AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer DiseaseNCT05270408

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

A study testing Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8) in people with Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The research objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of HD-tDCS to the preSMA/DACC region and its influence on verbal episodic memory in patients with MCI or dementia after 10 sessions of HD-tDCS. There will be three treatment arms: two active HD-tDCS (1 mA or 2 mA) and a sham group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
What is being tested?
Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
33 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jul 2022to 15 Feb 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 50 and older
  • Fluent in English
  • Active diagnosis of MCI or dementia

Who cannot join

  • Substance use disorder
  • Has metal fragments in head
  • Taking medications that may interact with the HD-tDCS effect (i.e., amphetamines, L-dopa, carbamazepine, sulpiride, pergolide, lorazepam, dextromethorphan, D-cycloserine, flunarizine, or ropinirole)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

Other trials in United States

About this study

The research objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of HD-tDCS to the preSMA/DACC region and its influence on verbal episodic memory in patients with MCI or dementia after 10 sessions of HD-tDCS. There will be three treatment arms: two active HD-tDCS (1 mA or 2 mA) and a sham group. A verbal episodic memory task will be completed at baseline, immediately following the last HD-tDCS session, and a 2-month follow-up.

Read the detailed description

This is a pilot study being done to attempt to improve verbal episodic memory in persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Although the hippocampus is a brain structure most often associated with early deficits in MCI and dementia, the pre-supplemental motor area (preSMA) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (DACC) have been shown to play a role in verbal episodic memory for such patients. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to the preSMA/DACC region and its influence on verbal episodic memory in patients with MCI and dementia. Entraining the preSMA/DACC circuit with 10 sessions at one of two levels of HD-tDCS will allow the researchers to investigate whether neuromodulation may be used to improve verbal episodic memory. Participants will receive 10 sessions at one of two levels of active stimulation (1 mA or 2 mA anodal HD-tDCS targeting preSMA/DACC for 20 min) or sham across 2 weeks. The device is used to deliver high definition transcranial direct current stimulation to targeted regions. A verbal episodic memory task will be completed at baseline, immediately following the last HD-tDCS session, and a 2-month follow-up. The investigators plan to recruit English-speaking participants aged 50 years and older with MCI and dementia. Participants will be randomized into HD-tDCS conditions.

Being tested
Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8), Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)
Keywords
Transcranial direct current stimulation, Alzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, MCI, Mild neurocognitive disorder, Amnestic, Pre- alzheimer
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction, Dementia, Neurocognitive Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)Device

    Participants wear a neoprene cap on their head and electrodes filled with gel are attached and will deliver 1mA to the scalp.

  • Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)Device

    Participants wear a neoprene cap on their head and electrodes filled with gel are attached and will deliver 2mA to the scalp.

  • Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)Device

    Participants wear a neoprene cap on their head and electrodes filled with gel are attached and will deliver no current to the scalp.

Study groups in NCT05270408
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active stimulation at 1mAExperimentalParticipants will receive 1 mA active HD-tDCS for 20 minutes.
Receives: Device: Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)
Active stimulation at 2mAExperimentalParticipants will receive 2 mA active HD-tDCS for 20 minutes.
Receives: Device: Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)
Sham groupSham comparatorParticipants will receive sham HD-tDCS for 20 minutes, meaning no stimulation.
Receives: Device: Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Score on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    The RAVLT is a verbal episodic memory task where a list of 15 words is read aloud for 5 consecutive trials followed by a 20 minute delayed recall trial. The number of items recalled immediately after each trial are summed to create a total learning score, ranging from 0-75. Also, the number of items recalled for the delayed trial are recorded as a delayed recall score, ranging from 0-15. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better episodic memory performance. Changes from baseline for the total learning and delayed recall scores at the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured as the primary outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Score on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)

    The BVMT-R is a visual episodic memory task where 6 simple designs are shown for 10 seconds in a 2 x 3 matrix for 3 learning trials followed by a 25-minute delayed recall trial. The number of items recalled immediately after each trial are summed to create a total learning score, ranging from 0-36. Also, the number of items recalled for the delayed trial are recorded as a delayed recall score, ranging from 0-12. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better visual episodic memory performance. Changes from baseline for the total learning and delayed recall scores at the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

  2. Change in Score on the Boston Naming Test Short Form

    The Boston Naming Test Short Form is a 30 item version of the task (odd and even item versions of the full test) and a measure of language. The subject is shown pictures of objects and is required to correctly name them as quickly as possible. The outcome measure for this task is the total number of correct responses, ranging from 0-30. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better performance. Changes from baseline to the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

  3. Change in Score on the Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Phonemic Fluency

    The DKEFS phonemic verbal fluency task is a measure of language. The subject is required to name as many words as possible that begin with specified letters within 1 minute. Three different letter trials are completed. The outcome measure for this task is the total number of correct responses across the trials, ranging from 0-90. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better performance. Changes from baseline to the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

  4. Change in Score on the Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Semantic Fluency

    The DKEFS semantic verbal fluency task is a measure of language and involves 3 conditions. The subject is required to name as many animals and people names as possible within 1 minute. The outcome measure for this task is the total number of correct responses for both conditions combined, ranging from 0-90. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better performance. Changes from baseline to the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

  5. Change in Score on the Trail Making Test

    The Trail Making Test is a measure of cognitive flexibility and executive functions. The task requires the subject to as quickly as possible complete two conditions, involving number sequencing and then number-letter switching. The outcome measure for this task is the time in seconds to complete the number-letter switching condition, ranging from 15-300. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better performance. Changes from baseline to the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

  6. Change in Score on the Southwestern Assessment of Processing Speed

    The Southwestern Assessment of Processing Speed is a measure of psychomotor processing speed. The subject is required to transcribe numbers to their corresponding written symbol as quickly as possible within 60 seconds. The outcome measure for this task is the total number of correct responses, ranging from 0-75. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better performance. Changes from baseline to the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

  7. Change in Score on the DKEFS Color-Word Interference Test

    The DKEFS Color-Word Interference test is a measure of information processing speed and complex attention. The task requires the subject to as quickly as possible complete four conditions, involving color naming, word reading, response inhibition, and then switching back-and-forth between two response patterns. The outcome measures for this task was the response inhibition trial and the switching trial, which are scored as the time in seconds to complete the conditions, ranging from 20-180. Scores were converted to standardized scores (T-scores) using normative data, ranging from 2-86. Higher scores reflect better performance. Changes from baseline to the last HD-tDCS session and the 2-month follow-up will be measured.

    Measured: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2022
  2. Study start13 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Feb 2024
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05270408
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU-2021-0974
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
30 Dec 2021
Last updated
5 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • LoBue C, Chiang HS, Salter A, McClintock S, Nguyen TP, Logan R, Smernoff E, Pandya S, Hart J. High definition transcranial direct current stimulation as an intervention for cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's dementia: A randomized controlled trial. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Feb;12(2):100023. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100023. Epub 2025 Jan 1.

    PubMed 39863318

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Transcranial direct current stimulation (STARStim 8) in people with Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Score on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (time frame: Baseline, immediately following last treatment session, and 2-months post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05270408, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in