Psychotic EpisodePEPsy-CMNCT05116514
Evaluation of the Impact of Case Manager Intervention on the 3-year Psychotic Episode Recurrence Rate in Patients Aged 16 to 30 Years With a First Psychotic Episode.
A study testing Case management in people with Psychotic Episode, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 6 sites in France.
Trial summary
The study investigators hypothesize that the intervention of case managers specifically trained in case management of early psychosis will change the paradigm of care of a first psychotic episode from the current organization of the care system. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Psychotic Episode
- What is being tested?
- Case management
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 256 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 27 Sep 2021to Nov 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient or their close relative must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for a 3-year follow-up.
- Patient is managed in a psychiatric service (consultation or hospitalization) for a first episode psychosis defined by:
- Presence of positive psychotic symptoms (delusion(s) and/or hallucination(s) and/or conceptual disorganization) evolving for at least one week, either daily or at least 3 times per week for at least one hour per occasion ;
- Never having taken a neuroleptic treatment with antipsychotic aim (except for an antipsychotic treatment started for the current episode for example by the general practitioner before being referred to psychiatry);
Show all 9Show fewer
- A disorder meeting the DSM 5 criteria from the following list: delusional disorder, brief psychotic disorder greater than 7 days, schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, substance-induced psychotic disorder greater than 7 days, other specific or nonspecific schizophrenic spectrum disorder or other psychotic disorder, bipolar I or II disorder with congruent and non-mood congruent psychotic features, bipolar disorder with congruent and non-mood congruent psychotic features induced by a substance, major depressive disorder with congruent and non-mood congruent psychotic features.
- Inclusion should be within the first 3 months of care for first episode psychosis in the psychiatric service.
- At the time of inclusion, the psychotic symptomatology observed during the first episode psychosis may still be present or in remission.
Who cannot join
- The subject is participating in another category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject, or one of the parents for minor patients, refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- The patients has an IQ less than or equal to 55
- The patient has a first psychotic episode linked to a psychotic problem triggered by a medication of other medical condition
- The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
France6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
CH Saint Marie Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
Sébastien ALMON, sebastien.almon@hotmail.fr
- Recruiting
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier
Delphine CAPDEVIELLE, 04.67.33.97.02, d-capdevielle@chu-montpellier.fr
Delphine CAPDEVIELLE
- Not yet recruiting
CHU Nice
Nice
Bruno GIORDANA, 04.92.03.76.09, giordana.b@chu-nice.fr
- Recruiting
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes
Anissa Megzari, 04.66.68.42.36, drc@chu-nimes.fr
Aurélie SCHANDRIN
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Léon-Jean Grégory
Thuir
Aurore LARUE, 04.68.84.66.20, aurore.larue@ch-thuir.fr
- Not yet recruiting
CHU de TOULOUSE
Toulouse, Choisir Une Région, 31
ETIENNE VERY, 05.61.77.22.33, very-e@chu-toulouse.fr
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Case Manager Intervention on the 3-year Psychotic Episode Recurrence Rate in Patients Aged 16 to 30 Years With a First Psychotic Episode. Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Controlled Study With Blinded Evaluation.
The study investigators hypothesize that the intervention of case managers specifically trained in case management of early psychosis will change the paradigm of care of a first psychotic episode from the current organization of the care system. Indeed, the creation of specific services for emerging psychotic disorders cannot easily be generalized throughout the country and requires specific funding. The intervention of case managers according to the recommendations of good practices will make it possible to propose the fundamental principles of early intervention to young patients and their families on a large scale throughout the territory, namely: personalized and proactive accompaniment, psycho-education of the pathology and treatments, involvement and support of the families, and support for socio-professional reintegration
- Conditions
- Psychotic Episode
- Being tested
- Case management
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Case managementOther
Regular and personalized follow-up by a case manager using a "case management" approach, updated every 3 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Case manager group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Case management |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of patients with recurrence of psychotic episode at least once between groups
Recurrence of the psychotic episode will be defined as psychiatric hospitalization with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder and/or the presence of positive psychotic symptoms according to the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) ≥ 4 for item P1 (delusions) and/or P2 (conceptual disorganization) and/or P3 (hallucination)) over a period of at least one week.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (194)
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of recurrences of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
number
Measured: 1 year
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of recurrences of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
number
Measured: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of recurrences of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
number
Measured: 3 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient
number
Measured: 1 year
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient
number
Measured: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient
number
Measured: 3 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the duration of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
days/weeks/months
Measured: 1 year
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the duration of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
days/weeks/months
Measured: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the duration of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
days/weeks/months
Measured: 3 years
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: Inclusion
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: 6 months
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: 1 year
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: 18 months
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: 2 years
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: 2.5 years
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
%
Measured: 3 years
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: Inclusion
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: 6 months
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: 1 year
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: 18 months
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: 2 years
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: 2.5 years
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
% voluntary versus involuntary
Measured: 3 years
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: Inclusion
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: 6 months
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: 1 year
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: 18 months
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: 2 years
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: 2.5 years
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Defined by a break in follow-up organized by the referring care team for more than 30 days
Measured: 3 years
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: Inclusion
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: 6 months
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: 1 year
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: 18 months
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: 2 years
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: 2.5 years
Treatment compliance between groups
item 13 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS, hetero-assessment)
Measured: 3 years
Adherence to treatment
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 1 year
Adherence to treatment
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 2 years
Adherence to treatment
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 3 years
Therapeutic alliance
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 1 year
Therapeutic alliance
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 2 years
Therapeutic alliance
Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 3 years
Patient awareness of disorders and of the need for treatment
Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 1 year
Patient awareness of disorders and of the need for treatment
Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 2 years
Patient awareness of disorders and of the need for treatment
Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS, self-administered questionnaire)
Measured: 3 years
Assessment of addictive comorbidities
semi-structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID)
Measured: Inclusion
Assessment of addictive comorbidities
semi-structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID)
Measured: 3 years
Assessment of tobacco, alcohol and drug use
Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
Measured: Every 6 months from inclusion
Evaluation of the clinical impact of the intervention between groups
Clinical Global Impression questionnaire (CGI)
Measured: Every 6 months from inclusion
Psychotic and general symptoms
Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS)
Measured: Every 6 months from inclusion
Depressive symptoms
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: Every 6 months from inclusion
Self- and hetero-aggressive behaviors
according to Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) items 1 and 2
Measured: Every 6 months from inclusion
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: Inclusion
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: 6 months
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: 1 year
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: 18 months
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: 2 years
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: 2.5 years
Reported adverse events
death by suicide, attempted suicide or self-injurious acts, hetero-aggressive acts according to the medical record and investigated if score greater than or equal to 3 on items 1 and 2 of the HoNOS
Measured: 3 years
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: Inclusion
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: 6 months
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: 1 year
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: 18 months
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: 2 years
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: 2.5 years
Current suicidal ideations
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS)
Measured: 3 years
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: Inclusion
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: 6 months
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: 1 year
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: 18 months
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: 2 years
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: 2.5 years
Assess the impact of the intervention on socio-professional functioning and quality of life
Socio-demographic data updated every 6 months: living conditions (housing, entourage, income), level of education and/or professional situation
Measured: 3 years
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: Inclusion
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: 6 months
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: 1 year
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: 18 months
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: 2 years
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: 2.5 years
Social and occupational functioning
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Measured: 3 years
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: Inclusion
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: 6 months
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: 1 year
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: 18 months
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: 2 years
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: 2.5 years
Social functioning
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales
Measured: 3 years
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: Inclusion
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: 6 months
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: 1 year
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: 18 months
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: 2 years
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: 2.5 years
Psychosocial functioning
Quality of Life Scale (QLS) - semi-structured interview
Measured: 3 years
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: Inclusion
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: 1 year
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: 18 months
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: 2 years
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: 2.5 years
Functioning
Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Revision 4: self-administered questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Quality of life of users (patient and family)
World Health Organization Quality of Life brief (WHOQOL-brief)
Measured: 1 year
Quality of life of users (patient and family)
World Health Organization Quality of Life brief (WHOQOL-brief)
Measured: 2 years
Quality of life of users (patient and family)
World Health Organization Quality of Life brief (WHOQOL-brief)
Measured: 3 years
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5D 3 level version (EQ-5D-35L)
Measured: 1 year
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5D 3 level version (EQ-5D-35L)
Measured: 2 years
Health-related quality of life
EuroQol-5D 3 level version (EQ-5D-35L)
Measured: 3 years
Quality of life of relatives
caregiver schizophrenia quality of life questionnaire (S-CGQoL)
Measured: 1 year
Quality of life of relatives
caregiver schizophrenia quality of life questionnaire (S-CGQoL)
Measured: 2 years
Quality of life of relatives
caregiver schizophrenia quality of life questionnaire (S-CGQoL)
Measured: 3 years
Cost-outcome type ratio
the ratio of the difference in costs between the two strategies divided by the difference in QALYs. This ratio measures the cost per life-year gained in full health, i.e. a cost per QALY. This indicator is obtained by weighting the time spent in each health state h by the utility of that health state measured by the EQ-5D
Measured: 3 years
Cost of care
assessed from a community perspective (health care system, out-of-pocket expenses, caregivers)
Measured: 3 years
Budget impact analysis between strategies
National estimates of avoided costs, care consumption and the cost of implementing the system in the two management strategies
Measured: 3 years
Psychiatric assessment
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM
Measured: Inclusion
Psychiatric assessment
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM
Measured: 3 years
Patient age
Measured: Inclusion
Patient sex
Measured: Inclusion
Current patient professional/training situation
working or studying
Measured: Over the study until 3 years
Financial situation
Measured: Over the study until 3 years
Care pathways taken by patient
specialist care sought
Measured: Over the study until 3 years
Duration of non-treated psychosis
Interval between start of psychotic symptoms and start of sufficient antipsychotic treatment
Measured: Inclusion
Personal and family psychiatric history
Measured: Inclusion
Social and academic function
Premorbid Adjustment Scale
Measured: Inclusion
Medical treatment received
Measured: Until 3 years
Cerebral imagery
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Cerebral imagery
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Cerebral imagery
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
IQ profile
Homogenous/heterogenous
Measured: Inclusion
IQ profile
Homogenous/heterogenous
Measured: 1 year
IQ profile
Homogenous/heterogenous
Measured: 2 years
IQ
value
Measured: Inclusion
IQ
value
Measured: 1 year
IQ
value
Measured: 2 years
BMI
kg/m2
Measured: Inclusion
BMI
kg/m2
Measured: 1 year
BMI
kg/m2
Measured: 2 years
Fasting glycemia
mmol/l
Measured: Inclusion
Fasting glycemia
mmol/l
Measured: 1 year
Fasting glycemia
mmol/l
Measured: 2 years
Lipid assessment
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Lipid assessment
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Lipid assessment
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Whole blood count
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Whole blood count
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Whole blood count
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Electrolytes
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Electrolytes
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Electrolytes
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Neurological exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Neurological exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Neurological exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Cardiovascular exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Cardiovascular exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Cardiovascular exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Morphological exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Morphological exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Morphological exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Hepatic exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Hepatic exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Hepatic exam
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
Presence of neurometabolic disease
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
Presence of neurometabolic disease
Yes/no
Measured: 1 year
Presence of neurometabolic disease
Yes/no
Measured: 2 years
Electrocardiogram
Normal/abnormal
Measured: Inclusion
Electrocardiogram
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 1 year
Electrocardiogram
Normal/abnormal
Measured: 2 years
C-reactive protein
mg/l
Measured: Inclusion
C-reactive protein
mg/l
Measured: 1 year
C-reactive protein
mg/l
Measured: 2 years
thyroid-stimulating hormone
mUI/l
Measured: Inclusion
thyroid-stimulating hormone
mUI/l
Measured: 1 year
thyroid-stimulating hormone
mUI/l
Measured: 2 years
Cortisol
nmol/l
Measured: Inclusion
Cortisol
nmol/l
Measured: 1 year
Cortisol
nmol/l
Measured: 2 years
Adverse events
Any of the following (yes/no): Neurological symptoms, overweight, metabolic syndrome, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, salivation dysfunction, other
Measured: Inclusion
Adverse events
Any of the following (yes/no): Neurological symptoms, overweight, metabolic syndrome, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, salivation dysfunction, other
Measured: 1 year
Adverse events
Any of the following (yes/no): Neurological symptoms, overweight, metabolic syndrome, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, salivation dysfunction, other
Measured: 2 years
Non-medical treatment received
Psychosocial/psychotherapy interventions
Measured: Until 3 years
In the experimental group: case management according to good practice guidelines
EPPIC Model Integrity Tool (80 items with subscores)
Measured: End of follow-up (3 years)
In the experimental group: Conformity of case management
Index of Fidelity to Assertive Community Treatment (16 criteria of conformity for three dimensions)
Measured: End of study (5 years)
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: Month 3
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: Month 6
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: 1 year
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: 18 Months
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: 2 years
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: 30 Months
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each patient
TIDieR checklist-patient
Measured: 3 years
In the experimental group: conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center
Customized TIDieR checklist-center
Measured: Annually until end of study (5 years)
Satisfaction of patients and their families
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)-8
Measured: 1 year
Satisfaction of patients and their families
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)-8
Measured: 2 years
Satisfaction of patients and their families
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)-8
Measured: 3 years
Satisfaction of participants receiving help from a health coordinator
7-item custom questionnaire with free answer section
Measured: End of follow-up (3 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2021
- Study start27 Sep 2021
- Primary completionSep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psychotic EpisodeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aurélie Schandrin, Principal investigator, CHU Nimes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05116514
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PREPS/2018/AS-01
- Acronym
- PEPsy-CM
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 31 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Schandrin A, Jourdan J, Chkair S, Bouvet S, Fabbro-Peray P, Abbar M; PEPsy-CM working group. PEPsy-CM study protocol: impact of a 3-year program for early psychosis based on case-management on relapse rate, a French multicenter randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 15;25(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06940-y.
PubMed 40375175
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Impact of Case Manager Intervention on the 3-year Psychotic Episode Recurrence Rate in Patients Aged 16 to 30 Years With a First Psychotic Episode. Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Controlled Study With Blinded Evaluation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05116514
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PEPsy-CM / PREPS/2018/AS-01
- Conditions
- Psychotic Episode
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 256 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study investigators hypothesize that the intervention of case managers specifically trained in case management of early psychosis will change the paradigm of care of a first psychotic episode from the current organization of the care system. Indeed, the creation of specific services for emerging psychotic disorders cannot easily be generalized throughout the country and requires specific funding. The intervention of case managers according to the recommendations of good practices will make it possible to propose the fundamental principles of early intervention to young patients and their families on a large scale throughout the territory, namely: personalized and proactive accompaniment, psycho-education of the pathology and treatments, involvement and support of the families, and support for socio-professional reintegration
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Case manager group | Experimental | Other: Case management |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- The patient or their close relative must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for a 3-year follow-up.
- Patient is managed in a psychiatric service (consultation or hospitalization) for a first episode psychosis defined by:
- Inclusion should be within the first 3 months of care for first episode psychosis in the psychiatric service.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The subject is participating in another category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject, or one of the parents for minor patients, refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- The patients has an IQ less than or equal to 55
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Case managementRegular and personalized follow-up by a case manager using a "case management" approach, updated every 3 months | Other | Case manager group |
Primary outcome
Rate of patients with recurrence of psychotic episode at least once between groups
Time frame: 3 years
Recurrence of the psychotic episode will be defined as psychiatric hospitalization with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder and/or the presence of positive psychotic symptoms according to the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) ≥ 4 for item P1 (delusions) and/or P2 (conceptual disorganization) and/or P3 (hallucination)) over a period of at least one week.
194 secondary outcomes
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of recurrences of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of recurrences of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of recurrences of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the duration of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the duration of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on the duration of psychiatric hospitalization per patient
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: Inclusion
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: 18 months
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: 2 years
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: 2.5 years
Percentage per patient of medical and caregiving appointments honored between groups
Time frame: 3 years
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: Inclusion
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: 6 months
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: 1 year
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: 18 months
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: 2 years
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: 2.5 years
Type of hospital admission (voluntary versus involuntary) between groups
Time frame: 3 years
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: Inclusion
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: 6 months
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: 1 year
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: 18 months
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: 2 years
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: 2.5 years
Unscheduled discharge from care between groups
Time frame: 3 years
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: Inclusion
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: 1 year
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: 18 months
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: 2 years
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: 2.5 years
Treatment compliance between groups
Time frame: 3 years
Adherence to treatment
Time frame: 1 year
Adherence to treatment
Time frame: 2 years
Adherence to treatment
Time frame: 3 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 40375175Schandrin A, Jourdan J, Chkair S, Bouvet S, Fabbro-Peray P, Abbar M; PEPsy-CM working group. PEPsy-CM study protocol: impact of a 3-year program for early psychosis based on case-management on relapse rate, a French multicenter randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 15;25(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06940-y.
Related trials for Psychotic Episode
Recruiting
On Track for Wellness (OTW) Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
Sleep, Physical Activity
RecruitingObservational study
The ATP Project (Antipsychotic-TEP-Psychosis)
First Episose Psychosis, Metabolic Disease
Recruiting
French Minds Cohort: a French Longitudinal and Multimodal Cohort of Patients With Major Mood Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Healthy Controls
Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, First Episode Psychosis (FEP)
RecruitingObservational study
Deep Phenotyping for Clinical Inferring Response in Treatment Resistant Depression
Depressive; Disorder, Major, Single Episode, Major, With Psychotic Symptoms, Depressive; Disorder, Major, Single Episode, Major (Without Psychotic Symptoms)
RecruitingPhase 3
Stratification and Treatment in Early Psychosis Study - ENHANCE
Psychosis, First Episode Psychosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Aurélie Schandrin principal investigator
CHU Nimes
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Case management in people with Psychotic Episode, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 6 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aurélie Schandrin (04.66.68.34.26, aurelie.schandrin@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of patients with recurrence of psychotic episode at least once between groups (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05116514, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2025.