AzTrials
AzTrials

ApathyFAME3NCT05232877

Effects of t-DCS and Cognitive Training on Apathy in Elderly With Minor Neurocognitive Impairment

A study testing tDCS in people with Apathy and Neurocognitive Disorders, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique using a low intensity electric current to modify cortical excitability. Apathy is a pervasive neuropsychiatric symptom characterized by a reduction in goal-directed behavior and activity that persists over time and causes… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Apathy, Neurocognitive Disorders
What is being tested?
tDCS
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
27 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
5 Apr 2022to 10 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Subject consulting in one of the investigating centers
  • Clinical diagnosis of Minor Neurocognitive Disorder according to DSM 5 criteria (APA, 2013)
  • Apathetic syndrome defined according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Apathy (Miller \& al., 2021)
  • Subject who can read and write French
  • Subjects who are beneficiaries of a social security plan
  • Signature of free and informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Current clinical diagnosis of a depressive episode characterized by DSM 5 criteria (APA, 2013)
  • Known diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance abuse or dependence
  • Significant sensory or motor impairment
  • Subject under guardianship, conservatorship, or conservatorship
  • Active smoking or smoking cessation of less than one year
  • Contraindications to the practice of tDCS: history of intracranial hypertension, neurosurgery, metallic implant at the cephalic level, pacemaker
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Unbalanced epilepsy
  • Severe somatic disease not stabilized
  • Previous use of tDCS (problem of maintaining the integrity of the blinding procedure)
  • Scalp skin disease
  • Concurrent participation in another drug research study or any other study that may interfere with study results

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre Memoire Ressources et Recherche, CHU de Nice

    Nice, 06000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Effects of t-DCS Combined With Concurrent Cognitive Training on Apathy in Elderly Subjects With Minor Neurocognitive Impairment

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique using a low intensity electric current to modify cortical excitability. Apathy is a pervasive neuropsychiatric symptom characterized by a reduction in goal-directed behavior and activity that persists over time and causes identifiable functional impairment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of repeated sessions of tDCS combined with simultaneous cognitive training on apathy in older people with minor neurocognitive disorders.

Read the detailed description

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique using a low intensity electric current to modify cortical excitability. There is growing interest for tDCS for psychiatric illnesses, notably for depression.

Apathy is a pervasive neuropsychiatric symptom characterized by a reduction in goal-directed behavior and activity that persists over time and causes identifiable functional impairment. tDCS could be a promising new area for non-pharmacological treatment of apathy.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of repeated sessions of tDCS combined with simultaneous cognitive training on apathy in older people with minor neurocognitive disorders. For this, 30 apathetic subjects with minor neurocognitive disorders will be included and randomized between two groups. The intervention group will follow sessions of tDCS combined with a simultaneous cognitive training on tablet. The control group will follow cognitive training with a combined sham tDCS. Intervention will last for 4-week with 3 sessions per week (12 sessions). Stimulation will be performed with Startim 20 (Neuroelectrics®) which is approved by the European Union as a Class IIa medical device and meeting European safety standards. Stimulation will last for 20 minutes and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (F3) will be targeted. For the intervention group, the electric current will be 2mA. Assessments will be done at baseline, just after the end of intervention and 3 months after intervention. Apathy, daily functional motor behaviors, cognitive functions and fatigue will be assessed with clinician assessment, self-administered questionnaires, ambulatory actigraphy and cognitive tests. The assessments and the intervention will be done by different people. Study will be a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Being tested
SHAM tDCS, tDCS
Medical subject headings
Lethargy, Neurocognitive Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SHAM tDCSOther

    The control group will follow cognitive training with a combined sham tDCS. Intervention will last for 4-week with 3 sessions per week (12 sessions).

  • tDCSOther

    The intervention group will follow sessions of tDCS combined with a simultaneous cognitive training on tablet

Study groups in NCT05232877
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tDCS combined with simultaneous cognitive trainingExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: tDCS
cognitive training with a combined sham tDCSSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: SHAM tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Apathy Inventory (Robert et al., 2002), clinician version

    The Apathy Inventory scored from 0 (No problem) to 4 (major problem) the 3 dimensions of apathy: the emotional blunting, the loss of initiative and the loss of interest. A higher total score indicates a greater severity.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms

    Clinician assess behavioral symptoms and scored the severity from 0 to 3.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  2. Assessment of the global cognitive functioning

    Mini mental state examination (MMSE): test for asses the global cognitive functioning

    Unit of measure: score

    Scored from 0 to 30. A lower score indicate lower performance in global cognitive functioning.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  3. Assessment of cognitive functions with FAB

    Frontal assessment battery (FAB): test for asses global executive functions

    Unit of measure: score

    Scored from 0 to 18. A lower score indicate lower performance in global executive functions.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  4. Assessment of episodic memory

    Grober and Bruschke test : test for asses episodic memory

    Unit of measure: score

    Scored from 0 to 48. A lower score indicate lower performance in episodic memory

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  5. Assessment of attention and mental flexibilty

    Trail Making test A_b: test for attention and mental flexibilty

    Unit of measure: time to realize the test

    A longer time indicate a lower performance in attention and mental flexibility.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  6. Assessment of working memory

    Empan de chiffres: test for asses working memory

    Unit of measure: score

    A lower score indicate a lower performance in working memory

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  7. Assessment of verbal fluency

    Fluency test: test for asses verbal fluency

    Unit of measure: number of words produced by the participant into 60 seconds

    A lower score indicate a lower performance.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  8. Assessment of language

    Test de "dénomination d'image": test for asses language

    Unit of measure: score

    A lower score indicate a lower performance.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  9. Assessment of fatigue with Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI)

    Multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI): 20-item self-report questionnaire for measuring five dimensions of fatigue.

    Each subscale contains four items, which are scored on a five-point Likert-scale.

    Scores range from 4 (absence of fatigue) to 20 (maximum fatigue) for each subscale.

    Unit of measure: score

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  10. Assessment of fatigue with 15-sec Sustained maximal handgrip contraction

    15-sec Sustained maximal handgrip contraction: The decrease in force during the 15-s was used as the indicator of fatigability.

    Measure: performance for the test: The decrease in force during the 15-s was used as the indicator of fatigability. It was computed as the difference between the area under constant curve equal to the maximal grip force and the area under the force-time curve of 15-s

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  11. Assessment of daily physical activity

    Actigraphy: assessment of time physical activity of light, moderate and vigorous intensity and sedentary time in daily life in minute and % of daily activity.

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

  12. Assessment of tDCS adverse effects questionnaire

    tDCS adverse effects questionnaire: questionnaire for asses the tDCS adverse effects.

    It is a 11-item scale. Each item corresponds to an adverse effect. Each item is scored from 1 (absence of the adverse effect) to 4 (severe). If the adverse effect is present (score>1) the clinician scored if this is related to tdCS from 0 (none) to 5 (definite).

    A higher score indicate more adverse effects.

    Unit of measure: score

    Measured: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2022
  2. Study start5 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The intervention group will follow sessions of tDCS combined with a simultaneous cognitive training on tablet. he control group will follow cognitive training with a combined sham tDCS. Intervention will last for 4-week with 3 sessions per week (12 sessions).
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05232877
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-PP-15
Acronym
FAME3
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
21 Dec 2021
Last updated
26 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tDCS in people with Apathy and Neurocognitive Disorders, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Apathy Inventory (Robert et al., 2002), clinician version (time frame: Changes from baseline severity of apathy at 4 weeks and 18 weeks are assessed (12 weeks after the end of intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in