AzTrials
AzTrials

Relapsed Adult AMLSCOPE-LNCT05237258

Specialty Compared to Oncology Delivered Palliative Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A study testing Specialty Palliative Care and Primary Palliative Care in people with Relapsed Adult AML and Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 20 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This research study is evaluating whether primary palliative care is an alternative strategy to specialty palliative care for improving quality of life, symptoms, mood, coping, and end of life outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Specialty Palliative Care and Primary Palliative Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,300 participants
Where
20 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to Apr 2029
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient Inclusion Criteria
  • Hospitalized patients (age ≥ 18 years) with high-risk AML defined as:
  • Patients with new diagnosis ≥ 60 years of age
  • An antecedent hematologic disorder
  • Therapy related-disease
  • Relapsed or primary refractory AML
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Within five business days of initiating therapy with either a) intensive chemotherapy (7+3) or modification of this regimen on a clinical trial, or a similar intensive regimen requiring prolonged hospitalization; or b) hypomethylating agents +/- additional agents or modification of this regimen on a clinical trial.
  • Caregiver Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult (≥18 years) relative or friend of a participating patient who the patient identifies as living with or has in-person contact with them at least twice per week.

Who cannot join

  • Patient Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML)
  • Patients with AML receiving supportive care alone
  • Patients with psychiatric or cognitive conditions which the treating clinicians believe prohibits informed consent or compliance with study procedures
  • Patients seen by a palliative care clinician (MD, DO, APP) during two previous hospitalizations in the six months prior to enrollment
  • Patients expected to be discharged within 2 days

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Areej El-Jawahri, MD contact

617-724-4000

ael-jawahri@partners.org

Chardria S Trotter, MPH, MBA contact

CTrotter@mgh.harvard.edu

20 sites in 1 country

United States20 sites, 20 recruiting
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

    Dio Kavalieratos, MD, d.kavalieratos@emory.edu

    Martha Arellano, MD, marella@emory.edu

    Recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21218

    Corey Tapper, MD, ctapper1@jhmi.edu

    B. Douglas Smith, MD, bdsmith@jhmi.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Alabama - Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

    Richard Taylor, PhD, rtaylor@uabmc.edu

    Omer Jamy, MD, omerjamy@uabmc.edu

    Recruiting
  • Indiana University

    Bloomington, Indiana, 47405

    Larry Cripe, MD, lcripe@iu.edu

    James Cleary, MD, jfcleary@iu.edu

    Recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Areej El-Jawahri, MD, 617-724-4000, ael-jawahri@mgb.org

    Areej El-Jawahri, MD

    Recruiting
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

    Oreofe Odejide, MD, MPH, oreofe_odejide@dfci.harvard.edu

    James Tulsky, MD, jamesa_tulsky@dfci.harvard.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

    Laura Hanson, MD, MPH, laura_hanson@med.unc.edu

    William Wood, Jr., MD, william_wood@med.unc.edu

    Recruiting
  • Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

    Erin Stevens, DO, erin.stevens@osumc.edu

    Alice Mims, MD, Alice.Mims@osumc.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Colorado Denver I Anschutz Medical Campus

    Denver, Colorado, 80204

    Stacy Fischer, MD, STACY.FISCHER@CUANSCHUTZ.EDU

    Christine McMahon, MD, CHRISTINE.MCMAHON@CUANSCHUTZ.EDU

    Recruiting
  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27708

    Thomas LeBlanc, MD, Thomas.LeBlanc@duke.edu

    Wil Santivasi, MD, wil.santivasi@duke.edu

    Recruiting
  • Northwestern University

    Evanston, Illinois, 60208

    Jessica Altman, MD, jaltman@nm.org

    Jayson Neagle, MD, jayson.neagle@nm.org

    Recruiting
  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53715

    Priyanka Pophali, MD, pophali@wisc.edu

    Meaghan Trainor, MD, mtrainor@medicine.wisc.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33146

    Lara Traeger, PhD, ltraeger@miami.edu

    Michael Huber, MD, mth131@med.miami.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

    Selina Luger, MD, Selina.Luger@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Kathryn McGrath, MD, Kathryn.Mcgrath@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Recruiting
  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

    Jason Webb, MD, webbja@ohsu.edu

    Rachel Cook, MD, MS, coora@ohsu.edu

    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

    Jacob Strand, MD, strand.jacob@mayo.edu

    Hassan Alkhateeb, MD, alkhateeb.hassan@mayo.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Rochester

    Rochester, New York, 14627

    Kah Poh Loh, MD, kahpoh_loh@urmc.rochester.edu

    Paul Vermilion, MD, Paul_Vermilion@URMC.Rochester.edu

    Recruiting
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

    Mohamed Sorror, MD, MSc, msorror@fredhutch.org

    James Fausto, PhD, jfausto@uw.edu

    Recruiting
  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305

    Karl Lorenz, MD, kalorenz@stanford.edu

    Gabriel Mannis, MD, gmannis@stanford.edu

    Recruiting
  • Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

    Sara Tinsley-Vance, PhD, Sara.TinsleyVance@moffitt.org

    David Craig, PharmD, David.Craig@moffitt.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This research study is evaluating whether primary palliative care is an alternative strategy to specialty palliative care for improving quality of life, symptoms, mood, coping, and end of life outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Read the detailed description

Patients with newly diagnosed AML confront a sudden and life-threatening diagnosis, requiring an immediate disruption of their life and an urgent hospitalization to begin therapy. During their hospitalization for chemotherapy, patients with AML often experience difficult physical symptoms that negatively impact their quality of life and physical function. Patients with AML also experience significant psychological distress as they combat the abrupt onset of illness, uncertainty regarding their prognosis, physical and social isolation during hospitalization, and complete loss of independence. The abrupt onset of these symptoms can be distressing to both the patient and their family and friends (also called "caregivers").

Research has shown that early involvement of a team of clinicians specializing in lessening (or "palliating") these physical and emotional symptoms and helping patients and their caregivers cope with AML improves their quality of life and experience with their illness. This team is called "specialty palliative care" and consists of physicians and advanced practice providers who work closely and collaboratively with the oncology team to care for patients and caregivers. Research has also shown that training oncology clinicians to incorporate palliative care skills into their practice, called "primary palliative care," is an alternative strategy to having specialty palliative care clinicians care for patients with leukemia.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether specialty palliative care or primary palliative care is the best way to improve the quality of life and experience of patients with AML and their caregivers. This study will randomly assign hospitals to deliver either specialty palliative care or primary palliative care for patients with AML. Participants in this study will receive either specialty or primary palliative care during their hospital stays based upon which strategy their hospital has been assigned to. Participants assigned to specialty palliative care will be care for by both oncology and palliative care clinicians during their hospital stays for AML. Participants assigned to primary palliative care will be cared for by oncology clinicians who have been trained in palliative care during their hospital stays for AML.

Being tested
Specialty Palliative Care, Primary Palliative Care
Keywords
Relapsed Adult AML, Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Caregivers
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Specialty Palliative CareBehavioural

    Participants assigned to specialty palliative care will be cared for by both oncology and palliative care clinicians during their hospital stays for AML.

  • Primary Palliative CareBehavioural

    Participants assigned primary palliative care will be cared for by oncology clinicians who have been trained in palliative care during the hospital stays for AML.

Study groups in NCT05237258
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Specialty Palliative CareExperimental- Participants will complete baseline self-report assessments at the time of informed consent
Receives: Behavioral: Specialty Palliative Care
Primary Palliative CareExperimental- Participants will complete baseline self-report assessments at the time of informed consent
Receives: Behavioral: Primary Palliative Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Life (QOL)

    Establish that primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leukemia) over 12 weeks.

    Higher scores on FACT-Leukemia (range 0-176) indicate a better QOL.

    Measured: Over 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Patient Quality of Life (QOL)

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to patient-reported quality of life (QOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leukemia).

    Measured: Up to 2 Weeks

  2. Patient Depression Symptoms

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with depression symptoms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Higher scores on HADS depression subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater depression symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  3. Patient Anxiety Symptoms

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with anxiety symptoms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Higher scores on HADS anxiety subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  4. Patient Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms as measured by the Post-Traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian version.

    Higher scores on the Post-Traumatic Stress Checklist (range 17-85) indicate greater PTSD symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  5. End-of-Life (EOL) Communication

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to patient reported end-of-life (EOL) communication measured by the Prognostic Awareness Impact Scale (PAIS).

    The PAIS includes an item that measures patient self-report of communication about their wishes if they were dying (yes vs. no).

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  6. End-of-Life (EOL) Care

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to chemotherapy administration in the last 30 days of life based on documentation from the Electronic Health Record.

    Measured: Last 30 days of life

  7. Caregiver Quality of Life (QOL)

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to caregiver quality of life measured by the Caregiver Oncology QOL Questionnaire (CARGOQOL).

    Higher scores on CARGOQOL (range 0-100) indicate better QOL.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  8. Caregiver Burden

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to caregiver burden measured by the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA).

    Higher scores on the CRA (range 24-120) indicate greater caregiving burden.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  9. Caregiver Depression Symptoms

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to caregiver depression symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Higher scores on HADS depression subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater depression symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

  10. Caregiver Anxiety Symptoms

    Assess whether primary palliative care is non-inferior to specialty palliative care with respect to caregiver anxiety symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Higher scores on HADS anxiety subscale (range 0-21) indicate greater anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: Up to 12 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completionApr 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05237258
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-646
Acronym
SCOPE-L
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
2 Feb 2022
Last updated
25 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to Sponsor Investigator or designee. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in