AzTrials
AzTrials

InfectionsNCT05149547

mNGS Versus Blood Culture in FN

An observational study of Infections and Hematologic Diseases, run by Peking University People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Blood stream infection (BSI) during febrile neutropenia (FN) is a lethal complication, while confirmed diagnosis via blood culture is usually with low sensitivity and time delay. The new technique of metagenome next generation sequencing (mNGS) has the potential of early and more accurate detection of pathogens. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 years and older
What is being tested?
blood culture versus mNGS detection
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Oct 2021to 31 Aug 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients with hematologic disease during febrile neutropenia

Who may be able to join

  • hematologic disease
  • febrile neutropenia

Who cannot join

  • refuse to consent
  • age<=14
  • not caused by infection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Yuqian Sun

    Beijing

    YUQIAN SUN, sunyuqian83@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Comparison of mNGS Versus Blood Culture for Early Diagnosis of Blood Stream Infection During the Febrile Neutropenia in Patients With Hematological Disease

Blood stream infection (BSI) during febrile neutropenia (FN) is a lethal complication, while confirmed diagnosis via blood culture is usually with low sensitivity and time delay. The new technique of metagenome next generation sequencing (mNGS) has the potential of early and more accurate detection of pathogens. However, this technique has not been well validated for BSI diagnosis in patients with hematological disease. Therefore, we designed a prospective multicenter study to compare the diagnosis performance in BSI.

Being tested
blood culture versus mNGS detection
Medical subject headings
Infections, Hematologic Diseases, Febrile Neutropenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • blood culture versus mNGS detectionDiagnostic test

    peripheral 4ml for mNGS detection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. diagnosis performance

    the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS

    Measured: 14 days after sapmpling

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2021
  2. Study start15 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion31 May 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05149547
Sponsor's protocol ID
mNGS for FN(2021PHB362-001)
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
26 Nov 2021
Last updated
8 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Infections and Hematologic Diseases, run by Peking University People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yuqian Sun, MD (861088324577, sunyuqian83@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

diagnosis performance (time frame: 14 days after sapmpling). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in