AzTrials
AzTrials

Caries; InitialNCT05127356

Diagnostic Accuracy of DIAGNOdent Compared to ICDAS II

An observational study of Caries; Initial, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There is a paradigm shift in conservative dentistry by substituting the surgical model with the medical model of treatment. Early detection of initial carious lesions will aid in clinical decision making during management ; either no care advised, preventive care advised or operative care advised. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Caries; Initial
What is being tested?
DIAGNOdent and ICDAS II
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
193 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 5 May 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Patients with non cavitated incipient carious white spot lesions

Who may be able to join

  • Non cavitated white spot lesions.
  • Patient compliance

Who cannot join

  • Cavitated lesions.
  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Enrollment in another clinical trials.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

    Cairo, El Manial, 11553

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Accuracy of DIAGNOdent Compared to ICDAS II in Detection of Incipient White Spot Lesions: An In-vivo Evaluation

There is a paradigm shift in conservative dentistry by substituting the surgical model with the medical model of treatment. Early detection of initial carious lesions will aid in clinical decision making during management ; either no care advised, preventive care advised or operative care advised. According to recent systematic reviews meticulous visual examination using ICDAS II presented a substantial level of reproducibility and accuracy for assessment of carious lesions and was considered the reference for clinical visual assessment . However, visual examination is subjective and is highly dependent on the dentist's skills and experience, with high specificity and low sensitivity. New devices have been developed to detect and quantify incipient demineralization. Besides visual detection systems, laser fluorescence assessment can be considered a suitable method. In vitro data suggested that the visual examination and fluorescence method have similar accuracy to detect initial carious lesions.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent) compared to to visual examination (ICDAS II) in detection of incipient carious lesions for decision making during caries management

Conditions
Caries; Initial
Being tested
DIAGNOdent, ICDAS II

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DIAGNOdentDevice

    Laser fluorescence device

  • ICDAS IIDiagnostic test

    International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II)

Study groups in NCT05127356
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Laser fluorescenceDIAGNOdent is a laser fluorescence device that detects and quantify stages of development of incipient carious lesions 0-4 healthy tooth structure; 5-10 Outer half enamel caries; 11-20 Inner half enamel caries; 21+ Dentin caries
Receives: Device: DIAGNOdent
Visual examinationICDAS II Code 0: Sound tooth surface; Code 1: First visual change in enamel; Code 2:Distinct visual change in enamel when viewed wet; Code 3: Localized enamel breakdown due to caries with no visible dentin; Code 4: Underlying dark shadow from dentin with or without localized enamel breakdown; Code 5: Distinct cavity with visible dentin; Code 6: Extensive distinct cavity with visible dentin.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: ICDAS II

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy

    Assessing the validity of both methods in detecting initial carious lesions in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

    Measured: Immediate (cross-sectional)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion5 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
193 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05127356
Sponsor's protocol ID
Diagnodent
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
5 Nov 2021
Last updated
31 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Caries; Initial, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy (time frame: Immediate (cross-sectional)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in