Binge-Eating DisorderPhase 2NCT05113953
A Trial of Centanafadine Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability in Adult Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder
A Phase 2 study testing Centanafadine in people with Binge-Eating Disorder, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 25 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of 2 doses of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) (200 milligrams [mg] and 400 mg total daily dose [TDD]) compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Binge-Eating Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Centanafadine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 147 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Dec 2021to 19 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants 18 to 65 years of age (inclusive) at the time of informed consent.
- A primary diagnosis of BED, or is diagnosed at screening, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria and confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID).
- BED with a history of at least 2 binge eating days per week for 6 months prior to screening.
- A rating of 4 or higher on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) at screening and baseline.
- Body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 45 kg/m^2, inclusive.
Who cannot join
- Lifetime history of bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa.
- Participation in a formal weight loss program within 3 months of screening or planning to start a weight loss program during the trial.
- History of bariatric surgery.
- Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 18.
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 1 country.
25 sites in 1 country
United States25 sites
Psychiatry + Psychotherapy Partners Austin
Austin, Texas, 78737
Southern California Research LLC
Beverly Hills, California, 90210
Boston Clinical Trials
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131
Center for Emotional Fitness
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08002
FutureSearch Trials - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Midwest Clinical Research Center
Dayton, Ohio, 45417
iResearch Atlanta
Decatur, Georgia, 30030
Mountain View Clinical Research, LLC
Denver, Colorado, 80209
Pharmacology Research Institute - San Fernando Valley
Encino, California, 91316
Collaborative Neuroscience Research, LLC
Garden Grove, California, 92845
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Psych Atlanta, PC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Craig and Frances Linder Center of Hope
Mason, Ohio, 45040
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Miami Dade Medical Research Institute
Miami, Florida, 33176
Manhattan Behavioral Medicine
New York, New York, 10036
Medical Research Network, LLC
New York, New York, 10128
Psychiatric Associates
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
NoesisPharma, LLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
ActivMed Practices and Research - Portsmouth
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Collective Medical Research
Prairie Village, Kansas, 66208
Princeton Medical Institute
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540
Richmond Behavioral Associates
Staten Island, New York, 10312
Pacific Clinical Research Management Group LLC
Upland, California, 91786
St. Charles Psychiatric Associates & Midwest Research Group
Weldon Spring, Missouri, 63304
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Centanafadine Sustained-release Tablets After Oral Administration in Adult Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of 2 doses of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) (200 milligrams [mg] and 400 mg total daily dose [TDD]) compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED).
- Conditions
- Binge-Eating Disorder
- Being tested
- Centanafadine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Centanafadine, Binge Eating Disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Binge-Eating Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CentanafadineDrug
Sustained-release oral tablets
PlaceboDrug
Oral tablets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive centanafadine 200 mg SR tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) at a TDD of 400 mg for 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Centanafadine |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Experimental | Participants will receive centanafadine 100 mg SR tablets, orally, BID at a TDD of 200 mg along with centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Centanafadine; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week
Binge eating day was defined as a day with at least one binge eating episode. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method with change from baseline in binge eating days per week at scheduled visit as dependent variable and included fixed effect terms for treatment, trial center, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-administered global rating scale that measures disease severity on scale with a score range of 0 to 7 where, 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. A higher score on the CGI-S represents a higher severity of disease. LS mean was determined by MMRM method with change from baseline value as dependent variable and included treatment, trial center, visit week, treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline-by-week interaction as covariates.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered an IMP and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AESIs were newly acquired skin eruptions that were non-traumatic which included eruptions such as skin rashes, skin irritations, skin reactions, or acneiform lesions. AEs related to abuse included: Feeling abnormal (floaty feeling in the head), euphoric mood (feeling high). MHIs included: IMP accounting errors, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; Non-compliance with trial procedures, not involving suspected abuse nor diversion by participant; and other cases involving neither suspected abuse nor diversion of trial IMP by participant.
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory assessments included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. Abnormality criteria included: In milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) [high bilirubin ≥2.0, low/high calcium ≤8.2/ ≥12, high cholesterol fasting ≥240, high glucose, fasting ≥100, high triglycerides, fasting ≥150, high urate ≥8.5 female / ≥10.5 male, high protein urine ≥2 units increase]; high creatine kinase (units per liter [U/L]) >3xupper limit of normal (ULN); high eosinophils/leukocytes ≥10%, low neutrophils/leukocytes ≤15%; In 10^3/microliter (µL) [low or high leukocytes ≤2.8x10^9/L or ≥16.0x10^9/L, low neutrophils ≤1.5x10^9/L]. The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital sign measurements included heart rate in supine and standing positions (low: <50 beats per minute [bpm] and decrease ≥10 bpm; High: >100 bpm and increase ≥10 bpm), systolic blood pressure (BP) in supine and standing positions (low: <90 millimeters of mercury [mmHg] and decrease ≥20 mmHg; High: ≥140 mmHg and increase ≥20 mmHg), diastolic BP in supine and standing positions (low: <60 mmHg and decrease ≥10 mmHg; High: ≥90 mmHg and increase ≥10 mmHg), weight in kilograms (kg) (low: ≥7% decrease; High: ≥7% increase), orthostatic hypotension, (≥30mmHg decrease is systolic BP or ≥20 mmHg in diastolic BP after at least 3 minutes of standing compared to the previous supine BP), and orthostatic tachycardia (≥25 bpm increase in heart rate from supine to standing). The categories with at least one participant with clinically relevant value are reported here.
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
12-lead ECG abnormality criteria included Rhythm: Supraventricular premature beat (not present at baseline and present post baseline); and Conduction: Primary (1°) atrioventricular block (PR ≥200 milliseconds [msec] and increase of ≥50 msec).
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score
SMWQ is a questionnaire to assess withdrawal symptoms subsequent to completion of dosing with IMP. The SMWQ is a modification of the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire, in which in which the terms "amphetamines and methamphetamine" are replaced with the term "the study medication." This change was intended to prevent bias by implying that the trial medication might be an amphetamine or amphetamine-like stimulant when presented with the survey. This questionnaire comprises of 13 items which describe symptoms associated with the cessation of study medication use for which participants indicate severity on a scale with scores ranging from 0 (no withdrawal symptoms) to 4 (most severe withdrawal symptom). The total score is calculated as the sum of all the scores for the 13 items, ranging from 0 to 52. Lower scores indicate less withdrawal symptoms.
Measured: Week 8
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score
The HAM-A scale assesses both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). It consists of 14 items to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety, each scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 56 and categorized as 0-13: normal range, 14-17: mild severity, 18-24: mild to moderate severity, 25-30: moderate to severe, and >=31: severe. A higher score indicates a more severe anxiety.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
The MADRS is a diagnostic questionnaire used by clinician to assess the participant's severity of depression. The questionnaire includes questions on ten symptoms: Apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, difficulty concentrating, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Each question is scored on a range of 0 to 6 points and the total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores, ranging from 0 to 60 categorized as: 0 to 6: normal/symptoms absent, 7 to 19: mild depression, 20 to 34: moderate depression, and 35 to 60: severe depression. Higher scores indicate increased depressive symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8
Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
The C-SSRS is a clinician-administered instrument that systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and suicidal behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of SI on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent." The scale identifies SI severity and intensity, which may be indicative of an individual's intent to commit suicide. C-SSRS SI severity subscale ranges from 0 (no SI) to 5 (active SI with plan and intent). The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from "preparatory acts or behavior" to "suicide" which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. Suicidality was reported in this outcome measure, defined as at least 1 occurrence of suicidal ideation or at least 1 occurrence of suicidal behavior for each assessment period.
Measured: Week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2021
- Study start22 Dec 2021
- Primary completion19 Aug 2022
- Study completion19 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Binge-Eating DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 147 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05113953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 405-201-00056
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results of this study will be shared with researchers to achieve aims pre-specified in a methodologically sound research proposal. Small studies with less than 25 participants are excluded from data sharing.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Centanafadine Sustained-release Tablets After Oral Administration in Adult Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05113953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 405-201-00056
- Conditions
- Binge-Eating Disorder
- Keywords
- Centanafadine, Binge Eating Disorder
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 147 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Sep 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of 2 doses of centanafadine sustained-release (SR) (200 milligrams [mg] and 400 mg total daily dose [TDD]) compared with placebo in adults with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Centanafadine 400 mg | Experimental | Drug: CentanafadineParticipants will receive centanafadine 200 mg SR tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) at a TDD of 400 mg for 8 weeks. |
| Centanafadine 200 mg | Experimental | Drug: Centanafadine, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive centanafadine 100 mg SR tablets, orally, BID at a TDD of 200 mg along with centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive centanafadine matching placebo tablets, orally, BID for 8 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult participants 18 to 65 years of age (inclusive) at the time of informed consent.
- A primary diagnosis of BED, or is diagnosed at screening, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria and confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID).
- BED with a history of at least 2 binge eating days per week for 6 months prior to screening.
- A rating of 4 or higher on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) at screening and baseline.
- Body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 45 kg/m^2, inclusive.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Lifetime history of bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa.
- Participation in a formal weight loss program within 3 months of screening or planning to start a weight loss program during the trial.
- History of bariatric surgery.
- Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 18.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CentanafadineSustained-release oral tablets | Drug | Centanafadine 200 mg, Centanafadine 400 mg |
| PlaceboOral tablets | Drug | Centanafadine 200 mg, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8
Binge eating day was defined as a day with at least one binge eating episode. Least squares (LS) mean was determined by Mixed-effect Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method with change from baseline in binge eating days per week at scheduled visit as dependent variable and included fixed effect terms for treatment, trial center, visit week, and an interaction term of treatment by visit week.
9 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) Related to Rash, AEs Related to Abuse, and AEs Involving Medication Handling Irregularities (MHIs)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Relevant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 1 week post last dose (Up to 9 weeks)
Study Medication Withdrawal Questionnaire (SMWQ) Total Mean Score
Time frame: Week 8
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Number of Participants With Suicidality as Measured by Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Time frame: Week 8
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results of this study will be shared with researchers to achieve aims pre-specified in a methodologically sound research proposal. Small studies with less than 25 participants are excluded from data sharing.
Related trials for Binge-Eating Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Be Body Brave: Digital Written Exposure Therapy for Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Solriamfetol in Subjects With Binge Eating Disorder
Binge-Eating Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
Enrolling by invitation
Sleep and Activity For Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa
Active, not recruiting
Project VIBE: Virtual Intervention for Binge Eating in Adolescents
Obesity, Binge-Eating Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
25 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Centanafadine in people with Binge-Eating Disorder, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. at 25 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Number of Binge Eating Days Per Week (time frame: Baseline, Weeks 7 to 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2025.