AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscular DystrophiesExo-KGO1NCT05199246

Assessment of Safety and Acute Effects of a Lower-limb Powered Dermoskeleton in Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders

A study testing Lower-limb powered dermoskeleton in people with Muscular Dystrophies and Congenital Myopathy, run by Institut de Myologie, France at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of the current study are as follow: i) Evaluate the safety, usability, and acute efficiency of a programmable ambulation exoskeleton (KeeogoTM Dermoskeleton System, B-Temia Inc., Quebec, Canada) in patients with neuromuscular disorders, ii) Elaborate recommendations regarding usability criteria for safe and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Lower-limb powered dermoskeleton
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 22 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years and < 70 years of age
  • Height between 1.50 m and 1.95 m
  • Weight between 45 kg and 110 kg
  • Abdominal perimeter < 125 cm
  • Written informed consent
  • Affiliate or beneficiary of a social security scheme
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Able to comply with all protocol requirements
  • Confirmed diagnosis of a pathology belonging to one of the following family*:
  • Primary disorders of muscles
  • Muscular dystrophy
  • Congenital myopathies
  • Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy
  • Mitochondrial myopathies
  • Metabolic disorders
  • Inborn errors of metabolism
  • Glycogen storage disease
  • Functional capacities:
  • Able to stand up from a chair with armrest without other supports at least 3 times and at most 15 times in 30 seconds.
  • Report the ability to walk without the assistance of a person at least 2min
  • The use of traditional orthoses and walking aids will be accepted excepted knee orthoses and walkers (e.g. canes/crutches, ankle foot orthosis).

Who cannot join

  • Unable to participate in the study
  • Inability to comply with protocol requirements
  • Guardianship/trusteeship
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Unstable Cardiomyopathy
  • Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Medical history of osteoporotic fracture
  • Balance disorder with extra neuromuscular causes
  • Recent trauma (fall, accident, ...)
  • Unstable Cardiomyopathy
  • Severe respiratory insufficiency

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Institute of Myology

    Paris, 75013

Other trials in France

About this study

The aims of the current study are as follow:

  1. Evaluate the safety, usability, and acute efficiency of a programmable ambulation exoskeleton (KeeogoTM Dermoskeleton System, B-Temia Inc., Quebec, Canada) in patients with neuromuscular disorders, ii) Elaborate recommendations regarding usability criteria for safe and efficient use the device in patients with neuromuscular disorders (e.g. type and severity of patient's functional deficits), iii) generate necessary data to foresee a future study involving a home use of the device and assessment of long-term benefits.
Read the detailed description

Patients with neuromuscular disorders display different type of symptoms depending on the type of pathology. Diseases like facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD), limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD2b), sporadic inclusion body myositis (SIBM) or Pompe disease (PD) are characterized by severe muscle weakness leading to reduced functional capacities. This leads to a dramatic decrease of quality of life (e.g. reduced autonomy/participation, social isolation, depression) associated with increased fall risk and complications (e.g. trauma, cardio-vascular issues, trauma, chronic pain, loss of bone mass, and weight gain).

However, a residual of level of strength and residual function may be maintained over years, even at severe disease stages allowing transfers and ambulation. However, the maintenance of this type of activity is often associated with substantial compensatory movements, leading to high load on joints, orthopedic complications, and high fall-risk.

In contrast to traditional passive assistive devices such as orthoses, powered assistive devices, frequently termed dermo- or exoskeletons, have a very high potential for compensating muscle weakness and regain mobility and independence. Devices such as the ReWalk® or the Indego® use rigid structures, in parallel to the user's legs, and electric motors to stabilize the human against gravity during standing and walking. Thus far, these systems have been used mostly in clinical environments for gait rehabilitation in neurological conditions (e.g. spinal cord injury, post-stroke syndrome). Their weight, which can range from 13 to 48 kg, can make them difficult to use and transport, thus limiting their applicability beyond clinical environments. However, for assistive devices to be used in everyday life, they must provide assistance across activities of daily living (ADLs) in an unobtrusive manner.

Wearable motion assistance systems, especially those dedicated to lower limbs are highly promising for ambulant patients with neuromuscular disorders (e.g. FSHD, LGMD, SIBM or PD). In these conditions, the prevalence of lower-limb muscle weakness, especially in proximal muscle groups (i.e. providing strength/torque to knees) is very high. In 2014, Bouyer et al. introduced a powered knee exoskeleton, a wearable device designed to increase movement capacity during different task (6MWT, TUG, Stair Test…). This dermoskeleton has been created to enhance and augment mobility through biomechanical assistance using motorized orthopedic supports controlled by computers. This device is mainly based on the interaction of three components: 1) a network to sense the biomechanical characteristics of a specific user; 2) software for movement recognition to characterize gait phases and movement status; and 3) software to control the dermoskeleton joint mechanism to optimize biomechanical assistance. McLeod et al. demonstrated that the KeeogoTM increased performance on the 30STS, SCT and improved motor control, postural control and movement kinetics during the STS task in a chronic stroke survivor with significant hemiparesis. Recently, McGibbon et al. proved that the KeeogoTM is able to deliver an exercise-mediated benefit to individuals with MS that improved their unassisted gait endurance and stair climbing ability. However, the effect of the device on movement parameters and user perception must be specifically investigated, especially considering neuromuscular patients' specificities. We believe that ambulant patients with such disorders may highly benefit from a system that provides mobility assistance like the KeeogoTM. The use of such a device has the potential to shift the loss of ambulation and/or transfer abilities to an higher age and might mitigate disease progression as well as the occurrence of complications. Whether the KeeogoTM may be safe, usable, and efficient in ambulant patients with neuromuscular disorders, remain to be specifically investigated.

Being tested
Lower-limb powered dermoskeleton
Keywords
Neuromuscular disorders, Myopathy, Muscle, Exoskeleton, Device, Motion assistance, FSHD, LGMD
Medical subject headings
Muscular Dystrophies, Myotonia Congenita, Myositis, Mitochondrial Myopathies, Glycogen Storage Disease, Neuromuscular Diseases, Muscular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lower-limb powered dermoskeletonDevice

    Patients and healthy subjects will wear the movement assistance device to perform different standardised physical evaluations.

Study groups in NCT05199246
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lower-limb powered dermoskeletonExperimentalPatients and healthy subjects will use a lower-limb powered dermoskeleton to perform different standardised tasks
Receives: Device: Lower-limb powered dermoskeleton
No assistance deviceNo interventionPatients and healthy subjects will perform different standardised tasks without lower-limb powered dermoskeleton

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absence of adverse effect attributable to the use of the device during task performed within a lower-limb powered dermoskeleton

    Measured: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Variation in the 2 Minutes Walking Test distance (express in meters) when performed using versus not using the device

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  2. Variation in the 10 Meters Walking Test performance (express in seconds) when performed using versus not using the device

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  3. Difference of performance with and without the device during 30 Sit To Stand

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  4. Difference of performance with and without the device during simple Sit To Stand

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  5. Difference of performance with and without the device during the squating test

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  6. Difference of performance with and without the device during Time Up & Go test

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  7. Difference of performance with and without the device during stairs climbing test

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  8. Variation in spatiotemporal gait parameters during the 2 Minutes Walking Test with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system

    Spatiotemporal gait parameters: Cadence, Gait Speed, Step Duration, Stride Length, Cadence Asymmetry, Gait Speed Asymmetry, Stance Asymmetry, Stride Length Asymmetry

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  9. Variation in spatiotemporal gait parameters during the 10 Meters Walking Test with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system

    Spatiotemporal gait parameters: Cadence, Gait Speed, Step Duration, Stride Length, Cadence Asymmetry, Gait Speed Asymmetry, Stance Asymmetry, Stride Length Asymmetry

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  10. Variation in kinematics parameters during 30 Sit To Stand with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system

    Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee \& Knee-Ankle Plots

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  11. Variation in kinematics parameters during unique Sit To Stand with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system

    Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee \& Knee-Ankle Plots

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  12. Variation in kinematics parameters during Time Up & Go evaluation with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system

    Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee \& Knee-Ankle Plots

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  13. Variation in kinematics parameters during Stairs Climbing Test with and without the device using 3D accelerometers' system

    Kinematics parameters: Gait Joint Angles, Stick Plot Visualization - Sagital plane, Hip-Knee \& Knee-Ankle Plots

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  14. Modification of lower limb muscle recruitment measured by surface EMG with and without the device

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  15. Variation in postural stability measured by force platform with and without the device

    Mean Velocity, RMS Sway

    Measured: Visit 2 and 3, on average 2 weeks

  16. Modification in scoring of the device measured by the Modified Nordic Questionnaire

    Measured: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks

  17. Positive scoring of device efficiency measured by the System usability scale

    Measured: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion22 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion22 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05199246
Sponsor's protocol ID
Exo-KGO1
Acronym
Exo-KGO1
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
2 Dec 2021
Last updated
16 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lower-limb powered dermoskeleton in people with Muscular Dystrophies and Congenital Myopathy, run by Institut de Myologie, France at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absence of adverse effect attributable to the use of the device during task performed within a lower-limb powered dermoskeleton (time frame: Through study completion, on average 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in