AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-operativeNCT05123092

Erectae Spinae Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesis in Lumbar Surgeries

A study testing Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block and Intrathecal Morphine injection in people with Post-operative and Analgesia, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study. The patients will be included in the study shoud be in the following category: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II Age range from 18 and 70 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Post-operative, Analgesia
What is being tested?
Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block and Intrathecal Morphine injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
82 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
20 Jan 2021to 20 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II patients who will be scheduled for elective lumbar surgery for one or two levels. • Age range from 18 and 70 years.

Who cannot join

  • patient refusal.
  • significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
  • History of allergy to one of the study drugs.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
  • Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
  • Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Atef Mohamed mahmoud

    Al Fayyum, 63511

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients: A DOUBLE - BLINDED RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY.

The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study.

The patients will be included in the study shoud be in the following category:

Read more
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II
  • Age range from 18 and 70 years.

The patients will be discarded from the study shoud be in the following:

  • patient refusal.
  • significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
  • Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
  • Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) score as primary outcome measure. demographic data ( Age, Weight, sex and height) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (min), time to the first rescue analgesic (min) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(microgram),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( BP ,H R and oxgen saturation %) and complications as 2ry outcome measures.
Read the detailed description

This study will be performed in the in the FAYOUM University hospital after the local Institutional Ethics Committee and local institutional review board approval. The study design will be double blinded retrospective controlled comparative study. A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible patients before recruitment and randomization.

Inclusion criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II patients who will be scheduled for elective lumbar surgery for one or two levels.
  • Age range from 18 and 70 years.

Exclusion criteria:

  • patient refusal.
  • significant renal, hepatic and cardiovascular diseases.
  • History of allergy to one of the study drugs.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders.
  • Chronic opioid use, history of chronic pain and cognitive disorders.
  • Lumbar spine lesion revision and dural tear. Randomization will be done via computer-generated random numbers that will be placed in separate closed envelopes and will be opened by study investigators just after induction of general anesthesia. Neither the patients, the study investigators, the attending clinicians nor the data collectors will be aware of the allocation of groups till the study ends.

The patients will be allocated in 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups:

group erector spinae plane block (n=41), and group intrathecal morphine (n=41).

Anesthesia procedure:

All patients will receive 150 mg ranitidine oral tablet at the night and on the morning of the operation as a premedication. Upon arrival to the operating room, standard monitors (Electrocardiogram, Pulse oximeter, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring) will be applied and continued all over the operation. An intravenous (IV) access will be established. General anesthesia will be performed as follows: induction will be made using IV propofol (2mg/kg), atracurium (0.5mg/kg), and fentanyl

(1microgram/kg). A cuffed endotracheal tube (7-8.5) size will be placed to secure the airway .The patients will be placed in the prone position. Maintenance of anesthesia will be made using inhalational anesthesia (isoflurane) and IV atracurium according to the patients' requirements.

Block procedure:

The same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block. In the group ESP, a high frequency linear US probe (HFL_50, 15_6MHz) will be placed vertically and nearly 3 cm lateral to the vertebra in the middle of the incision line. The transverse process and the overlaying erector spinae muscles (ESM) will be identified under parasagittal scanning A22 G,50 mm block needle (SONOTAP,Pajunk, Geisingen,Germany) will be inserted at a 30-40° angle in the cranial to caudal direction via an in-plane approach and advanced into the plane between the fascia of ESM and transverse process under sterile conditions. The correct needle position will be confirmed after a hydro dissection with 3 ml of isotonic saline, and then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in the interfascial plane between the rhomboideus major muscle and ESM. The local anesthetic spread will be visualized in a fascial longitudinal pattern deep to the ESM. The same procedure will be performed on the contralateral side. In the group of intrathecal morphine , a lumbar puncture will be done in the lateral position via a midline approach into the level of the vertebra which exists in the middle of the incision with complete aseptic condition using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle to give 0.3 mg of morphine (preservative free form) suspended in 0.4 ml of normal saline . Anesthesia will be discontinued at the end of the surgery and the patients will be extubated after return of spontaneous respiration .All patients will be followed for 1 hour in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) then discharged to the ward. In the postoperative period we will give the patients multimodal analgesic regimen as following : a) paracetamol 1000 mg IV 3 times/day, b) dexketoprofen 50 mg IV once/day, c) IV pethidine 0.5mg/kg as a rescue analgesic on demand. Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS 0: no pain, 10: worst pain ever) at 0 hours postoperative in PACU, then at postoperative 2., 6.,12.,24., and 48 hours at the ward by a research assistant who will be blinded to the study groups. Pethidine IV 0.5 mg/kg will be given as a rescue analgesic when the VAS score will be more than 3. The amount of pethidine consumption will be recorded between 0-12., 12-24., and 24-48 hours. The following criteria will be recorded and compared between the two groups : demographic data ( Age, Weight, sex and height) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (min), VAS scores , time to the first rescue analgesic (h) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(mg),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( blood pressure ,heart rate and spo2 ) and complications. Complications include complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia , intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression , nausea and vomiting, urine retension, hypotension , bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness ).9

Primary outcome measures:

The mean VAS score (score 0 =no pain and 10 =worst pain ever ) in the two groups of the study.

Secondary outcome measures:

The secondary outcome will include the following : demographic data ( Age, Weight, height, body mass index) , ASA classification ,mean operative times (minutes), time to first rescue analgesic (minutes) ,intraoperative fentanyl consumption(micrograme),postoperative opioid consumption ,sedation score, hemodynamics intraoperative and postoperative ( blood pressure

,heart rate and spo2 ) and complications. Complications include complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia, intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness).

Statistical analysis and sample size estimation :

Sample size was calculated using G*power version 3.1.9.4. Previous similar studies indicated that a minimal sample size of 37 patients in each group will be needed to achieve a power level of 0.80 , alpha level of 0.05(two tailed) , will a medium effect size of 0.66 for the VAS score at 24 hours. Estimating that 10% of patients may drop out of the study due to different reasons , sample size was increased to 82 patients (41 in each group).10 Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM,Armonk,NY,USA).Data are presented as mean (SD) , median [interquartile range (IQR) ], or number of patients (%) . Distribution normality will be assessed using the Kolmogorov_Smirnov test. Comparisons between groups will be made using independent t_test or Mann_Whitney U test , as appropriate. Categorical variables will be analyzed using chi_square test or Fisher exact test. A p_value less 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block, Intrathecal Morphine injection
Keywords
Ultrsound, Intrathecal, Morphine, Erectae spinae
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae blockOther

    One group by using ultrasound for making erectae spinae block

  • Intrathecal Morphine injectionOther

    Injecting intrathecal morphine

Study groups in NCT05123092
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group ( ultrasound guided erectae spinae block)Active comparatorThe same anesthesiologist who is experienced in US guided regional anesthesia will perform the block. In the group ESP, a high frequency linear US probe (HFL_50, 15_6MHz) will be placed vertically and nearly 3 cm lateral to the vertebra in the middle of the incision line. The transverse process and the overlaying erector spinae muscles (ESM) will be identified under parasagittal scanning A22 G,50 mm block needle (SONOTAP,Pajunk, Geisingen,Germany) will be inserted at a 30-40° angle in the cranial to caudal direction via an in-plane approach and advanced into the plane between the fascia of ESM and transverse process under sterile conditions. The correct needle position will be confirmed after a hydro dissection with 3 ml of isotonic saline, and then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected in the interfascial plane between the rhomboideus major muscle and ESM. The local anesthetic spread will be visualized in a fascial longitudinal pattern deep to the ESM.
Receives: Other: Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block; Other: Intrathecal Morphine injection
Group (Intrathecal morphine)Active comparatorIn the group of intrathecal morphine , a lumbar puncture will be done in the lateral position via a midline approach into the level of the vertebra which exists in the middle of the incision with complete aseptic condition using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle to give 0.3 mg of morphine (preservative free form) suspended in 0.4 ml of normal saline .
Receives: Other: Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block; Other: Intrathecal Morphine injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VAS score

    The mean VAS score (score 0 =no pain and 10 =worst pain ever ) in the two groups of the study.

    Measured: Every 4 bours for 48 hours post operative

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Age

    Age messured by (years)

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Gender

    Male or female

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Height

    Height measured by (meter)

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Weight

    Weight measured by kilogram (kg)

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Body Mass Index

    BMI measured by kilogram divided by square meter (kg/m^2)

    Measured: Day 1

  6. Mean operative time

    Sum of operative time divided by number

    Measured: during surgery

  7. Intra and post-operative opoid injected

    Sum of opoid injected intra and post

    Measured: up to 48 hours

  8. Hemodynamics intra operative

    MABP, HR, SPO2,

    Measured: Every half hour during surgery

  9. Hemodynamics post-operative

    MABP, HR, SPO2,

    Measured: Every 4 hours for 24 hours

  10. Time for 1ST analgesic request

    after what time IV analgesia reequired

    Measured: up to 48 hours

  11. Complications

    complications related to the block and the surgery (nerve damage, local anesthesia toxicity, bleeding, infection, and thromboembolism) and complications related to the general anesthesia, intrathecal morphine and IV opioids (respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, constipation and dizziness). Grades from 1

    Measured: up to 48 hours

  12. Ramsy sedation score

    Ramsay Sedation Scale

    1 Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both 3 Patient responds to commands only 4 Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 5 Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus 6 Patient exhibits no response

    Measured: Every 4 hours for 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2021
  2. Study start20 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion20 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion20 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The patients will be allocated in 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups: group erector spinae plane block (n=41), and group intrathecal morphine (n=41).
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05123092
Sponsor's protocol ID
M520
Other IDs
M520
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
13 Aug 2021
Last updated
7 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Upon finishing my study and publishing an article, I will share my data upon resonable rquest.

Publications

  • Mahmoud AM, Ragab SG, Shawky MA, Masry DH, Botros JM. The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared With Intrathecal Morphine in Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Double-blind Prospective Comparative Study. Pain Physician. 2023 Mar;26(2):149-159.

    PubMed 36988361

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound guided lumbar erectae spinae block and Intrathecal Morphine injection in people with Post-operative and Analgesia, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VAS score (time frame: Every 4 bours for 48 hours post operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05123092, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in