AzTrials
AzTrials

Myelodysplastic SyndromesMPO-MDS-ValidNCT05175469

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Peripheral Blood Neutrophil Myeloperoxidase Expression for Ruling Out Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Protocol for a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

An observational study of Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 8 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal bone marrow neoplasms characterized by dysplasia and ineffective hematopoiesis leading to peripheral blood cytopenias, with an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What is being tested?
Flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression
How many people
400 participants
Where
8 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Mar 2022to Jan 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult, Older Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age at enrollment ≥18 years
  • Referral for suspicion of myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Indication for bone marrow examination
  • ≥1 peripheral blood cytopenia defined by hemoglobin concentration <12 g/dL for female and <13g/dL for male patients, platelet count <150 x109/L, absolute neutrophil count <1.8 x109/L
  • Inpatient or outpatient care

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate
  • History of or active documented MDS or CMML
  • Enrollment in intensive or critical care unit
  • Incarcerated or individuals protected by French regulation (Article L1121.5 and following, Code de la Santé Publique)
  • Not affiliated with social security system
  • Previous enrollment in the study

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

France8 sites, 8 recruiting
  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

    Richard VEYRAT-MASSON

    Not yet recruiting
  • Grenoble_Alpes UniversityHospital

    Grenoble, 38043

    Tatiana RASKOVALOVA, +3347676, TRaskovalova@chu-grenoble.fr

    Tatiana RASKOVALOVA

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Lyon Sud, HCL

    Lyon, 69310

    Delphine MANZONI

    Recruiting
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes

    Marseille, 13009

    Anne-Catherine LHOUMEAU

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Saint-Eloi

    Montpellier, 34090

    Caroline BRET

    Recruiting
  • Chu Nantes

    Nantes, 44093

    Caroline MAYEUR-ROUSSE, caroline.mayeurrousse@chu-nantes.fr

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital NICE

    Nice, 06202

    Michel TICCHIONI, 33+ (0)4 92 03 55 02, michel.ticchioni@unice.fr

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital, Saint-Étienne

    Saint-Etienne, 42055

    Chrystelle ABDO, Chrystelle.Abdo@chu-st-etienne.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal bone marrow neoplasms characterized by dysplasia and ineffective hematopoiesis leading to peripheral blood cytopenias, with an increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. The conventional diagnostic work-up of MDS relies on cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow, which may be complemented by conventional cytogenetic, flow cytometry, and molecular analysis by next generation sequencing techniques.

Suspicion of MDS is the commonest reason for bone marrow aspirate in older patients with unexplained peripheral blood cytopenias. Yet many patients are exposed to unnecessary bone marrow aspiration-related discomfort and harms, because of the limited prevalence of disease among subjects referred for suspected MDS. In this context, a valid and reliable assay based on peripheral blood sample that accurately discriminates MDS from other cytopenia etiologies without requiring invasive bone marrow aspiration is warranted.

Read more

The accuracy of peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression quantified by flow cytometric analysis for the diagnosis of MDS is supported by three primary studies totaling 211 individuals. An intra-individual robust coefficient of variation (RCV) value for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression lower than 30.0% accurately ruled out MDS, with both sensitivity and negative predictive value point estimates of 100%, in consecutive patients with suspected disease. This biomarker might obviate the need for cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate for up to 35% of patients referred for suspected MDS. Although promising, these preliminary results require replication in an independent external validation sample.

The broad aim of the multicenter MPO-MDS-Valid study project is to prospectively validate the diagnostic accuracy of intra-individual RCV for peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression quantified by flow cytometric analysis among consecutive patients referred for suspected MDS.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of the MPO-MDS-Valid study is to estimate the discriminative accuracy (i.e., area under the ROC curve point estimate along with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of the intra-individual RCV for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood for the diagnosis of MDS in consecutive patients.

The secondary objectives are:

  1. To estimate the negative predictive value of the intra-individual RCV for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood (with a prespecified threshold of 30.0%) for ruling out MDS in consecutive patients.
  2. To estimate the prevalence of alternate diagnoses established by bone marrow cytomorphology among true negative patients (i.e., patients with intra-individual RCV value lower than 30.0% and for whom MDS was ruled out by the reference method).

Study design: The MPO-MDS-Valid study project is a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study of an index test by comparison with a reference standard in unselected consecutive patients. An institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III) reviewed and approved the study protocol and the information form, prior to study initiation. No specific intervention is assigned to participants. All diagnostic testing, procedures, and medication ordering are performed at the discretion of attending physicians. The index test result will have no impact on patient management.

Screening: All consecutive patients referred for suspicion of MDS to the immuno-hematology lab at the study sites will be screened for eligibility. A lab physician will review inclusion and exclusion criteria, using computerized medical and laboratory records.

Recruitment: Participants will be included in the study once all the screening activities have been conducted and only if the patient meets all inclusion and none exclusion criteria. The consent for flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood sample and data collection through chart review will be sought under a regime of "non-opposition" (opt-out): after appropriate written information is delivered, data will be collected except in case of opposition from the patient. All patients included in the study will be assigned a unique patient identification number. This number will be used to identify the patient throughout the study.

Index test: Flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood will be blinded to the reference standard. Myeloperoxidase expression in the peripheral blood neutrophil population within an individual subject will be expressed as RCV. The intra-individual RCV is calculated as the robust standard deviation divided by the median. The robust standard deviation is a function of the deviation of individual data points to the median of the study population. Intra-individual RCV is expressed as percentage and reflects the variability in myeloperoxidase expression in the peripheral blood neutrophil population within an individual subject.

Reference standard: At each study site, cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate will be performed by experienced hematopathologists blinded to the index test.

Morphologic assessment may be complemented by bone marrow flow cytometric score, karyotype, and molecular profiling, where relevant. The reference criteria for MDS are 1) the presence of ≥10% dysplastic cells in any hematopoietic lineage on bone marrow aspirate, and 2) the exclusion of acute myeloid leukemia (defined by the presence of ≥20% bone marrow blasts). Consistent with WHO classification, MDS subcategorization will be based on the degree of dysplasia (unilineage versus multilineage), blast percentages, presence of ring sideroblasts, and cytogenetic analysis (del(5q)).

The reference criteria for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) diagnosis are 1) the presence of persistent peripheral blood monocytosis ≥1 x109/L, and 2) monocyte accounting for more than 10% of the white blood cell differential count. Idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance (ICUS) will be defined by unexplained mild persistent cytopenia for 4 to 6 months and the failure to establish the diagnosis of MDS according to reference criteria.

Patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is confirmed by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with confirmed suspicion of MDS.

Patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS: Participants for whom the diagnosis of MDS (or CMML) is ruled out by the reference standard will be categorized as patients with unconfirmed suspicion of MDS. This latter subgroup will include patients with ICUS, as defined in accordance with published guidelines.

Being tested
Flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression
Keywords
Myelodysplastic syndromes, Diagnostic accuracy study, Flow cytometry analysis, Myeloperoxidase, Peripheral blood sample, Additional relevant MeSH terms: Preleukemia, Syndrome, Disease, Pathologic Processes
Medical subject headings
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Syndrome, Disease, Pathologic Processes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expressionDiagnostic test

    Performance of flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood samples will be blinded to the reference standard. Peripheral blood samples will be collected in 5 ml (EDTA) anticoagulant plastic tubes and processed on the same day of collection.

    Blood samples will be incubated with a panel of antibodies conjugated to fluorochromes, according to the manufacturers' recommendations.

    At least 10,000 cell events will be acquired on a 3-laser, 8/12-color flow cytometer and analyzed using flow cytometry software. Myeloperoxidase expression in the peripheral blood neutrophil population within an individual subject will be expressed as intra-individual robust coefficient of variation (RCV).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

    The area under the ROC curve point estimate along with 95% confidence interval will quantify the accuracy of the index test (i.e., intra-individual RCV for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood) for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The reference diagnosis will be established by cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate performed by independent experienced hematopathologists blinded to the index test results. Morphologic assessment may be complemented by bone marrow flow cytometric score, karyotype, and molecular profiling, where relevant.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Negative predictive value

    The negative predictive value point estimate along with 95% confidence interval for the index test (i.e., intra-individual robust coefficient of variation with a prespecified threshold of 30.0%) will be computed by comparison with the reference standard for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Prevalence of alternate diagnoses for true negative cases

    Prevalence point estimate (along with 95% confidence interval) of alternate diagnosis established by bone marrow examination for unconfirmed suspicions of myelodysplastic syndromes with intra-individual RCV< 30.0% for neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in peripheral blood.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completionJan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05175469
Sponsor's protocol ID
38RC21.145
Other IDs
2021-A01101-40
Acronym
MPO-MDS-Valid
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
14 Dec 2021
Last updated
13 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The principal investigator will respond directly to data requests by providing a de-identified data set. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the published articles (i.e., main text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be supplied.

Publications

  • Planta C, Bret C, Manzoni D, Lhoumeau AC, Mayeur Rousse C, Ticchioni M, Campos L, Eischen A, Gonnet N, Merle R, Seigneurin A, Paul F, Comte E, Allieri-Rosenthal A, Tondeur S, Regnart C, Jacob MC, Labarere J, Park S, Raskovalova T. Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MPO-MDS-Valid): protocol for a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 17;14(6):e081200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081200.

    PubMed 38889946

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 8 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tatiana RASKOVALOVA (04 76 76 63 34, traskovalova@chu-grenoble.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05175469, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in