AzTrials
AzTrials

AngioplastyiliCoNCT05192616

Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of iCover Covered Stent for the Treatment of the Aorto-iliac Occlusive Disease

An observational study of Angioplasty and Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by iVascular S.L.U. at 18 sites in 4 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm observational study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of the iCover covered stent over a 24-month follow-up period for the treatment of de novo iliac occlusive lesions, defined by a significant vessel stenosis ≥70%, in patients with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Covered stent implantation
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
241 participants
Where
18 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
27 Apr 2022to Jun 2026
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with symptomatic arteriopathy of the lower limbs (Rutherford class 2 to 5). Patients with de novo atheromatous aorto-iliac lesions. According to the incidence of TASC II lesions, approximately 70% of the patients will be classified as TASC II A or B lesions, while the other 30% will be classified as TASC II C or D lesions.

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Rutherford clinical stage 2 to 5
  • Significant (≥70%) stenosis of atheromatous iliac lesions evidenced by duplex scan, MRI CT angiography or arteriography
  • De novo atheromatous lesion of the aortoiliac segment
  • Patient informed about the study and collection of the patient's informed consent agreement Exclusion criteria
  • Subjects will not be eligible to participate in the study if any of the following conditions are present in the subject:
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Protected adult patients, guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice
  • Woman with possibility of pregnancy
  • Patient with asymptomatic atheromatous lesions
  • Patient with inflow lesion in the infrarenal aorta
  • Patient treated with Covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB reconstruction)
  • Acute ischemia or acute thrombosis
  • Non-atherosclerotic disease
  • History of coagulopathy
  • Severe comorbidities with life expectancy <2 years
  • Contraindication to taking antiplatelet aggregation therapy (aspirin or clopidogrel). The patient must be able to take an antiplatelet aggregation for at least 3 months after the procedure
  • Patient participating in another clinical study which may interfere with the results
  • Comorbidity or any reason which, according to the investigator, could limit the participation, the patient's adherence with the follow-up or the scientific integrity of the study
  • Lesion near or adjacent to an aneurysm
  • Inability to follow-up during the investigation
  • Patient objection to participate in the investigation

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 4 countries.

18 sites in 4 countries

France5 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest

    Brest

  • CHU Pitié Salpêtrière

    Paris

  • Hôpital Paris Saint Joseph

    Paris

  • Hôpital privé Saint-Martin

    Pessac

  • Hôpital privé Villeneuve d'Ascq

    Villeneuve-d'Ascq

Other trials in France

Germany5 sites
  • Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen

    Bad Krozingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79189

  • KEH Berlin

    Berlin

  • MVZ Kaiserslautern

    Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67657

  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

    Leipzig, Saxony, 04103

  • Imland Klinik Rendsburg

    Rendsburg

Other trials in Germany

Belgium4 sites
  • Onze Lieve Vrouw Aalst

    Aalst

  • Imelda Bonheiden

    Bonheiden

  • Az Sint Blasius Dendermonde

    Dendermonde

  • ZOL Genk

    Genk

Other trials in Belgium

Spain4 sites
  • Hospital de Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona

  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

    Barcelona

  • Hospital de Cruces

    Bilbao

  • Hospital Parc Taulí

    Sabadell

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Multicenter, Non-randomized, Single-arm Observational Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of iCover Covered Stent for the Treatment of the Aorto-iliac Occlusive Disease

The objective of this prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm observational study is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of the iCover covered stent over a 24-month follow-up period for the treatment of de novo iliac occlusive lesions, defined by a significant vessel stenosis ≥70%, in patients with symptomatic arteriopathy of the lower limbs (Rutherford class 2 to 5).

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-arm, multinational, and multicenter study conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the iCover covered stent for the treatment of de novo iliac occlusive lesions (common and/or external iliac arteries) in patients with symptomatic lower limb arteriopathy. The primary endpoint of the study is primary patency, defined as the absence of restenosis in the target lesion over a 12-month follow-up period in patients who did not undergo a reintervention on the target lesion. Restenosis is defined as a reduction in the luminal diameter of more than 50%, assessed either by duplex ultrasound (considered as a peak systolic velocity index ≥ 2.4 at the target lesion) or by angio-CT (multiplanar reconstruction). Secondary endpoints include: technical and procedural success rate, freedom from all major adverse events, incidence of procedure- or device-related major local complications at the treated lesion, rate of SAEs, major amputation rate at the target limb, primary sustained clinical improvement (improvement in Rutherford classification), primary and secondary patency rates, TLR and TVR rates, and changes in ABI, the Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and the EQ-5D questionnaire from baseline.

Being tested
Covered stent implantation
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Covered stent implantationDevice

    Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with iCover covered stent for the treatment of de novo aorto-iliac occlusive lesions

Study groups in NCT05192616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
iCover covered stentPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)
Receives: Device: Covered stent implantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Patency

    The primary patency, defined as the absence of restenosis in the target lesion over the 12-month follow-up period in patients who did not undergo a reintervention on the target lesion.

    Measured: 12 months after index procedure.

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Technical success rate

    Technical success rate, defined as the ability to cross and dilate the lesion and achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% after iCover stent graft insertion. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions treated at the end of the procedure.

    Measured: Day 0.

  2. Procedural success rate

    Procedural success rate, defined as technical success and no complications during the procedure including general and local complications as defined in the protocol. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of patients at the end of the procedure.

    Measured: Day 0.

  3. Freedom from All Major Adverse Event (MAEs)

    MAEs are described as All-Cause Mortality post-procedure, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) post-procedure and Major Amputation of the Target Limb post-procedure (amputations above the ankle of the target leg).

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  4. Incidence of Procedure- or Device- related Major Local Complications

    Incidence of Procedure- or Device- related Major Local Complications at the treated lesion or Puncture Site up to 30 days post-procedure. Major Local Complications include: Iliac arterial rupture, retroperitoneal hematoma, thrombosis of the iliac axis on the ipsilateral side, need for surgery to achieve hemostasis, bleeding with loss of more than 2 g/ dL of hemoglobin, false aneurysm at the puncture site, preventing resumption of walking at 24 hours or appearance of ischemia on the ipsilateral side.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after index procedure.

  5. Rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Rates of SAEs, including both related and unrelated events. SAEs will be categorized as related or unrelated to the procedure/device based on adjudication by an Independent Clinical Events Committee.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  6. Major amputation at target limb rate

    Percentage of patients with amputations above the ankle of the target leg will be counted.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  7. Primary sustained clinical improvement

    Primary sustained clinical improvement defined as a sustained upward shift of 1 category of the Rutherford classification for patients with claudication, and by wound healing and rest pain resolution for patients in critical limb ischemia, without the need for repeated target lesion revascularization in surviving patients.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  8. Primary patency rates

    Primary patency rates, defined as the lack of restenosis without reintervention of the target lesion. Restenosis is defined as a reduction in the luminal diameter of more than 50%, determined by either, duplex ultrasound examination considered as a peak systolic velocity index ≥ 2.4 at the target lesion, or by angio-CT (multiplanar reconstruction). In case of death, the vessel is considered as patent as long as no restenosis was detected during the last visit before the patient died. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions (Time frame: 6, 24 months after index procedure).

    Measured: 6 and 24 months after index procedure.

  9. Secondary patency rates

    Secondary patency rates, defined as the patency of the stent following an endovascular or surgical reintervention due to significant in-stent restenosis or occlusion. Outcomes computed as percentage of lesions.

    Measured: 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  10. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate

    Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, defined as the need for repeated procedures (endovascular or surgical) due to a problem arising from the lesion initially treated in surviving patients with preserved limbs. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  11. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate

    Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate, defined as the need for repeated procedures (endovascular or surgical) due to a problem arising remote from the vessel initially treated in surviving patients with preserved limbs. Outcomes will be computed as the percentage of lesions.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months after index procedure.

  12. Change in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) from baseline

    Change in ABI from baseline.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months post-procedure.

  13. Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire from baseline

    The Walking Impairment Questionnaire values will be recorded and compared to the baseline values. This questionnaire is a validated tool to assess walking capability in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease in different situations.

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months post-procedure.

  14. Change in quality of life from baseline

    Change in quality of life from baseline, as measured by EQ-5D. The EQ-5D Questionnaire values will be recorded and compared to the baseline values. It is a validated questionnaire to measure the quality of life based on 5 different parameters. Worst possible score in this study would be 0, best possible score would be 1. In addition, the patient indicates her/his current health on an analog scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

    Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24 months post-procedure.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jan 2022
  2. Study start27 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
241 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05192616
Sponsor's protocol ID
iliCo Study
Acronym
iliCo
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
14 Dec 2021
Last updated
16 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in