Bariatric Surgery CandidateNCT05146232
Effect of Opioid Free Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia on Cerebral Oximetry In Gastric Sleeve Operation
A study testing induction of anesthesia, maintainance of anesthesia and monitoring in people with Bariatric Surgery Candidate, run by Tanta University.
Trial summary
Obesity and pneumoperitoneum in the reverse-Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are reported to negatively affect cerebral oxygenation. Anesthetic agents can have variable effects on the regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured with near-infrared spectroscopy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- What is being tested?
- induction of anesthesia, maintainance of anesthesia and monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2022to 30 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASAphysical status class II-III
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve
Who cannot join
- neurolgical diseases
- cardiovascular diseases
About this study
Obesity and pneumoperitoneum in the reverse-Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are reported to negatively affect cerebral oxygenation. Anesthetic agents can have variable effects on the regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured with near-infrared spectroscopy. This study investigated the potential impact of opioid free versus opioid based anesthesia on rSO2 in LSG cases. 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III patients, 18-65 years of age, with a body mass index of >35 kg/m2 , undergoing LSG were randomized to two groups: opioid free and opioid based groups for anesthesia maintenance. The rSO2 values were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after anesthesia induction, and every 5 min during surgery. Arterial blood gases (ABG) were measured in the fifth minute postinduction (t1), 30th minute postinsuflation (t2), and postextubation (t3), and correlation with rSO2 .
Read the detailed description
All study participants wiere provided a written informed consent before enrollment. 80 patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class II-III, 18-65 years of age, with a BMI of >35 kg/m2 who were planning to undergo an elective LSG were enrolled in the study. Patients with preexisting cerebrovascular diseases, overt neurological signs, alcohol or psychoactive drug addiction, uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, advanced organ failure, preoperative peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) <96%, or a hemoglobin˂9g/dL were excluded.
Randomization for the investigation, the patients were randomly assigned using opaque sealed envelopes to two groups; Group (I) (n = 40): The Opioid based anesthesia: Pre-induction of general anesthesia a bolus of 2ug/kg/ IV Fentanyl (sunny pharmaceutical Egypt Company under License of Hameln pharmaceutical Germany) was administered then infusion of 1 ug/kg/h was given intraoperatively to maintain the change in hemodynamics within 20 % of the baseline , and Group (II) (n = 40): Opioid free anesthesia: Pre-induction of general anesthesia 1000 mg paracetamol (Pharco B international pharmaceutical-Egypt) and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg. Lidocaine 1 mg/kg (Alexandria co. for pharmaceutical and chemical industries-Egypt), ketamine 0.5 mg/kg were given I V bolus dose. Then continuous infusion with lidocaine 2 mg/kg/hr and magnesium sulfate (Manufactured by E.I.P.I.CO-. Egypt).1.5 g/hr was started. Local infiltration of skin incision with 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of the operation (Sunny pharmaceutical -Egypt) (n = 30). Randomization was performed according to a computer-generated randomization code, and a statement showing the patients' group was placed in a sealed, numbered envelope according to the results. Each patient drew an envelope and was enrolled in the study depending on the group written in the envelope. Randomization was performed by a physician who was not involved in the monitoring of the patients. The anesthesiologist caring for the patient was aware of the group assignments. The patients were blinded to the group assignments.
Anesthesia protocol all patients was administered 300 mg of oral ranitidine the night before the surgery and 10 mg IV metoclopramide in combination with 150 mg ranitidine 1 h before arrival to the operating room. Upon the arrival to the operating room, an electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, SpO2, rSO2 (Masimo oximeter), and neuromuscular monitoring (TOF-Watch SX; Organon, Dublin, Ireland) were performed on the patients. Afterward, preoxygenation was performed with 4 L/min oxygen (80%) for 3 min by using facemasks, and anesthesia was induced with an IV propofol injection (1.5-2.5 mg/kg of ideal body weight) and an IV bolus administration of remifentanil (1 lg/kg of lean body weight [LBW]) for 30-60 s, and then switched to infusion at 0.25 lg/kg of LBW/min. After the eyelid reflex disappeared, a neuromuscular blockade was performed using rocuronium (1.2 mg/kg of LBW) and tracheal intubation was done. Volume-controlled mechanical ventilation was applied. Breathing gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide and sevoflurane), the tidal volume were set as 7-8 mL/kg of LBW, inspiratory:expiratory ratio as 1:2, positive end-expiratory pressure as 5-8 cmH2O, and the respiratory rate was determined to obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) of 32-37 mmHg. These ventilator settings were not changed throughout the operation. Oxygen/air (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] of 0.40), inspiratory fresh gas flow of 2 L/min), sevoflurane (1 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]), and remifentanil IV infusion (0.1-0.25 lg/kg of LBW/min) were used in the for the maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was performed during the operation by rocuronium infusion (0.3- 0.7 mg/kg of LBW/h). IV normal saline or lactated Ringer's solution at 5-7 mL/kg of LBW was also used for perioperative fluid maintenance. Nasopharyngeal temperature was monitored throughout the surgery, and the patient temperature (36-37C) was ensured by using a forced-air warming system for the maintenance of intraoperative normothermia during the procedure. After anesthesia induction, a neutral head position of the patients was preserved to prevent alteration of cerebral venous drainage. Carbon dioxide insufflation was performed with an electronic laparoflator using a closed Veress needle technique, and intra-abdominal pressure was automatically kept at the desired level (14-16 mmHg) during the surgery. After the insufflation of carbon dioxide, the patients were positioned in a 30 reverse-Trendelenburg and at a 10 right lateral position. At the end of the surgery, the blockade was reversed by administering 4 mg/kg of adjusted body weight sugammadexwith a PTC of 1-2. All patients were extubated when fully awake. The patients were referred to the recovery unit and monitored for 50 min for complications. In cases where no complications was apparent, the recovery was evaluated using the modified Aldrete scoring system. Once the score was ≥9, the patients were taken to the unit. For postoperative nausea and vomiting, 4-5 mg dexamethasone was used (except for diabetic patients on insulin) 90 min before anesthesia induction and 4-8 mg IV ondansetron 20-30 min before the end of the operation. For postoperative pain management, 1 g IV acetaminophen was administered 20 min after induction and 30 mg IV ketorolac 20 min before onset. Then, 1 g IV acetaminophen was administered every 6 h + 50 mg IV dexketoprofen every 8 h for the first 48 h. In addition, morphine was administered using a patient-controlled analgesia delivery system (demand dose, 20 lg/kg of ideal body weight; lockout time, 6-10 min; 4 h limit, 80% of the total calculated dosage) for 48 h postoperatively.
Intraoperative measurements, physiological variables including heart rate (HR), MAP, SpO2, and PETCO2 were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after the induction, and every 5 min until the patient was referred to the recovery unit. The MAP and HR values were allowed to fluctuate up to 20% of the preoperative values of the patients. For this purpose, the infusion rate of remifentanil was accordingly increased and decreased. When hypotension (MAP ˂60 mmHg) or bradycardia (HR˂45beats/min) continued for longer than 3 min, they were treated with 5 mg ephedrine and 0.5 mg atropine, respectively. Patients who received ephedrine or atropine more than twice were excluded from the study.
Cerebral oxygen saturation. The rSO2 values of the patients were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after the induction, and every 5 min until the patient was referred to the recovery unit. Measurements in the last 30 s of preoxygenation, performed for 3 min with 4 L/min oxygen (80%) preinduction was accepted as preoperative values. To assess rSO2, cerebral oximetry sensors were placed at least 2 cm above the left and right eyebrows and 3 cm from the midline (to prevent the sagittal sinus from influencing the results) before the induction in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Before applying the sensor pads, the forehead of the patient was cleaned with acetone alcohol and bandaged to protect the sensors from ambient light and to keep them stable. Cerebral oxygen desaturation was defined as a >25% decrease in the rSO2 value compared with the preoperative value (decrease should be more than 20% if the preoperative value was˂50) and maintenance of this situation for≥15s. In this case, the following algorithm was used. First of all, normotension of the patient was ensured (administration of vasopressors such as ephedrine, and/or infusion of isotonic fluids) and the patient's neck were checked. Operating times. anesthesia, surgery, pneumoperitoneum, and recovery times were recorded. Recovery time was defined as the time from discontinuation of sevoflurane or propofol and remifentanil at the end of the surgery to the restoration of spontaneous breathing, opening of the eyes upon a verbal command, squeezing of the hand of the observer and extubation. Additionally, the complications (including nausea and vomiting) developed by the patients were also recorded.
- Conditions
- Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Being tested
- induction of anesthesia, maintainance of anesthesia, monitoring, First postoperative analgesia, Second postoperative analgesia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
induction of anesthesiaOther
induction of anesthesia during gastric sleeve surgery
maintainance of anesthesiaOther
maintainance of anesthesia during gastric sleeve surgery either opioid free or opioid based
monitoringOther
electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, SpO2, rSO2 (Masimo oximeter), and neuromuscular monitoring (TOF-Watch SX; Organon, Dublin, Ireland) were performed on the patients.
First postoperative analgesiaOther
IV acetaminophen will be administered every 6 h
Second postoperative analgesiaOther
50 mg IV dexketoprofen every 8 h for the first 48 h.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Opioid free group | Active comparator | After induction of aesthesia, anesthesia maintained by sevoflurane and continuous unfusion of lidocaine, ketamine, dexmeditomedine and Paracetamol. Receives: Other: induction of anesthesia; Other: maintainance of anesthesia; Other: monitoring; Other: First postoperative analgesia; Other: Second postoperative analgesia |
| Opioid based group | Active comparator | After induction of aesthesia, anesthesia maintained by continuous remifentanyl infusion Receives: Other: induction of anesthesia; Other: maintainance of anesthesia; Other: monitoring; Other: First postoperative analgesia; Other: Second postoperative analgesia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes of regional cerebral oxygen saturation percentage
Measred noninvasively by electrodes of Masimo oximeter on all patient' forehead before induction of anesthesia
Measured: Measured preoperatively, 1 minute after the induction, and every 5 minutes until the patient will be referred to the recovery unit.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2021
- Study start5 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Mar 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bariatric Surgery CandidateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tanta UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The rSO2 values will be recorded preoperatively, 1 min after anesthesia induction, and every 5 min during surgery. Arterial blood gases (ABG) will be measured in the fifth minute postinduction (t1), 30th minute postinsufflation (t2), and postextubation (t3), and correlation with rSO2 will be examined.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mona Mohamed Mogahed, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05146232
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 34777/7/21
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Opioid Free Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia on Cerebral Oximetry In Gastric Sleeve Operation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05146232
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 34777/7/21
- Conditions
- Bariatric Surgery Candidate
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obesity and pneumoperitoneum in the reverse-Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are reported to negatively affect cerebral oxygenation. Anesthetic agents can have variable effects on the regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured with near-infrared spectroscopy. This study investigated the potential impact of opioid free versus opioid based anesthesia on rSO2 in LSG cases. 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III patients, 18-65 years of age, with a body mass index of >35 kg/m2 , undergoing LSG were randomized to two groups: opioid free and opioid based groups for anesthesia maintenance. The rSO2 values were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after anesthesia induction, and every 5 min during surgery. Arterial blood gases (ABG) were measured in the fifth minute postinduction (t1), 30th minute postinsuflation (t2), and postextubation (t3), and correlation with rSO2 .
Detailed description
All study participants wiere provided a written informed consent before enrollment. 80 patients in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class II-III, 18-65 years of age, with a BMI of >35 kg/m2 who were planning to undergo an elective LSG were enrolled in the study. Patients with preexisting cerebrovascular diseases, overt neurological signs, alcohol or psychoactive drug addiction, uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, advanced organ failure, preoperative peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) <96%, or a hemoglobin˂9g/dL were excluded.
Randomization for the investigation, the patients were randomly assigned using opaque sealed envelopes to two groups; Group (I) (n = 40): The Opioid based anesthesia: Pre-induction of general anesthesia a bolus of 2ug/kg/ IV Fentanyl (sunny pharmaceutical Egypt Company under License of Hameln pharmaceutical Germany) was administered then infusion of 1 ug/kg/h was given intraoperatively to maintain the change in hemodynamics within 20 % of the baseline , and Group (II) (n = 40): Opioid free anesthesia: Pre-induction of general anesthesia 1000 mg paracetamol (Pharco B international pharmaceutical-Egypt) and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg. Lidocaine 1 mg/kg (Alexandria co. for pharmaceutical and chemical industries-Egypt), ketamine 0.5 mg/kg were given I V bolus dose. Then continuous infusion with lidocaine 2 mg/kg/hr and magnesium sulfate (Manufactured by E.I.P.I.CO-. Egypt).1.5 g/hr was started. Local infiltration of skin incision with 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of the operation (Sunny pharmaceutical -Egypt) (n = 30). Randomization was performed according to a computer-generated randomization code, and a statement showing the patients' group was placed in a sealed, numbered envelope according to the results. Each patient drew an envelope and was enrolled in the study depending on the group written in the envelope. Randomization was performed by a physician who was not involved in the monitoring of the patients. The anesthesiologist caring for the patient was aware of the group assignments. The patients were blinded to the group assignments.
Anesthesia protocol all patients was administered 300 mg of oral ranitidine the night before the surgery and 10 mg IV metoclopramide in combination with 150 mg ranitidine 1 h before arrival to the operating room. Upon the arrival to the operating room, an electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, SpO2, rSO2 (Masimo oximeter), and neuromuscular monitoring (TOF-Watch SX; Organon, Dublin, Ireland) were performed on the patients. Afterward, preoxygenation was performed with 4 L/min oxygen (80%) for 3 min by using facemasks, and anesthesia was induced with an IV propofol injection (1.5-2.5 mg/kg of ideal body weight) and an IV bolus administration of remifentanil (1 lg/kg of lean body weight [LBW]) for 30-60 s, and then switched to infusion at 0.25 lg/kg of LBW/min. After the eyelid reflex disappeared, a neuromuscular blockade was performed using rocuronium (1.2 mg/kg of LBW) and tracheal intubation was done. Volume-controlled mechanical ventilation was applied. Breathing gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide and sevoflurane), the tidal volume were set as 7-8 mL/kg of LBW, inspiratory:expiratory ratio as 1:2, positive end-expiratory pressure as 5-8 cmH2O, and the respiratory rate was determined to obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO2) of 32-37 mmHg. These ventilator settings were not changed throughout the operation. Oxygen/air (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] of 0.40), inspiratory fresh gas flow of 2 L/min), sevoflurane (1 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]), and remifentanil IV infusion (0.1-0.25 lg/kg of LBW/min) were used in the for the maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was performed during the operation by rocuronium infusion (0.3- 0.7 mg/kg of LBW/h). IV normal saline or lactated Ringer's solution at 5-7 mL/kg of LBW was also used for perioperative fluid maintenance. Nasopharyngeal temperature was monitored throughout the surgery, and the patient temperature (36-37C) was ensured by using a forced-air warming system for the maintenance of intraoperative normothermia during the procedure. After anesthesia induction, a neutral head position of the patients was preserved to prevent alteration of cerebral venous drainage. Carbon dioxide insufflation was performed with an electronic laparoflator using a closed Veress needle technique, and intra-abdominal pressure was automatically kept at the desired level (14-16 mmHg) during the surgery. After the insufflation of carbon dioxide, the patients were positioned in a 30 reverse-Trendelenburg and at a 10 right lateral position. At the end of the surgery, the blockade was reversed by administering 4 mg/kg of adjusted body weight sugammadexwith a PTC of 1-2. All patients were extubated when fully awake. The patients were referred to the recovery unit and monitored for 50 min for complications. In cases where no complications was apparent, the recovery was evaluated using the modified Aldrete scoring system. Once the score was ≥9, the patients were taken to the unit. For postoperative nausea and vomiting, 4-5 mg dexamethasone was used (except for diabetic patients on insulin) 90 min before anesthesia induction and 4-8 mg IV ondansetron 20-30 min before the end of the operation. For postoperative pain management, 1 g IV acetaminophen was administered 20 min after induction and 30 mg IV ketorolac 20 min before onset. Then, 1 g IV acetaminophen was administered every 6 h + 50 mg IV dexketoprofen every 8 h for the first 48 h. In addition, morphine was administered using a patient-controlled analgesia delivery system (demand dose, 20 lg/kg of ideal body weight; lockout time, 6-10 min; 4 h limit, 80% of the total calculated dosage) for 48 h postoperatively.
Intraoperative measurements, physiological variables including heart rate (HR), MAP, SpO2, and PETCO2 were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after the induction, and every 5 min until the patient was referred to the recovery unit. The MAP and HR values were allowed to fluctuate up to 20% of the preoperative values of the patients. For this purpose, the infusion rate of remifentanil was accordingly increased and decreased. When hypotension (MAP ˂60 mmHg) or bradycardia (HR˂45beats/min) continued for longer than 3 min, they were treated with 5 mg ephedrine and 0.5 mg atropine, respectively. Patients who received ephedrine or atropine more than twice were excluded from the study.
Cerebral oxygen saturation. The rSO2 values of the patients were recorded preoperatively, 1 min after the induction, and every 5 min until the patient was referred to the recovery unit. Measurements in the last 30 s of preoxygenation, performed for 3 min with 4 L/min oxygen (80%) preinduction was accepted as preoperative values. To assess rSO2, cerebral oximetry sensors were placed at least 2 cm above the left and right eyebrows and 3 cm from the midline (to prevent the sagittal sinus from influencing the results) before the induction in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Before applying the sensor pads, the forehead of the patient was cleaned with acetone alcohol and bandaged to protect the sensors from ambient light and to keep them stable. Cerebral oxygen desaturation was defined as a >25% decrease in the rSO2 value compared with the preoperative value (decrease should be more than 20% if the preoperative value was˂50) and maintenance of this situation for≥15s. In this case, the following algorithm was used. First of all, normotension of the patient was ensured (administration of vasopressors such as ephedrine, and/or infusion of isotonic fluids) and the patient's neck were checked. Operating times. anesthesia, surgery, pneumoperitoneum, and recovery times were recorded. Recovery time was defined as the time from discontinuation of sevoflurane or propofol and remifentanil at the end of the surgery to the restoration of spontaneous breathing, opening of the eyes upon a verbal command, squeezing of the hand of the observer and extubation. Additionally, the complications (including nausea and vomiting) developed by the patients were also recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The rSO2 values will be recorded preoperatively, 1 min after anesthesia induction, and every 5 min during surgery. Arterial blood gases (ABG) will be measured in the fifth minute postinduction (t1), 30th minute postinsufflation (t2), and postextubation (t3), and correlation with rSO2 will be examined.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Opioid free group | Active comparator | Other: induction of anesthesia, Other: maintainance of anesthesia, Other: monitoring, Other: First postoperative analgesia, Other: Second postoperative analgesiaAfter induction of aesthesia, anesthesia maintained by sevoflurane and continuous unfusion of lidocaine, ketamine, dexmeditomedine and Paracetamol. |
| Opioid based group | Active comparator | Other: induction of anesthesia, Other: maintainance of anesthesia, Other: monitoring, Other: First postoperative analgesia, Other: Second postoperative analgesiaAfter induction of aesthesia, anesthesia maintained by continuous remifentanyl infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ASAphysical status class II-III
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- neurolgical diseases
- cardiovascular diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| induction of anesthesiainduction of anesthesia during gastric sleeve surgery | Other | Opioid based group, Opioid free group |
| maintainance of anesthesiamaintainance of anesthesia during gastric sleeve surgery either opioid free or opioid based | Other | Opioid based group, Opioid free group |
| monitoringelectrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, SpO2, rSO2 (Masimo oximeter), and neuromuscular monitoring (TOF-Watch SX; Organon, Dublin, Ireland) were performed on the patients. | Other | Opioid based group, Opioid free group |
| First postoperative analgesiaIV acetaminophen will be administered every 6 h | Other | Opioid based group, Opioid free group |
| Second postoperative analgesia50 mg IV dexketoprofen every 8 h for the first 48 h. | Other | Opioid based group, Opioid free group |
Primary outcome
Changes of regional cerebral oxygen saturation percentage
Time frame: Measured preoperatively, 1 minute after the induction, and every 5 minutes until the patient will be referred to the recovery unit.
Measred noninvasively by electrodes of Masimo oximeter on all patient' forehead before induction of anesthesia
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2022.
Related trials for Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Active, not recruiting
Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial
Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Stepwise PEEP vs Sustained Inflation in Bariatric Surgery Patients
Recruitment, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
RecruitingObservational study
Blood Collection Biorepository for Liver Disease Research
Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis(NASH), Hepatitis C
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Dietary Sugar Absorptive Phenotype for Prediction of Weight Loss Outcome
Obese, Healthy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Stress Response in Bariatric Surgery With and Without the Use of Opioids
Opioid Use, Unspecified, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing induction of anesthesia, maintainance of anesthesia and monitoring in people with Bariatric Surgery Candidate, run by Tanta University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes of regional cerebral oxygen saturation percentage (time frame: Measured preoperatively, 1 minute after the induction, and every 5 minutes until the patient will be referred to the recovery unit.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2022.