HypercholesterolemiaPhase 2NCT05261126
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Enclitide Chloride (MK-0616 Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor) in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia (MK-0616-008)
A Phase 2 study testing Enclitide Chloride in people with Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Hypercholesterolemia, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC at 63 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enclitide chloride, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in participants with hypercholesterolemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypercholesterolemia, Familial Hypercholesterolemia
- What is being tested?
- Enclitide Chloride
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 381 participants
- Where
- 63 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2022to 28 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), or has an ASCVD risk equivalent and/or a 10-year risk of having an ASCVD event ≥5.0%, AND has a corresponding LDL-C that falls within the protocol-specified range at screening.
- Treatment with a stable dose of one or more lipid-lowering therapies for ≥30 days before screening, or has not received treatment with any lipid-lowering therapy for ≥30 days before screening.
- A female participant is not pregnant or breastfeeding, not a woman of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) or is a WOCBP and agrees to follow contraceptive guidance during the intervention period and for at least 8 weeks after the last dose of study intervention.
Who cannot join
- History of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) based on genetic or clinical criteria.
- History of nephrotic syndrome.
- History of unstable angina, a myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, transient ischemic attack, or stroke within 3 months before Screening.
- Has poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, defined as hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥9.0% at Screening.
- History of malignancy ≤3 years before screening, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer, which have no timeframe limitations relative to screening.
- Currently participating in or has previously participated in an interventional clinical study within 3 months before Screening.
- Has moderate or greater renal insufficiency.
Trial locations and contacts
63 sites in 8 countries.
63 sites in 8 countries
United States20 sites
New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center ( Site 0032)
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Westside Medical Associates of Los Angeles ( Site 0026)
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Excel Medical Clinical Trials ( Site 0042)
Boca Raton, Florida, 33434
Alliance for Multispecialty Research, LLC ( Site 0050)
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Dallas Diabetes Research Center ( Site 0012)
Dallas, Texas, 75230
altoona center for clinical research ( Site 0045)
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Healthcare Research Network - Chicago ( Site 0037)
Flossmoor, Illinois, 60422
Piedmont Research Partners ( Site 0005)
Fort Mill, South Carolina, 29707
Center for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention/Baylor College of Medicine ( Site 0051)
Houston, Texas, 77030
Midwest Institute For Clinical Research ( Site 0036)
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
The University of Mississippi Medical Center-Clinical Research and Trials Unit ( Site 0028)
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Jubilee Clinical Research ( Site 0047)
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
L-MARC Research Center ( Site 0003)
Louisville, Kentucky, 40213
Mid Hudson Medical Research ( Site 0004)
New Windsor, New York, 12553
National Clinical Research, Inc-research office ( Site 0019)
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
Clinical Trials Research ( Site 0007)
Sacramento, California, 95821
Northeast Clinical Research of San Antonio ( Site 0014)
San Antonio, Texas, 78233
National Research Institute (NRI) - Santa Ana ( Site 0024)
Santa Ana, California, 92704
ForCare Clinical Research ( Site 0017)
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Cotton O'Neil Mulvane ( Site 0022)
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Mexico10 sites
Centro de Atención e Investigación Clínica ( Site 0214)
Aguascalientes, 20129
Centro de Estudios de Investigacion Metabolicos y Cardiovasculares-Subinvestigation ( Site 0201)
Ciudad Madero, Tamaulipas, 89440
Instituto Jalisciense de Investigacion en Diabetes y Obesidad-Endocrinology ( Site 0205)
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 04460
Unidad de Investigaci�n Cl�nica Cardiometabolica de Occident-Unidad de Investigación Clínica Cardio
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44150
Medical Care and Research SA de CV ( Site 0211)
Mérida, Yucatán, 97070
Bio Investigación AMARC, S.C. ( Site 0204)
Mexico City, Mexico City, 11410
Hospital Angeles Mocel ( Site 0209)
Mexico City, Mexico City, 11850
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran ( Site 0212)
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080
Unidad biomedica avanzada monterrey-Clinical Trials ( Site 0200)
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Hospital Angeles Xalapa-Internal Medicine-Cardiology ( Site 0202)
Xalapa, Veracruz, 91193
Japan8 sites
Seiwa Clinic ( Site 1605)
Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 123-0845
meiwa hospital ( Site 1602)
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0041
Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital ( Site 1611)
Kuse-gun Kumiyama-cho, Kyoto, 613-0034
Chubu Rosal Hospital ( Site 1612)
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 455-8530
Kitada Clinic ( Site 1604)
Osaka, Osaka, 538-0044
Heishinkai Medical Group ToCROM Clinic ( Site 1601)
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0008
Medical Corporation Heishinkai OCROM Clinic ( Site 1600)
Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0853
Sekino Hospital ( Site 1603)
Toshimaku, Tokyo, 171-0014
Norway8 sites
Nordlandssykehuset ( Site 0709)
Bodø, Nordland, 8005
Akershus Universitetssykehus-Hjertemedisinsk Avdeling ( Site 0705)
Lørenskog, Akershus, 1478
Oslo Universitetssykehus Aker-Preventiv kardiologi Aker ( Site 0704)
Oslo, 0316
Oslo Universitetssykehus Rikshospitalet-Kardiologisk avdeling ( Site 0702)
Oslo, 0372
Oslo Universitetssykehus Ullevål-Hjertemedisinsk avdeling, Ullevål ( Site 0701)
Oslo, 0450
Oslo Universitetssykehus Aker-Lipidklinikken ( Site 0700)
Oslo, 0586
Stavanger Universitetssykehus ( Site 0706)
Stavanger, Rogaland, 4011
Sykehuset i Vestfold-Hjerteseksjonen ( Site 0703)
Tønsberg, Vestfold, 3103
Germany5 sites
Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum ( Site 0505)
Berlin, 13353
Ambulantes Herzzentrum Kassel ( Site 0501)
Kassel, Hesse, 34121
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig ( Site 0500)
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen ( Site 0504)
München, Bavaria, 80336
Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis ( Site 0502)
Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90402
United Kingdom5 sites
Layton Medical Centre ( Site 1303)
Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 7EN
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital-Glasgow Clinical Research Facility ( Site 1310)
Glasgow, Glasgow City, G51 4TF
Royal Free Hospital ( Site 1311)
London, England, NW32QG
William Harvey Heart Centre ( Site 1308)
London, London, City of, EC1M 5PZ
Walsall Manor Hospital ( Site 1309)
West Midlands, Walsall, WS2 9PS
South Korea4 sites
Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital ( Site 1703)
Daegu, Taegu-Kwangyokshi, 42601
Seoul National University Hospital ( Site 1702)
Seoul, 03080
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System ( Site 1701)
Seoul, 03722
Samsung Medical Center ( Site 1700)
Seoul, 06351
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Hacettepe Universitesi ( Site 1002)
Ankara, 06230
Ege University Medicine of Faculty-Cardilogy Department ( Site 1003)
Bornova, İzmir, 35100
Eskisehir Osmangazi University-Cardiology ( Site 1000)
Eskişehir, 26480
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0616 in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enclitide chloride, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in participants with hypercholesterolemia. The primary hypothesis is that at least one of the four doses of enclitide chloride tested in this study is superior to placebo on percent change from baseline in LDL-C at Week 8.
- Being tested
- Enclitide Chloride, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Hypercholesterolemia, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enclitide ChlorideDrug
Also called MK-0616
Enclitide Chloride administered orally
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching enclitide chloride administered orally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Enclitide Chloride 6 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 6 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Enclitide Chloride |
| Enclitide Chloride 12 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 12 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Enclitide Chloride |
| Enclitide Chloride 18 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 18 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Enclitide Chloride |
| Enclitide Chloride 30 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive 30 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Enclitide Chloride |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive enlicitide chloride-matching placebo orally QD for 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment to assess mean percent change in LDL-C. Based on a constrained longitudinal analysis (cLDA) model including terms for treatment, time, baseline statin intensity, baseline renal function, and the interaction of treatment by time. The percent change from baseline in LDL-C at week 8 was reported.
Measured: Baseline and up to Week 8
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported.
Measured: Up to approximately 17 Weeks
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to AEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to AEs was reported.
Measured: Up to approximately 9 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 8
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment to assess mean percent change in ApoB. The least square mean and 95% CI were obtained from fitting a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, baseline statin intensity, baseline renal function, and the interaction of treatment by time. The percent change from baseline in ApoB at week 8 was reported.
Measured: Baseline and up to Week 8
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment to assess mean percent change in non-HDL-C. The least square mean and 95% CI were obtained from fitting a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, baseline statin intensity, baseline renal function, and the interaction of treatment by time. The percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C at week 8 was reported.
Measured: Baseline and up to Week 8
Percentage of Participants With LDL-C Value at Goal at Week 8
LDL-C goal was defined as: LDL-C <70 mg/dL (<1.81 mmol/L) in participants with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), LDL-C <100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) in participants with an ASCVD risk-equivalent and/or a 10-year risk of having an ASCVD event that is ≥7.5%, OR LDL-C <130 mg/dL (<3.37mmol/L) in participants with a 10-year risk of having an ASCVD event that is ≥5.0% and <7.5%. The percentage of participants with LDL-C value at goal at week 8 were reported.
Measured: Week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2022
- Study start10 Mar 2022
- Primary completion28 Nov 2022
- Study completion28 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypercholesterolemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 381 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05261126
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0616-008
- Other IDs
- MK-0616-008, jRCT2031210701, 2021-005221-24
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Publications
Ballantyne CM, Banka P, Mendez G, Garcia R, Rosenstock J, Rodgers A, Mendizabal G, Mitchel Y, Catapano AL. Phase 2b Randomized Trial of the Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor MK-0616. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Apr 25;81(16):1553-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
PubMed 36889610
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0616 in Adults With Hypercholesterolemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05261126
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0616-008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 381 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Dec 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enclitide chloride, an oral PCSK9 inhibitor, in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in participants with hypercholesterolemia. The primary hypothesis is that at least one of the four doses of enclitide chloride tested in this study is superior to placebo on percent change from baseline in LDL-C at Week 8.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Enclitide Chloride 6 mg | Experimental | Drug: Enclitide ChlorideParticipants will receive 6 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks |
| Enclitide Chloride 12 mg | Experimental | Drug: Enclitide ChlorideParticipants will receive 12 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks |
| Enclitide Chloride 18 mg | Experimental | Drug: Enclitide ChlorideParticipants will receive 18 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks |
| Enclitide Chloride 30 mg | Experimental | Drug: Enclitide ChlorideParticipants will receive 30 mg of enlicitide chloride orally QD for 8 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive enlicitide chloride-matching placebo orally QD for 8 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- History of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), or has an ASCVD risk equivalent and/or a 10-year risk of having an ASCVD event ≥5.0%, AND has a corresponding LDL-C that falls within the protocol-specified range at screening.
- Treatment with a stable dose of one or more lipid-lowering therapies for ≥30 days before screening, or has not received treatment with any lipid-lowering therapy for ≥30 days before screening.
- A female participant is not pregnant or breastfeeding, not a woman of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) or is a WOCBP and agrees to follow contraceptive guidance during the intervention period and for at least 8 weeks after the last dose of study intervention.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) based on genetic or clinical criteria.
- History of nephrotic syndrome.
- History of unstable angina, a myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, transient ischemic attack, or stroke within 3 months before Screening.
- Has poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, defined as hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥9.0% at Screening.
- History of malignancy ≤3 years before screening, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer, which have no timeframe limitations relative to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enclitide ChlorideAlso: MK-0616Enclitide Chloride administered orally | Drug | Enclitide Chloride 12 mg, Enclitide Chloride 18 mg, Enclitide Chloride 30 mg, Enclitide Chloride 6 mg |
| PlaceboPlacebo matching enclitide chloride administered orally | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 8
Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment to assess mean percent change in LDL-C. Based on a constrained longitudinal analysis (cLDA) model including terms for treatment, time, baseline statin intensity, baseline renal function, and the interaction of treatment by time. The percent change from baseline in LDL-C at week 8 was reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to approximately 17 Weeks
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experienced at least one AE was reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to AEs
Time frame: Up to approximately 9 Weeks
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinued study intervention due to AEs was reported.
3 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 8
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 8
Percentage of Participants With LDL-C Value at Goal at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 36889610Ballantyne CM, Banka P, Mendez G, Garcia R, Rosenstock J, Rodgers A, Mendizabal G, Mitchel Y, Catapano AL. Phase 2b Randomized Trial of the Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor MK-0616. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Apr 25;81(16):1553-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
- Merck Clinical Trials InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Related trials for Hypercholesterolemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Study Evaluating LDL-C Change and Adherence to Inclisiran Lipid-lowering Therapy in ASCVD
Primary Hypercholesterolemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Causes and Natural History of Dyslipidemias
Hypercholesterolemia, Atherosclerosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Pre-school Children ( CzeCH-IT)
Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
Not yet recruiting
Penn Family Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia (NHLBI R33) Trial 3
Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
63 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Enclitide Chloride in people with Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Hypercholesterolemia, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC at 63 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 63 sites in United States, Mexico, Japan, Norway, Germany and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline and up to Week 8). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05261126, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2024.