Bloodstream InfectionPhase 4SHORTEN2NCT05210439
Efficacy and Safety of 7 Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Treatment for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Bacteraemia
A Phase 4 study testing Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen and Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen in people with Bloodstream Infection, run by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla at 37 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Phase IV, open-labeled, randomized and multicenter clinical trial to demonstrate the superiority of antibiotics with authorized indication for 7 days versus 14 days in the treatment of bloodstream infections produced by P. aeruginosa (BSI-PA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bloodstream Infection
- What is being tested?
- Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen and Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 306 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2022to Jun 2026
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main inclusion criteria:
- Adult patients with diagnosis of BSI-PA who have received 6 days (+/- 1) of active antibiotic treatment from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture and until the moment of randomization.
- Informed consent signed.
Main exclusion criteria:
- Bacteremia source not adequately controlled at least 72h before randomization.
- Bacteremia secondary to an infection that necessarily requires prolonged antibiotic treatment more than 7 days
- Coexistence of a different infection at the time of diagnosis of bacteremia that also requires antibiotic treatment.
- Bacteremic pneumonia in severely immunosuppressed patients
- Bacteremia of any origin in patients with severe neutropenia (<500 cells / mm3) at the time of randomization.
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 1 country.
37 sites in 1 country
Spain37 sites
Hospital Universitario de A Coruña
A Coruña, 15006
Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis
Alicante, 03010
Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas
Almería, 04009
Hospital Universitario de Cruces
Barakaldo, Bizkaia, 48903
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos, 09006
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
Cadiz, 11009
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía
Córdoba, 14004
Hospital Universitario de Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, 20014
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
Granada, 18014
Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio
Granada, 18016
Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez
Huelva, 21005
Complejo Hospitalario Ciudad de Jaén
Jaén, 23007
Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera
Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, 11407
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital San Pedro
Logroño, La Rioja, 26006
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
Lugo, 27003
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Costa del Sol
Marbella, Málaga, 29603
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33011
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07120
Clínica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real
Puerto Real, Cádiz, 11510
Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, 39008
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, 41013
Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme
Seville, 41014
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46014
Hospital Universitario La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, 47003
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
Vigo, Pontevedra, 36213
Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of 7 Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Treatment for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Bacteremia: a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial (SHORTEN-2) With a DOOR / RADAR Analysis
Phase IV, open-labeled, randomized and multicenter clinical trial to demonstrate the superiority of antibiotics with authorized indication for 7 days versus 14 days in the treatment of bloodstream infections produced by P. aeruginosa (BSI-PA).
Read the detailed description
The project is designed to determine the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, by comparing an adequate antibiotic treatment regimen of 7 days (experimental arm) with another of 14 days (control arm). The evaluation of infection recurrences, mortality, number of free days of antibiotic treatment, adverse events and superinfections are included as secondary objectives.
Active antibiotic treatment will be considered any treatment with proven in vitro activity against the strain responsible for the patient's bacteremia, regardless of the administered dose.
Clinical rules are included in order to stop antibiotic treatment or continuation and re-evaluation in each arm of treatment.
This is a pragmatic study as the number or visits performed for the study are similar to the normal clinical follow-up for this patients. Final contact and final visit for the study will be performed at 90 days after the first positive blood culture.
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infection
- Being tested
- Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen, Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen
- Keywords
- Bacteremia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bloodstream infection, DOOR / RADAR Analysis, Antimicrobial stewardship
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Bacteremia, Pseudomonas Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimenDrug
Also called Any active antibiotic with treatment with proven in vitro activity from a pre-stablished list of antibiotics included
7 days of any active antibiotic treatment for BSI-PA
Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimenDrug
Also called Any active antibiotic with treatment with proven in vitro activity a pre-stablished list of antibiotics included
14 days of any active antibiotic treatment for BSI-PA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen | Experimental | 7 days of any active antibiotic treatment from the date of the last positive blood culture Receives: Drug: Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen |
| Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen | Active comparator | 14 days of any active antibiotic treatment from the date of the last positive blood culture Receives: Drug: Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Probability of achieving better DOOR/RADAR score for patients in the experimental group than in the control group
Probability of any given patient in the experimental arm to achieve better results than a patient in the control group assessed through their score in the DOOR/RADAR ( Desirability of Outcome Ranking/Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk) analysis.
This analysis categorizes patients in two steps:
- A first ordinal clinical outcome ranking (DOOR), defined by the following mutually excluding categories:
- Healing without incidences.
- Healing with a proven or probable recurrence.
- Healing with a serious adverse event.
- No clinical cure.
- Death.
- A second classification in which patients from the same clinical outcome category are ranked according to the number of days of antibiotic treatment (RADAR).
Patients with a lower DOOR/RADAR score will be those with best outcomes in terms of clinical effectiveness as well as reduced exposure to antibiotic treatment.
Measured: 30 days after treatment withdrawal
Secondary outcomes (8)
Non-inferiority secondary endpoint; Treatment failure
Defined as mortality from any cause or proven/probable recurrence
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption
Recurrence of infection
Proven, probable or possible recurrence rate
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Mortality from any cause
Number of patients who died from any cause from the date of inclusion to the final follow-up period
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Describe the superinfections
Superinfection rate
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Safety of antibiotic treatment
Gathering any related adverse event from the informed consent form signature up to 90 days
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture and weighted by 1,000 days of follow-up.
Efficiency of the short-treatment arm
Number of days of treatment and days of hospital stay avoided at the end of the follow-up period
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Confirmation of origin of recurrences
Checking if the recurrences are due to the same strain, comparing the P. aeruginosa strains by genetic sequencing
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Comparison of ecological impact of short and long treatment regimens
Diversity of the gut microbiota analysis
Measured: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2022
- Study start28 Apr 2022
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025
- Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bloodstream InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment Randomized 1:1 to experimental group (short-treatment arm):control group (long-treatment arm)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReN, Centers for International Business Education and Research
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- José Miguel Cisneros Herreros, MD-PhD, Principal investigator, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05210439
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHORTEN II
- Other IDs
- 2021-003847-10
- Acronym
- SHORTEN2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Final database containing only anonymous data from participant subjects will be shared with direct investigators in a timeframe of 6 months after the complete depuration
Publications
Molina J, Rosso-Fernandez CM, Montero-Mateos E, Pano-Pardo JR, Solla M, Guisado-Gil AB, Alvarez-Marin R, Pachon-Ibanez ME, Gimeno A, Martin-Gutierrez G, Lepe JA, Cisneros JM; SHORTEN-2 trial team. Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial to assess 7 versus 14-days of treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (SHORTEN-2 trial). PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0277333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277333. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36548225
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of 7 Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Treatment for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Bacteremia: a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial (SHORTEN-2) With a DOOR / RADAR Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05210439
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHORTEN2 / SHORTEN II
- Conditions
- Bloodstream Infection
- Keywords
- Bacteremia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bloodstream infection, DOOR / RADAR Analysis, Antimicrobial stewardship
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en SevillaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReN, Centers for International Business Education and Research
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Phase IV, open-labeled, randomized and multicenter clinical trial to demonstrate the superiority of antibiotics with authorized indication for 7 days versus 14 days in the treatment of bloodstream infections produced by P. aeruginosa (BSI-PA).
Detailed description
The project is designed to determine the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia, by comparing an adequate antibiotic treatment regimen of 7 days (experimental arm) with another of 14 days (control arm). The evaluation of infection recurrences, mortality, number of free days of antibiotic treatment, adverse events and superinfections are included as secondary objectives.
Active antibiotic treatment will be considered any treatment with proven in vitro activity against the strain responsible for the patient's bacteremia, regardless of the administered dose.
Clinical rules are included in order to stop antibiotic treatment or continuation and re-evaluation in each arm of treatment.
This is a pragmatic study as the number or visits performed for the study are similar to the normal clinical follow-up for this patients. Final contact and final visit for the study will be performed at 90 days after the first positive blood culture.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment Randomized 1:1 to experimental group (short-treatment arm):control group (long-treatment arm)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen | Experimental | Drug: Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen7 days of any active antibiotic treatment from the date of the last positive blood culture |
| Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen | Active comparator | Drug: Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen14 days of any active antibiotic treatment from the date of the last positive blood culture |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimenAlso: Any active antibiotic with treatment with proven in vitro activity from a pre-stablished list of antibiotics included7 days of any active antibiotic treatment for BSI-PA | Drug | Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen |
| Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimenAlso: Any active antibiotic with treatment with proven in vitro activity a pre-stablished list of antibiotics included14 days of any active antibiotic treatment for BSI-PA | Drug | Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen |
Primary outcome
Probability of achieving better DOOR/RADAR score for patients in the experimental group than in the control group
Time frame: 30 days after treatment withdrawal
Probability of any given patient in the experimental arm to achieve better results than a patient in the control group assessed through their score in the DOOR/RADAR ( Desirability of Outcome Ranking/Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk) analysis. This analysis categorizes patients in two steps: 1. A first ordinal clinical outcome ranking (DOOR), defined by the following mutually excluding categories: 1. Healing without incidences. 2. Healing with a proven or probable recurrence. 3. Healing with a serious adverse event. 4. No clinical cure. 5. Death. 2. A second classification in which patients from the same clinical outcome category are ranked according to the number of days of antibiotic treatment (RADAR). Patients with a lower DOOR/RADAR score will be those with best outcomes in terms of clinical effectiveness as well as reduced exposure to antibiotic treatment.
8 secondary outcomes
Non-inferiority secondary endpoint; Treatment failure
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption
Recurrence of infection
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Mortality from any cause
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Describe the superinfections
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Safety of antibiotic treatment
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture and weighted by 1,000 days of follow-up.
Efficiency of the short-treatment arm
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Confirmation of origin of recurrences
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Comparison of ecological impact of short and long treatment regimens
Time frame: Day +30 from trial treatment interruption and day +90 from the date of extraction of the first positive blood culture.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36548225Molina J, Rosso-Fernandez CM, Montero-Mateos E, Pano-Pardo JR, Solla M, Guisado-Gil AB, Alvarez-Marin R, Pachon-Ibanez ME, Gimeno A, Martin-Gutierrez G, Lepe JA, Cisneros JM; SHORTEN-2 trial team. Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial to assess 7 versus 14-days of treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (SHORTEN-2 trial). PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0277333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277333. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Final database containing only anonymous data from participant subjects will be shared with direct investigators in a timeframe of 6 months after the complete depuration
Related trials for Bloodstream Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
José Miguel Cisneros Herreros, MD-PhD principal investigator
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
37 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Short-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen and Long-treatment of any active antibiotic regimen in people with Bloodstream Infection, run by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla at 37 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Probability of achieving better DOOR/RADAR score for patients in the experimental group than in the control group (time frame: 30 days after treatment withdrawal). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05210439, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2026.