AzTrials
AzTrials

Humeral FracturesNCT05118087

Comparison of Bracing With Co-aptation Splinting for the Initial Treatment of Acute Humeral Shaft Fractures: The COBRAS Trials

A study testing Webril Padded Plaster Splint and Pre-Fabricated Fracture Brace in people with Humeral Fractures, run by NYU Langone Health at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to determine which initial method of immobilization for humeral shaft fractures in the emergency room maximizes patient comfort. The two methods of initial management for humeral shaft fractures are sarmiento bracing (pre-fabricated fracture brace) and coaptation splinting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Humeral Fractures
What is being tested?
Webril Padded Plaster Splint and Pre-Fabricated Fracture Brace
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
20 Jul 2021to 1 Nov 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presenting to an emergency room or ICARE in the participating centers with an acute humeral shaft fracture
  • Age above 18 and skeletally mature
  • Isolated Injury
  • Treated non-operatively first 2 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Open fractures
  • Poly trauma
  • Injuries deemed operative by attending surgeon
  • Patients undergoing treatment for malignancy
  • Prisoners

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • NYU Winthrop Hospital

    Garden City, New York, 11530

  • NYU Langone Health

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Jamaica Hospital Medical Center

    Queens, New York, 11418

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to determine which initial method of immobilization for humeral shaft fractures in the emergency room maximizes patient comfort. The two methods of initial management for humeral shaft fractures are sarmiento bracing (pre-fabricated fracture brace) and coaptation splinting. In this study, the team will compare patient related outcomes and comfort for each method of initial management of humeral shaft fractures. Participant pain, narcotic usage, and function will be tracked over a 2 week period to see which method of immobilization is preferred.

Being tested
Webril Padded Plaster Splint, Pre-Fabricated Fracture Brace
Keywords
Sarmiento Brace, Coaptation Splint
Medical subject headings
Humeral Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Webril Padded Plaster SplintProcedure or surgery

    Patients in the coaptation splint group will have a webril padded plaster splint that is placed around the humerus. The forearm and wrist are then suspended in a cuff and collar.

  • Pre-Fabricated Fracture BraceProcedure or surgery

    Patients in the sarmiento group will be given a fitted pre-fabricated fracture brace with a cuff and collar for the forearm. The patients will be educated on brace maintained, tightening, and care during at the time of the ER encounter.

Study groups in NCT05118087
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Coaptation SplintActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Webril Padded Plaster Splint
Sarmiento BraceActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Pre-Fabricated Fracture Brace

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score on Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and on the right (extreme pain). The patient is asked to mark their current pain level on the line. The total range of score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain); the higher the pain, the greater the amount of pain.

    Measured: Week 1 post-treatment

  2. Score on Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and on the right (extreme pain). The patient is asked to mark their current pain level on the line. The total range of score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain); the higher the pain, the greater the amount of pain.

    Measured: Week 2 post-treatment

  3. Number of Tramadol Pills Taken

    All patients will be discharged with 28 pills of tramadol 50mg. At week 1 follow-up, number of tramadol pills taken will be reported.

    Measured: Week 1 post-treatment

  4. Number of Tramadol Pills Taken

    All patients will be discharged with 28 pills of tramadol 50mg. At week 2 follow-up, number of tramadol pills taken will be reported.

    Measured: Week 2 post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Incidence of cutaneous complications

    Cutaneous complications between immediate fracture bracing and coaptation splints in the ER within the first 2 weeks of treatment will be reported

    Measured: Week 2 post-treatment

  2. Score on PROMIS - Physical Function - Short Form 10b

    PROMIS consists of 10 statements/questions that are scored 1-5 each. The total range of score is 10-50; a higher score indicates less difficulty performing an activity.

    Measured: Week 1 post-treatment

  3. Score on PROMIS - Physical Function - Short Form 10b

    PROMIS consists of 10 statements/questions that are scored 1-5 each. The total range of score is 10-50; a higher score indicates less difficulty performing an activity.

    Measured: Week 2 post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2021
  2. Study start20 Jul 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05118087
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-00438
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
1 Nov 2021
Last updated
27 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be available upon reasonable request.

Publications

  • Kingery MT, Ganta A, Egol KA. Comparison of Early Bracing Versus Splinting for the Initial Treatment of Acute Humeral Shaft Fractures (The COBRAS Trial). J Orthop Trauma. 2026 Aug 1;40(8):408-415. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003196.

    PubMed 42466769

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Webril Padded Plaster Splint and Pre-Fabricated Fracture Brace in people with Humeral Fractures, run by NYU Langone Health at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score on Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: Week 1 post-treatment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05118087, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in