Gingival RecessionNCT05122468
Tunnel vs. CAF for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
A study testing Connective tissue Harvest and CAF and Connective tissue Harvest and Tunnel in people with Gingival Recession, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Many studies have compared the tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of single and multiple recessions. However, there is a lack of evidence that compared both techniques in combination with a connective tissue graft, for just multiple adjacent recessions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gingival Recession
- What is being tested?
- Connective tissue Harvest and CAF and Connective tissue Harvest and Tunnel
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 2 Dec 2016to 25 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with a minimum of two adjacent teeth and a maximum of four adjacent teeth with gingival recessions (at least one with a depth ≥ 3 mm) and requiring surgical intervention, without medical contraindications to elective surgery.
Who cannot join
- Presence of untreated periodontitis
- Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from tooth brushing
- Interdental attachment loss greater than 1 mm or furcation involvement in the teeth to be treated
- Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation or clinically significant super-eruption
- Self-reported current smoking
- Presence of medical contraindications to elective surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Use of a Connective Tissue Auto-graft in Combination With Either the Tunnel Technique or the Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Many studies have compared the tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of single and multiple recessions. However, there is a lack of evidence that compared both techniques in combination with a connective tissue graft, for just multiple adjacent recessions. No technique is clearly superior to another in terms of complete root coverage (CRC), mean root coverage (MRC) and the gain of keratinized tissue height (KTH) when multiple recession coverage was evaluated. Moreover, as a connective tissue graft supposed to offer more stability in terms of complete root coverage in long-term basis, the main question should be aimed at the role of the sub-epithelial connective tissue graft, when it is used in combination with one technique or another. Hence, the hypothesis is focused on if the use of a connective tissue graft in combination with a tunnel technique would provide higher clinical outcomes and similar patient-based outcomes than its use in combination with the Coronally Advanced flap technique.
Read the detailed description
Parallel group, clinical evaluator- and statistician-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Being tested
- Connective tissue Harvest and CAF, Connective tissue Harvest and Tunnel
- Medical subject headings
- Gingival Recession
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Connective tissue Harvest and CAFProcedure or surgery
A connective tissue graft will be harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft, which will be de-epithelialized with a 15-c blade(Zucchelli et al. 2010) before opening of the opaque envelopes, which contains the allocation concealment. The dimensions of the graft achieve 3 to 5 mm mesial and distal from the lateral teeth with an ideal thickness about 1 to 1.5 mm. Donor tissue will be taken at premolar and molar level. In control sites, the graft will be adapted to cover each exposed root to the CEJ, and stabilized with either 6-0 resorbable sutures (with the knot placed under the papillary area) or a non-resorbable suture with the knot on the palatal side. For suturing of the graft, interrupted sutures or sling sutures (anchored to periosteum apical to the graft and hanging around the neck of the experimental teeth) may be used.
Connective tissue Harvest and TunnelProcedure or surgery
A connective tissue graft will be harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft, which will be de-epithelialized with a 15-c blade(Zucchelli et al. 2010) before opening of the opaque envelopes, which contains the allocation concealment. The dimensions of the graft achieve 3 to 5 mm mesial and distal from the lateral teeth with an ideal thickness about 1 to 1.5 mm. Donor tissue will be taken at premolar and molar level.
In test sites, the graft should be slid through the tunnel. To accomplish the adequate position of the graft into the tunnel, 2 sutures are first placed, 1 at the most mesial and the other at the most distal aspect of the tunnel. The needles should pass underneath the tunnel and exit through the largest or most central gingival recession, the one through which the grafting tissue will be introduced. With these 2 sutures already inside the tunnel, the graft is bitten on both ends with vertical mattress sutures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CAF group | Active comparator | Coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft.
According to the technique(Zucchelli \& De Sanctis 2000), this procedure consists of a rotated papilla, envelope flap. Intrasulcular incisions will be performed involving all the experimental units and at least one tooth mesial and distal to the experimental teeth. From the centre of rotation the incisions will be traced in a corono-apical direction toward the mesial and toward the distal extension of the flap.
After the accurate initial incisions, the flap will be raised full thickness apical to the mucogingival junction (MGJ), exposing 1 to 2 mm of bone at the base of the recession/dehiscence defects.
A linear mesio-distal incision will then be performed to cut the periosteum, releasing any muscular tension and allow a passive coronal positioning of the flap to cover the CEJ. Receives: Procedure: Connective tissue Harvest and CAF |
| Tunnel group | Experimental | Tunnel technique in combination with a connective tissue graft.
When tunnelling procedures are applied, this technique consists of a supra-periosteal bed under a pedicle flap without any external incisions (Zabalegui et al. 1999). Afterwards, a connective tissue graft is placed and secured through the tunnel, covering the adjacent exposed roots.
To create a tunnel at the buccal aspect of the gingiva, sulcular partial-thickness incisions are made by means of a micro-blade through each recession area, extending the split-thickness beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ). The partial dissection plane is then extended laterally through the papillae between the treated teeth without separating them. This incision must also be extended 3 to 5 mm mesial and distal from the lateral teeth to allow space for the connective tissue graft. Receives: Procedure: Connective tissue Harvest and Tunnel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete root coverage
The complete root coverage is defined as the percentage of cases that 100% of the recessions will be covered in their whole extension.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mean Root Coverage
The mean root coverage is the percentage of recession extension, which will be covered at 6 months after surgery.
Measured: 6 months
Recession Reduction (RR)
It is described as the changes in recession measurements between baseline and 6 months post-operative. Recession is defined as position of the gingival margin. All included recessions will be measured with two methods:
- from the CEJ to the gingival margin
- from the incisal edge to the gingival margin All measures will be taken using as reference the most apical position of the gingival margin on the facial aspect of the tooth.
Measured: 6 months
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Depth of the gingival sulcus/pocket will be assessed on the mid-facial aspect of each tooth. The width of keratinized tissue will be assessed clinically, while attached gingival will be derived mathematically subtracting the width of keratinized gingiva and the depth of the sulcus/pocket.
Measured: 6 months
Clinical attachment Gain
It is the change in clinical attachment levels between baseline and 6 Months post-opeartive. Clinical attachment level is defined as the sum of recession and probing pocket depth.
Measured: 6 months
Width of Keratinized Tissue (KTW)
It is measured as the distance from the free gingival margin to the mucogingival junction, which will be measured at 6 months.
Measured: 6 months
Wound Healing Index (WHI)
Early wound healing will be assessed semi-quantitatively with a composite index (Dastoor et al. 2007)designed to explore 4 areas/aspects of wound healing: i) the flap margin; ii) the interdental papilla; iii) the graft; and iv) the sutures. Weighted scores will be given to each parameter to develop a score designed to have a low value in a situation of perfect/uneventful early wound healing and higher values when aspects of wound failure will be detected
Measured: 3 months
Root Coverage Aesthetic Score (Ref)
In order to assess the aesthetic outcome achieved after root coverage procedures, the Root Coverage Esthetic Score index (Cairo et al. 2009)will be used. This system evaluated 5 variables 6 months after the surgical procedure. The position of the gingival margin received 0, 3 or 6 points while all the other variables (marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, gingival color and MGJ alignment) were assigned either 0 or 1.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2021
- Study start2 Dec 2016
- Primary completion25 May 2022
- Study completion25 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gingival RecessionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universidad Complutense de MadridThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The two intervention groups will be the CAF group (standard of care control) and Tunnel group (TUN, Test group). Two experienced clinicians (ML, or JG) will deliver treatment consisting of root coverage surgery using a coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft (Control group), or a tunnel technique (Test group) in combination with a connective tissue graft. Follow-up of individual patients will be 6 months (to be extended to 3 years to observe differences in a long-term basis)
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jerian González-Febles, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- Investigators
- Mariano Sanz, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad Complutense de Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05122468
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C.I. 16/504
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 3 May 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only on reasonable request to corresponding author
Publications
Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):705-10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565.
PubMed 19335093Dastoor SF, Travan S, Neiva RF, Rayburn LA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Effect of adjunctive systemic azithromycin with periodontal surgery in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in smokers: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):1887-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070072.
PubMed 17915999Gobbato L, Nart J, Bressan E, Mazzocco F, Paniz G, Lops D. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes after the application of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap or via a tunneling technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2191-2202. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1721-7. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
PubMed 26814715Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
PubMed 24641000Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):593-603. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12254.
PubMed 24708338Zabalegui I, Sicilia A, Cambra J, Gil J, Sanz M. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Apr;19(2):199-206.
PubMed 10635186Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth. J Periodontol. 2005 Dec;76(12):2286-92. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.12.2286.
PubMed 16332241Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.
PubMed 11022782Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Petracci E, Montebugnoli L. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12224. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
PubMed 24382170Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, de Sanctis M. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):728-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01550.x. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
PubMed 20590963Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
PubMed 24117676Gonzalez-Febles J, Romandini M, Laciar-Oudshoorn F, Noguerol F, Marruganti C, Bujaldon-Daza A, Zabalegui I, Sanz M. Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3627-3638. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
PubMed 36988824
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of a Connective Tissue Auto-graft in Combination With Either the Tunnel Technique or the Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05122468
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C.I. 16/504
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many studies have compared the tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of single and multiple recessions. However, there is a lack of evidence that compared both techniques in combination with a connective tissue graft, for just multiple adjacent recessions. No technique is clearly superior to another in terms of complete root coverage (CRC), mean root coverage (MRC) and the gain of keratinized tissue height (KTH) when multiple recession coverage was evaluated. Moreover, as a connective tissue graft supposed to offer more stability in terms of complete root coverage in long-term basis, the main question should be aimed at the role of the sub-epithelial connective tissue graft, when it is used in combination with one technique or another. Hence, the hypothesis is focused on if the use of a connective tissue graft in combination with a tunnel technique would provide higher clinical outcomes and similar patient-based outcomes than its use in combination with the Coronally Advanced flap technique.
Detailed description
Parallel group, clinical evaluator- and statistician-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The two intervention groups will be the CAF group (standard of care control) and Tunnel group (TUN, Test group). Two experienced clinicians (ML, or JG) will deliver treatment consisting of root coverage surgery using a coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft (Control group), or a tunnel technique (Test group) in combination with a connective tissue graft. Follow-up of individual patients will be 6 months (to be extended to 3 years to observe differences in a long-term basis)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CAF group | Active comparator | Procedure: Connective tissue Harvest and CAFCoronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft. According to the technique(Zucchelli \& De Sanctis 2000), this procedure consists of a rotated papilla, envelope flap. Intrasulcular incisions will be performed involving all the experimental units and at least one tooth mesial and distal to the experimental teeth. From the centre of rotation the incisions will be traced in a corono-apical direction toward the mesial and toward the distal extension of the flap. After the accurate initial incisions, the flap will be raised full thickness apical to the mucogingival junction (MGJ), exposing 1 to 2 mm of bone at the base of the recession/dehiscence defects. A linear mesio-distal incision will then be performed to cut the periosteum, releasing any muscular tension and allow a passive coronal positioning of the flap to cover the CEJ. |
| Tunnel group | Experimental | Procedure: Connective tissue Harvest and TunnelTunnel technique in combination with a connective tissue graft. When tunnelling procedures are applied, this technique consists of a supra-periosteal bed under a pedicle flap without any external incisions (Zabalegui et al. 1999). Afterwards, a connective tissue graft is placed and secured through the tunnel, covering the adjacent exposed roots. To create a tunnel at the buccal aspect of the gingiva, sulcular partial-thickness incisions are made by means of a micro-blade through each recession area, extending the split-thickness beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ). The partial dissection plane is then extended laterally through the papillae between the treated teeth without separating them. This incision must also be extended 3 to 5 mm mesial and distal from the lateral teeth to allow space for the connective tissue graft. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects with a minimum of two adjacent teeth and a maximum of four adjacent teeth with gingival recessions (at least one with a depth ≥ 3 mm) and requiring surgical intervention, without medical contraindications to elective surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Presence of untreated periodontitis
- Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from tooth brushing
- Interdental attachment loss greater than 1 mm or furcation involvement in the teeth to be treated
- Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation or clinically significant super-eruption
- Self-reported current smoking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Connective tissue Harvest and CAFA connective tissue graft will be harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft, which will be de-epithelialized with a 15-c blade(Zucchelli et al. 2010) before opening of the opaque envelopes, which contains the allocation concealment. The dimensions of the graft achieve 3 to 5 mm mesial and distal from the lateral teeth with an ideal thickness about 1 to 1.5 mm. Donor tissue will be taken at premolar and molar level. In control sites, the graft will be adapted to cover each exposed root to the CEJ, and stabilized with either 6-0 resorbable sutures (with the knot placed under the papillary area) or a non-resorbable suture with the knot on the palatal side. For suturing of the graft, interrupted sutures or sling sutures (anchored to periosteum apical to the graft and hanging around the neck of the experimental teeth) may be used. | Procedure or surgery | CAF group |
| Connective tissue Harvest and TunnelA connective tissue graft will be harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft, which will be de-epithelialized with a 15-c blade(Zucchelli et al. 2010) before opening of the opaque envelopes, which contains the allocation concealment. The dimensions of the graft achieve 3 to 5 mm mesial and distal from the lateral teeth with an ideal thickness about 1 to 1.5 mm. Donor tissue will be taken at premolar and molar level. In test sites, the graft should be slid through the tunnel. To accomplish the adequate position of the graft into the tunnel, 2 sutures are first placed, 1 at the most mesial and the other at the most distal aspect of the tunnel. The needles should pass underneath the tunnel and exit through the largest or most central gingival recession, the one through which the grafting tissue will be introduced. With these 2 sutures already inside the tunnel, the graft is bitten on both ends with vertical mattress sutures. | Procedure or surgery | Tunnel group |
Primary outcome
Complete root coverage
Time frame: 6 months
The complete root coverage is defined as the percentage of cases that 100% of the recessions will be covered in their whole extension.
7 secondary outcomes
Mean Root Coverage
Time frame: 6 months
Recession Reduction (RR)
Time frame: 6 months
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical attachment Gain
Time frame: 6 months
Width of Keratinized Tissue (KTW)
Time frame: 6 months
Wound Healing Index (WHI)
Time frame: 3 months
Root Coverage Aesthetic Score (Ref)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 19335093Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):705-10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565.
- Background: PubMed 17915999Dastoor SF, Travan S, Neiva RF, Rayburn LA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Effect of adjunctive systemic azithromycin with periodontal surgery in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in smokers: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):1887-96. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070072.
- Background: PubMed 26814715Gobbato L, Nart J, Bressan E, Mazzocco F, Paniz G, Lops D. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes after the application of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap or via a tunneling technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2191-2202. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1721-7. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
- Background: PubMed 24641000Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.
- Background: PubMed 24708338Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):593-603. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12254.
- Background: PubMed 10635186Zabalegui I, Sicilia A, Cambra J, Gil J, Sanz M. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Apr;19(2):199-206.
- Background: PubMed 16332241Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth. J Periodontol. 2005 Dec;76(12):2286-92. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.12.2286.
- Background: PubMed 11022782Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.
- Background: PubMed 24382170Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Petracci E, Montebugnoli L. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12224. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 20590963Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, de Sanctis M. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):728-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01550.x. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 24117676Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36988824Gonzalez-Febles J, Romandini M, Laciar-Oudshoorn F, Noguerol F, Marruganti C, Bujaldon-Daza A, Zabalegui I, Sanz M. Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3627-3638. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only on reasonable request to corresponding author
Related trials for Gingival Recession
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Recruiting
i-PRF-Based Bioactive Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
Gingival Graft, Recession, Gingival
Recruiting
Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest in Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Trial
Diabetes Mellitus, Gingival Recession, Generalized
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Smoking on Palatal Donor Site Tissue Profile in the Success of Connective Tissue Grafts
Soft Tissue Augmentation, Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
Active, not recruiting
Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap Versus Coronally Advanced Flap for Miller Class I Gingival Recession
Gingival Recession
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mariano Sanz, PhD principal investigator
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Connective tissue Harvest and CAF and Connective tissue Harvest and Tunnel in people with Gingival Recession, run by Universidad Complutense de Madrid at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete root coverage (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05122468, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2022.