Colorectal CancerNCT05246839
Informed Choice - Compass
An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by Exact Sciences Corporation at 39 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a theoretically grounded video that includes information about CRC screening modality choices on CRC screening rates and time adherent to CRC guidelines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Brief Video and Brief Video Plus
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 1,823 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2022to 31 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects will be 45 to 70 years of age, inclusive, who are scheduled for a primary care appointment, at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), and due for CRC screening. The study will enroll approximately 1,851 subjects.
Who may be able to join
- Participant is 45 to 70 years of age, inclusive.
- Participant presents for a primary care appointment.
- Participant understands the study procedures and can provide informed consent to participate in the study and authorization for release of relevant protected health information (PHI) to the study Investigator.
- Participant has never been screened for CRC.
Who cannot join
- Participant has symptoms or signs that require immediate, or near-term referral for diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy.
- Participant is due for CRC screening within three months and is already scheduled for colonoscopy.
- Participant has a personal history of CRC or colonic adenomatous or sessile serrated polyps.
- Participant has a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Participant has a family history of CRC in at least one first- or second-degree relative diagnosed prior to age 60 and/or at least 2 first-degree relatives diagnosed with CRC at any age.
- Participant has a personal diagnosis or family history of any of the following conditions:
Show all 12Show fewer
- Familial adenomatous polyposis (also referred to as "FAP", including attenuated FAP and Gardner's syndrome),
- Hereditary non-polyposis CRC syndrome (also referred to as "HNPCC" or "Lynch Syndrome"),
- Other hereditary cancer syndromes including, but are not limited to Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome, MYH-Associated Polyposis (MAP), Turcot's (or Crail's) Syndrome, Cowden's Syndrome, Juvenile Polyposis, Neurofibromatosis, or Familial Hyperplastic Polyposis.
- Participant has a diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome.
- Participant is current with CRC screening, including gFOBT or FIT within the preceding 12 months, Cologuard within the preceding 3 years, flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography within the preceding 5 years, or colonoscopy within the preceding 10 years. Participants can be enrolled up to 3 months prior to screening due date.
- Participant has any condition that in the opinion of the Investigators should preclude participation in the study, including comorbid illnesses precluding endoscopic evaluation or that limit life expectancy to less than 10 years.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 1 country.
39 sites in 1 country
United States39 sites
Annapolis Internal Medicine
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Skylight Health Group
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Ellipsis Research Group, LLC
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
OnSite Clinical Solutions, LLC
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28208
Sheridan Medical Center, S.C
Chicago, Illinois, 60613
SPICA Clinical Research
Columbia, South Carolina, 29322
ClinCept, LLC
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Skylight Health
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17109
Clear Brook Medical Associates
Houston, Texas, 77089
The Jackson Clinic, PA
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Skylight Health Group
Jacksonville, Florida, 32218
Alliance Community Healthcare, INC
Jersey City, New Jersey, 07302
Barrett Clinic
La Vista, Nebraska, 68128
Biopharma Informatic
Los Angeles, California, 90035
Pivotal Clinical Research & Associates, LLC
Marietta, Georgia, 30062
I.V.A.M Clinical & Investigational Center
Miami, Florida, 33144
ITB Research
Miami, Florida, 33173
Ascension DePaul Community Services of New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70118
Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center
Niagara Falls, New York, 14304
Hightower Clinical OKC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73134
Emerald Coast OBGYN
Panama City, Florida, 32405
BioPharma Informatic
Pharr, Texas, 78577
Mercado Medical Practice
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Absolute Clinical Research
Phoenix, Arizona, 85323
Ogden Clinic - Mountain View
Pleasant View, Utah, 84404
Saviers Medical Group
Port Hueneme, California, 93041
Pottstown Medical Specialists Inc
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464
Center for Medical Research, LLC
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908
Advanced Primary and Geriatric Care
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Laurelton Heart Specialist PC
Rosedale, New York, 11422
Ogden Clinic - Grand View
Roy, Utah, 84067
Valley Ob-Gyn Clinic, PC
Saginaw, Michigan, 48602
South Ogden Family Medicine
South Ogden, Utah, 84405
Valena Medical Research
Spring, Texas, 77379
St. Louis Medical Professionals
St Louis, Missouri, 63119
A & U Family Medicine
Sugarland, Texas, 77479
Herman Clinical Research, LLC
Suwanee, Georgia, 30013
North Hudson Community Action Corporation
Union City, New Jersey, 07087
About this study
Official title: Informed Choice Intervention for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Compass
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a theoretically grounded video that includes information about CRC screening modality choices on CRC screening rates and time adherent to CRC guidelines. The results will not be posted because the study terminated early and the primary endpoint was not analyzed.
Read the detailed description
Participants 45 to 70 years of age, scheduled for a primary care (index) appointment, at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), and due for CRC screening will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomized to one of three intervention arms: no video (arm 1), brief CRC screening video (arm 2), or enhanced CRC screening video (arm 3). Participants in all intervention arms will complete surveys regarding intention to screen for CRC and preference for screening modality prior to viewing the video, after the video, and after their index appointment. Participants will be surveyed, and medical information collected, for 1 year after randomization to assess adherence to CRC screening and CRC screening outcomes.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Brief Video, Brief Video Plus
- Keywords
- CRC Screening, Colonoscopy, FIT, Cologuard, Screening Modality, Survey, Video, sDNA-FIT
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brief VideoBehavioural
Videos about colorectal cancer screening.
Brief Video PlusBehavioural
Videos about colorectal cancer screening and modalities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Usual Care (No Video) | Participant will receive the usual care pertaining to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to their respective clinical site and will not view either of the study videos. | |
| Arm 2 - Brief Video | Participant will watch a video pertaining to the importance of CRC screening. Receives: Behavioral: Brief Video | |
| Arm 3 - Brief Video Plus | Participant will watch the same video as described in Arm 2, immediately followed by a second video pertaining to 3 CRC screening modalities: colonoscopy, FIT, and Cologuard. Receives: Behavioral: Brief Video Plus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Impact of Brief Videos
To evaluate the impact of a theoretically grounded video that includes information about CRC screening modality choices (colonoscopy, FIT, and Cologuard) on CRC screening rates and the proportion of time adherent to CRC guidelines.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Participant Screening Preferences
To examine initial mode preferences between participants viewing a theoretically grounded video that includes information about CRC screening modality choices (colonoscopy, FIT, and Cologuard) compared to those receiving only a brief informational video about CRC screening or receiving only usual care.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2022
- Study start28 Apr 2022
- Primary completion31 Jan 2025
- Study completion31 Jan 2025
Why it stopped: Business decision to terminate the study early. Primary endpoint will not be assessed.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,823 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Exact Sciences Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, University of Utah, American Cancer Society, Inc., F!ght Colorectal Cancer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joan M. Griffin, PhD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic College of MedicineJohn Inadomi, MD, Principal investigator, University of UtahCharles R. Rogers, PhD, Principal investigator, Rogers Solutions Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05246839
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-02
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications of the study may be shared after deidentification. This may include text, tables, figures, and appendices. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan (when applicable), informed consent form (when applicable), and clinical study report (when applicable) may also be shared. Data will be available from 2 years and ending 4 years after publication. Data may be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the aims outlined in the approved proposal.
Publications
Griffin JM, Finney Rutten LJ, Zhu X, Feng Z, Rogers CR, Marsh TL, Inadomi JM. The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
PubMed 35842109
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Informed Choice Intervention for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Compass
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05246839
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-02
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- CRC Screening, Colonoscopy, FIT, Cologuard, Screening Modality, Survey, Video, sDNA-FIT
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Business decision to terminate the study early. Primary endpoint will not be assessed.
- Enrolment
- 1,823 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Exact Sciences CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, University of Utah, American Cancer Society, Inc., F!ght Colorectal Cancer
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a theoretically grounded video that includes information about CRC screening modality choices on CRC screening rates and time adherent to CRC guidelines. The results will not be posted because the study terminated early and the primary endpoint was not analyzed.
Detailed description
Participants 45 to 70 years of age, scheduled for a primary care (index) appointment, at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), and due for CRC screening will be enrolled in the study. Participants will be randomized to one of three intervention arms: no video (arm 1), brief CRC screening video (arm 2), or enhanced CRC screening video (arm 3). Participants in all intervention arms will complete surveys regarding intention to screen for CRC and preference for screening modality prior to viewing the video, after the video, and after their index appointment. Participants will be surveyed, and medical information collected, for 1 year after randomization to assess adherence to CRC screening and CRC screening outcomes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Usual Care (No Video) | – | –Participant will receive the usual care pertaining to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to their respective clinical site and will not view either of the study videos. |
| Arm 2 - Brief Video | – | Behavioral: Brief VideoParticipant will watch a video pertaining to the importance of CRC screening. |
| Arm 3 - Brief Video Plus | – | Behavioral: Brief Video PlusParticipant will watch the same video as described in Arm 2, immediately followed by a second video pertaining to 3 CRC screening modalities: colonoscopy, FIT, and Cologuard. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects will be 45 to 70 years of age, inclusive, who are scheduled for a primary care appointment, at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), and due for CRC screening. The study will enroll approximately 1,851 subjects.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participant is 45 to 70 years of age, inclusive.
- Participant presents for a primary care appointment.
- Participant understands the study procedures and can provide informed consent to participate in the study and authorization for release of relevant protected health information (PHI) to the study Investigator.
- Participant has never been screened for CRC.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Participant has symptoms or signs that require immediate, or near-term referral for diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy.
- Participant is due for CRC screening within three months and is already scheduled for colonoscopy.
- Participant has a personal history of CRC or colonic adenomatous or sessile serrated polyps.
- Participant has a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Participant has a family history of CRC in at least one first- or second-degree relative diagnosed prior to age 60 and/or at least 2 first-degree relatives diagnosed with CRC at any age.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brief VideoVideos about colorectal cancer screening. | Behavioural | Arm 2 - Brief Video |
| Brief Video PlusVideos about colorectal cancer screening and modalities. | Behavioural | Arm 3 - Brief Video Plus |
Primary outcome
Impact of Brief Videos
Time frame: 1 year
To evaluate the impact of a theoretically grounded video that includes information about CRC screening modality choices (colonoscopy, FIT, and Cologuard) on CRC screening rates and the proportion of time adherent to CRC guidelines.
1 secondary outcome
Participant Screening Preferences
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Business decision to terminate the study early. Primary endpoint will not be assessed.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Nov 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35842109Griffin JM, Finney Rutten LJ, Zhu X, Feng Z, Rogers CR, Marsh TL, Inadomi JM. The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in publications of the study may be shared after deidentification. This may include text, tables, figures, and appendices. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan (when applicable), informed consent form (when applicable), and clinical study report (when applicable) may also be shared. Data will be available from 2 years and ending 4 years after publication. Data may be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the aims outlined in the approved proposal.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab Plus Cetuximab and Irinotecan for Second-Line Right-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Colon Cancer Phase II Study
Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Not yet recruiting
FLuorescent Angiography in REduction of Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer Surgery
Rectal Cancer Patients, Rectal Cancer Surgery
Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial Evaluating ctDNA-Guided Interruption Versus Standard of Care Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy In Patients With Advanced / Metastatic Solid Tumors.
NSCLC (Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08165784 in People With PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Advanced Breast Cancer, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joan M. Griffin, PhD principal investigator
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
John Inadomi, MD principal investigator
University of Utah
Charles R. Rogers, PhD principal investigator
Rogers Solutions Group
39 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by Exact Sciences Corporation at 39 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Business decision to terminate the study early. Primary endpoint will not be assessed.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Impact of Brief Videos (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05246839, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2025.