AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerNCT05103059

Role of Serum Albumin and Total Protein in Survival of Cancer Cachectic Patients

An observational study of Cancer, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Serum albumin can indicate the onset of cancer cachexia, provide information about a patient's nutritional status, and serve as a biomarker for the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia. However, the relationship between serum albumin levels and mortality in patients with cancer cachexia remains unclear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer
What is being tested?
BMI
How many people
100 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Nov 2021to 1 Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: weight loss in the past 12 months is ≥5%, and the physiological variables of patients match at least threeof the following five criteria: decreased muscle strength,fatigue, anorexia, low fat-free mass index (FFMI), and abnormal blood profile

Who may be able to join

  • patients who will accept to participate in our study with diagnosis of cancer cachexia

Who cannot join

  • patients who not fulfill criteria of cance cachexia

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

nehal suliman, resident doctor contact

01098019919

nehal.ali95@yahoo.com

samir shehata, professor doctor contact

01222302375

About this study

Official title: Prognostic Value of Serum Albumin and Total Protein in Survival of Cancer Cachectic Patients

Serum albumin can indicate the onset of cancer cachexia, provide information about a patient's nutritional status, and serve as a biomarker for the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia. However, the relationship between serum albumin levels and mortality in patients with cancer cachexia remains unclear. We aimed to examine the association of albumin and total protein with 1-year mortality in patients with cancer cachexia

Read the detailed description

Cancer cachexia is defined as a multifactorial and multi-organ syndrome characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of adipose tissue), which cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support. In recent years, cancer cachexia has increasingly been seen as a systemic phenomenon that affects various organs, such as the liver and myocardial tissue. Cachexia is closely related to anorexia, inflammation, insulin resistance, and decreased protein levels, which can lead to progressive functional impairment, treatment-related complications, poor quality of life, and cancer-related death. Its pathophysiology is characterized by a negative protein and energy balance. However, there are no clear clinical guidelines to effectively combat the progressive tissue loss associated with cachexia. Cancer cachexia occurs mostly in advanced cancers, with more than half of patients with cancer having cachexia in the later stages, and >10% of patients die with or from it.

Studies have shown that cachexia can be diagnosed when weight loss in the past 12 months is ≥5%, and the physiological variables of patients match at least threeof the following five criteria: decreased muscle strength,fatigue, anorexia, low fat-free mass index (FFMI), and abnormal blood profile. Albumin and total protein are two variables that reflect an individual's nutritional status and disease severity. Additionally, albumin can serve as an indicator of the inflammatory response and is considered a highly sensitive marker of a patient's nutritional status. Serum albumin and total protein can be used to define cancer cachexia and cancer-related malnutrition; patients with cachexia have lower total protein and albumin levels than those without cachexia.5 Serum albumin may serve as a prognostic factor for treatment outcomes and compliance in patients with advanced cancer.

Although a reduction in albumin and total protein levels are associated with the diagnosis of cancer related cachexia, no studies have shown that albumin and total protein can predict mortality in patients with cancer cachexia. Here, we describe a prospective non randomized study that will be conducted to explore the association between serum albumin and total protein levels and 1-year mortality in patients with cancer cachexia .

Conditions
Cancer
Being tested
BMI
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BMIDiagnostic test

    Patients with cancer cachexia will be enrolled in the study, and the following data will be collected: age, sex, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, body mass index (BMI), mid-arm circumference (MAC), thickness of triceps skinfold (TSF), handgrip strength (HGS), and calf circumference (CC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the association between serum albumin and total protein with one year mortality in patients with cancer cachexia

    to evaluate the association between serum albumin and total protein with one year mortality in patients with cancr cachexia

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the association between anthropometric measures and other laboratory findings with one year mortality in patients with cancer cachexia

    to evaluate the association between anthropometric measures and other laboratory findings with one year mortality in patients with cancer cachexia

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Nov 2021
  2. Study start1 Nov 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05103059
Sponsor's protocol ID
cancer cachexia
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
21 Oct 2021
Last updated
2 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

    PubMed 21296615
  • Schmidt SF, Rohm M, Herzig S, Berriel Diaz M. Cancer Cachexia: More Than Skeletal Muscle Wasting. Trends Cancer. 2018 Dec;4(12):849-860. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

    PubMed 30470306
  • Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argiles J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, Jatoi A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lochs H, Mantovani G, Marks D, Mitch WE, Muscaritoli M, Najand A, Ponikowski P, Rossi Fanelli F, Schambelan M, Schols A, Schuster M, Thomas D, Wolfe R, Anker SD. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;27(6):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

    PubMed 18718696
  • Penet MF, Bhujwalla ZM. Cancer cachexia, recent advances, and future directions. Cancer J. 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):117-22. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000100.

    PubMed 25815852
  • Cong M, Song C, Xu H, Song C, Wang C, Fu Z, Ba Y, Wu J, Xie C, Chen G, Chen Z, Zhou L, Li T, Deng L, Xin L, Yang L, Cui J, Shi H; Investigation on Nutrition Status and Clinical Outcome of Common Cancers (INSCOC) Group. The patient-generated subjective global assessment is a promising screening tool for cancer cachexia. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 May;12(e1):e39-e46. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002296. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

    PubMed 32826265
  • Matsuzuka T, Kiyota N, Mizusawa J, Akimoto T, Fujii M, Hasegawa Y, Iwae S, Monden N, Matsuura K, Onozawa Y, Hayashi R, Tahara M; Japan Clinical Oncology Group(JCOG) Head and Neck Cancer Study Group. Clinical impact of cachexia in unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer: supplementary analysis of a phase II trial (JCOG0706-S2). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;49(1):37-41. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy145.

    PubMed 30364985

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cancer, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact nehal suliman, resident doctor (01098019919, nehal.ali95@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the association between serum albumin and total protein with one year mortality in patients with cancer cachexia (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05103059, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in