Musculoskeletal ManipulationsPERMASNCT05114811
Effects of Perineal Massage (PERMAS)
A study testing Self-provided perineal massage and Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO) in people with Musculoskeletal Manipulations and Primary Prevention, run by Universidad de León at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Perineal massage increases elasticity of myofascial perineal tissue and decreases the burning and perineal pain during labour, thus optimizing child birth, although an application protocol has not been standardized yet. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Primary Prevention, Obstetric Labor Complications
- What is being tested?
- Self-provided perineal massage and Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2020to 15 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Full term delivery (37th week or more).
- Single gestation and with cephalic presentation.
- Pregnancy with no complications, nor added risks during gestation.
- No participation in any other psychoprophylaxis intervention.
- Deliver at the Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles (Spain).
Who cannot join
- Any contraindication for perineal massage and/or vaginal delivery.
- Medical diagnosis of any urogynecologi-cal pathology previous to gestation process.
- Any records of cesarean delivery and/or history of perineal injury and/or urinary incontinence.
- Not giving informed consent of participation in the study or lack of attendance to every programmed intervention and/or evaluation session.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Perineal Massage During Pregnancy on Women's Health
Perineal massage increases elasticity of myofascial perineal tissue and decreases the burning and perineal pain during labour, thus optimizing child birth, although an application protocol has not been standardized yet. The objective of this non-randomized controlled trial is to determine the efficiency of massage in perineal tear and urinary incontinence prevention and identification of possible differences in massage application. The sample target is to exceed 75 women analysed between January and May 2020. The interventions include: (a) perineal massage and EPI-NO® device group, applied by an expert physiotherapist; (b) self-massage group, where women were instructed to apply perineal massage in domestic household; and (c) a control group, which received ordinary obstetric attention.
Approval for the study was obtained through the Ethics Committee of the University of Leon (code: ETICA-ULE-021-2018). All participants signed an informed consent form, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (rev. 2013), and had the option to revoke their participation in the study at any time. Ethical regulations were respected as well as the Spanish Law for Protection Data Organic Law and for Biomedical Research in Human Participants.
Data collection took place during an evaluation session on the fifth- or sixth- postpartum week through a self-reported form where participants registered the characteristics of delivery (gestation week, baby's weight, duration and posture of delivery, tear, episiotomy, use of equipment and/or analgesia). The form also included a question on intensity of perineal pain at the time of evaluation (quantified by visual analogue scale) and and urinary incontinence incidence through ICIQ-SF (punctuation higher than 0) and description (quantity of loss of urine and how this affects to their daily life), identified on the items included on the questionnaire.
Read the detailed description
This non-randomized controlled trial has the sample target of 75 women analysed, at least, between January and May 2020.
The following inclusion criteria were defined to participate in the study: (a) women between 18 and 40 years of age; (b) full term delivery (37th week or more); (c) single gestation and with cephalic presentation; (d) pregnancy with no complications, nor added risks during gestation; (e) no participation in any other psychoprophylaxis intervention; (f) deliver at the Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles (Spain). The following exclusion criteria were simultaneously defined: (a) any contraindication for perineal massage and/or vaginal delivery; (b) medical diagnosis of any urogynecologi-cal pathology previous to gestation process; (c) any records of cesarean delivery and/or history of perineal injury and/or urinary incontinence; (d) not giving informed consent of participation in the study or lack of attendance to every programmed intervention and/or evaluation session.
Approval for the study was obtained through the Ethics Committee of the University of Leon, Spain (code: ETICA-ULE-021-2018). All participants signed an informed consent form, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (rev. 2013), and had the option to revoke their participation in the study at any time. Ethical regulations were respected as well as the Spanish Law for Protection Data Organic Law and for Biomedical Research in Human Participants.
Methodology The interventions include: (a) perineal massage and EPI-NO® device group, applied by an expert physiotherapist; (b) self-massage group, where women were instructed to apply perineal massage in domestic household; and (c) a control group, which received ordinary obstetric attention. Groups were not randomized since the priority was the wellbeing of the pregnant par-ticipant and were assigned according to the participant's preferences (attendance at the medical centre for physiotherapy treatment, self-massage at home or attendance at childbirth preparation sessions only).
Data collection took place during an evaluation session on the fifth- or sixth- postpartum week through a self-reported form where participants registered the characteristics of delivery (gestation week, baby's weight, duration and posture of de-livery, tear, episiotomy, use of equipment and/or analgesia). The form also included a question on intensity of perineal pain at the time of evaluation (quantified by visual analogue scale).
Perineal self-massage intervention Self-massage group received permanent instructions on perineal massage during pregnancy: it should be applied at least twice a week (on alternate days) during 10 minutes using a water-based lubricant from the 34th gestation week until delivery. The position during self-massage should be comfortable and relaxed (recommended: lying face up or semi-seated position). External massage should be applied in semicircles (towards the medial) on both sides of the vaginal vestibule and by 'pumping' (rhyth-mically pressing and releasing) on the central core of the perineum. Internal massage should be applied intracavitary with the thumb by dorso-central glides on both vaginal lateral walls (gliding on the introitus vaginae from 8 to 11 and from 4 to 1 clockwise until tissue relaxation). Then, with the help of the index finger, identify tenser areas on the vaginal walls (such as thin strings) that could be gently pressed or rubbed and then wait for relaxation. Finally, apply tissue stretching technique by clamp traction with one intracavitary finger and other external finger until tension or discomfort, hold the position until relief and then without releasing, apply traction again. This latter tech-nique should be repeated three times on both sides (gliding on the introitus vaginae from 11 to 1 clockwise). Participants in the self-massage group received exhaustive in-formation on massage application and filled in a daily register to check on their ad-herence to guidelines given and were also checked weekly (at consultation in person or by phone).
Perineal massage intervention Perineal massage was applied by a physiotherapist expert in urogynecology and obstetrics during a total of 6 to 10 sessions (from 34th gestation week until delivery) of 30 minutes each on a weekly basis. The position of the pregnant participant is semi-seated, with her back against the stretcher and the legs on the stretchers' legs. A water-based lubricant was used for massage.
The treatment sequence included external massage with two manouvres: vulvar drainage and pump of the perineum central core. Drainage is a semicircular applica-tion with two or three fingers towards the medial on both sides of the vaginal vesti-bule, 15 semicircles on each side, in 3 series of 5 repetitions and moving forward in an-teroposterior direction. In case of identification of vulvar edema, there should be as many applications as needed. Pumps is a series of rhythmical pressures with one or two fingers (3 series of 5 repetitions, that is, 15 pumps in total). In case of muscular edema or hypertone, as many pumps as needed should be applied until normalization of tissue.
Intracavitary techniques were then applied through three maneuvers. First, mas-sage with longitudinal glides on the ani levator muscles, on both lateral walls of the vagina in anteroposterior direction (following the track of the ischiopubian branches) with the second and third fingers. There were 3 series of 5 glides on both sides, in-creasing its number until normalization of tissue. Second, application of treatment of myofascial trigger points of pelvic diaphragm identified by tense bands or active points that provoked referred pain recognizable to the patient and/or response to local spasm. In such cases, manual technique involves inhibition by pressure and/or friction until normalization of tissue and disappearance of associated symptomatology. Finally, application of manual stretches on both sides of the vagina (on the area coinciding with a future possibility of lateromedial episiotomy). The stretching was applied in three stages, moving progressively, according to the sensations of the pregnant partic-ipant and the elasticity of the perineal muscles.
After application of manual techniques, instrumental massage was applied with the EPI-NO® device. First, the device should be introduced deflated and once placed in the vagina, slowly inflated until finding the first barrier, where the pregnant partici-pant manifests sensation of stretching (never discomforting nor painful). Inflation volume was held until the pregnant participant noted her sensation of stretching di-minished, then the ball was slowly inflated again until meeting another stretching bar-rier. Three barriers should be met, and the device should be moved gently in the search for stretching barriers and local massage.
Finally, an external manual technique was applied to relax the perineal area through perineal global pumping by contacting with the first phalanx of the four last fingers of the hand (with fist closed) on the vulvar area. 3 series of 5 pumps were ap-plied.
Safety considerations None of the interventions and assessment tools used (applied as described and as recommended in the available literature) have shown adverse effects after application.
Follow-up The research protocol does not include follow-up for data collection. However, the women participants will be able to go to the physiotherapist who recruited the participants, who applied the different interventions and who collected the information analysed through direct consultation in the public health centre where it is expected that she will continue to work.
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Primary Prevention, Obstetric Labor Complications, Physical Therapy Modalities
- Being tested
- Self-provided perineal massage, Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO)
- Medical subject headings
- Obstetric Labor Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self-provided perineal massageProcedure or surgery
External massage should be applied with pump of the perineum central core. Internal massage should be applied intracavitary with longitudinal glides, myofascial trigger points of pelvic diaphragm and streching.
Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO)Procedure or surgery
The treatment sequence included external massage with two manouvres: vulvar drainage and pump of the perineum central core. Intracavitary techniques were then applied through three maneuvers: massage with longitudinal glides, myofascial trigger points of pelvic diaphragm and streching.
After this, instrumental massage was applied with the EPI-NO® device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapist massage | Experimental | Perineal massage was applied by a physiotherapist expert in urogynecology and obstetrics during a total of 6 to 10 sessions (from 34th gestation week until delivery) of 30 minutes each on a weekly basis. Receives: Procedure: Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO) |
| Self-massage intervention | Experimental | Self-massage group received permanent instructions on perineal massage during pregnancy: it should be applied at least twice a week (on alternate days) during 10 minutes using a water-based lubricant from the 34th gestation week until delivery. Receives: Procedure: Self-provided perineal massage |
| Control | No intervention | Group receiving standard obstetric care (consultation and check-ups with the gynaecologist and midwife). No contact with the research physiotherapists. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gestation week
Number of the gestational week in which the birth took place.
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Urinary incontinence incidence
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Baby's weight
Baby's weight in kilograms at birth
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Duration of delivery
Duration of labour (in hours) from the onset of contractions to the delivery of the placenta
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Posture of delivery
Recording the mother's posture during the second stage of labour: lithotomy, lying on the side, sitting, squatting or on all fours.
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Perineal tear
Record of whether perineal tearing occurred during delivery and, if so, its severity (types: I, IIa, IIb or III).
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Episiotomy
Record of whether episiotomy was performed (or not) during delivery.
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Use of equipment
Record whether delivery instruments were used during delivery: no instruments, vacuum extraction or forceps.
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Analgesia
Record whether pharmacological analgesia was used during labour: no analgesia, epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia or local perineal analgesia.
Measured: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Nov 2021
- Study start2 Jan 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2020
- Study completion15 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Musculoskeletal ManipulationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Non-randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de León
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez, Universidad de León
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05114811
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OBST2021001
- Acronym
- PERMAS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Publication of two scientific articles describing the procedure and publicly disclosing the results obtained. No individual data of any of the patients or images related to them will be disclosed.
Publications
Ochandorena-Acha M, Noell-Boix R, Yildirim M, Cazorla-Sanchez M, Iriondo-Sanz M, Troyano-Martos MJ, Casas-Baroy JC. Experiences and coping strategies of preterm infants' parents and parental competences after early physiotherapy intervention: qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1174-1187. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1818339. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
PubMed 32892686Van Kampen M, Devoogdt N, De Groef A, Gielen A, Geraerts I. The efficacy of physiotherapy for the prevention and treatment of prenatal symptoms: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1575-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2684-y. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PubMed 25822028Ray-Griffith SL, Wendel MP, Stowe ZN, Magann EF. Chronic pain during pregnancy: a review of the literature. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 9;10:153-164. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S151845. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29692634Gallo RBS, Santana LS, Marcolin AC, Duarte G, Quintana SM. Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018 Jan;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
PubMed 29289579Taavoni S, Abdolahian S, Haghani H, Neysani L. Effect of birth ball usage on pain in the active phase of labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(2):137-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2010.00013.x. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
PubMed 21429078Badaoui A, Kassm SA, Naja W. Fear and Anxiety Disorders Related to Childbirth: Epidemiological and Therapeutic Issues. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Mar 12;21(4):27. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1010-7.
PubMed 30868272Airo Toivanen R, Korja R, Saisto T, Rouhe H, Muotka J, Salmela-Aro K. Changes in emotions and personal goals in primiparous pregnant women during group intervention for fear of childbirth. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018 Sep;36(4):363-380. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2018.1462477. Epub 2018 May 7.
PubMed 29733686Dieb AS, Shoab AY, Nabil H, Gabr A, Abdallah AA, Shaban MM, Attia AH. Perineal massage and training reduce perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):613-619. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03937-6. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
PubMed 30941442Shahoei R, Zaheri F, Nasab LH, Ranaei F. The effect of perineal massage during the second stage of birth on nulliparous women perineal: A randomization clinical trial. Electron Physician. 2017 Oct 25;9(10):5588-5595. doi: 10.19082/5588. eCollection 2017 Oct.
PubMed 29238501Schreiner L, Crivelatti I, de Oliveira JM, Nygaard CC, Dos Santos TG. Systematic review of pelvic floor interventions during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143(1):10-18. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12513. Epub 2018 May 18.
PubMed 29705985Beckmann MM, Stock OM. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub3.
PubMed 23633325Romina S, Ramezani F, Falah N, Mafi M, Ranjkesh F. Effect of Perineal Massage with Ostrich Oil on the Episiotomy and Lacerations in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Feb 24;25(2):134-138. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_76_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
PubMed 32195159
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Perineal Massage During Pregnancy on Women's Health
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05114811
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PERMAS / OBST2021001
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Primary Prevention, Obstetric Labor Complications, Physical Therapy Modalities
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad de LeónUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Perineal massage increases elasticity of myofascial perineal tissue and decreases the burning and perineal pain during labour, thus optimizing child birth, although an application protocol has not been standardized yet. The objective of this non-randomized controlled trial is to determine the efficiency of massage in perineal tear and urinary incontinence prevention and identification of possible differences in massage application. The sample target is to exceed 75 women analysed between January and May 2020. The interventions include: (a) perineal massage and EPI-NO® device group, applied by an expert physiotherapist; (b) self-massage group, where women were instructed to apply perineal massage in domestic household; and (c) a control group, which received ordinary obstetric attention.
Approval for the study was obtained through the Ethics Committee of the University of Leon (code: ETICA-ULE-021-2018). All participants signed an informed consent form, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (rev. 2013), and had the option to revoke their participation in the study at any time. Ethical regulations were respected as well as the Spanish Law for Protection Data Organic Law and for Biomedical Research in Human Participants.
Data collection took place during an evaluation session on the fifth- or sixth- postpartum week through a self-reported form where participants registered the characteristics of delivery (gestation week, baby's weight, duration and posture of delivery, tear, episiotomy, use of equipment and/or analgesia). The form also included a question on intensity of perineal pain at the time of evaluation (quantified by visual analogue scale) and and urinary incontinence incidence through ICIQ-SF (punctuation higher than 0) and description (quantity of loss of urine and how this affects to their daily life), identified on the items included on the questionnaire.
Detailed description
This non-randomized controlled trial has the sample target of 75 women analysed, at least, between January and May 2020.
The following inclusion criteria were defined to participate in the study: (a) women between 18 and 40 years of age; (b) full term delivery (37th week or more); (c) single gestation and with cephalic presentation; (d) pregnancy with no complications, nor added risks during gestation; (e) no participation in any other psychoprophylaxis intervention; (f) deliver at the Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles (Spain). The following exclusion criteria were simultaneously defined: (a) any contraindication for perineal massage and/or vaginal delivery; (b) medical diagnosis of any urogynecologi-cal pathology previous to gestation process; (c) any records of cesarean delivery and/or history of perineal injury and/or urinary incontinence; (d) not giving informed consent of participation in the study or lack of attendance to every programmed intervention and/or evaluation session.
Approval for the study was obtained through the Ethics Committee of the University of Leon, Spain (code: ETICA-ULE-021-2018). All participants signed an informed consent form, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (rev. 2013), and had the option to revoke their participation in the study at any time. Ethical regulations were respected as well as the Spanish Law for Protection Data Organic Law and for Biomedical Research in Human Participants.
Methodology The interventions include: (a) perineal massage and EPI-NO® device group, applied by an expert physiotherapist; (b) self-massage group, where women were instructed to apply perineal massage in domestic household; and (c) a control group, which received ordinary obstetric attention. Groups were not randomized since the priority was the wellbeing of the pregnant par-ticipant and were assigned according to the participant's preferences (attendance at the medical centre for physiotherapy treatment, self-massage at home or attendance at childbirth preparation sessions only).
Data collection took place during an evaluation session on the fifth- or sixth- postpartum week through a self-reported form where participants registered the characteristics of delivery (gestation week, baby's weight, duration and posture of de-livery, tear, episiotomy, use of equipment and/or analgesia). The form also included a question on intensity of perineal pain at the time of evaluation (quantified by visual analogue scale).
Perineal self-massage intervention Self-massage group received permanent instructions on perineal massage during pregnancy: it should be applied at least twice a week (on alternate days) during 10 minutes using a water-based lubricant from the 34th gestation week until delivery. The position during self-massage should be comfortable and relaxed (recommended: lying face up or semi-seated position). External massage should be applied in semicircles (towards the medial) on both sides of the vaginal vestibule and by 'pumping' (rhyth-mically pressing and releasing) on the central core of the perineum. Internal massage should be applied intracavitary with the thumb by dorso-central glides on both vaginal lateral walls (gliding on the introitus vaginae from 8 to 11 and from 4 to 1 clockwise until tissue relaxation). Then, with the help of the index finger, identify tenser areas on the vaginal walls (such as thin strings) that could be gently pressed or rubbed and then wait for relaxation. Finally, apply tissue stretching technique by clamp traction with one intracavitary finger and other external finger until tension or discomfort, hold the position until relief and then without releasing, apply traction again. This latter tech-nique should be repeated three times on both sides (gliding on the introitus vaginae from 11 to 1 clockwise). Participants in the self-massage group received exhaustive in-formation on massage application and filled in a daily register to check on their ad-herence to guidelines given and were also checked weekly (at consultation in person or by phone).
Perineal massage intervention Perineal massage was applied by a physiotherapist expert in urogynecology and obstetrics during a total of 6 to 10 sessions (from 34th gestation week until delivery) of 30 minutes each on a weekly basis. The position of the pregnant participant is semi-seated, with her back against the stretcher and the legs on the stretchers' legs. A water-based lubricant was used for massage.
The treatment sequence included external massage with two manouvres: vulvar drainage and pump of the perineum central core. Drainage is a semicircular applica-tion with two or three fingers towards the medial on both sides of the vaginal vesti-bule, 15 semicircles on each side, in 3 series of 5 repetitions and moving forward in an-teroposterior direction. In case of identification of vulvar edema, there should be as many applications as needed. Pumps is a series of rhythmical pressures with one or two fingers (3 series of 5 repetitions, that is, 15 pumps in total). In case of muscular edema or hypertone, as many pumps as needed should be applied until normalization of tissue.
Intracavitary techniques were then applied through three maneuvers. First, mas-sage with longitudinal glides on the ani levator muscles, on both lateral walls of the vagina in anteroposterior direction (following the track of the ischiopubian branches) with the second and third fingers. There were 3 series of 5 glides on both sides, in-creasing its number until normalization of tissue. Second, application of treatment of myofascial trigger points of pelvic diaphragm identified by tense bands or active points that provoked referred pain recognizable to the patient and/or response to local spasm. In such cases, manual technique involves inhibition by pressure and/or friction until normalization of tissue and disappearance of associated symptomatology. Finally, application of manual stretches on both sides of the vagina (on the area coinciding with a future possibility of lateromedial episiotomy). The stretching was applied in three stages, moving progressively, according to the sensations of the pregnant partic-ipant and the elasticity of the perineal muscles.
After application of manual techniques, instrumental massage was applied with the EPI-NO® device. First, the device should be introduced deflated and once placed in the vagina, slowly inflated until finding the first barrier, where the pregnant partici-pant manifests sensation of stretching (never discomforting nor painful). Inflation volume was held until the pregnant participant noted her sensation of stretching di-minished, then the ball was slowly inflated again until meeting another stretching bar-rier. Three barriers should be met, and the device should be moved gently in the search for stretching barriers and local massage.
Finally, an external manual technique was applied to relax the perineal area through perineal global pumping by contacting with the first phalanx of the four last fingers of the hand (with fist closed) on the vulvar area. 3 series of 5 pumps were ap-plied.
Safety considerations None of the interventions and assessment tools used (applied as described and as recommended in the available literature) have shown adverse effects after application.
Follow-up The research protocol does not include follow-up for data collection. However, the women participants will be able to go to the physiotherapist who recruited the participants, who applied the different interventions and who collected the information analysed through direct consultation in the public health centre where it is expected that she will continue to work.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Non-randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Physiotherapist massage | Experimental | Procedure: Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO)Perineal massage was applied by a physiotherapist expert in urogynecology and obstetrics during a total of 6 to 10 sessions (from 34th gestation week until delivery) of 30 minutes each on a weekly basis. |
| Self-massage intervention | Experimental | Procedure: Self-provided perineal massageSelf-massage group received permanent instructions on perineal massage during pregnancy: it should be applied at least twice a week (on alternate days) during 10 minutes using a water-based lubricant from the 34th gestation week until delivery. |
| Control | No intervention | –Group receiving standard obstetric care (consultation and check-ups with the gynaecologist and midwife). No contact with the research physiotherapists. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Full term delivery (37th week or more).
- Single gestation and with cephalic presentation.
- Pregnancy with no complications, nor added risks during gestation.
- No participation in any other psychoprophylaxis intervention.
- Deliver at the Hospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles (Spain).
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Any contraindication for perineal massage and/or vaginal delivery.
- Medical diagnosis of any urogynecologi-cal pathology previous to gestation process.
- Any records of cesarean delivery and/or history of perineal injury and/or urinary incontinence.
- Not giving informed consent of participation in the study or lack of attendance to every programmed intervention and/or evaluation session.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self-provided perineal massageExternal massage should be applied with pump of the perineum central core. Internal massage should be applied intracavitary with longitudinal glides, myofascial trigger points of pelvic diaphragm and streching. | Procedure or surgery | Self-massage intervention |
| Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO)The treatment sequence included external massage with two manouvres: vulvar drainage and pump of the perineum central core. Intracavitary techniques were then applied through three maneuvers: massage with longitudinal glides, myofascial trigger points of pelvic diaphragm and streching. After this, instrumental massage was applied with the EPI-NO® device. | Procedure or surgery | Physiotherapist massage |
Primary outcome
Gestation week
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Number of the gestational week in which the birth took place.
Urinary incontinence incidence
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form
Baby's weight
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Baby's weight in kilograms at birth
Duration of delivery
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Duration of labour (in hours) from the onset of contractions to the delivery of the placenta
Posture of delivery
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Recording the mother's posture during the second stage of labour: lithotomy, lying on the side, sitting, squatting or on all fours.
Perineal tear
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Record of whether perineal tearing occurred during delivery and, if so, its severity (types: I, IIa, IIb or III).
Episiotomy
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Record of whether episiotomy was performed (or not) during delivery.
Use of equipment
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Record whether delivery instruments were used during delivery: no instruments, vacuum extraction or forceps.
Analgesia
Time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week
Record whether pharmacological analgesia was used during labour: no analgesia, epidural analgesia, spinal analgesia or local perineal analgesia.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32892686Ochandorena-Acha M, Noell-Boix R, Yildirim M, Cazorla-Sanchez M, Iriondo-Sanz M, Troyano-Martos MJ, Casas-Baroy JC. Experiences and coping strategies of preterm infants' parents and parental competences after early physiotherapy intervention: qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Sep;38(9):1174-1187. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1818339. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 25822028Van Kampen M, Devoogdt N, De Groef A, Gielen A, Geraerts I. The efficacy of physiotherapy for the prevention and treatment of prenatal symptoms: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1575-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2684-y. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 29692634Ray-Griffith SL, Wendel MP, Stowe ZN, Magann EF. Chronic pain during pregnancy: a review of the literature. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 9;10:153-164. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S151845. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 29289579Gallo RBS, Santana LS, Marcolin AC, Duarte G, Quintana SM. Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018 Jan;64(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 21429078Taavoni S, Abdolahian S, Haghani H, Neysani L. Effect of birth ball usage on pain in the active phase of labor: a randomized controlled trial. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(2):137-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2010.00013.x. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 30868272Badaoui A, Kassm SA, Naja W. Fear and Anxiety Disorders Related to Childbirth: Epidemiological and Therapeutic Issues. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Mar 12;21(4):27. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1010-7.
- Background: PubMed 29733686Airo Toivanen R, Korja R, Saisto T, Rouhe H, Muotka J, Salmela-Aro K. Changes in emotions and personal goals in primiparous pregnant women during group intervention for fear of childbirth. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018 Sep;36(4):363-380. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2018.1462477. Epub 2018 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 30941442Dieb AS, Shoab AY, Nabil H, Gabr A, Abdallah AA, Shaban MM, Attia AH. Perineal massage and training reduce perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):613-619. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03937-6. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 29238501Shahoei R, Zaheri F, Nasab LH, Ranaei F. The effect of perineal massage during the second stage of birth on nulliparous women perineal: A randomization clinical trial. Electron Physician. 2017 Oct 25;9(10):5588-5595. doi: 10.19082/5588. eCollection 2017 Oct.
- Background: PubMed 29705985Schreiner L, Crivelatti I, de Oliveira JM, Nygaard CC, Dos Santos TG. Systematic review of pelvic floor interventions during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143(1):10-18. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12513. Epub 2018 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 23633325Beckmann MM, Stock OM. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 32195159Romina S, Ramezani F, Falah N, Mafi M, Ranjkesh F. Effect of Perineal Massage with Ostrich Oil on the Episiotomy and Lacerations in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Feb 24;25(2):134-138. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_76_19. eCollection 2020 Mar-Apr.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Publication of two scientific articles describing the procedure and publicly disclosing the results obtained. No individual data of any of the patients or images related to them will be disclosed.
Related trials for Musculoskeletal Manipulations
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Manual Therapy on Musculoskeletal Pain in Adolescent Dancers
Musculoskeletal Pain, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Osteopathic Care Combined With Physiotherapy and Pain Education for Cervicogenic Headache
Cervicogenic Headache
Not yet recruiting
Multi-Segmental Spinal Manual Therapy in Women With Episodic Migraine
Migraine Disorders
Active, not recruiting
Non-surgical Spinal Decompression Therapy and Outcomes
Low Back Pain, Herniation, Disc
Recruiting
Combined Effects of INF and OEP in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Self-provided perineal massage and Physiotherapist perineal massage: manual and instrumental (with EPI-NO) in people with Musculoskeletal Manipulations and Primary Prevention, run by Universidad de León at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gestation week (time frame: Post-test: fifth- or sixth- postpartum week). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05114811, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2021.