AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal AdenomaM3-AANCT05144152

Diagnostic Accuracy of M3 in Predicting Colorectal Advanced Adenoma Recurrence (M3-AA)

An observational study of Colorectal Adenoma and Advanced Adenoma, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and the novel panel of four bacterial gene markers collectively named as M3, to detect recurrent advanced adenomas in patients with history of colonic adenomas. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
M3 and FIT
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
13 Dec 2021to 31 Dec 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subeject with history of colorectal adenomas

Who may be able to join

  • Known colorectal adenomas during index colonoscopy;
  • Available baseline M3 and FIT results before index colonoscopy;
  • Aged ≥18 years old;
  • Written informed consent obtained.

Who cannot join

  • Refusal or unfit to undergo surveillance colonoscopy;
  • Incomplete colonoscopy, incomplete removal of colorectal adenomas, or inadequate bowel preparation (defined as Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score 0 or 1 in any colonic segment) at index colonoscopy;
  • Previous colonic resection;
  • Personal history of colorectal cancer;
  • Personal history of polyposis syndrome;
  • Personal history of inflammatory bowel disease;
  • Known pregnancy or lactation;
  • Advanced comorbid conditions (defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 or above);

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin, New Territories

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Study to Assess the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Bacterial Gene Markers (M3) in Predicting Colorectal Advanced Adenoma Recurrence

The investigators aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and the novel panel of four bacterial gene markers collectively named as M3, to detect recurrent advanced adenomas in patients with history of colonic adenomas.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer in Hong Kong with more than 5,600 new cases annually. There is prevailing evidence of increasing trend of young onset CRC globally. Early detection and endoscopic resection of pre-malignant colonic adenomas has shown to reduce CRC-related mortality.

After the index colonoscopy, a surveillance colonoscopy will be required at regular intervals, depending on the number, size and histology of colonic polyps. Studies have reported the use of faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to reduce the burden on surveillance endoscopy service. However, approximately 30-40% of interval CRC and 40-70% of advanced adenomas (AA) could be missed by this strategy. The major limitation of this widely used non-invasive stool test is its unsatisfactory sensitivities for CRC (79%) and AA (40%). The sensitivity for non-advanced adenomas is even lower than 10%. A large proportion of advanced and non-advanced adenomas will be missed by FIT alone. Therefore, identification of alternative non-invasive test with better sensitivity to detect colonic adenomas is warranted.

Multitarget stool DNA test and faecal microbial DNA markers appear to be the most promising stool-based diagnostic biomarkers for screening CRC. Several bacterial gene markers have been identified by metagenome sequencing and reported to be associated with CRC, including Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch) and Bacteroides clarus (Bc). However, these molecular markers had low accuracy in distinguishing adenomas from normal tissue. Recently, a new Lachnoclostridium gene marker (labelled as 'm3') has been shown to have high diagnostic yield for the detection of colorectal adenomas. In a case-control study of 1012 subjects, a linear increasing trend of m3 level was observed from fecal samples of healthy subjects to those with adenomas and cancers. The overall sensitivity of m3 was significantly higher than FIT in detecting all adenomas (48% vs 9.3%), AA (50.8% vs 16.1%) and non-advanced adenomas (44.2% vs 0%). The diagnostic accuracy of m3 could be further enhanced by combining with a panel of fecal microbial markers composing of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Bacteroides clarus (Bc), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch) for CRC (82.3%) and adenomas (64.2%). The combination of these 4 bacterial gene markers (known as M3) has recently been proven to be useful in detecting adenoma recurrence after polypectomy in a retrospective study. The hypothesis is that it would be effective in the detection of recurrent advanced adenomas.

This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and the novel panel of four bacterial gene markers (Fn, m3, Ch and Bc) collectively named as M3, to detect recurrent advanced adenomas in patients with history of colonic adenomas.

Being tested
M3, FIT
Keywords
FIT, Bacterial marker, Colonoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • M3Diagnostic test

    A panel of four bacterial gene markers (Fn, m3, Ch and Bc)

  • FITDiagnostic test

    faecal immunochemical test

Study groups in NCT05144152
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
History of colorectal adenomas groupSubjects with known colorectal adenomas at the index colonoscopy
Receives: Diagnostic Test: M3; Diagnostic Test: FIT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of the panel of bacterial gene markers (M3) or FIT in detection of recurrent colonic advanced adenomas

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of either M3 or FIT among those with one of more advanced adenomas detected during the surveillance colonoscopy examination at year 3

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Sensitivity for advanced adenomas (year 3)

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of either M3 or FIT among those with one of more advanced adenomas detected at year 3 colonoscopy

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Sensitivity for non-advanced adenomas (year 3)

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of either M3 or FIT among those with non-advanced adenomas detected at year 3 colonoscopy

    Measured: 3 years

  3. Sensitivity for all adenomas (year 3)

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of either M3 or FIT among those with all adenomas detected at year 3 colonoscopy

    Measured: 3 years

  4. Specificity (year 3)

    Proportion of true negative results of M3/FIT among those with no adenoma detected in colonoscopy (year 3)

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2021
  2. Study start13 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05144152
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021.558
Acronym
M3-AA
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
21 Nov 2021
Last updated
22 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no plan to share individual participant data to other researchers

Publications

  • Yu J, Feng Q, Wong SH, Zhang D, Liang QY, Qin Y, Tang L, Zhao H, Stenvang J, Li Y, Wang X, Xu X, Chen N, Wu WK, Al-Aama J, Nielsen HJ, Kiilerich P, Jensen BA, Yau TO, Lan Z, Jia H, Li J, Xiao L, Lam TY, Ng SC, Cheng AS, Wong VW, Chan FK, Xu X, Yang H, Madsen L, Datz C, Tilg H, Wang J, Brunner N, Kristiansen K, Arumugam M, Sung JJ, Wang J. Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Gut. 2017 Jan;66(1):70-78. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309800. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

    PubMed 26408641
  • Liang JQ, Wong SH, Szeto CH, Chu ES, Lau HC, Chen Y, Fang J, Yu J, Sung JJ. Fecal microbial DNA markers serve for screening colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic subjects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;36(4):1035-1043. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15171. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

    PubMed 32633422
  • Liang Q, Chiu J, Chen Y, Huang Y, Higashimori A, Fang J, Brim H, Ashktorab H, Ng SC, Ng SSM, Zheng S, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Yu J. Fecal Bacteria Act as Novel Biomarkers for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):2061-2070. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1599. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

    PubMed 27697996
  • Wong SH, Kwong TNY, Chow TC, Luk AKC, Dai RZW, Nakatsu G, Lam TYT, Zhang L, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Ng SSM, Wong MCS, Ng SC, Wu WKK, Yu J, Sung JJY. Quantitation of faecal Fusobacterium improves faecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia. Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1441-1448. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312766. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

    PubMed 27797940
  • Flanagan L, Schmid J, Ebert M, Soucek P, Kunicka T, Liska V, Bruha J, Neary P, Dezeeuw N, Tommasino M, Jenab M, Prehn JH, Hughes DJ. Fusobacterium nucleatum associates with stages of colorectal neoplasia development, colorectal cancer and disease outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;33(8):1381-90. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2081-3. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

    PubMed 24599709
  • Amitay EL, Werner S, Vital M, Pieper DH, Hofler D, Gierse IJ, Butt J, Balavarca Y, Cuk K, Brenner H. Fusobacterium and colorectal cancer: causal factor or passenger? Results from a large colorectal cancer screening study. Carcinogenesis. 2017 Aug 1;38(8):781-788. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx053.

    PubMed 28582482
  • Liang JQ, Li T, Nakatsu G, Chen YX, Yau TO, Chu E, Wong S, Szeto CH, Ng SC, Chan FKL, Fang JY, Sung JJY, Yu J. A novel faecal Lachnoclostridium marker for the non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal adenoma and cancer. Gut. 2020 Jul;69(7):1248-1257. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318532. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

    PubMed 31776231
  • Heitman SJ, Ronksley PE, Hilsden RJ, Manns BJ, Rostom A, Hemmelgarn BR. Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.032. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

    PubMed 19523536
  • Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Kawabe T, Wada R, Doi H, Omata M. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut. 2004 Apr;53(4):568-72. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.026112.

    PubMed 15016753
  • Robertson DJ, Lee JK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Lieberman D, Levin TR, Rex DK. Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1217-1237.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.053. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

    PubMed 27769517
  • Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM, Regula J, Bretthauer M, Chaussade S, Dekker E, Ferlitsch M, Gimeno-Garcia A, Jover R, Kalager M, Pellise M, Pox C, Ricciardiello L, Rutter M, Helsingen LM, Bleijenberg A, Senore C, van Hooft JE, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Quintero E. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020 Aug;52(8):687-700. doi: 10.1055/a-1185-3109. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

    PubMed 32572858
  • Lee JK, Liles EG, Bent S, Levin TR, Corley DA. Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):171. doi: 10.7326/M13-1484.

    PubMed 24658694

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Adenoma and Advanced Adenoma, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Min Dai (+85260490760, mindai@link.cuhk.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of the panel of bacterial gene markers (M3) or FIT in detection of recurrent colonic advanced adenomas (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05144152, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in