AzTrials
AzTrials

Autism Spectrum DisorderNCT05127863

Efficacy of a Pragmatic Intervention to Improve Adaptation to Context and Interlocutor

A study testing social communication intervention (pragmatic) in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Language Disorder, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have communicational difficulties to adapt their language to context and to interlocutors. These difficulties have long term impacts on education and social life of these patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 14 years
What is being tested?
social communication intervention (pragmatic)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 1 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 14 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • diagnostic of ASD or DLD
  • pragmatic difficulties

Who cannot join

  • intellectual deficiency

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • UCLouvain - faculty of psychology

    Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Patients with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) or Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have communicational difficulties to adapt their language to context and to interlocutors. These difficulties have long term impacts on education and social life of these patients. Speech language therapists (SLT) helps child and teenagers with pragmatic and communicational disorders. Nevertheless, few research evaluated the efficacy of such interventions.

In the present research, the students will do a literature review to identify efficacy intervention's strategies of pragmatic disorders. Then, 2 to 5 patients, aged from 8 to 14 years old, with ASD or DLD and pragmatic disorders, and who haven't intellectual disorder will be recruited. They will come to the faculty of psychology of UCLouvain before the beginning of the intervention. In this pretest session, parents will answer questionnaires et children will have tests in order to evaluate their pragmatic abilities (during 30 minutes), like conversations, role plays, communication referential tasks, etc. This evaluation will be video recorded to code pragmatic abilities. Then, a group intervention of ten sessions will be proposed (1 session per week, 10 weeks). Activities will include role plays, conversations, etc. At the end of the intervention period, a post test session, like the pretest session, will be proposed to evaluate intervention efficacy.

The design is multiple study cases. This is the best design to control efficacy of these kind of interventions considering the inter-individual variability of DLD and ASD patients. This study is original since few research evaluated the efficiency of pragmatic intervention. Some studies demonstrated the efficacy of pragmatic intervention in DLD and ASD patients but theses researches were conducted in English-speaking countries. Furthermore, the present research will propose a group intervention, which weren't proposed in the literature to our knowledge (individual intervention). If the group intervention is efficacy, the cost-benefice ratio would be interested.

Being tested
social communication intervention (pragmatic)
Medical subject headings
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Language Development Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • social communication intervention (pragmatic)Behavioural

    10 sessions of group intervention in order to improve pragmatic/social communication. one session of one hour per week. Activities will included role play, conversations, etc.

Study groups in NCT05127863
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
2 to 5 ASD or TDL patientsExperimental2 to 5 ASD or TDL patients, 8 to 14 years old, with no intellectual disability.
Receives: Behavioral: social communication intervention (pragmatic)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. social communication abilities (according parents)

    questionnaire (Children Communication Checklist) - pragmatic scale Maximum 162 (good performance), minimum 86 (bad performance)

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. social communication abilities (evaluated by clinician)

    social communication task, conversations

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2022

Why it stopped: The study is completed

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
multiple single case study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05127863
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRAGMA-INTERV
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
8 Nov 2021
Last updated
21 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing social communication intervention (pragmatic) in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Language Disorder, run by Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The study is completed). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

social communication abilities (according parents) (time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in