Traumatic Brain InjuryTRACK-BIONCT05201833
TRACK-TBI Longitudinal Biomarker Study
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury, run by University of Pennsylvania at 11 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The overarching goal of this study is to improve understanding of the long-range natural history of TBI by extending follow-up of a previously enrolled cohort (TRACK-TBI) beyond the first 12 months after injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Telephone Outcome Assessment, In-Person Outcome Assessment and 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2022to 28 Feb 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants enrolled in TRACK-TBI
Who may be able to join
- LONGITUDINAL Telephone Assessment:
- Participated in TRACK-TBI,
- At least two years post injury, and
- Completed at least 1 GOSE during the TRACK-TBI follow-up assessments
- LONGITUDINAL BIOMARKER In-Person Assessment:
- Must complete at least one Longitudinal Telephone Assessment and fall into one of the following groups:
Show all 10Show fewer
- Group 1- Completed TRACK-TBI 6M MRI and are stable or improved with regard to Criteria for Establishing Decline
- Group 2- Criteria for Establishing Decline met when comparing the Telephone Assessments to the last completed TRACK-TBI assessment
- Group 3- All TRACK-TBI orthopedic controls
- Ability of participant or legally authorized representative to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Dementia diagnosed prior to the index TBI
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
United States11 sites
University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas, 78712
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Pennsylvania/Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94110
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104
About this study
Official title: Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI)- a Longitudinal Biomarker Study
The overarching goal of this study is to improve understanding of the long-range natural history of TBI by extending follow-up of a previously enrolled cohort (TRACK-TBI) beyond the first 12 months after injury.
Read the detailed description
This longitudinal observational study is part of the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) initiative, a multi-institutional project designed to characterize the acute and longer-term clinical, neuroimaging, and blood biomarker features of TBI. TRACK-TBI enrolled TBI patients at 18 Level 1 Trauma Centers in the US, across the age and injury spectrum. This study will extend the follow-up period for TRACK-TBI participants. The extensive clinical, imaging, and biomarker data that has already been collected in these TRACK-TBI participants, in combination with the extended longitudinal data, will allow for the identification of risk factors, co-morbidities, and prognostic biomarkers of TBI. Consequently, the extension of study follow-up will help to determine negative neurological and psychological outcomes of individuals who experienced a TBI compared to healthy and orthopedic controls.
TBI is a complex disease process, in which diverse injury subtypes and multiple molecular mechanisms overlap. There is a need to identify and measure these subtypes, in order to develop precision medicine approaches where specific pathobiological processes are targeted by mechanistically appropriate therapies. The absence of validated biomarkers in the neurotrauma field is a barrier to drug development in this area, and there are currently no disease-modifying therapies that limit the burden of TBI. Biomarkers specific for injury mechanisms should be identified to select participants for clinical trials of targeted therapies (prognostic biomarkers), as well as to confirm target engagement and biological efficacy (pharmacodynamic biomarkers).
Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is a common pathologic consequence of TBI, and underlies some of the most disabling consequences of injury, including cognitive and affective problems. TAI progresses for years after injury in a subset of patients, and is a key mechanism for long-term neurodegeneration after TBI. Recent breakthroughs in pre-clinical models indicate that novel therapeutic interventions, including strategies such as targeting the mitochondrial transition pore, or promoting axonal maintenance factors are effective in promoting resilience of injured axons and improving neurologic outcome after experimental TBI. Translation of such promising therapies into clinical trials will require prognostic biomarkers that can measure TAI in individual patients, so they can be selected for early phase studies of axon-protective therapies, as well pharmacodynamic biomarkers than can measure the biologic efficacy of such treatments. Currently, the best biomarker for TAI is fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of white matter tracts, measured using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI. This technique, while robust, is poorly suited for dynamic longitudinal assessments, and measures the end-result of axonal degeneration, rather than an early step in the neurodegenerative process. Recently, the ability to assay axonal proteins in peripheral blood has made it potentially feasible to assess of TAI rapidly, inexpensively, and longitudinally. The axonal protein that holds the most promise as a biomarker of axonal degeneration is neurofilament light chain (NF-L). This project aims to address the gaps in the existing literature regarding specific biomarkers for injury mechanisms and outcomes following TBI. Furthermore, it is likely that a sophisticated understanding of the subtypes and molecular mechanisms of TBI will be required to successfully develop therapies to treat these subtypes.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Telephone Outcome Assessment, In-Person Outcome Assessment, 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Blood Draw
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telephone Outcome AssessmentBehavioural
Assessments will be administered over the telephone to evaluate participant outcome status
In-Person Outcome AssessmentBehavioural
Assessments will be administered to evaluate participant outcome status
3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Procedure or surgery
Participants will be asked to complete a 3T MRI
Blood DrawProcedure or surgery
Blood Draw for Plasma, DNA, Serum, RNA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone Assessment Battery | TRACK-TBI participants may complete up to three annual telephone calls to assess outcome status. These assessments will determine eligibility for the in-person study visit. Receives: Behavioral: Telephone Outcome Assessment | |
| Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB) | Participants who demonstrate decision-making capacity will be asked to complete the Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB). The CAB in-person is comprised of measures of cognition (i.e. attention, memory, information processing speed, executive functions), mood (i.e., depression, anxiety), social participation, subjective well-being, post-traumatic stress, interviews, global functional status measures, and a COVID-19 questionnaire. Receives: Behavioral: Telephone Outcome Assessment; Behavioral: In-Person Outcome Assessment; Procedure: 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Procedure: Blood Draw | |
| Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB) | Participants who do not have decision-making capacity will be asked to complete a modified assessment battery, called the Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB). The AAB in-person assessment will administer the Speech Intelligibility, GOAT, and CAP and/or CRS-R to study participants. Receives: Behavioral: Telephone Outcome Assessment; Behavioral: In-Person Outcome Assessment; Procedure: 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Procedure: Blood Draw |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)
The GOSE provides an overall measure of functional status based on information on cognition, independence, employability, and social/community participation collected via structured interview. Individuals are described by one of the eight outcome categories: Dead (1); Vegetative State (2); Lower Severe Disability (3); Upper Severe Disability (4); Lower Moderate Disability (5); Upper Moderate Disability (6); Lower Good Recovery (7) and Upper Good Recovery (8). Good Recovery is defined as a score of 7-8, Moderate Disability is defined by a score of 5-6 and Severe Disability is defined by a score of 3-4.
Measured: ~4-6 years post-injury
Secondary outcomes (1)
Serum NF-L (neurofilament light chain)
Using advanced blood-based assay platforms, levels of blood biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NF-L) will be measured to validate the utility as a biomarkers for traumatic axonal injury (TAI).
Measured: ~4-6 years post-injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2022
- Primary completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Football League, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05201833
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 834982
- Other IDs
- U01NS114140
- Acronym
- TRACK-BIO
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI)- a Longitudinal Biomarker Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05201833
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRACK-BIO / 834982
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Football League, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overarching goal of this study is to improve understanding of the long-range natural history of TBI by extending follow-up of a previously enrolled cohort (TRACK-TBI) beyond the first 12 months after injury.
Detailed description
This longitudinal observational study is part of the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) initiative, a multi-institutional project designed to characterize the acute and longer-term clinical, neuroimaging, and blood biomarker features of TBI. TRACK-TBI enrolled TBI patients at 18 Level 1 Trauma Centers in the US, across the age and injury spectrum. This study will extend the follow-up period for TRACK-TBI participants. The extensive clinical, imaging, and biomarker data that has already been collected in these TRACK-TBI participants, in combination with the extended longitudinal data, will allow for the identification of risk factors, co-morbidities, and prognostic biomarkers of TBI. Consequently, the extension of study follow-up will help to determine negative neurological and psychological outcomes of individuals who experienced a TBI compared to healthy and orthopedic controls.
TBI is a complex disease process, in which diverse injury subtypes and multiple molecular mechanisms overlap. There is a need to identify and measure these subtypes, in order to develop precision medicine approaches where specific pathobiological processes are targeted by mechanistically appropriate therapies. The absence of validated biomarkers in the neurotrauma field is a barrier to drug development in this area, and there are currently no disease-modifying therapies that limit the burden of TBI. Biomarkers specific for injury mechanisms should be identified to select participants for clinical trials of targeted therapies (prognostic biomarkers), as well as to confirm target engagement and biological efficacy (pharmacodynamic biomarkers).
Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is a common pathologic consequence of TBI, and underlies some of the most disabling consequences of injury, including cognitive and affective problems. TAI progresses for years after injury in a subset of patients, and is a key mechanism for long-term neurodegeneration after TBI. Recent breakthroughs in pre-clinical models indicate that novel therapeutic interventions, including strategies such as targeting the mitochondrial transition pore, or promoting axonal maintenance factors are effective in promoting resilience of injured axons and improving neurologic outcome after experimental TBI. Translation of such promising therapies into clinical trials will require prognostic biomarkers that can measure TAI in individual patients, so they can be selected for early phase studies of axon-protective therapies, as well pharmacodynamic biomarkers than can measure the biologic efficacy of such treatments. Currently, the best biomarker for TAI is fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of white matter tracts, measured using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) MRI. This technique, while robust, is poorly suited for dynamic longitudinal assessments, and measures the end-result of axonal degeneration, rather than an early step in the neurodegenerative process. Recently, the ability to assay axonal proteins in peripheral blood has made it potentially feasible to assess of TAI rapidly, inexpensively, and longitudinally. The axonal protein that holds the most promise as a biomarker of axonal degeneration is neurofilament light chain (NF-L). This project aims to address the gaps in the existing literature regarding specific biomarkers for injury mechanisms and outcomes following TBI. Furthermore, it is likely that a sophisticated understanding of the subtypes and molecular mechanisms of TBI will be required to successfully develop therapies to treat these subtypes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone Assessment Battery | – | Behavioral: Telephone Outcome AssessmentTRACK-TBI participants may complete up to three annual telephone calls to assess outcome status. These assessments will determine eligibility for the in-person study visit. |
| Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB) | – | Behavioral: Telephone Outcome Assessment, Behavioral: In-Person Outcome Assessment, Procedure: 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Procedure: Blood DrawParticipants who demonstrate decision-making capacity will be asked to complete the Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB). The CAB in-person is comprised of measures of cognition (i.e. attention, memory, information processing speed, executive functions), mood (i.e., depression, anxiety), social participation, subjective well-being, post-traumatic stress, interviews, global functional status measures, and a COVID-19 questionnaire. |
| Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB) | – | Behavioral: Telephone Outcome Assessment, Behavioral: In-Person Outcome Assessment, Procedure: 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Procedure: Blood DrawParticipants who do not have decision-making capacity will be asked to complete a modified assessment battery, called the Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB). The AAB in-person assessment will administer the Speech Intelligibility, GOAT, and CAP and/or CRS-R to study participants. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants enrolled in TRACK-TBI
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- LONGITUDINAL Telephone Assessment:
- Participated in TRACK-TBI,
- At least two years post injury, and
- Completed at least 1 GOSE during the TRACK-TBI follow-up assessments
- LONGITUDINAL BIOMARKER In-Person Assessment:
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Dementia diagnosed prior to the index TBI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone Outcome AssessmentAssessments will be administered over the telephone to evaluate participant outcome status | Behavioural | Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB), Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB), Telephone Assessment Battery |
| In-Person Outcome AssessmentAssessments will be administered to evaluate participant outcome status | Behavioural | Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB), Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB) |
| 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Participants will be asked to complete a 3T MRI | Procedure or surgery | Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB), Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB) |
| Blood DrawBlood Draw for Plasma, DNA, Serum, RNA | Procedure or surgery | Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB), Comprehensive Assessment Battery (CAB) |
Primary outcome
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)
Time frame: ~4-6 years post-injury
The GOSE provides an overall measure of functional status based on information on cognition, independence, employability, and social/community participation collected via structured interview. Individuals are described by one of the eight outcome categories: Dead (1); Vegetative State (2); Lower Severe Disability (3); Upper Severe Disability (4); Lower Moderate Disability (5); Upper Moderate Disability (6); Lower Good Recovery (7) and Upper Good Recovery (8). Good Recovery is defined as a score of 7-8, Moderate Disability is defined by a score of 5-6 and Severe Disability is defined by a score of 3-4.
1 secondary outcome
Serum NF-L (neurofilament light chain)
Time frame: ~4-6 years post-injury
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Blood NfL and Functional Outcomes After Moderate-to-Severe TBI
Traumatic Brain Injury
Enrolling by invitation
Fareon Open Label Device Clinical Trial
Cognitive Dysfunction, Acquired Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Study On Histoacryl Used For Embolization Of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) In Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH)
Subdural Hematoma, Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Supplementary Neuromuscular Rehabilitation During Acute Concussion Recovery
Concussion (Diagnosis), Gait Abnormality
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Propranolol in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Triple-Blind Study
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Traumatic Brain Injury, run by University of Pennsylvania at 11 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) (time frame: ~4-6 years post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.