AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-Dural Puncture HeadachePhase 2NCT05116930

Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate for the Treatment of Headache After Dural Puncture

A Phase 2 study testing Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate in people with Post-Dural Puncture Headache, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate to treat post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) to reduce the proportion of postpartum women with a PDPH requiring epidural blood patch (EBP) who developed a PDPH after accidental dural puncture. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 54 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Post-Dural Puncture Headache
What is being tested?
Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Nov 2021to Dec 2027
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 54 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after documented dural puncture with Tuohy needle during placement of epidural analgesia for labor and no other explanation for headache (HA).
  • Onset of HA within 72 hours of delivery.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Visual analog scale (NRS) score < 4.
  • History of migraine headaches.
  • Asthma.
  • Arrhythmia.
  • Heart block.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Myasthenia gravis.
  • Inability to understand pain scores and other questionnaires.
  • Inability to speak English.
  • Contraindication to acetaminophen or NSAIDs.
  • Temperature > 38.5 C.
  • Prior EBP done for this HA.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

    Mark Rollins, MD, PhD, (507) 422-0662, rollins.mark@mayo.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate for the Treatment of Post Dural Puncture Headache After Known Dural Puncture With a Tuohy Needle: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate to treat post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) to reduce the proportion of postpartum women with a PDPH requiring epidural blood patch (EBP) who developed a PDPH after accidental dural puncture.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: Neostigmine and glycopyrrolate will reduce the proportion of postpartum women with a PDPH requiring EBP who developed a PDPH after accidental dural puncture with a Tuohy needle.

Background: The post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-documented complication of dural puncture. Depending on a number of factors, the overall incidence of PDPH following dural puncture with an epidural Tuohy needle is typically around 50%, but can be as high as 70% for certain populations.

The headache is characterized as frontal or occipital in nature, with a typical onset of 6-72 hours after dural puncture. It is normally exacerbated by the upright position and improved by the supine position. Associated symptoms may include photophobia, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, tinnitus, neck stiffness, decreased hearing and visual changes. These symptoms tend to be extremely debilitating in affected patients, severely limiting their functional capacity until the resolution of the headache. The compromise is even greater in postpartum women who also need to care for a newborn, as the time after birth is important for forming attachment and encompasses many new obligations for the new mother.

The treatment of the PDPH often begins with conservative treatment including supportive therapies such as hydration, bed rest, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and oral opioids. In addition, some evidence exists for the use of caffeine. While these do not hasten recovery, they may improve symptoms. For PDPH of all etiologies, 72% will resolve spontaneously in 7 days and 89% by 14 days.

For patients with moderate to severe symptoms or long lasting headaches, the gold standard for treatment of headaches that do not resolve is the epidural blood patch (EBP). This treatment has been shown to be effective in 70-98% of patients. However, it has numerous contraindications including fever, infection, coagulopathy, active neurological disease, patient refusal. In addition, a potential complication is yet another dural puncture. Also, while the EBP is generally very safe, it is an invasive procedure with its own complications; it has been associated with very rare but serious complications including: moderate long-lasting backache, meningitis, epidural abscess formation, epidural hematoma formation, and neurologic deficit development.

The use of neostigmine and atropine in the treatment of PDPH was first described in a randomized placebo-controlled trial in 2018. The addition of neostigmine and atropine to conservative treatment for PDPH resulted in all 41 patients in the treatment group reporting a visual analog scale (NRS) score ≤ 3 after 2 doses, no recurrence of headache, and none receiving EBP. Seven out of 42 (15.9%) patients in the placebo group reported a persistent NRS ≥ 5 and all received EBP. Postulated mechanisms of action of neostigmine and atropine in the treatment of PDPH include increased CSF volume and cerebral vasoconstriction. Patients enrolled in this study developed a PDPH after spinal anesthesia using a 22-gauge Quincke needle. The effects of neostigmine and atropine on PDPH resulting from accidental dural puncture with a larger-bore, 17-gauge epidural Tuohy needle are unknown.

Neostigmine and atropine, when given concomitantly, antagonize each other's adverse effects resulting in a favorable safety profile. The most common adverse effects reported include blurred vision, dry mouth, abdominal cramps, muscle twitches, and urinary urgency - all of which were transient. Additionally, simultaneous administration of neostigmine and atropine likely have a net neutral effect on oxytocin release and likely do not affect lactation or breastfeeding for the mother. Both neostigmine and atropine are excreted in very small amounts in the breastmilk and are unlikely to affect the breastfed infant more than transiently.

In the available literature, the main driver of this improvement is thought to be from the cholinergic effects of neostigmine. When unopposed, these cholinergic effects are known to cause side effects such as muscle cramping. The main purpose of adding of atropine in the original study - as well as the addition of an anticholinergic in most clinical practice applications - to neostigmine is to counteract these potential cholinergic adverse reactions. Glycopyrrolate is the anticholinergic of choice for use with neostigmine as a muscle relaxant reversal agent. This is because glycopyrrolate has a pharmacokinetic profile that mirrors neostigmine and is able to more effectively to eliminate the cholinergic effects in patients who receive neostigmine over the duration of the neostigmine pharmacologic effect.

Number of Participants: Enrollment of 36 with goal of 18 evaluable patients

Design: Prospective Pilot Study

Recruitment: In person contact by OB Anesthesia resident, OB Anesthesia fellow, Anesthesia consultant, or Research Coordinator

Recruitment process: Patients will be identified as at risk on the labor and delivery ward after they have experienced a known dural puncture with a Tuohy needle. Patients will be assessed daily while in the hospital for signs and symptoms of a PDPH. If patient meets criteria after dural puncture (a positional headache after known dural puncture, worsened by the upright position, NRS score of ≥ 4), they will be informed of the study procedures, given time to ask questions regarding procedures, and decide if they consent to participation. Patients will also be counseled on the risks and benefits of EBP and can elect to proceed with EBP at any point in the study.

Intervention:

Patients with a PDPH after documented accidental dural puncture with a Tuohy needle and a NRS score of ≥ 4 will receive a slow infusion of 20 μg/kg neostigmine and 4 μg/kg glycopyrrolate IV given over 10 minutes. Patients will be monitored with blood pressure measurements every 3 minutes along with continuous EKG and pulse oximetry during the infusion and for 20 minutes after completion of the infusion. This regimen is repeated every 8 hours for a maximum of 3 doses. Treatments continue until a NRS score ≤ 3 is achieved or the patient elects to proceed with an epidural blood patch. Patients also receive conservative PDPH management which includes encouraging oral hydration, encouraging oral caffeine consumption in patients who regularly consume caffeine, 1 g acetaminophen every 6 hours, and 600 mg ibuprofen every 6 hours. Oxycodone 5-10 mg every 4 hours PRN may be utilized for postoperative pain.

Safety Monitoring: Patients receiving the intervention will be monitored during and after the intervention for abdominal or muscle cramps, blurred vision, dry mouth, or urinary urgency by the OB anesthesia provider administering the intervention. They will be instructed to call the research PI if they have any of these complications. Patients will also be monitored with blood pressure measurements every 3 minutes along with continuous EKG and pulse oximetry during the infusion and for 20 minutes after completion of the infusion.

Consent process: Consent will be obtained after identification of a PDPH after documented accidental dural puncture with a Tuohy needle and a NRS score of ≥ 4 in the patient's hospital room. Patients will be given sufficient time to ask any questions to the attending/resident anesthesiologist and research personnel related to the procedure and this research study.

Being tested
Neostigmine, Glycopyrrolate
Medical subject headings
Post-Dural Puncture Headache

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NeostigmineDrug

    IV infusion 20 μg/kg over 10 minutes repeated every 8 hours for a maximum of 3 doses

  • GlycopyrrolateDrug

    IV infusion 4 μg/kg over 10 minutes repeated every 8 hours for a maximum of 3 doses

Study groups in NCT05116930
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Postpartum dural puncture headache following dural puncture from Tuohy needleExperimentalSubjects identified as experienced a post dural puncture headache after a confirmed dural puncture from a Tuohy needle will receive an IV administration of the study medications neostigmine and glycopyrrolate.
Receives: Drug: Neostigmine; Drug: Glycopyrrolate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of postpartum women requiring epidural blood patch

    Total number of postpartum women with a post dural puncture headache (PDPH) requiring epidural blood patch (EBP)

    Measured: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in pain scores

    Measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score (0-10) with patient in sitting position for 5 min

    Measured: Baseline, 1 hour, 8 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 1 week, and 2 weeks after intervention

  2. Adverse Events

    Total number of adverse events experienced by subjects

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2021
  2. Study start19 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05116930
Sponsor's protocol ID
21-009530
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
2 Nov 2021
Last updated
23 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Nov;91(5):718-29. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg231.

    PubMed 14570796
  • Amorim JA, Gomes de Barros MV, Valenca MM. Post-dural (post-lumbar) puncture headache: risk factors and clinical features. Cephalalgia. 2012 Sep;32(12):916-23. doi: 10.1177/0333102412453951. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

    PubMed 22843225
  • Flaatten H, Rodt S, Rosland J, Vamnes J. Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1987 Feb;42(2):202-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb03001.x.

    PubMed 3826597
  • Abouleish E, Vega S, Blendinger I, Tio TO. Long-term follow-up of epidural blood patch. Anesth Analg. 1975 Jul-Aug;54(4):459-63. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197554040-00012.

    PubMed 125053
  • Cornwall RD, Dolan WM. Radicular back pain following lumbar epidural blood patch. Anesthesiology. 1975 Dec;43(6):692-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197512000-00023. No abstract available.

    PubMed 127535
  • Mehta SP, Keogh BP, Lam AM. An epidural blood patch causing acute neurologic dysfunction necessitating a decompressive laminectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):78-80. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000025.

    PubMed 24310044
  • Reynolds AF Jr, Hameroff SR, Blitt CD, Roberts WL. Spinal subdural epiarachnoid hematoma: a complication of a novel epidural blood patch technique. Anesth Analg. 1980 Sep;59(9):702-3. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7191232
  • Sperry RJ, Gartrell A, Johnson JO. Epidural blood patch can cause acute neurologic deterioration. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):303-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00038. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7832316
  • Abdelaal Ahmed Mahmoud A, Mansour AZ, Yassin HM, Hussein HA, Kamal AM, Elayashy M, Elemady MF, Elkady HW, Mahmoud HE, Cusack B, Hosny H, Abdelhaq M. Addition of Neostigmine and Atropine to Conventional Management of Postdural Puncture Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Dec;127(6):1434-1439. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003734.

    PubMed 30169405
  • Nair AS. Questions Regarding the Use of Neostigmine-Atropine to Treat Postdural Puncture Headache. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):e126-e127. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004156. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31094821
  • Daoud M, Asfour M, Mubashirulhassan S. Missed Neostigmine-Atropine Side Effects: Uncommonly Noticed Postanesthesia but Commonly Noticed in Other Situations. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):e128. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004158. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31094823
  • Abrishami A, Ho J, Wong J, Yin L, Chung F. Sugammadex, a selective reversal medication for preventing postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD007362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007362.pub2.

    PubMed 19821409
  • Luo J, Chen S, Min S, Peng L. Reevaluation and update on efficacy and safety of neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Dec 10;14:2397-2406. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S179420. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30573962
  • Salem MG, Richardson JC, Meadows GA, Lamplugh G, Lai KM. Comparison between glycopyrrolate and atropine in a mixture with neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Studies in patients following open heart surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1985 Feb;57(2):184-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.2.184.

    PubMed 2857570

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate in people with Post-Dural Puncture Headache, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of postpartum women requiring epidural blood patch (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05116930, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in