CancerNCT05221970
Effectiveness and Suitability of the Online Mobile Application for the Mental and Physical Health of Cancer Patients
A study testing Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online, Positive Psychology - online and Autogenic Training - online in people with Cancer, run by Masaryk University at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
In this study, the researchers will examine the effects of a mental health supportive online mobile application called MOÚ MindCare to self-reported values of stress, anxiety, depression, emotion regulation, personality traits, rumination and reflection, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and severity of somatic symptoms in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online, Positive Psychology - online and Autogenic Training - online
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2022to Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women over the age of 18
- Diagnosis of some kind of cancer
- Receiving some form of cancer treatment or finished cancer treatment
Who cannot join
- Patients without a mobil device ("smart" mobile phone)
- Patients without internet access
- Patients suffering from some psychiatric disorder (Schizophrenia, Bipolar Affective Disorder, personality disorder associated with mood changes, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, suicide attempt, suicide thoughts, Somatoform Disorder or other medically unexplained symptoms which, due to their severity, prevent the person concerned from daily life
- Patients suffering during the last year from: depression with psychotic symptoms, panic anxiety, repeated hospitalization in psychiatry
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
Brno, Bohunice, 62500
Miroslav Světlák, PhD, 549 49 1372, msvetlak@med.muni.cz
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Suitability of the Online Mobile Application MOÚ MindCare for the Mental and Physical Health of Cancer Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial
In this study, the researchers will examine the effects of a mental health supportive online mobile application called MOÚ MindCare to self-reported values of stress, anxiety, depression, emotion regulation, personality traits, rumination and reflection, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and severity of somatic symptoms in a sample of patients with cancer.
Read the detailed description
Background: Promoting the mental health of cancer patients is one of the main pillars of comprehensive oncological care. Due to the insufficient capacity of psychotherapists and the mental and physical problems of cancer patients associated with treatment, classical face-to-face mental health support is not always available.
Objectives: 1. To evaluate the impact of online psychological interventions on selected parameters of mental and physical health in cancer patients. 2. To compare which type of psychological intervention is most suitable for which type of oncology patients. 3. To evaluate the moderating roles of intervention adherence and perceived acceptability in the effectiveness of the intervention programs.
Methods: The study design is RCT that includes 4 arms : 1. MBCT (Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy) 2. Positive Psychology 3. Autogenic Training 4. Waiting list. Participants will take the 8 week online program via mobile application. Outcomes will be assessed online at, 1) Baseline, 2) Post-intervention (PI), 3) 3 months post PI and 4) 9 months post PI.
Anticipated Findings: Completion of the 8-week online program will lead to the improvement of selected variables of psychological and physical health in oncology patients in comparison with the passive control group. It is expected that programs involving a cognitive component (MBCT-Ca and PP) will be more effective than AT. The investigators expect higher adherence and acceptability to be associated with greater improvement in the outcome variables.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online, Positive Psychology - online, Autogenic Training - online
- Keywords
- psychological intervention, mHealth, cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - onlineBehavioural
This intervention can be adapted into low-intensity structured program, suitable for eHealth mental health support applications for individual use without the need of direct involvement of a trained mental health professional.
Positive Psychology - onlineBehavioural
This intervention can be adapted into low-intensity structured program, suitable for eHealth mental health support applications for individual use without the need of direct involvement of a trained mental health professional.
Autogenic Training - onlineBehavioural
This intervention can be adapted into low-intensity structured program, suitable for eHealth mental health support applications for individual use without the need of direct involvement of a trained mental health professional.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online | Other | MBCT uses cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) methods in collaboration with mindfulness meditative practices and similar psychological strategies. Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online |
| Positive Psychology - online | Other | Positive psychology is focused on the character strengths and behaviors that allow individuals to build a life of meaning and purpose. Receives: Behavioral: Positive Psychology - online |
| Autogenic Training - online | Other | Autogenic training is a relaxation technique focusing on promoting feelings of calm and relaxation to help reduce stress and anxieties. Receives: Behavioral: Autogenic Training - online |
| Waiting list | No intervention | No intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in symptoms of individual stress level using the Perceived Stress Scale
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a classic stress assessment instrument. The questions in this scale ask about feelings and thoughts during the last month. Each question has five response options ranging in value from null to four (0=never; 1=almost never; 2=sometimes; 3=fairly often; 4=very often). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question (reverse code items 4, 5, 7a and 8). Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in depression, anxiety and stres using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a 21 items scale designed to measure depression, anxiety, and stress. The instrument comprises three subscales: the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each question has four response options ranging in value from null to four (0= did not apply to me at all; 1= applied to me to some degree, or some of the time; 2= applied to me a considerable degree or a good part of time; 3= applied to me very much or most of the time). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question for each of subscale (scores will need to be multiplied by 2 to calculate the final score). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 42 for each subscale. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in positive mental health using the Positive Mental Health Scale
The Positive Mental Health Scale (PMHS) is a nine-item scale designed to measure positive mental health (combination of emotional, psychological, and social aspects of well-being). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (do not agree) - 3 (agree). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 27. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in health-related quality of life using The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT)-(Sp) is composed of the FACT-General (FACT-G) and a 12-item Spiritual Well-Being scale (FACIT-Sp-12).The FACT-G (Version 4) is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into four primary QOL subscales: Physical Well-Being (PWB; 7-items), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB; 7-items), Emotional Well-Being (EWB; 6-items), and Functional Well-Being (FWB; 7-items).Each question has five response options ranging in value from null to four (0= not at all; 1= a little bit; 2=somewhat; 3= quite a bit; 4=very much). The total FACT-G score is obtained by summing individual subscale scores (PWB + EWB + SWB + FWB). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 48 in Spiritual Well-Being subscales. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 108 in FACT-G. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (19)
Change in current emotional state using the Self-Assessment Manikin
Current emotional state will be assessed three times per day using three short items (Self-Assessment Manikin) directly incorporated in the MOÚ MindCare Application. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) measures pleasure, arousal, and dominance. It is a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique.
Measured: during a whole intervention (3 times a day)
Adherence to/satisfaction with the MOÚ MindCare application and intervention programme using the MOÚ MindCare Feasibility Questionnaire
Mobile application will be monitoring completing tasks by participants. Satisfaction with the MOÚ MindCare application will be measured by the MOÚ MindCare Feasibility Questionnaire. Questions have two, three, four or five response options ranging in value from one to two, three, four or five. A few questions have open answers options. To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question (reverse code item: 4). The lowest possible raw score is 8 and the highest possible raw score is 26. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: week 9 from baseline
Change in emotion dysregulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-SF
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) is a measure used to identify emotional regulation issues. The measure covers 4 dimensions of emotional regulation: awareness and understanding of emotions; acceptance of emotions; the ability to engage in goal-directed behaviour and refrain from impulsive behaviour when experiencing negative emotions; and access to emotion regulation strategies perceived as effective. Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five (1=almost never; 2=sometimes; 3=about half of the time; 4=most of the time; 5=almost always). The lowest possible raw score is 18 and the highest possible raw score is 90. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-15
The 15-item FFMQ (FFMQ-15) measures five facets: Observing, Describing, Acting with Awareness, Non-Judging of inner experience, and Nonreactivity to inner experience. Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five (1=never or very rarely true; 2= rarely true; 3=sometimes true; 4=often true; 5=very often or always true). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question (reverse code items 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 13 and 14). The lowest possible raw score is 15 and the highest possible raw score is 75. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale
The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) measures the application of mindfulness practices in daily life among persons participating in mindfulness-based interventions. The measure covers three domains of applied mindfulness processes: decentering, positive emotional regulation, and negative emotional regulation. Each question has five response options ranging in value from null to four (0= never; 1= rarely; 2=sometimes; 3=often; 4=almost always). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 60. A score ranging from 0-20 is obtained by summing each factor individually. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Self-Compassion Scale
The Self-compassion Scale (SCS) is a psychometrically measurement of self-compassion. The instrument comprises six subscales: Self-Kindness; Self-Judgment; Common Humanity; Isolation; Mindfulness and Over-identification. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 1-5 (1=almost never, 5=almost always). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question for each of subscale (reverse code items 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24 and 25). The lowest possible raw score is 26 and the highest possible raw score is 130. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Gratitude Questionnaire Six-Item Form
The Gratitude Questionnaire-Six-Item Form (GQ-6) is a self-report questionnaire measures individual differences in the proneness to experience gratitude in daily life. Each question has seven response options ranging in value from one to seven (1= strongly disagree; 2= disagree; 3= slightly disagree; 4= neutral; 5= slightly agree; 6= agree; 7= strongly agree). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question (reverse code items 3 and 6). The lowest possible raw score is 6 and the highest possible raw score is 42. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Perceived Hope Scale
The Perceived Hope Scale (PHS) is self-report questionnaire measures individual judgment about one's experience and levels of hope. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-5 (0= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 30. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Basic personality traits using the Big Five Inventory BFI-10
The Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10) measures the Big Five personality traits: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Openness. Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five (1= disagree strongly; 2= disagree a little; 3= neither agree or disagree; 4= agree a little; 5= agree strongly). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question for each of subscale (reverse code items 1,3,4,5 and 7). The lowest possible raw score is 10 and the highest possible raw score is 50. A score ranging from 2-10 is obtained by summing each factor individually. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline
Change in rumination and reflection using the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire
The Rumination Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) measures an adaptive (self-focus) and maladaptive form (self-rumination) of self-focus or self-attention. The instrument comprises two subscales: Rumination and Reflection. Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five (1= strongly disagree; 2= disagree; 3= neutral; 4= agree; 5= strongly agree). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question for each of subscale (reverse code items 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 20 and 24). The lowest possible raw score is 24 and the highest possible raw score is 120. A score ranging from 12-60 is obtained by summing each factor individually. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in impact of event using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised
The Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) measures impact of recent and specific events, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. The instrument comprises three subscales: Intrusion; Avoidance and Hyperarousal. Each question has five response options ranging in value from null to four (0= not at all; 1= a little bit; 2= moderately; 3= quite a bit; 5= extremely). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 88. A scores ranging from: 0-32; 0-32 and 0-24 are obtained by summing each factor individually. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) measures sleep quality and disturbances. The instrument comprises seven subscales: subjective sleep quality; sleep latency; sleep duration; habitual sleep efficiency; sleep disturbances; use of sleeping medication and daytime dysfunction. Questions have four response options ranging in value from null to three and a few questions with open answers options. To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question and for each subscale separately. The sum of scores for components yields one global score. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 21. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in fatigue using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory
The Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) measures multiple aspects of fatigue, including its perceived severity, frequency, and interference with daily functioning. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-10 (0= not at all fatigued, 10= as fatigued as I could be). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 130. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in severity of somatic symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire 15
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) measures common mental disorders and is used to assess somatic symptom severity and screen for the potential somatisation and somatoform disorders. Each question has three response options ranging in value from null to two (0= not bothered at all; 1= bothered a little; 2= bothered a lot). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 30. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
The total amount of received health care using the medical documentation software (GreyFox)
Number of PET, CT and MR imaging examinations, number of acute hospitalizations, the total cost of care, and the type and amount of anticancer treatment will be measured by using hospital database program called "GreyFox".
Measured: month 9 post-intervention
Change in pain medication use
The following variables about medication will be collected: name and strength of medication; number of days in the week the medication was taken (0-7), number of taken doses per the day (0-7 and more); regularity of a medication using (options: regularly/according to need).
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in psychiatric medication use
The following variables about medication will be collected: name and strength of medication; condition the medication is used for (options= sleep disorder/anxiety/depression/other); number of days in the week the medication was taken (0-7); number of taken doses per the day (0-7 and more); regularity of a medication using (options: regularly/according to need).
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in pain intensity using the Numerical Rating Scale of Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be measured by the Numerical Rating Scale of Pain Intensity (NRS-I) consists of a range of numbers (0-10). The lowest number is null and represents "no pain". The highest number is ten and represents "an extreme level of pain". Respondents are asked to choose the number that best represents a level of pain intensity.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in dealing with pain using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a 10-item scale designed to measure the confidence of people with ongoing pain to achieve different activities despite pain. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (not at all confident) to 6 (completely confident). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 60. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Measured: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2022
- Study start6 Jun 2022
- Primary completionOct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Masaryk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Miroslav Světlák, Masaryk University
- Investigators
- Miroslav Světlák, PhD, Study chair, Masaryk University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05221970
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022NALET
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Suitability of the Online Mobile Application MOÚ MindCare for the Mental and Physical Health of Cancer Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05221970
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022NALET
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- psychological intervention, mHealth, cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Masaryk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, the researchers will examine the effects of a mental health supportive online mobile application called MOÚ MindCare to self-reported values of stress, anxiety, depression, emotion regulation, personality traits, rumination and reflection, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and severity of somatic symptoms in a sample of patients with cancer.
Detailed description
Background: Promoting the mental health of cancer patients is one of the main pillars of comprehensive oncological care. Due to the insufficient capacity of psychotherapists and the mental and physical problems of cancer patients associated with treatment, classical face-to-face mental health support is not always available.
Objectives: 1. To evaluate the impact of online psychological interventions on selected parameters of mental and physical health in cancer patients. 2. To compare which type of psychological intervention is most suitable for which type of oncology patients. 3. To evaluate the moderating roles of intervention adherence and perceived acceptability in the effectiveness of the intervention programs.
Methods: The study design is RCT that includes 4 arms : 1. MBCT (Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy) 2. Positive Psychology 3. Autogenic Training 4. Waiting list. Participants will take the 8 week online program via mobile application. Outcomes will be assessed online at, 1) Baseline, 2) Post-intervention (PI), 3) 3 months post PI and 4) 9 months post PI.
Anticipated Findings: Completion of the 8-week online program will lead to the improvement of selected variables of psychological and physical health in oncology patients in comparison with the passive control group. It is expected that programs involving a cognitive component (MBCT-Ca and PP) will be more effective than AT. The investigators expect higher adherence and acceptability to be associated with greater improvement in the outcome variables.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online | Other | Behavioral: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - onlineMBCT uses cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) methods in collaboration with mindfulness meditative practices and similar psychological strategies. |
| Positive Psychology - online | Other | Behavioral: Positive Psychology - onlinePositive psychology is focused on the character strengths and behaviors that allow individuals to build a life of meaning and purpose. |
| Autogenic Training - online | Other | Behavioral: Autogenic Training - onlineAutogenic training is a relaxation technique focusing on promoting feelings of calm and relaxation to help reduce stress and anxieties. |
| Waiting list | No intervention | –No intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Men and women over the age of 18
- Diagnosis of some kind of cancer
- Receiving some form of cancer treatment or finished cancer treatment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients without a mobil device ("smart" mobile phone)
- Patients without internet access
- Patients suffering from some psychiatric disorder (Schizophrenia, Bipolar Affective Disorder, personality disorder associated with mood changes, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, suicide attempt, suicide thoughts, Somatoform Disorder or other medically unexplained symptoms which, due to their severity, prevent the person concerned from daily life
- Patients suffering during the last year from: depression with psychotic symptoms, panic anxiety, repeated hospitalization in psychiatry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - onlineThis intervention can be adapted into low-intensity structured program, suitable for eHealth mental health support applications for individual use without the need of direct involvement of a trained mental health professional. | Behavioural | Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online |
| Positive Psychology - onlineThis intervention can be adapted into low-intensity structured program, suitable for eHealth mental health support applications for individual use without the need of direct involvement of a trained mental health professional. | Behavioural | Positive Psychology - online |
| Autogenic Training - onlineThis intervention can be adapted into low-intensity structured program, suitable for eHealth mental health support applications for individual use without the need of direct involvement of a trained mental health professional. | Behavioural | Autogenic Training - online |
Primary outcome
Change in symptoms of individual stress level using the Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a classic stress assessment instrument. The questions in this scale ask about feelings and thoughts during the last month. Each question has five response options ranging in value from null to four (0=never; 1=almost never; 2=sometimes; 3=fairly often; 4=very often). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question (reverse code items 4, 5, 7a and 8). Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Change in depression, anxiety and stres using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) is a 21 items scale designed to measure depression, anxiety, and stress. The instrument comprises three subscales: the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each question has four response options ranging in value from null to four (0= did not apply to me at all; 1= applied to me to some degree, or some of the time; 2= applied to me a considerable degree or a good part of time; 3= applied to me very much or most of the time). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question for each of subscale (scores will need to be multiplied by 2 to calculate the final score). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 42 for each subscale. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Change in positive mental health using the Positive Mental Health Scale
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
The Positive Mental Health Scale (PMHS) is a nine-item scale designed to measure positive mental health (combination of emotional, psychological, and social aspects of well-being). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 (do not agree) - 3 (agree). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 27. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Change in health-related quality of life using The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT)-(Sp) is composed of the FACT-General (FACT-G) and a 12-item Spiritual Well-Being scale (FACIT-Sp-12).The FACT-G (Version 4) is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into four primary QOL subscales: Physical Well-Being (PWB; 7-items), Social/Family Well-Being (SWB; 7-items), Emotional Well-Being (EWB; 6-items), and Functional Well-Being (FWB; 7-items).Each question has five response options ranging in value from null to four (0= not at all; 1= a little bit; 2=somewhat; 3= quite a bit; 4=very much). The total FACT-G score is obtained by summing individual subscale scores (PWB + EWB + SWB + FWB). The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 48 in Spiritual Well-Being subscales. The lowest possible raw score is 0 and the highest possible raw score is 108 in FACT-G. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
19 secondary outcomes
Change in current emotional state using the Self-Assessment Manikin
Time frame: during a whole intervention (3 times a day)
Adherence to/satisfaction with the MOÚ MindCare application and intervention programme using the MOÚ MindCare Feasibility Questionnaire
Time frame: week 9 from baseline
Change in emotion dysregulation using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-SF
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-15
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Self-Compassion Scale
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Gratitude Questionnaire Six-Item Form
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in transdiagnostic and transtheoretical indicators of positive and adaptive functioning using the Perceived Hope Scale
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Basic personality traits using the Big Five Inventory BFI-10
Time frame: baseline
Change in rumination and reflection using the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in impact of event using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in fatigue using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Changes in severity of somatic symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire 15
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
The total amount of received health care using the medical documentation software (GreyFox)
Time frame: month 9 post-intervention
Change in pain medication use
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in psychiatric medication use
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in pain intensity using the Numerical Rating Scale of Pain Intensity
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Change in dealing with pain using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Miroslav Světlák, PhD study chair
Masaryk University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT-Ca) - online, Positive Psychology - online and Autogenic Training - online in people with Cancer, run by Masaryk University at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Miroslav Světlák, PhD (+420 549 49 1372, msvetlak@med.muni.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in symptoms of individual stress level using the Perceived Stress Scale (time frame: baseline, week 9 from baseline, month 3 post-intervention, month 9 post-intervention). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.