Lung CancerNCT05174468
Analysis of Volatile Chemicals in Lung Cancer Screen-Eligible Subjects Using Infrared Spectroscopy
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Breathe BioMedical Inc at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to sample and analyze volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a high-risk population of subjects eligible for lung cancer screening as defined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2022to 12 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: subjects who meet the USPSTF eligibility guidelines for lung cancer screening
Who may be able to join
- Being screened for lung cancer on LUCAS;
- At high-risk for lung cancer based on USPSTF guidelines:
- Asymptomatic adults aged 50-80 years
- Tobacco smoking history of at least 20 pack-years (one pack-year = smoking one pack per day for one year; 1 pack = 20 cigarettes)
- Current smoker or has quit smoking within the past 15 years.
- No history of lung cancer or any other active cancer within 3 years (Note: DCIS, CIN, non-invasive bladder cancer, non-melanomatous skin cancers are an exception);
- Ability to provide a breath sample;
- Ability to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Persons who cannot give informed consent or assent (i.e. mentally incompetent persons, or those physically incapacitated) or do not have a legally acceptable representative are not to be recruited into this study;
- Persons who require the use of supplemental oxygen;
- The breath sampling technology is sensitive to the chemicals produced by tobacco, cannabis, and e-cigarettes as well as alcohol (consumed by the subject or used by the operator around the equipment). So we ask that subjects refrain from Smoking (tobacco, cannabis, or e-cigarettes ) at least 4 hours before and consuming alcohol (including mouthwash) 8 hours before breath sampling
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
About this study
The aim of this study is to sample and analyze volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a high-risk population of subjects eligible for lung cancer screening as defined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. The breath sample analysis will help investigators describe and identify real-world breath profiles from individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer and to use this to test machine learning (ML) algorithms for lung cancer screening. This study will also evaluate the feasibility and usability of Picomole's breath sampling technology in a mobile platform.
with lung cancer when compared to normal breath profiles using infrared spectroscopy. This work will help validate early proof of concept results conducted with prototype technology and later stage NSCLC breath samples, and inform future breath testing analysis.
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer is the most common malignancy in the world in terms of both incidence and mortality (1.1 million new cases per year and 0.95 million deaths in males and 0.51 million new cases per year and 0.43 million deaths in females). The highest rates of lung cancer are found in Europe and North America. In addition, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Canada. Lung cancer is believed to develop slowly via a progressive accumulation of genetic mutations, hence the disease allows time for diagnosis and curative surgical treatment. When detected in the early stages, the 5-year survival rate for NSCLC is 57% to 61%, compared with a survival rate of approximately 6% once distant metastases are present. Unfortunately, most patients do not experience any signs or symptoms of lung cancer until the disease has progressed to an advanced stage. Therefore, technologies that facilitate detection of lung cancer in the earliest asymptomatic stages have significant potential to reduce lung cancer-specific mortality.
Malignant transformation is facilitated by deregulation of fundamental cellular processes, including alterations in metabolism. Thus, metabolomic profiling may be a promising strategy for identifying lung cancer before it is detectable via conventional methods such as CT scans. Breathomics is a field of study dedicated to deconstructing the metabolomic profile or biological components of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in breath. To date, various analytical techniques including gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, ion mobility spectrometry, proton transfer reaction spectrometry, and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry have been used to study breath VOCs. In a recent study, ion mobility spectrometry discriminated between lung cancer and chronic obstructive lung disease with 79% accuracy, 76.8% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity. Furthermore, breath analysis can be used to not only identify lung cancer but also distinguish between lung cancers with particular somatic mutations. For example, electronic nose technology demonstrated 79% and 85% sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for identifying EGFR-mutant lung cancer. These studies suggest that breath analysis is a highly sensitive and specific approach to detecting lung cancer.
This study will evaluate the performance characteristics of infrared spectroscopy for breath analysis. The spectrometer used to analyze breath gases is optimized to measure chemical concentrations down to the parts per trillion range. In a pilot study of 165 (67 newly diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) subjects which used infrared spectroscopy to analyze breath specimens from subjects with lung cancer and subjects without cancer, sensitivity and specificity for detecting lung cancer was 88.7% and 80%, respectively, with an accuracy of 86%. These preliminary results compare very favorably to mass spectrometry (the analytical platform that has been used in most breath analysis studies).
This study will analyze breath VOCs from 300 subjects who meet the USPSTF eligibility guidelines for lung cancer screening. The study aims to better understand the VOC breath profiles in a larger group of subjects at high risk for developing lung cancer. By restricting the population to screen-eligible subjects, this study will approximate the potential future "real world" use of this screening strategy and better approximate its utility in the field, sampling high risk populations in rural settings. It is envisioned that this study will generate preliminary data that will inform the performance of machine learning algorithms developed to detect the presence of lung cancer in unselected populations.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Breath Analysis, Volatile Organic Compounds, Infrared Spectroscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Screen-eligible Subjects | High-risk for lung cancer population who meet the USPSTF eligibility. One 10-L breath sample will be collected from each subject. During breath collection, subjects will be asked to exhale into a portable breath sampling device through a single use filter. Subjects will not be contacted to donate additional/serial breath specimens after the initial breath samples. Subjects will fill out a medical questionnaire and medical records will also be reviewed to extract low-dose CT scan (LDCT) screening results and any additional tumour-related information including histologic subtype, tumor stage, and sites of disease. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VOC spectral profile differences
VOC spectral profiles will be compared between cohorts to identify statistical differences
Measured: within 30 days after collection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2021
- Study start22 Sep 2022
- Primary completion12 Jul 2023
- Study completion12 Jul 2023
Why it stopped: Change in sponsor's business strategy (disease focus changed to breast cancer)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Breathe BioMedical Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- West Virginia University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kyle Chapman, MD, Principal investigator, West Virginia University , Department of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05174468
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WVU010521
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to make IPD available
Publications
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
PubMed 21296855Boots AW, van Berkel JJ, Dallinga JW, Smolinska A, Wouters EF, van Schooten FJ. The versatile use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in human health and disease. J Breath Res. 2012 Jun;6(2):027108. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/6/2/027108. Epub 2012 May 23.
PubMed 22621865Shlomi D, Abud M, Liran O, Bar J, Gai-Mor N, Ilouze M, Onn A, Ben-Nun A, Haick H, Peled N. Detection of Lung Cancer and EGFR Mutation by Electronic Nose System. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(10):1544-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.073. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
PubMed 28709937Schmidt FM, Metsala M, Vaittinen O, Halonen L. Background levels and diurnal variations of hydrogen cyanide in breath and emitted from skin. J Breath Res. 2011 Dec;5(4):046004. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/5/4/046004. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
PubMed 21808098Chen W, Metsala M, Vaittinen O, Halonen L. Hydrogen cyanide in the headspace of oral fluid and in mouth-exhaled breath. J Breath Res. 2014 Jun;8(2):027108. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/8/2/027108. Epub 2014 May 21.
PubMed 24844251
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Analysis of Volatile Chemicals in Lung Cancer Screen-Eligible Subjects Using Infrared Spectroscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05174468
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WVU010521
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Breath Analysis, Volatile Organic Compounds, Infrared Spectroscopy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Change in sponsor's business strategy (disease focus changed to breast cancer)
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Breathe BioMedical IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- West Virginia University
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to sample and analyze volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a high-risk population of subjects eligible for lung cancer screening as defined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. The breath sample analysis will help investigators describe and identify real-world breath profiles from individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer and to use this to test machine learning (ML) algorithms for lung cancer screening. This study will also evaluate the feasibility and usability of Picomole's breath sampling technology in a mobile platform.
with lung cancer when compared to normal breath profiles using infrared spectroscopy. This work will help validate early proof of concept results conducted with prototype technology and later stage NSCLC breath samples, and inform future breath testing analysis.
Detailed description
Lung cancer is the most common malignancy in the world in terms of both incidence and mortality (1.1 million new cases per year and 0.95 million deaths in males and 0.51 million new cases per year and 0.43 million deaths in females). The highest rates of lung cancer are found in Europe and North America. In addition, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Canada. Lung cancer is believed to develop slowly via a progressive accumulation of genetic mutations, hence the disease allows time for diagnosis and curative surgical treatment. When detected in the early stages, the 5-year survival rate for NSCLC is 57% to 61%, compared with a survival rate of approximately 6% once distant metastases are present. Unfortunately, most patients do not experience any signs or symptoms of lung cancer until the disease has progressed to an advanced stage. Therefore, technologies that facilitate detection of lung cancer in the earliest asymptomatic stages have significant potential to reduce lung cancer-specific mortality.
Malignant transformation is facilitated by deregulation of fundamental cellular processes, including alterations in metabolism. Thus, metabolomic profiling may be a promising strategy for identifying lung cancer before it is detectable via conventional methods such as CT scans. Breathomics is a field of study dedicated to deconstructing the metabolomic profile or biological components of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in breath. To date, various analytical techniques including gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, ion mobility spectrometry, proton transfer reaction spectrometry, and selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry have been used to study breath VOCs. In a recent study, ion mobility spectrometry discriminated between lung cancer and chronic obstructive lung disease with 79% accuracy, 76.8% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity. Furthermore, breath analysis can be used to not only identify lung cancer but also distinguish between lung cancers with particular somatic mutations. For example, electronic nose technology demonstrated 79% and 85% sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for identifying EGFR-mutant lung cancer. These studies suggest that breath analysis is a highly sensitive and specific approach to detecting lung cancer.
This study will evaluate the performance characteristics of infrared spectroscopy for breath analysis. The spectrometer used to analyze breath gases is optimized to measure chemical concentrations down to the parts per trillion range. In a pilot study of 165 (67 newly diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) subjects which used infrared spectroscopy to analyze breath specimens from subjects with lung cancer and subjects without cancer, sensitivity and specificity for detecting lung cancer was 88.7% and 80%, respectively, with an accuracy of 86%. These preliminary results compare very favorably to mass spectrometry (the analytical platform that has been used in most breath analysis studies).
This study will analyze breath VOCs from 300 subjects who meet the USPSTF eligibility guidelines for lung cancer screening. The study aims to better understand the VOC breath profiles in a larger group of subjects at high risk for developing lung cancer. By restricting the population to screen-eligible subjects, this study will approximate the potential future "real world" use of this screening strategy and better approximate its utility in the field, sampling high risk populations in rural settings. It is envisioned that this study will generate preliminary data that will inform the performance of machine learning algorithms developed to detect the presence of lung cancer in unselected populations.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Screen-eligible Subjects | – | –High-risk for lung cancer population who meet the USPSTF eligibility. One 10-L breath sample will be collected from each subject. During breath collection, subjects will be asked to exhale into a portable breath sampling device through a single use filter. Subjects will not be contacted to donate additional/serial breath specimens after the initial breath samples. Subjects will fill out a medical questionnaire and medical records will also be reviewed to extract low-dose CT scan (LDCT) screening results and any additional tumour-related information including histologic subtype, tumor stage, and sites of disease. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- subjects who meet the USPSTF eligibility guidelines for lung cancer screening
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Being screened for lung cancer on LUCAS;
- At high-risk for lung cancer based on USPSTF guidelines:
- Asymptomatic adults aged 50-80 years
- Tobacco smoking history of at least 20 pack-years (one pack-year = smoking one pack per day for one year; 1 pack = 20 cigarettes)
- Current smoker or has quit smoking within the past 15 years.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Persons who cannot give informed consent or assent (i.e. mentally incompetent persons, or those physically incapacitated) or do not have a legally acceptable representative are not to be recruited into this study;
- Persons who require the use of supplemental oxygen;
- The breath sampling technology is sensitive to the chemicals produced by tobacco, cannabis, and e-cigarettes as well as alcohol (consumed by the subject or used by the operator around the equipment). So we ask that subjects refrain from Smoking (tobacco, cannabis, or e-cigarettes ) at least 4 hours before and consuming alcohol (including mouthwash) 8 hours before breath sampling
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
VOC spectral profile differences
Time frame: within 30 days after collection
VOC spectral profiles will be compared between cohorts to identify statistical differences
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Change in sponsor's business strategy (disease focus changed to breast cancer)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 21296855Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 22621865Boots AW, van Berkel JJ, Dallinga JW, Smolinska A, Wouters EF, van Schooten FJ. The versatile use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in human health and disease. J Breath Res. 2012 Jun;6(2):027108. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/6/2/027108. Epub 2012 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 28709937Shlomi D, Abud M, Liran O, Bar J, Gai-Mor N, Ilouze M, Onn A, Ben-Nun A, Haick H, Peled N. Detection of Lung Cancer and EGFR Mutation by Electronic Nose System. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(10):1544-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.073. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 21808098Schmidt FM, Metsala M, Vaittinen O, Halonen L. Background levels and diurnal variations of hydrogen cyanide in breath and emitted from skin. J Breath Res. 2011 Dec;5(4):046004. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/5/4/046004. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
- Background: PubMed 24844251Chen W, Metsala M, Vaittinen O, Halonen L. Hydrogen cyanide in the headspace of oral fluid and in mouth-exhaled breath. J Breath Res. 2014 Jun;8(2):027108. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/8/2/027108. Epub 2014 May 21.
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts \& Figures 2019. Atlanta: American Cancer SocietyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Canadian Cancer Statistics 2019Link provided by the sponsor.
- The American Cancer Society (2016). Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival Rates.Link provided by the sponsor.
- \[Abstract\] Janssens E, Lamote K, van Meerbeeck JP (2018). Breath analysis by ion mobility spectrometry allows to discriminate COPD from lung cancer patients. European Respiratory Journal. 52: Suppl. 62,Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to make IPD available
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kyle Chapman, MD principal investigator
West Virginia University , Department of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Breathe BioMedical Inc at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Change in sponsor's business strategy (disease focus changed to breast cancer)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VOC spectral profile differences (time frame: within 30 days after collection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05174468, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.