Urinary Tract InfectionsFIDONCT05259683
Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome Study
An observational study of Urinary Tract Infections and Meningitis, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Febrile infants under 3 months of age represent a high risk group for invasive bacterial infection (IBI) and UTI with approximately 10-20% having bacteremia, meningitis or urinary tract infection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 90 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Infections, Meningitis, Sepsis
- How many people
- 2,076 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2022to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 90 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Infants attending paediatric emergency care in the United Kingdom and Ireland
Who may be able to join
- All infants 90 days of age and under with a fever of greater than 38 Centigrade during their time in the Emergency Department (ED) or Assessment Unit (AU) or with a history of fever of greater than 38 Centigrade recorded by anyone via any thermometer type within the last 24 hours.
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Queen's University Belfast
Belfast, Antrim, BT9 7BL
About this study
Official title: Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.
Febrile infants under 3 months of age represent a high risk group for invasive bacterial infection (IBI) and UTI with approximately 10-20% having bacteremia, meningitis or urinary tract infection. The assessment of febrile infants is challenging, and current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance advocates a cautious approach with the majority of infants requiring a septic screen, parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotics, and admission to hospital. Internationally there is significant variation in the approach to febrile infants with European and USA guidance advocating a tailored approach based on clinical features and biomarker testing. None of the available clinical decision aids (CDA) have been validated in a UK and Irish cohort. The main objectives of the FIDO study are to report performance accuracy of CDA in a UK (United Kingdom) and Irish population, and describe the aetiology of SBI in young infants.
The FIDO study is a prospective observational cohort study of infants under 90 days of age with a measured fever greater than 38 Centrigrade within 24 hours of presentation. The study will run for approximately 12 months and recruit a minimum of 1000 participants.Symptoms, clinical features and laboratory results will be recorded on an electronic case report form (CRF) by the attending clinician.
Read the detailed description
Background
Infants below three months of age are at high risk of invasive bacterial infections (IBI) and urinary tract infections (UTI). Recent studies have reported the combined rate of IBI and UTI in the range of 10 - 20% , with IBI (bacteremia and meningitis) account for to up to 3% of the total. Unlike older children infants regularly appear well or have non-specific features despite having an IBI or UTI, with history and physical examination alone not sufficient to detect all cases. Furthermore, the clinical differentiation between fever caused by bacteria and viruses is most challenging in the less than three month age group. The majority of children still have self-limiting illness in this age group making risk assessment challenging for clinicians.
The ideal approach to the assessment and management of febrile infants is not clear, as exemplified by the contrasting approaches advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The NICE guideline 51 (NG51) "Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management" advises that all febrile infants (under 3 months of age) receive parenteral antibiotics immediately whereas NICE guideline 143 (NG143) "Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management" suggests a tailored approach based on clinical assessment and laboratory testing. The recently proposed British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) guidance also supports a tailored approach similar to the NICE guideline NG143. The primary aim of this study is to prospectively validate these CDA.
Objectives Primary Objectives
- Report the aetiology of IBI in febrile infants under three months in the UK and Ireland.
- Describe the clinical and laboratory predictors of IBI in febrile infants under three months of age.
- Report the performance of tailored CDAs to correctly identify a cohort suitable for management without parenteral antibiotics.
- Report the performance of tailored CDAs to correctly identify a cohort suitable for management without lumbar puncture.
Secondary Objectives
- Report a cost analysis for different CDAs.
- Report parents/guardians' and clinicians' views on how best to communicate different treatment strategies, including the risks and benefits of each.
Study Design A multicentre observational prospective cohort study in the UK and Ireland conducted via Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI).
Study Population All infants 90 days of age and under with a fever of greater than 38 Centigrade during their time in the Emergency Department (ED) or Assessment Unit (AU) or with a history of fever of greater than 38 Centigrade recorded by anyone via any thermometer type within the last 24 hours. There are no exclusion criteria, but data will be recorded regarding gestational age, antenatal complications, underlying health conditions and recent admissions to hospital.
Setting PERUKI sites across the UK and Ireland.
Screening Eligible participants will be screened by appropriately trained clinical staff, using the case report form (CRF). The CRF will be used to record anonymised non-personal data such as baseline demographic data, clinical features and initial examination findings.
Procedures All eligible participants will be enrolled. In all instances routine care will not be interrupted. Where possible an additional 1ml of blood will be taken and stored for PCT testing. This blood will be collected during routine phlebotomy. There will be no additional phlebotomy events beyond those required for routine clinical care. Seven days after discharge the CRF will be completed by a trained member of the local study team. This will involve reviewing the medical records and a phone call (maximum of three attempts) to the parent/guardian to determine if there had been any subsequent unplanned re-attendances to hospital.
Reference Standards The reference standard is the diagnosis of IBI (meningitis/bacteremia) and urinary tract infection (excluding contaminants).
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) will be confirmed by >100,000 CFU/ml of a single organism from a single clean urine (clean catch, suprapubic aspiration, urethral catheter specimen) or >100,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml of the same single organism from two non-clean urines (pads, bags, cotton wool) and the presence of pyuria (>5 white blood cells per high powered-field) on laboratory microscopy.
Meningitis will be confirmed by culture or molecular testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Bacteremia will be confirmed by culture or molecular testing of blood. The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Contaminants include coagulase negative Staphylococcus, Propionibacterium acnes, Streptococcus viridans, or Diphtheroides. A list of all suspected contaminants will be provided at the end of the study.
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections, Meningitis, Sepsis, Bacterial Infections
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections, Meningitis, Sepsis, Bacterial Infections
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Urinary Tract Infection
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) will be confirmed by >100,000 CFU/ml of a single organism from a single clean urine (clean catch, suprapubic aspiration, urethral catheter specimen) or >100,000 CFU/ml of the same single organism from two non-clean urine samples (pads, bags, cotton wool) and pyuria (>5 white blood cells per high-powered field) on laboratory microscopy.
Measured: 7 days of attendance
Bacterial Meningitis
Meningitis will be confirmed by culture or molecular testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Measured: 7 days of attendance
Bacteriaemia
Bacteremia will be confirmed by bacterial culture or molecular testing of blood using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Measured: 7 days of attendance
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2022
- Study start1 Aug 2022
- Primary completion31 Aug 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,076 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen's University, Belfast
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thomas Waterfield, Queen's University, Belfast
- Investigators
- Thomas Waterfield, PhD, Principal investigator, Queen's University, Belfast
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05259683
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 278080
- Acronym
- FIDO
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: To be determined
Publications
Umana E, Mills C, Norman-Bruce H, Mitchell H, McFetridge L, Lynn F, McKeeman G, Foster S, Barrett MJ, Roland D, Lyttle MD, Watson C, Waterfield T; Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI). Performance of clinical decision aids (CDA) for the care of young febrile infants: a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Ireland. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 27;78:102961. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102961. eCollection 2024 Dec.
PubMed 39677360Evans J, Umana E, Waterfield T; FIDO Study Group in collaboration with PERUKI. Respiratory viral testing for young febrile infants presenting to emergency care: a planned secondary analysis of the Febrile Infants Diagnostic assessment and Outcome (FIDO) prospective observational cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2024 Nov 19;109(12):988-993. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327567.
PubMed 39357988Wilson K, Umana E, McCleary D, Waterfield T, Woolfall K. Exploring communication preferences and risk thresholds of clinicians and parents of febrile infants under 90 days presenting to the emergency department: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child. 2024 Oct 18;109(11):886-893. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326727.
PubMed 38986575Umana E, Mills C, Norman-Bruce H, Wilson K, Mitchell H, McFetridge L, Woolfall K, Lynn FA, McKeeman G, Foster S, Barrett M, Roland D, Lyttle MD, Watson C, Waterfield T. Applying clinical decision aids for the assessment and management of febrile infants presenting to emergency care in the UK and Ireland: Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome (FIDO) Study protocol. BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e075823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075823.
PubMed 37730397
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05259683
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FIDO / 278080
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections, Meningitis, Sepsis, Bacterial Infections
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,076 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen's University, BelfastUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Febrile infants under 3 months of age represent a high risk group for invasive bacterial infection (IBI) and UTI with approximately 10-20% having bacteremia, meningitis or urinary tract infection. The assessment of febrile infants is challenging, and current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance advocates a cautious approach with the majority of infants requiring a septic screen, parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotics, and admission to hospital. Internationally there is significant variation in the approach to febrile infants with European and USA guidance advocating a tailored approach based on clinical features and biomarker testing. None of the available clinical decision aids (CDA) have been validated in a UK and Irish cohort. The main objectives of the FIDO study are to report performance accuracy of CDA in a UK (United Kingdom) and Irish population, and describe the aetiology of SBI in young infants.
The FIDO study is a prospective observational cohort study of infants under 90 days of age with a measured fever greater than 38 Centrigrade within 24 hours of presentation. The study will run for approximately 12 months and recruit a minimum of 1000 participants.Symptoms, clinical features and laboratory results will be recorded on an electronic case report form (CRF) by the attending clinician.
Detailed description
Background
Infants below three months of age are at high risk of invasive bacterial infections (IBI) and urinary tract infections (UTI). Recent studies have reported the combined rate of IBI and UTI in the range of 10 - 20% , with IBI (bacteremia and meningitis) account for to up to 3% of the total. Unlike older children infants regularly appear well or have non-specific features despite having an IBI or UTI, with history and physical examination alone not sufficient to detect all cases. Furthermore, the clinical differentiation between fever caused by bacteria and viruses is most challenging in the less than three month age group. The majority of children still have self-limiting illness in this age group making risk assessment challenging for clinicians.
The ideal approach to the assessment and management of febrile infants is not clear, as exemplified by the contrasting approaches advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The NICE guideline 51 (NG51) "Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management" advises that all febrile infants (under 3 months of age) receive parenteral antibiotics immediately whereas NICE guideline 143 (NG143) "Fever in under 5s: assessment and initial management" suggests a tailored approach based on clinical assessment and laboratory testing. The recently proposed British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) guidance also supports a tailored approach similar to the NICE guideline NG143. The primary aim of this study is to prospectively validate these CDA.
Objectives Primary Objectives
- Report the aetiology of IBI in febrile infants under three months in the UK and Ireland.
- Describe the clinical and laboratory predictors of IBI in febrile infants under three months of age.
- Report the performance of tailored CDAs to correctly identify a cohort suitable for management without parenteral antibiotics.
- Report the performance of tailored CDAs to correctly identify a cohort suitable for management without lumbar puncture.
Secondary Objectives
- Report a cost analysis for different CDAs.
- Report parents/guardians' and clinicians' views on how best to communicate different treatment strategies, including the risks and benefits of each.
Study Design A multicentre observational prospective cohort study in the UK and Ireland conducted via Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI).
Study Population All infants 90 days of age and under with a fever of greater than 38 Centigrade during their time in the Emergency Department (ED) or Assessment Unit (AU) or with a history of fever of greater than 38 Centigrade recorded by anyone via any thermometer type within the last 24 hours. There are no exclusion criteria, but data will be recorded regarding gestational age, antenatal complications, underlying health conditions and recent admissions to hospital.
Setting PERUKI sites across the UK and Ireland.
Screening Eligible participants will be screened by appropriately trained clinical staff, using the case report form (CRF). The CRF will be used to record anonymised non-personal data such as baseline demographic data, clinical features and initial examination findings.
Procedures All eligible participants will be enrolled. In all instances routine care will not be interrupted. Where possible an additional 1ml of blood will be taken and stored for PCT testing. This blood will be collected during routine phlebotomy. There will be no additional phlebotomy events beyond those required for routine clinical care. Seven days after discharge the CRF will be completed by a trained member of the local study team. This will involve reviewing the medical records and a phone call (maximum of three attempts) to the parent/guardian to determine if there had been any subsequent unplanned re-attendances to hospital.
Reference Standards The reference standard is the diagnosis of IBI (meningitis/bacteremia) and urinary tract infection (excluding contaminants).
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) will be confirmed by >100,000 CFU/ml of a single organism from a single clean urine (clean catch, suprapubic aspiration, urethral catheter specimen) or >100,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml of the same single organism from two non-clean urines (pads, bags, cotton wool) and the presence of pyuria (>5 white blood cells per high powered-field) on laboratory microscopy.
Meningitis will be confirmed by culture or molecular testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Bacteremia will be confirmed by culture or molecular testing of blood. The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Contaminants include coagulase negative Staphylococcus, Propionibacterium acnes, Streptococcus viridans, or Diphtheroides. A list of all suspected contaminants will be provided at the end of the study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 90 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Infants attending paediatric emergency care in the United Kingdom and Ireland
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All infants 90 days of age and under with a fever of greater than 38 Centigrade during their time in the Emergency Department (ED) or Assessment Unit (AU) or with a history of fever of greater than 38 Centigrade recorded by anyone via any thermometer type within the last 24 hours.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Urinary Tract Infection
Time frame: 7 days of attendance
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) will be confirmed by >100,000 CFU/ml of a single organism from a single clean urine (clean catch, suprapubic aspiration, urethral catheter specimen) or >100,000 CFU/ml of the same single organism from two non-clean urine samples (pads, bags, cotton wool) and pyuria (>5 white blood cells per high-powered field) on laboratory microscopy.
Bacterial Meningitis
Time frame: 7 days of attendance
Meningitis will be confirmed by culture or molecular testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Bacteriaemia
Time frame: 7 days of attendance
Bacteremia will be confirmed by bacterial culture or molecular testing of blood using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The reference standard test will be performed by staff blinded to the clinical data and suspected diagnosis.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Feb 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39677360Umana E, Mills C, Norman-Bruce H, Mitchell H, McFetridge L, Lynn F, McKeeman G, Foster S, Barrett MJ, Roland D, Lyttle MD, Watson C, Waterfield T; Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI). Performance of clinical decision aids (CDA) for the care of young febrile infants: a multicentre prospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Ireland. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 27;78:102961. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102961. eCollection 2024 Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39357988Evans J, Umana E, Waterfield T; FIDO Study Group in collaboration with PERUKI. Respiratory viral testing for young febrile infants presenting to emergency care: a planned secondary analysis of the Febrile Infants Diagnostic assessment and Outcome (FIDO) prospective observational cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2024 Nov 19;109(12):988-993. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327567.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38986575Wilson K, Umana E, McCleary D, Waterfield T, Woolfall K. Exploring communication preferences and risk thresholds of clinicians and parents of febrile infants under 90 days presenting to the emergency department: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child. 2024 Oct 18;109(11):886-893. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326727.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37730397Umana E, Mills C, Norman-Bruce H, Wilson K, Mitchell H, McFetridge L, Woolfall K, Lynn FA, McKeeman G, Foster S, Barrett M, Roland D, Lyttle MD, Watson C, Waterfield T. Applying clinical decision aids for the assessment and management of febrile infants presenting to emergency care in the UK and Ireland: Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome (FIDO) Study protocol. BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e075823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075823.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. To be determined
Related trials for Urinary Tract Infections
Recruiting
Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection Using DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction Versus Urine Culture
Urinary Tract Infections
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Clinical Performance Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® cUTI Plus AMR
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Recruiting
INterest of the Negative Predictive Value of Integrons in the reduCtion of Large Broad-spectrum anTibiotics Consumption for Urinary Tract infectionS
Drug Resistance, Microbial, Biomarkers
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparative Study of the Genomic Characteristics of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli According to the Severity of Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Guadeloupe (COLIGENURI)
Urinary Tract Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Waterfield, PhD principal investigator
Queen's University, Belfast
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Urinary Tract Infections and Meningitis, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Urinary Tract Infection (time frame: 7 days of attendance). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05259683, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2024.