90036

  • Ds Research

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40241

  • Skin Care Physicians of Georgia

    Macon, Georgia, 31217

  • Care Access Research

    Marriottsville, Maryland, 21104

  • Apex Dermatology Mayfield Heights

    Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124

  • International Dermatology Research, Inc.

    Miami, Florida, 33144

  • Twin Cities Dermatology Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416

  • MDCS Dermatology

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Sadick Research Group

    New York, New York, 10075

  • Markowitz Medical OptiSkin

    New York, New York, 10128

  • Care Access Research 1

    Newport Beach, California, 92660

  • Central Sooner Research

    Norman, Oklahoma, 73071

  • Tory P Sullivan M D PA

    North Miami Beach, Florida, 33162

  • Skin Specialists

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Park Avenue Dermatology

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • Epiphany Dermatology of Kansas, LLC

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66210

  • Riverchase Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028

  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • Temple University School of Medicine

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Accellacare of Raleigh

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • DermAssociates, PC

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • Lawrence J Green MD LLC

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • PMG Research of Rocky Mount, LLC

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804

  • St Joseph Dermatology and Vein Clinic

    Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085

  • Progressive Clinical Research

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists

    San Antonio, Texas, 78218

  • MedDerm Associates

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Synergy Clinical Research

    San Francisco, California, 94132

  • Southern California Dermatology

    Santa Ana, California, 92701

  • Clinical Science Institute

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Northshore University Healthsystem

    Skokie, Illinois, 60077

  • GCP Research

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • Somerset Skin Centre

    Troy, Michigan, 48084

  • Schweiger Dermatology Group

    Verona, New Jersey, 07044

  • Center for Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037

  • Henry Ford Medical Center

    West Bloomfield, Michigan, 48322

  • Dundee Dermatology

    West Dundee, Illinois, 60118

  • PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401

  • Wake Forest Health Sciences

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27104

Other trials in United States

Canada15 sites
  • CCA Medical Research Corporation

    Ajax, Ontario, L1S7K8

  • Dermatology Research Institute Inc

    Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1

  • Beacon Dermatology

    Calgary, Alberta, T3E 0B2

  • Alberta DermaSurgery Centre

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C1

  • Dr Dusan Sajic Medicine Professional Corporation

    Guelph, Ontario, N1L 0B7

  • Lynderm Research Inc.

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2

  • North York Research Inc

    North York, Ontario, M2M 4J5

  • JRB Research Inc

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1K 4L2

  • Nectar Research Group Inc

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 1A5

  • Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Dr. Lorne E. Albrecht

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6

  • Canadian Dermatology Center

    Toronto, Ontario, M3B 0A7

  • Toronto Research Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5Y8

  • FACET Dermatology

    Toronto, Ontario, M4E 2Y9

  • Research Toronto

    Toronto, Ontario, M4W 2N4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: CNTO1959PSO3018: A Phase 3b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Skin of Color Who Have Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and/or Moderate

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab treatment versus placebo in skin of color participants with predominant moderate-to-severe body psoriasis or predominant moderate-to-severe scalp psoriasis by assessing improvements in the signs and symptoms of psoriasis.

Being tested
Guselkumab, Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GuselkumabDrug

    Also called CNTO1959, Tremfya

    Participants will receive guselkumab as subcutaneous injection.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Participants will receive placebo as subcutaneous injection.

Study groups in NCT05272150
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort A: Moderate-to-severe Plaque PsoriasisExperimentalParticipants will receive either guselkumab subcutaneously (SC) or placebo SC. Placebo participants will then crossover to receive guselkumab SC.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo
Cohort B: Moderate-to-severe Scalp PsoriasisExperimentalParticipants will receive either guselkumab SC or placebo SC. Placebo participants will then crossover to receive guselkumab SC.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation; 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI 90 response (greater than or equal to [>=] 90 percent [%] improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) or Very Mild Disease (1) at Week 16

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  4. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) 90 Response at Week 16

    PSSI 90 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved at least 90% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation; 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  2. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Response at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 response (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Percent change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  4. Cohort A: Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  5. Cohort A: Time to Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 90 Percent (%) Reduction in PASI Score

    Time to >=90% reduction was defined as the time at which >=90% improvement in PASI from baseline was achieved. PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: From baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16

  6. Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in Total Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in total DLQI score at Week 16 was reported. The DLQI was a dermatology specific health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much), where higher score indicated more impact on QoL. The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. Baseline = closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  7. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Psoriasis Symptom and Sign Diary (PSSD) Itch Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Itch Score >=4

    PSSD was a patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7 day recall version was used. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. PSSD itch item score over seven days was averaged into a weekly itch score, ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

  8. Cohorts A and B: Change From Baseline in PSSD Symptom Score at Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  9. Cohorts A and B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptom Score of 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline PSSD Symptom Score >=1

    PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. 7-day recall version was used. PSSD was self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the weekly symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Score at Week 16

    PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  11. Cohort B: Percent Change From Baseline in Scalp Surface Area (SSA) at Week 16

    Scalp Surface Area (SSA) is defined as the extent of scalp skin affected by psoriasis, expressed as a percentage of the total scalp surface area. The adult SSA was 520-705 centimeter^2 (cm^2), which mean 1% SSA is 5.2 - 7.1 cm^2. The thumbprint has an average surface area of 5.5 cm^2 +/- 1.3 cm^2. The thumb (in particular, the thumb projection) was used as a tool for accurate measurement of 1% SSA. The overall SSA affected by psoriasis was thus be estimated based on the participant's thumb. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

  12. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Scalp Specific (ss)-IGA Score of Absence of Disease (0) at Week 16

    The ss-IGA instrument was used to evaluate the disease severity of scalp psoriasis. The lesions were assessed in terms of the clinical signs of redness, thickness, and scaliness which was scored as: absence of disease = 0, very mild disease = 1, mild disease = 2, moderate disease = 3, and severe disease = 4. A higher score indicated more severe disease.

    Measured: Week 16

  13. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSI 100 Response at Week 16

    PSSI 100 response is defined as a percentage of participants who achieved 100% improvement from baseline in the PSSI score. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

  14. Cohort B: Time to >=90% Reduction in PSSI Score

    Time to >=90% reduction was defined as the time at which >=90% improvement in PSSI from baseline was achieved. PSSI is a physician assessment of severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation and extent of psoriasis involvement. Severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation each scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the extent of psoriasis involvement scored on a scale from 1 (<10% of scalp involved) to 6 (90 to 100% of scalp involved). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the psoriasis involvement. The PSSI score ranged from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 16

  15. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Scalp Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline Scalp Itch Score >=4

    The scalp itch NRS was a single-item scale that asks participants to rate the severity of their scalp itching due to psoriasis by considering their worst level of itching over the past 24 hours. The 11-point scalp itch NRS ranged from 0 (no scalp itch) to 10 (worst scalp itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated more severe scalp itch. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date unless otherwise specified.

    Measured: Week 16

  16. Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.

    Measured: Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112; Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112

  17. Cohorts A and B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any AE that occurred after the start of initial study agent administration and those AEs that were presented at baseline but worsened in severity after the start of initial study agent administration.

    Measured: Cohorts A and B: Placebo: From Week 0 to Week 16; Cohorts A and B: Placebo Followed by Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 16 to Week 112; Cohorts A and B: Guselkumab 100 mg: From Week 0 to Week 112

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2022
  2. Study start13 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion30 May 2025
  4. Study completion30 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
211 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05272150
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR109163
Other IDs
CNTO1959PSO3018
Acronym
VISIBLE
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
1 Mar 2022
Last updated
24 Jun 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Publications

  • Alexis A, McMichael A, Vashi N, Bhutani T, Yeung J, Alkousakis T, Rowland K, Choi O, Ma T, Chan D, Lester J, Rodriguez AO, Yadav G, Kindred C, Grimes P, Taylor SC, Desai SR. The Impact of Post-inflammatory Pigment Alteration After Psoriasis: Novel Data from the VISIBLE Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Apr;16(4):2031-2045. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01688-z. Epub 2026 Mar 2.

    PubMed 41770445
  • Alexis A, McMichael A, Soung J, Choi O, Alkousakis T, Alonso-Llamazares J, Shahriari M, Rodriguez AO, Bhutani T, Chan D, Rowland K, Sauder M, Hong HC, Yadav G, Yeung J, Jeyarajah J, Ma T, Gao LL, Park-Wyllie L, Green L, Lee M, Vashi N, Kindred C, Grimes P, Taylor SC, Desai SR; VISIBLE Trial Investigators. Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones: Cohort A of the VISIBLE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Sep 1;161(9):901-911. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1836.

    PubMed 40560559
  • McMichael A, Shahriari M, Stein Gold L, Alkousakis T, Choi O, Bhutani T, Rodriguez AO, Tyring SK, Chan D, Rowland K, Albrecht L, Lynde C, Yadav G, Yeung J, Park-Wyllie L, Ma T, Jeyarajah J, Gao LL, Smith S, Moore AY, Vashi N, Kindred C, Grimes P, Desai SR, Taylor SC, Alexis A; VISIBLE Trial Investigators. Guselkumab for Moderate to Severe Scalp Psoriasis Across All Skin Tones: Cohort B of the VISIBLE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Sep 1;161(9):912-922. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1849.

    PubMed 40560554
  • Alexis A, McMichael A, Vashi N, Bhutani T, Rodriguez AO, Yeung J, Choi O, Chan D, Alkousakis T, Bronner DN, Park-Wyllie L, Gao LL, Grimes P, Shahriari M, Yadav G, Kindred C, Taylor SC, Desai SR. Improving Diversity in a Novel Psoriasis Study: VISIBLE as a Framework for Clinical Trial Quality Improvement. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Mar 1;161(3):256-264. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5103.

    PubMed 39661358

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Guselkumab in people with Plaque Psoriasis and Scalp Psoriasis, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 94 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 94 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05272150, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in