Grade 1 GliomaPhase 2PLGG - MEKTRICNCT05180825
Pediatric Low Grade Glioma - MEKinhibitor TRIal vs Chemotherapy
A Phase 2 study testing Trametinib and Vinblastine in people with Grade 1 Glioma and Mixed Glio-neuronal Tumors, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France at 25 sites in France.
Trial summary
Pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is a heterogeneous group of WHO grade I and II brain tumors, associated with a 10-year overall survival of 90%. It is the most common form of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor arising during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, accounting for over 30% of CNS tumors in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 25 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Grade 1 Glioma, Mixed Glio-neuronal Tumors, Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma
- What is being tested?
- Trametinib and Vinblastine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 5 May 2022to 1 Dec 2031
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 25 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: ≥ 1 month to ≤ 25 years
- Signed written informed consent prior to study participation of the legal representatives and the patient if the patient can understand the impact of clinical trial and to give consent. For patients above 18 years, their written informed consent will be obtained.
- Patient may be under guardianship or curatorship (for patient under legal guardianship, authorization is given by the legal representative of the patient under guardianship. For patient under curatorship, consent will be obtained from the adult assisted by his or her legal curator
- Histologically proven grade 1 glioma/mixed glio-neuronal tumors or pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) confirmed by local referee and the centrally pathology reviewing
- Determination of a negative BRAFv600 mutation by immunohistochemistry and/or molecular methods
- Systematic determination 7q34 duplication status or KIAA1549-BRAF fusion
Show all 35Show fewer
- Midline tumors without proven histone H3 mutations
- Diffuse glioma without IDH1 mutation
- Collection of fresh frozen tumor tissues and/or paraffin-embedded samples for further molecular biomarker testing
- Sus-tentorial, optic pathway, midline and spine locations allowed
- Karnofsky or Lansky ≥ 50%
- Criteria for post-surgical treatment: severe visual or neurological symptoms at diagnosis, clinical deterioration of visual or neurological symptoms or radiological progression. The radiological progression is defined as an increase of solid part of the tumor of more than 25% compared to the pre-baseline MRI-imaging over a time period of at least 3 months or the occurrence of new metastatic lesions.
- Infants below one year of age with chiasmatic and/or hypothalamic tumor will be treated immediately after surgery, independently from neurological and/or visual evolution
- Females of child-bearing potential must be willing to practice highly effective contraception during all treatment and until 6 months after the last dose of study drugs' administration. Additionally, females of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to start of study drugs. Boys with reproductive potential must be willing to use condom and consider contraception for partner women of childbearing potential during treatment and until 4 months after the last study drugs' administration.
- Patients must have adequate bone marrow function defined as: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1500/µL; platelets ≥ 100,000/µL and hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dl
- Patients must have adequate liver function within 7 days prior to screening: bilirubin (sum of unconjugated and conjugated) ≤ 1.5 ULN for age, ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase ≤ 4 x upper limit of normal, INR/PTT < 1.5 x upper limit of normal,
- Patients must have adequate renal function within 7 days prior to screening: serum creatinine < 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age and a creatinine clearance > 60 ml/min for 1.73 m2
- Cardiac function defined as a corrected QT (QTcF) interval < 480 msec, LVEF ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) by echocardiogram (ECHO)
- Adequate blood pressure control (smaller or equal to the 95th percentile for patient's age, height and gender)
- Patients are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and study procedures
- Guardians (in case of patients under 18 years) or patient if above 18 years must be affiliated to or a beneficiary of health insurance system.
- Non-inclusion criteria
- Patients presenting a neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) congenital disease
- Pure optic nerve glioma, limited to one nerve and without optic chiasma infiltration.
- Completely resected tumors
- Previous treatment except tumor surgery
- Pregnancy and lactation
- Participation in other clinical trials
- Prior non-surgical therapy for this tumor
- Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), even if histologically diagnosed as WHO grade II
- Subependymal giant astrocytoma (SEGA) in patients with TSC
- Patient having a known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B or C
- Known hypersensitivity to drugs or excipients
- History of another malignancy
- History of current uncontrolled infection
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
25 sites in 1 country
France25 sites, 25 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Amiens Picardie
Amiens, 80054
Camille KHANFAR, MD, 03 22 08 76 44 ext. 0033, khanfar.camille@chu-amiens.fr
Camille KHANFAR, MD
- Recruiting
Chu D'Angers
Angers, 49933
Emilie DE CARLI, MD, 02.41.35.38.63 ext. 0033, EmDeCarli@chu-angers.fr
Emilie DE CARLI, MD
- Recruiting
Chu de Besancon
Besançon, 25030
Véronique LAITHIER, MD, 03 81 21 91 82 ext. 0033, vlaithier@chu-besancon.fr
Véronique LAITHIER, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33000
Céline ICHER, MD, 05.57.82.04.34 ext. 0033, Celine.icher@chu-bordeaux.fr
Céline ICHER, MD
- Recruiting
Chu de Brest Morvan
Brest, 29609
Liana CARAUSU CARAUSU, MD, 02.98.22.33.33 ext. 0033, liana.carausu@chu-brest.fr
Liana CARAUSU, MD
- Not yet recruiting
CHU CAEN
Caen, 14 033
Marianna DEPARIS, MD, 02 31 06 44 88 ext. 0033, deparis-m@chu-caen.fr
Marianna DEPARIS, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, 21079
Florent NEUMANN, MD, 03 80 29 36 01, florent.neumann@chu-dijon.fr
Florent NEUMANN, MD
- Recruiting
Chu Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, 38043
Anne PAGNIER, 04.76.76.58.93 ext. 0033, APagnier@chu-grenoble.fr
Anne PAGNIER, MD
- Recruiting
Clcc Oscar Lambret Lille
Lille, 59020
Sandra RAIMBAULT, 03.20.29.59.59, s-raimbault@o-lambret.fr
Sandra RAIMBAULT
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Christophe PIGUET, 05.55.05.68.01, christophe.piguet@chu-limoges.fr
Christophe PIGUET
- Recruiting
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, 69373
Pierre LEBLOND, MD, 04 78 78 28 81 ext. 0033, pierre.leblond@ihope.fr
Pierre LEBLOND, MD
- Recruiting
APHM
Marseille, 13385
Nicolas ANDRE, MD, 04.91.38.68.21 ext. 0033, Nicolas.andre@ap-hm.fr
Nicolas ANDRE, MD
- Recruiting
Chu Montpellier
Montpellier, 34 295
Gilles PALENZUELA, 04 67 33 65 19, g-palenzuela@chu-montpellier.fr
Gilles PALENZUELA
- Not yet recruiting
Chu de Nice
Nice, 06202
Gwenaëlle DUHIL DE BENAZE, 04.92.03.92.68, duhildebenaze.g@chu-nice.fr
Gwenaëlle DUHIL DE BENAZE
- Recruiting
Institut Curie
Paris, 75005
Franck BOURDEAUT BOURDEAUT, 01 44 32 44 71, franck.bourdeaut@curie.fr
Franck BOURDEAUT
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Poitiers Chu La Miletrie
Poitiers, 86022
Frédéric MILLOT, 05.19.44.30.78, f.millot@chu-poitiers.fr
Frédéric MILLOT
- Not yet recruiting
CHU de REIMS
Reims, 51100
Grégory GUIMARD, 03-26-78-75-15, gguimard@chu-reims.fr
Grégory GUIMARD
- Not yet recruiting
Chu de Rennes
Rennes, 35203
Chloé PUISEUX, 02 99 26 59 17, chloe.puiseux@chu-rennes.fr
Chloé PUISEUX
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Rouen
Rouen, 76031
Aude Marie CARDINE, 02 32 88 81 90, aude.marie-cardine@chu-rouen.fr
Aude Marie CARDINE
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42100
Sandrine THOUVENIN, 06 20 56 12 17, sandrine.thouvenin@chu-st-etienne.fr
Sandrine THOUVENIN
- Recruiting
CHU Strasbourg - France
Strasbourg, 67091
Natacha ENTZ-WERLE, MD, 3 3 88 12 83 96 ext. 0033, Natacha.entz-werle@chru-strasbourg.fr
Natacha ENTZ-WERLE, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Chu Toulouse
Toulouse, 31 059
Anne Isabelle BERTOZZI, 05.34.55.86.43, bertozzi.ai@chu-toulouse.fr
Anne Isabelle BERTOZZI
- Recruiting
Chu Tours
Tours, 37044
Marion YVERT, 02.47.47.47.47, m.gillibert-yvert@chu-tours.fr
Marion YVERT
- Recruiting
Chu de Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500
Pascal CHASTAGNER, 03.83.15.46.37, p.chastagner@chu-nancy.fr
Pascal CHASTAGNER
- Recruiting
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94800
Samuel ABBOU, MD, 01 42 11 42 11 ext. 0033, samuel.abbou@gustaveroussy.fr
Samuel ABBOU, MD
About this study
Official title: A Randomized and Controlled Phase II Protocol in Non NF1 Pediatric and AYA (Adolescent and Young Adults) Patients Bearing a Newly Diagnosed Low Grade Glioma With Wild Type BRAF Gene Comparing a Daily Oral MEK Inhibitor (Trametinib) Versus Weekly Vinblastine for 18 Months
Pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is a heterogeneous group of WHO grade I and II brain tumors, associated with a 10-year overall survival of 90%. It is the most common form of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor arising during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, accounting for over 30% of CNS tumors in this age group. A large group of PLGG patients will benefit from a complete resection of their tumor. Nevertheless, PLGG can occur anywhere and can be in some locations associated with neurological symptoms, unresectable or radiological progressive tumors that need medical treatments rapidly to avoid long-term sequelae. The current problem during this first line therapy is to improve tumor response, overall survival rate, as well as progression free survival. In our study, we will focus on a specific group of PLGGs without any congenital NF1 mutation and with a wild-type BRAF gene in the tumor. In this subgroup, for instance, the PFS is not increasing anymore above 50% at 3 years independently from the chemotherapeutic scheme. The two current standard therapies are carboplatin plus vincristine during 81 weeks or a weekly IV administration of vinblastine during 70 weeks. The most recent Canadian approach with vinblastine seems to have the same PFS rate, but with a better daily tolerance and less toxicities than the carboplatin/vincristine combination. Therefore, it is becoming the new standard approach in those patients. Nevertheless, we need to improve more their outcome with less recurs and a better first-line tumor response. The recent molecular discoveries involving the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in those PLGG is opening a new era with specific targeted therapies that might be the key to improve their survivals and giving hope to less treatment lines and a better tumor response. Therefore, we designed a prospective open randomized phase II study, named PLGG-MEKTRIC, comparing the experimental arm (a daily MEK inhibitor, Trametinib, Mekinist©) to a standard arm comprising weekly vinblastine during 18 courses of 4 weeks each. The study will enroll 134 patients with a PLGG during childhood, adolescence or young adulthood with no NF1-related disease and without any BRAFv600 mutation located in brain or spine. 67 patients, in each treatment arm, are planned to be enrolled to answer our primary objective. This primary objective will be to determine in the experimental arm a 20% superiority of the 3-year PFS rate in comparison with the standard treatment administered during 18 courses (e.g. 72 weeks). A stratification of the patients will be done in both arms based on molecular tumor results and brain/spine locations to obtain two equivalent arms to be analyzed.
The recruitment time will be 36 months and the complete follow-up of each patient will last 3 years. The secondary objectives will be in both arms: the tumor response rate at 24 and 72 weeks of treatment, the 3-year PFS and OS rates and the frequency of AE/SAE/SUSAR (Adverse Event/Serious Adverse Event) based on CTCAE criteria during the 3 years after the first administration. A Quality of Life (QoL) assessment, based on PEDsQL questionnaires, at 24 weeks, at the end of treatment and 3 years after 1st treatment administration in both arms will be part of this study. Finally, 3-year PFS and OS will be analyzed according to molecular biomarkers and visual assessment (LogMar scale) in each arm. An economic analysis is also planned as an ancillary study to determine a cost effectiveness of the best arm and complementary ancillary molecular studies are already organized. In the future, we hope to push forward this new-targeted therapy as a referenced first line treatment of pediatric PLGG to obtain the best tolerance and positive long-term impact and to extend our knowledge of MEK inhibitor impact in molecular subgroups and in optical pathway locations. We also plan to do a "switch" strategy in patients relapsing in standard arm and we will propose systematically to those patients the experimental treatment (MEK inhibitor ).
- Being tested
- Trametinib, Vinblastine
- Medical subject headings
- Astrocytoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TrametinibDrug
Mekinist© (Trametinib) taken orally each day with a 18-course schedule of 4 weeks each.
VinblastineDrug
weekly intra-venous Vinblastine (Velbe©) during 18 courses of 4 weeks each
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Trametinib experimental arm | Experimental | the experimental arm will be Mekinist© (Trametinib) taken orally each day with a 18-course schedule of 4 weeks each. Receives: Drug: Trametinib |
| Vinblastine control arm | Active comparator | the control arm will be the weekly intra-venous Vinblastine (Velbe©) during 18 courses of 4 weeks each Receives: Drug: Vinblastine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS (Progression Free Survival rates) comparing the two arms (standard vs experimental).
Measured: At 3 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
the OS rate:
the OS calculation will take into account the survival measured from time of 1st treatment administration up to death
Measured: At 3 years
the tumor response based on the international and recognized RANO criteria,
the analysis comparing the 2 arms will be based on overall response rate (ORR) by central independent radiological review assessment. The analysis will be conducted in all patients at least at 24 weeks of completed treatment or earlier for the patients who have discontinued for progression reasons. The tumor response will classify the patients in 2 groups: PD subgroup versus CR/PR/SD subgroup.
Measured: at 24 weeks
the tumor response based on the international and recognized RANO criteria,
the analysis comparing the 2 arms will be based on overall response rate (ORR) by central independent radiological review assessment. The analysis will be conducted in all patients at least at 24 weeks of completed treatment or earlier for the patients who have discontinued for progression reasons. The tumor response will classify the patients in 2 groups: PD subgroup versus CR/PR/SD subgroup.
Measured: at 72 weeks
the frequency and description of AE (adverse event)/SAE (serious adverse event)
based on CTCAE criteria (using NCI-CTCAE version 5.0) focusing on visual disturbances, skin, intestinal and cardiac side effects in the experimental arm compared with the standard control arm.
Measured: At the end of Cycle 18 (each cycle is 28 days)
the PFS and OS rates according to molecular biomarkers obtained with routinely done molecular analyses (RENOCLIP-LOC platform) and after centralized review of each tumor histology.
Measured: At 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2022
- Study start5 May 2022
- Primary completion1 Nov 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Grade 1 GliomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Natacha ENTZ-WERLE, Principal investigator, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05180825
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7830
- Acronym
- PLGG - MEKTRIC
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized and Controlled Phase II Protocol in Non NF1 Pediatric and AYA (Adolescent and Young Adults) Patients Bearing a Newly Diagnosed Low Grade Glioma With Wild Type BRAF Gene Comparing a Daily Oral MEK Inhibitor (Trametinib) Versus Weekly Vinblastine for 18 Months
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05180825
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PLGG - MEKTRIC / 7830
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) is a heterogeneous group of WHO grade I and II brain tumors, associated with a 10-year overall survival of 90%. It is the most common form of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor arising during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, accounting for over 30% of CNS tumors in this age group. A large group of PLGG patients will benefit from a complete resection of their tumor. Nevertheless, PLGG can occur anywhere and can be in some locations associated with neurological symptoms, unresectable or radiological progressive tumors that need medical treatments rapidly to avoid long-term sequelae. The current problem during this first line therapy is to improve tumor response, overall survival rate, as well as progression free survival. In our study, we will focus on a specific group of PLGGs without any congenital NF1 mutation and with a wild-type BRAF gene in the tumor. In this subgroup, for instance, the PFS is not increasing anymore above 50% at 3 years independently from the chemotherapeutic scheme. The two current standard therapies are carboplatin plus vincristine during 81 weeks or a weekly IV administration of vinblastine during 70 weeks. The most recent Canadian approach with vinblastine seems to have the same PFS rate, but with a better daily tolerance and less toxicities than the carboplatin/vincristine combination. Therefore, it is becoming the new standard approach in those patients. Nevertheless, we need to improve more their outcome with less recurs and a better first-line tumor response. The recent molecular discoveries involving the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in those PLGG is opening a new era with specific targeted therapies that might be the key to improve their survivals and giving hope to less treatment lines and a better tumor response. Therefore, we designed a prospective open randomized phase II study, named PLGG-MEKTRIC, comparing the experimental arm (a daily MEK inhibitor, Trametinib, Mekinist©) to a standard arm comprising weekly vinblastine during 18 courses of 4 weeks each. The study will enroll 134 patients with a PLGG during childhood, adolescence or young adulthood with no NF1-related disease and without any BRAFv600 mutation located in brain or spine. 67 patients, in each treatment arm, are planned to be enrolled to answer our primary objective. This primary objective will be to determine in the experimental arm a 20% superiority of the 3-year PFS rate in comparison with the standard treatment administered during 18 courses (e.g. 72 weeks). A stratification of the patients will be done in both arms based on molecular tumor results and brain/spine locations to obtain two equivalent arms to be analyzed.
The recruitment time will be 36 months and the complete follow-up of each patient will last 3 years. The secondary objectives will be in both arms: the tumor response rate at 24 and 72 weeks of treatment, the 3-year PFS and OS rates and the frequency of AE/SAE/SUSAR (Adverse Event/Serious Adverse Event) based on CTCAE criteria during the 3 years after the first administration. A Quality of Life (QoL) assessment, based on PEDsQL questionnaires, at 24 weeks, at the end of treatment and 3 years after 1st treatment administration in both arms will be part of this study. Finally, 3-year PFS and OS will be analyzed according to molecular biomarkers and visual assessment (LogMar scale) in each arm. An economic analysis is also planned as an ancillary study to determine a cost effectiveness of the best arm and complementary ancillary molecular studies are already organized. In the future, we hope to push forward this new-targeted therapy as a referenced first line treatment of pediatric PLGG to obtain the best tolerance and positive long-term impact and to extend our knowledge of MEK inhibitor impact in molecular subgroups and in optical pathway locations. We also plan to do a "switch" strategy in patients relapsing in standard arm and we will propose systematically to those patients the experimental treatment (MEK inhibitor ).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Trametinib experimental arm | Experimental | Drug: Trametinibthe experimental arm will be Mekinist© (Trametinib) taken orally each day with a 18-course schedule of 4 weeks each. |
| Vinblastine control arm | Active comparator | Drug: Vinblastinethe control arm will be the weekly intra-venous Vinblastine (Velbe©) during 18 courses of 4 weeks each |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (35 listed)
- Age: ≥ 1 month to ≤ 25 years
- Signed written informed consent prior to study participation of the legal representatives and the patient if the patient can understand the impact of clinical trial and to give consent. For patients above 18 years, their written informed consent will be obtained.
- Patient may be under guardianship or curatorship (for patient under legal guardianship, authorization is given by the legal representative of the patient under guardianship. For patient under curatorship, consent will be obtained from the adult assisted by his or her legal curator
- Histologically proven grade 1 glioma/mixed glio-neuronal tumors or pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) confirmed by local referee and the centrally pathology reviewing
- Determination of a negative BRAFv600 mutation by immunohistochemistry and/or molecular methods
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TrametinibMekinist© (Trametinib) taken orally each day with a 18-course schedule of 4 weeks each. | Drug | Trametinib experimental arm |
| Vinblastineweekly intra-venous Vinblastine (Velbe©) during 18 courses of 4 weeks each | Drug | Vinblastine control arm |
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS (Progression Free Survival rates) comparing the two arms (standard vs experimental).
Time frame: At 3 years
5 secondary outcomes
the OS rate:
Time frame: At 3 years
the tumor response based on the international and recognized RANO criteria,
Time frame: at 24 weeks
the tumor response based on the international and recognized RANO criteria,
Time frame: at 72 weeks
the frequency and description of AE (adverse event)/SAE (serious adverse event)
Time frame: At the end of Cycle 18 (each cycle is 28 days)
the PFS and OS rates according to molecular biomarkers obtained with routinely done molecular analyses (RENOCLIP-LOC platform) and after centralized review of each tumor histology.
Time frame: At 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
Related trials for Grade 1 Glioma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of the Drugs Selumetinib vs. Carboplatin and Vincristine in Patients With Low-Grade Glioma
Low Grade Astrocytoma, Low Grade Glioma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Safety and Dose Finding Study of GLIX1 in Adults With Recurrent or Progressive High-grade Glioma
Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain, Glioma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of the Drug Selinexor With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine (DIPG) Glioma and High-Grade Glioma (HGG)
Malignant Glioma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of SRN-101 Gene Therapy in Adults With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma (ALERT-1)
Recurrent High Grade Gliomas, Glioblastoma (GBM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Natacha ENTZ-WERLE principal investigator
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Trametinib and Vinblastine in people with Grade 1 Glioma and Mixed Glio-neuronal Tumors, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France at 25 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 35 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Natacha ENTZ-WERLE (03 3 88 12 83 96 ext. 0033, Natacha.entz-werle@chru-strasbourg.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS (Progression Free Survival rates) comparing the two arms (standard vs experimental). (time frame: At 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.