Rectal CancerPhase 2CATARTICNCT05136326
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With CApecitabine and Temozolomide in MGMT Silenced, MSS, Locally Advanced RecTal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing External-beam radiation, Capecitabine and Temozolomide in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT) is considered the standard of care. Preoperative CTRT approach often results in a significant tumor downstaging and local control, with evidence of complete pathological response (pCR) rate of about 15% in high volume… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- External-beam radiation, Capecitabine and Temozolomide
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent to study procedures;
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0-1;
- Life expectancy of at least 5 years (excluding diagnosis of cancer);
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma, with centrally confirmed mismatch repair proficiency (MSS) by PCR, lack of MGMT expression by IHC and MGMT promoter methylation by pyrosequencing;
Show all 20Show fewer
- Locally advanced, resectable disease defined by the presence of at least one of the following features:
- Distal tumor margin at <15 cm from the anal verge;
- cT3N0 or cT1-3N1 (with the definition of a clinically positive lymph node being any node ≥ 1 cm);
- Less than four lymph nodes in the mesorectum showing morphological signs on MRI indicating metastatic disease;
- No evidence of enlarged lateral pelvic clinically positive lymph node (> 1 cm);
- No evidence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI);
- No evidence of metastatic disease by CT scan of the chest and abdomen and total body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT scan;
- No clear indication of involvement of the pelvic side walls by imaging;
- Tumor must be amenable to curative resection (curative resection can include pelvic exenteration);
- Hematopoietic: absolute neutrophil count ≥1500/mm3; platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3; haemoglobin level ≥ 10 g/dL;
- Hepatic total bilirubin ≤1.5 time upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2 times ULN; AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN or renal creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (or local institutional standard methods);
- Availability of an adequate archival tumor sample (Formalin Fixed Paraffin-embedded [FFPE]) for central tissue screening. If the tumor block is not available, a minimum of twenty-five (25) 3-micron unstained sections of tumor will be required (5 of those on standard non charged slides for immunochemistry, the others on charged slides);
- Male subjects with female partners of childbearing potential must be willing to use adequate contraception as approved by the investigator (barrier contraceptive measure or oral contraception) contraception starting with the first dose of study therapy, through 180 days after the last dose of treatment; Note: Abstinence is acceptable if this is the usual lifestyle and preferred contraception for these subject.
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative blood pregnancy test at the baseline visit and must be willing to use an effective means of contraception and to continue its use for the duration of the study and for 180 days after the last infusion of study treatment. For this trial, women of childbearing potential are defined as all women after puberty, unless they are postmenopausal for at least 12 months, are surgically sterile, or are sexually inactive. Note: Abstinence is acceptable if this is the usual lifestyle and preferred contraception for the subject.
Who cannot join
- Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency;
- Previous pelvic RT;
- Any of the following in the 6 months prior to treatment start: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure (≥ New York Heart Association Classification Class II), cerebrovascular accident/stroke, transient ischemic attack, serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication or symptomatic pulmonary embolism;
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy;
- Active infection requiring systemic therapy;
- Infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) plus CD4 cells <200/mm3 or AIDS-defining conditions despite HAART;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Known prior severe hypersensitivity to investigational product or any component in its. formulations;
- Lack of upper gastrointestinal tract integrity or malabsorption syndrome; immune colitis; active inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., patients requiring current medical interventions or who are symptomatic);
- Presence of metastatic disease, recurrent rectal cancer or history of invasive rectal malignancy, regardless of disease-free interval;
- Other rectal cancers (i.e., sarcoma, lymphoma, carcinoid, squamous cell or cloacogenic carcinoma) or synchronous colon cancer;
- Patients with prior malignancies, including invasive colon cancer, are eligible provided they have been disease-free for ≥ 3 years and are deemed by their physician to be at low risk for recurrence (patients with effectively treated squamous cell or basal cell skin cancer, melanoma in situ, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or carcinoma in situ of the colon or rectum are eligible even if diagnosed less than 3 years before study enrollment);
- Other severe acute or chronic medical conditions including immune pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis or psychiatric conditions including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior; or laboratory abnormalities that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study treatment administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study;
- Any concomitant drugs contraindicated for use with the trial drugs according to the product information of the pharmaceutical companies;
- Pregnant or lactating women.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
Milan, 20133
Filippo Pietrantonio, MD, +39 0223903807, filippo.pietrantonio@istitutotumori.mi.it
Federica Morano, MD, +39 0223903842, federica.morano@istitutotumori.mi.it
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With CApecitabine Plus Temozolomide in Patients With MGMT Silenced and Microsatellite Stable Locally Advanced RecTal Cancer: the CATARTIC Trial
In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT) is considered the standard of care. Preoperative CTRT approach often results in a significant tumor downstaging and local control, with evidence of complete pathological response (pCR) rate of about 15% in high volume institutions. In high-risk LARC a new strategy called total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged, in which systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (RAPIDO trial) or with the triplet FOLFIRINOX (as was used in the PRODIGE 23 study) is incorporated before or after the administration of short-course RT or neoadjuvant CTRT and prior to surgery. However, given the fact that TNT may represent an overtreatment for a subset of patients, additional therapeutic strategies are warranted to improve the outcomes also in patients with lower risk that are not good candidate for a TNT.
In the era of personalized medicine, tumor molecular profiling may lead to the identification of therapeutic targets for pharmacological intervention potentially useful to enhance treatment outcomes.
Read more
O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs DNA damage induced by alkylating agents and MGMT inactivation due to promoter methylation confers enhanced sensitivity to alkylating agents such as temozolomide (TMZ).
TMZ has modest activity in patients with MGMT-methylated pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer and responses are restricted to tumors with complete MGMT loss by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite stable (MSS) status.
Both capecitabine and temozolomide induces deoxythymidine triphosphate thymidine pool depletion might induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-double strand breaks and eventually apoptosis in rapidly dividing cells. On the basis of such evidences, there is a strong biological and clinical rationale for testing the addition of TMZ to capecitabine-based CTRT in patients with MGMT silenced and MSS technically resectable LARC.
The aim of this trial is investigating whether the addition of TMZ to standard concurrent capecitabine-based long-course chemoradiation may increase pCR rate as compared to historical control in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not candidate to TNT and molecularly selected for the presence of MGMT silencing and microsatellite stable status.
Read the detailed description
Preoperative CTRT (long-course radiotherapy with a recommended dose of 45-50 Gy in 25-28 fractions plus a boost with a further 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions, and concomitant administration of oral capecitabine or continuous intravenous infusions of 5-fluorouracil) is considered the standard of care in the management of LARC, based on the significantly better down-staging and local control obtained by preoperative CTRT compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, with a consequent reduction of local recurrence rate, and given its superior tolerability profile compared with postoperative treatment. Preoperative CTRT approach often results in a significant tumor downstaging and local control, with evidence of complete pathological response (pCR) rate of about 15% in high volume institutions. In high-risk LARC a new strategy called total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged, in which systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (RAPIDO trial) or with the triplet FOLFIRINOX (as was used in the PRODIGE 23 study) is incorporated before or after the administration of short-course RT or neoadjuvant CTRT and prior to surgery. However, given the fact that TNT may represent an overtreatment for a subset of patients, additional therapeutic strategies are warranted to improve the outcomes also in patients with lower risk that are not good candidate for a TNT.
In the era of personalized medicine, tumor molecular profiling may lead to the identification of therapeutic targets for pharmacological intervention potentially useful to enhance treatment outcomes. About 30-40% of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are characterized by the promoter methylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, encoding a repair enzyme involved in the elimination of alkyl groups from the O6-position of guanine, usually caused by alkylating agents. MGMT defect, due to epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene, may be involved in early steps of colorectal tumor genesis leading to an increase of G-to-A transitions and may be associated with enhanced chemosensitivity to alkylating agents including dacarbazine and its oral analogue temozolomide (TMZ) - as shown for melanoma and glioblastoma. Previous phase II studies showed that TMZ can induce an objective response by RECIST criteria in about 10% of heavily pre-treated patients with advanced CRC carrying MGMT promoter methylated, as determined by the qualitative assay methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). To refine patient selection for TMZ therapy, we recently showed how digital PCR quantification of MGMT methylation may further refine patient selection, with benefit restricted to those with highly hyper-methylated tumors. Moreover, we showed that MGMT negative/low expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is found in about one third of MSP-methylated samples and is associated with increased response rate, since patients with retained MGMT expression in their tumors do not benefit from TMZ therapy. Therefore, ongoing trials (MAYA [NCT03832621], ARETHUSA [NCT03519412], FLIRT-bev [NCT04689347], ERASE-TMZ [EUDRACT:2020-005437-32]) select patients based on lack of MGMT expression assessed by means of IHC and presence of MGMT methylation by pyrosequencing or methylBEAMing. Finally, patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are intrinsically resistant to TMZ and therefore should be excluded by clinical trials on TMZ-based therapies. Based on these data, an assessment of MGMT promoter methylation coupled with absent protein expression and of the microsatellite instability status could optimize the prediction of response.
Finally, previous reports indicate that acquired resistance to TMZ may emerge through the induction of a MSI-like phenotype with emergence of MMR gene mutations and elevated tumor mutational burden characterized by G>A transitions (signature 8 according to Alexandrov et al, Nature 2013). The recently completed MAYA trial (NCT03832621) investigated the combination of TMZ with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic and chemorefractory disease; however, no data are available on potential synergy between RT and TMZ in inducing potential sensitization to immunotherapy of "cold" tumors and translational data are required.
Both capecitabine and temozolomide induces deoxythymidine triphosphate. Thymidine pool depletion might induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-double strand breaks and eventually apoptosis in rapidly dividing cells. On the basis of such evidences, there is a strong biological and clinical rationale for testing the addition of TMZ to capecitabine-based CTRT in patients with MGMT silenced and MSS technically resectable LARC. Concurrent treatment with TMZ during RT followed by adjuvant TMZ is the standard of care for the treatment of malignant glioblastomas, showing a survival benefit compared to radiation alone, at the cost of a limited additional toxicity. When used together to radiotherapy, TMZ stabilize RT-induced double-strand breaks by producing 12-base adducts in DNA, including the cytotoxic lesions O6-methylguanine and 3-methyladenine. Therefore, the synergy between RT and TMZ could be of particular value in patients with MGMT silenced, MSS rectal cancers candidates for preoperative CTRT. Therefore, there is a strong rationale to investigate capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM)-based CTRT in this molecular subgroup.
In a phase 1 study, Jeong and colleagues evaluated the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose (RD) of temozolomide when combined with capecitabine as preoperative CTRT in patients with molecularly unselected LARC, showing that this treatment strategy is feasible and safe. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in patients treated with the highest temozolomide dose level tested in the study of 75 mg/m2/day, nor National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI-CTCAE) grade IV adverse events (AEs) were observed. Overall, the most frequent AE reported was nausea, occurring in 77.2% of the 22 patients treated. The MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in the 72.7% of patient enrolled. Tumor downstaging of the primary tumor and lymph nodes was observed in 81.8% and 72.7% of patients, respectively, the R0 resection rate was 90.9% and a pCR of the primary tumor (ypT0) was achieved in 31.8% of patients. As expected, the pCR rates were higher in the hypermethylated than in the unmethylated MGMT group (37.5% vs 16.7%), although this difference did not reach the statistical significance (odds ratio= 0.33; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.03-3.58; p=0.616).
The aim of this trial is investigating whether the addition of TMZ to standard concurrent capecitabine-based long-course chemoradiation may increase pCR rate as compared to historical control in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not candidate to TNT and molecularly selected for the presence of MGMT silencing and microsatellite stable status.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Being tested
- External-beam radiation, Capecitabine, Temozolomide
- Keywords
- locally advanced rectal cancer, temozolomide, MGMT, MSS
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
External-beam radiationRadiation
External-beam radiation 50.4 GY (45 Gy in 25 fractions + Boost 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions over 5 weeks)
CapecitabineDrug
825 mg/sqm/bid per os (p.o.) 5 days/week for 5 weeks;
TemozolomideDrug
75 mg/sqm p.o. 5 days/week for 5 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Catartic: chemoradiotherapy plus temozolomide | Experimental | External-beam radiation: 50.4 GY (45 Gy in 25 fractions + Boost 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions over 5 weeks) in association with:
Capecitabine 825 mg/sqm/bid per os (p.o.) 5 days/week for 5 weeks plus Temozolomide 75 mg/sqm p.o. 5 days/week for 5 weeks. Receives: Radiation: External-beam radiation; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Temozolomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the rate of complete pathologic response (pCR)
pCR, defined as complete histological regression with no available tumor cells yT0N0
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
To assess the R0 resection rate
R0 defined as the rate of microscopically margin-negative resections
Measured: 24 months
To assess the tumor downstaging rate
Tumor downstaging rate defined as the rate of reduction in the stage of the tumor as a result of pre-operative therapy, from a more to a less threatening stage at the radiologic assessment after the the end of CTRT
Measured: 24 months
To assess the rate of sphincter preservation
Sphincter preservation rate defined as the percentage of patients with preserved ano-rectal sphincter after surgery
Measured: 24 months
To assess the rate of local recurrence rate
Local recurrence rate defined as the rate of detectable local disease at follow-up after study treatment completion
Measured: 24 months
To assess the disease-free survival
Disease-free survival defined as the time from the enrollment in the study to the occurrence of disease relapse (local and/or distant) or death from any cause
Measured: The disease-free survival will be evaluated during a follow up of 5 years
To assess the overall survival
Overall survival defined as the time from the enrollment in the study to the occurrence of death.
Measured: The overall survival will be evaluated during a follow up of 5 years
To assess the incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events
Adverse events defined and graded according to the NCI CTCAE v5.0
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (45)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Phase II, multicentre, non-randomized, open-label trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05136326
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INT 188/21
- Other IDs
- INT 188/21
- Acronym
- CATARTIC
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The trial results concerning the primary, secondary and exploratory outcomes will be published according to the standard guidelines. IPD could eventually be requested to the Sponsor and Principal Investigator, who will carefully evaluate the motivated request
Publications
Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC; EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1114-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060829.
PubMed 16971718Lorimer PD, Motz BM, Kirks RC, Boselli DM, Walsh KK, Prabhu RS, Hill JS, Salo JC. Pathologic Complete Response Rates After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2095-2103. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5873-8. Epub 2017 May 22.
PubMed 28534080Gerard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouche O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejardin MT, Untereiner M, Leduc B, Francois E, Maurel J, Seitz JF, Buecher B, Mackiewicz R, Ducreux M, Bedenne L. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4620-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7629.
PubMed 17008704Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
PubMed 30207593Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
PubMed 20610543Berardi R, Maccaroni E, Onofri A, Giampieri R, Bittoni A, Pistelli M, Scartozzi M, Pierantoni C, Bianconi M, Cascinu S. Multidisciplinary treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a literature review. Part 1. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;10(14):2245-58. doi: 10.1517/14656560903143776.
PubMed 19640208Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986 Jun 28;1(8496):1479-82. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91510-2.
PubMed 2425199Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Bensadoun RJ, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC, Bolla M, Marchal D, Van Laethem JL, Klein V, Giralt J, Clavere P, Glanzmann C, Cellier P, Collette L; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70599-0. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PubMed 24440473Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
PubMed 19770376Chen EY, Kardosh A, Nabavizadeh N, Lopez CD. Evolving Treatment Options and Future Directions for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Dec;18(4):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
PubMed 31377214Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Martel-Laffay I, Hennequin C, Etienne PL, Vendrely V, Francois E, de La Roche G, Bouche O, Mirabel X, Denis B, Mineur L, Berdah JF, Mahe MA, Becouarn Y, Dupuis O, Lledo G, Montoto-Grillot C, Conroy T. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1638-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
PubMed 20194850Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, Pinto C, Cordio S, Rosati G, Artale S, Tagliagambe A, Ambrosini G, Rosetti P, Bonetti A, Negru ME, Tronconi MC, Luppi G, Silvano G, Corsi DC, Bochicchio AM, Chiaulon G, Gallo M, Boni L. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2773-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911. Epub 2011 May 23.
PubMed 21606427Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O'Connell MJ, Beart RW, Wozniak TF, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori G, Eakle JF, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Sharif S, Roh MS, Wolmark N. Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 14;107(11):djv248. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv248. Print 2015 Nov.
PubMed 26374429Huttner FJ, Probst P, Kalkum E, Hackbusch M, Jensen K, Ulrich A, Debus J, Jager D, Diener MK. Addition of Platinum Derivatives to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Stage II/III Rectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):887-902. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz081.
PubMed 31077329Dewdney A, Cunningham D, Tabernero J, Capdevila J, Glimelius B, Cervantes A, Tait D, Brown G, Wotherspoon A, Gonzalez de Castro D, Chua YJ, Wong R, Barbachano Y, Oates J, Chau I. Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision in patients with high-risk rectal cancer (EXPERT-C). J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1620-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6036. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PubMed 22473163
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With CApecitabine Plus Temozolomide in Patients With MGMT Silenced and Microsatellite Stable Locally Advanced RecTal Cancer: the CATARTIC Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05136326
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CATARTIC / INT 188/21
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer
- Keywords
- locally advanced rectal cancer, temozolomide, MGMT, MSS
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT) is considered the standard of care. Preoperative CTRT approach often results in a significant tumor downstaging and local control, with evidence of complete pathological response (pCR) rate of about 15% in high volume institutions. In high-risk LARC a new strategy called total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged, in which systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (RAPIDO trial) or with the triplet FOLFIRINOX (as was used in the PRODIGE 23 study) is incorporated before or after the administration of short-course RT or neoadjuvant CTRT and prior to surgery. However, given the fact that TNT may represent an overtreatment for a subset of patients, additional therapeutic strategies are warranted to improve the outcomes also in patients with lower risk that are not good candidate for a TNT.
In the era of personalized medicine, tumor molecular profiling may lead to the identification of therapeutic targets for pharmacological intervention potentially useful to enhance treatment outcomes.
O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs DNA damage induced by alkylating agents and MGMT inactivation due to promoter methylation confers enhanced sensitivity to alkylating agents such as temozolomide (TMZ).
TMZ has modest activity in patients with MGMT-methylated pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer and responses are restricted to tumors with complete MGMT loss by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite stable (MSS) status.
Both capecitabine and temozolomide induces deoxythymidine triphosphate thymidine pool depletion might induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-double strand breaks and eventually apoptosis in rapidly dividing cells. On the basis of such evidences, there is a strong biological and clinical rationale for testing the addition of TMZ to capecitabine-based CTRT in patients with MGMT silenced and MSS technically resectable LARC.
The aim of this trial is investigating whether the addition of TMZ to standard concurrent capecitabine-based long-course chemoradiation may increase pCR rate as compared to historical control in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not candidate to TNT and molecularly selected for the presence of MGMT silencing and microsatellite stable status.
Detailed description
Preoperative CTRT (long-course radiotherapy with a recommended dose of 45-50 Gy in 25-28 fractions plus a boost with a further 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions, and concomitant administration of oral capecitabine or continuous intravenous infusions of 5-fluorouracil) is considered the standard of care in the management of LARC, based on the significantly better down-staging and local control obtained by preoperative CTRT compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, with a consequent reduction of local recurrence rate, and given its superior tolerability profile compared with postoperative treatment. Preoperative CTRT approach often results in a significant tumor downstaging and local control, with evidence of complete pathological response (pCR) rate of about 15% in high volume institutions. In high-risk LARC a new strategy called total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged, in which systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (RAPIDO trial) or with the triplet FOLFIRINOX (as was used in the PRODIGE 23 study) is incorporated before or after the administration of short-course RT or neoadjuvant CTRT and prior to surgery. However, given the fact that TNT may represent an overtreatment for a subset of patients, additional therapeutic strategies are warranted to improve the outcomes also in patients with lower risk that are not good candidate for a TNT.
In the era of personalized medicine, tumor molecular profiling may lead to the identification of therapeutic targets for pharmacological intervention potentially useful to enhance treatment outcomes. About 30-40% of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are characterized by the promoter methylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene, encoding a repair enzyme involved in the elimination of alkyl groups from the O6-position of guanine, usually caused by alkylating agents. MGMT defect, due to epigenetic silencing of the MGMT gene, may be involved in early steps of colorectal tumor genesis leading to an increase of G-to-A transitions and may be associated with enhanced chemosensitivity to alkylating agents including dacarbazine and its oral analogue temozolomide (TMZ) - as shown for melanoma and glioblastoma. Previous phase II studies showed that TMZ can induce an objective response by RECIST criteria in about 10% of heavily pre-treated patients with advanced CRC carrying MGMT promoter methylated, as determined by the qualitative assay methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). To refine patient selection for TMZ therapy, we recently showed how digital PCR quantification of MGMT methylation may further refine patient selection, with benefit restricted to those with highly hyper-methylated tumors. Moreover, we showed that MGMT negative/low expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is found in about one third of MSP-methylated samples and is associated with increased response rate, since patients with retained MGMT expression in their tumors do not benefit from TMZ therapy. Therefore, ongoing trials (MAYA [NCT03832621], ARETHUSA [NCT03519412], FLIRT-bev [NCT04689347], ERASE-TMZ [EUDRACT:2020-005437-32]) select patients based on lack of MGMT expression assessed by means of IHC and presence of MGMT methylation by pyrosequencing or methylBEAMing. Finally, patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-high) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are intrinsically resistant to TMZ and therefore should be excluded by clinical trials on TMZ-based therapies. Based on these data, an assessment of MGMT promoter methylation coupled with absent protein expression and of the microsatellite instability status could optimize the prediction of response.
Finally, previous reports indicate that acquired resistance to TMZ may emerge through the induction of a MSI-like phenotype with emergence of MMR gene mutations and elevated tumor mutational burden characterized by G>A transitions (signature 8 according to Alexandrov et al, Nature 2013). The recently completed MAYA trial (NCT03832621) investigated the combination of TMZ with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic and chemorefractory disease; however, no data are available on potential synergy between RT and TMZ in inducing potential sensitization to immunotherapy of "cold" tumors and translational data are required.
Both capecitabine and temozolomide induces deoxythymidine triphosphate. Thymidine pool depletion might induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-double strand breaks and eventually apoptosis in rapidly dividing cells. On the basis of such evidences, there is a strong biological and clinical rationale for testing the addition of TMZ to capecitabine-based CTRT in patients with MGMT silenced and MSS technically resectable LARC. Concurrent treatment with TMZ during RT followed by adjuvant TMZ is the standard of care for the treatment of malignant glioblastomas, showing a survival benefit compared to radiation alone, at the cost of a limited additional toxicity. When used together to radiotherapy, TMZ stabilize RT-induced double-strand breaks by producing 12-base adducts in DNA, including the cytotoxic lesions O6-methylguanine and 3-methyladenine. Therefore, the synergy between RT and TMZ could be of particular value in patients with MGMT silenced, MSS rectal cancers candidates for preoperative CTRT. Therefore, there is a strong rationale to investigate capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM)-based CTRT in this molecular subgroup.
In a phase 1 study, Jeong and colleagues evaluated the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose (RD) of temozolomide when combined with capecitabine as preoperative CTRT in patients with molecularly unselected LARC, showing that this treatment strategy is feasible and safe. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in patients treated with the highest temozolomide dose level tested in the study of 75 mg/m2/day, nor National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI-CTCAE) grade IV adverse events (AEs) were observed. Overall, the most frequent AE reported was nausea, occurring in 77.2% of the 22 patients treated. The MGMT promoter hypermethylation was detected in the 72.7% of patient enrolled. Tumor downstaging of the primary tumor and lymph nodes was observed in 81.8% and 72.7% of patients, respectively, the R0 resection rate was 90.9% and a pCR of the primary tumor (ypT0) was achieved in 31.8% of patients. As expected, the pCR rates were higher in the hypermethylated than in the unmethylated MGMT group (37.5% vs 16.7%), although this difference did not reach the statistical significance (odds ratio= 0.33; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.03-3.58; p=0.616).
The aim of this trial is investigating whether the addition of TMZ to standard concurrent capecitabine-based long-course chemoradiation may increase pCR rate as compared to historical control in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not candidate to TNT and molecularly selected for the presence of MGMT silencing and microsatellite stable status.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Phase II, multicentre, non-randomized, open-label trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Catartic: chemoradiotherapy plus temozolomide | Experimental | Radiation: External-beam radiation, Drug: Capecitabine, Drug: TemozolomideExternal-beam radiation: 50.4 GY (45 Gy in 25 fractions + Boost 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions over 5 weeks) in association with: Capecitabine 825 mg/sqm/bid per os (p.o.) 5 days/week for 5 weeks plus Temozolomide 75 mg/sqm p.o. 5 days/week for 5 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Written informed consent to study procedures;
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0-1;
- Life expectancy of at least 5 years (excluding diagnosis of cancer);
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency;
- Previous pelvic RT;
- Any of the following in the 6 months prior to treatment start: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure (≥ New York Heart Association Classification Class II), cerebrovascular accident/stroke, transient ischemic attack, serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication or symptomatic pulmonary embolism;
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy;
- Active infection requiring systemic therapy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| External-beam radiationExternal-beam radiation 50.4 GY (45 Gy in 25 fractions + Boost 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions over 5 weeks) | Radiation | Catartic: chemoradiotherapy plus temozolomide |
| Capecitabine825 mg/sqm/bid per os (p.o.) 5 days/week for 5 weeks; | Drug | Catartic: chemoradiotherapy plus temozolomide |
| Temozolomide75 mg/sqm p.o. 5 days/week for 5 weeks | Drug | Catartic: chemoradiotherapy plus temozolomide |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the rate of complete pathologic response (pCR)
Time frame: 24 months
pCR, defined as complete histological regression with no available tumor cells yT0N0
7 secondary outcomes
To assess the R0 resection rate
Time frame: 24 months
To assess the tumor downstaging rate
Time frame: 24 months
To assess the rate of sphincter preservation
Time frame: 24 months
To assess the rate of local recurrence rate
Time frame: 24 months
To assess the disease-free survival
Time frame: The disease-free survival will be evaluated during a follow up of 5 years
To assess the overall survival
Time frame: The overall survival will be evaluated during a follow up of 5 years
To assess the incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 16971718Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC; EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1114-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060829.
- Background: PubMed 28534080Lorimer PD, Motz BM, Kirks RC, Boselli DM, Walsh KK, Prabhu RS, Hill JS, Salo JC. Pathologic Complete Response Rates After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2095-2103. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5873-8. Epub 2017 May 22.
- Background: PubMed 17008704Gerard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouche O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejardin MT, Untereiner M, Leduc B, Francois E, Maurel J, Seitz JF, Buecher B, Mackiewicz R, Ducreux M, Bedenne L. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4620-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7629.
- Background: PubMed 30207593Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 20610543Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 19640208Berardi R, Maccaroni E, Onofri A, Giampieri R, Bittoni A, Pistelli M, Scartozzi M, Pierantoni C, Bianconi M, Cascinu S. Multidisciplinary treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a literature review. Part 1. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;10(14):2245-58. doi: 10.1517/14656560903143776.
- Background: PubMed 2425199Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986 Jun 28;1(8496):1479-82. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91510-2.
- Background: PubMed 24440473Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Bensadoun RJ, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC, Bolla M, Marchal D, Van Laethem JL, Klein V, Giralt J, Clavere P, Glanzmann C, Cellier P, Collette L; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70599-0. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 19770376Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 31377214Chen EY, Kardosh A, Nabavizadeh N, Lopez CD. Evolving Treatment Options and Future Directions for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Dec;18(4):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 20194850Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Martel-Laffay I, Hennequin C, Etienne PL, Vendrely V, Francois E, de La Roche G, Bouche O, Mirabel X, Denis B, Mineur L, Berdah JF, Mahe MA, Becouarn Y, Dupuis O, Lledo G, Montoto-Grillot C, Conroy T. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1638-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
- Background: PubMed 21606427Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, Pinto C, Cordio S, Rosati G, Artale S, Tagliagambe A, Ambrosini G, Rosetti P, Bonetti A, Negru ME, Tronconi MC, Luppi G, Silvano G, Corsi DC, Bochicchio AM, Chiaulon G, Gallo M, Boni L. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2773-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911. Epub 2011 May 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The trial results concerning the primary, secondary and exploratory outcomes will be published according to the standard guidelines. IPD could eventually be requested to the Sponsor and Principal Investigator, who will carefully evaluate the motivated request
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing External-beam radiation, Capecitabine and Temozolomide in people with Rectal Cancer, run by Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Filippo Pietrantonio, MD (+39 0223903807, filippo.pietrantonio@istitutotumori.mi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the rate of complete pathologic response (pCR) (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05136326, which also lists 45 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2023.