Helplessness, LearnedNCT05086328
The Effect of Nonviolent Resistance in Parent Group Training in Child Psychiatric Care
An observational study of Helplessness, Learned and Family Conflict, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
In a Flemish sample of parents of children with psychiatric problems, this study evaluates the effect of a parent group training based on nonviolent resistance on family functioning, parenting variables and mental states of the parents, pre- and post-training. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Helplessness, Learned, Family Conflict, Mentalising
- What is being tested?
- Nonviolent Resistance
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Oct 2021to Mar 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: - parents of child on the waiting list or already admitted for help in the child psychiatric clinic at the study location, with specific parental stress related to helplessness
Who may be able to join
- Parents engage in the NVR training of the child psychiatric clinic at the study location for at least 5 out of 6 training sessions
Who cannot join
- insufficient understanding of Dutch/Flemish language
- simultaneously following a different parent group treatment, external to the study location
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Belgium1 site
UZ Brussel
Brussels
Bart Colson, MA, 00324776072, bart.colson@uzbrussel.be
Edward Campforts, MD, 00324776072, edward.campforts@uzbrussel.be
About this study
In a Flemish sample of parents of children with psychiatric problems, this study evaluates the effect of a parent group training based on nonviolent resistance on family functioning, parenting variables and mental states of the parents, pre- and post-training.
Read the detailed description
Nonviolent Resistance (NVR) is an intervention method for families and teams that are suffering from helplessness and hopelessness. By empowering individuals through specific focus points and techniques, they can re-establish their role as authority figures for the child. The child, exhibiting dangerous and/or coercive behavior, can feel reconnected and guided.
Previous research has shown that parents score higher on General family functioning, Affective reactions and affective involvement, and Role definitions, but not Behavioral control, Problem solving and Communication. Positive effects were visible at a follow up moment, three months later. Parents reported significantly lower on anxiety for the aggression of their child, the self-efficiency about parental capacities and received social support. General parenting stress diminished significantly. A control group showed no such significant changes.
Participants with specific problems and waiting to be admitted in the residential ward at the study location can receive pre-care, in the form of a parental group training based on NVR. In six two weekly sessions, combined with intermediate telephone support and home assignments, parents are involved in important parent-child-oriented aspects.
This study will evaluate the effect of the training in a Flemish sample, focusing on family functioning, parenting variables and reflective functioning of the parents, pre- and post-training. T1 is at the time between invitation to participate and the first session; T2 is in the first week after the last session (T1 + 12 to 14 weeks); T3 is at three months after the last session; T4 is at six months after the last session.
The following primary outcomes are expected after the parent group:
- More behavior and mental states pointing towards NVR
- More use of adequate emotion regulation
- Less behavioral problems in the child
Secondary outcomes are expected, according to previous research measuring indirect effects of NVR treatment
- More adequate attunement to child
- More cohesion and structure in the family
- More adequate parenting behavior
- Less stress and burdening for parents
The investigators also expect parents with a more secure attachment style to benefit more (T2) and longer (T3 and T4) from the training.
- Conditions
- Helplessness, Learned, Family Conflict, Mentalising, Parenting
- Being tested
- Nonviolent Resistance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nonviolent ResistanceBehavioural
Six two weekly sessions of two hours, based on nonviolent resistance Questionnaires pre and post intervention
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline mean scores in four domains of Nonviolent Resistance as measured with the Parental Anchoring Scale (Flemish version)
The Parental Anchoring Questionnaire (Flemish version = OAFS) measures Presence, Self-Control, Social Support, and Structure, on a 7-point scale. High scores mean more Nonviolent Resistance.
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in child behavior as measured with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
The CBCL is a general questionnaire measuring internalizing and externalizing behavior of the child as perceived by the parents, using a 3-point scale. High scores mean more problems.
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in emotion regulation as measured with the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
The ERQ measures Reappraisal and Suppression as two distinct mechanisms to deal with emotional problems. Reappraisal is related more with healthy coping. A 7-point scale leads to scores pointing to high Reappraisal and high Suppression.
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change from baseline mean scores in attunement to the child as measured with the Parental Reflective Functioning Scale (PRFQ)
The PRFQ measures reflective functioning or mentalizing, a process essential in developing a secure attachment and positive attunement to the child. There are three subscales with a 7-point scale: Pre-mentalizing (PM), Certainty about Mental States (CMS), and Interest and Curiosity in Mental States (IC).
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in family functioning as measured with the Questionnaire for Family Functioning (VGFO)
The VGFO measures Basic care, Education, Social contacts, Youth experiences (of parents), and the Partner relationship, each on a 5-point scale.
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in parental burden as measured with the Parental Burden Questionnaire (OBVL)
The OBVL measures possible sources of burden for parents in five scales: Parent-child relationship, Parenting competency, Depressed mood (of the parent), Role restriction, Health complaints, all on a 4-point scale. Higher scores mean more burden for the parents.
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in parental behavior as measured with the Short Scale for Parental Behavior (VSOG)
The VSOG measures five different types of parental behavior on a 5-point scale: Positive engagement, Setting/teaching rules, Material rewarding, Punishing, and Physical punishment.
Measured: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2021
- Study startOct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Helplessness, LearnedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bart Colson, MA, Principal investigator, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05086328
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021 GV OUG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sherman, E. (2018). Group-Based Nonviolent Resistance Program: Development of a Short-Term Intervention and Preliminary Assessment of Its Feasibility and Acceptance. Tel Aviv University, Master Thesis
Omer H, Lebowitz ER. Nonviolent Resistance: Helping Caregivers Reduce Problematic Behaviors in Children and Adolescents. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Oct;42(4):688-700. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12168. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
PubMed 27292182Kiliçarslan, S. (2019). The Effect of the Non-violent Resistance Program for the Parents of Children with Violent Behaviors. Kastamonu Education, 27(2), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2691
Kiliçarslani, S., Ördem, S., Taltekin, A. & Ardiç, R. (2019). The Effect of Non-Violent Resistance Program on Family Relationships and Parentship Perceptions of Parents. PAU Journal of Education, 45, 211-234. doi: 10.9779/PUJE.2018.230
Schorr-Sapir I, Gershy N, Apter A, Omer H. Parent training in non-violent resistance for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a controlled outcome study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;31(6):929-938. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01723-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
PubMed 33528659Van Holen F, Vanderfaeillie J, Omer H. Adaptation and Evaluation of a Nonviolent Resistance Intervention for Foster Parents: A Progress Report. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Apr;42(2):256-71. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12125. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
PubMed 25907660
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Nonviolent Resistance in Parent Group Training in Child Psychiatric Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05086328
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021 GV OUG
- Conditions
- Helplessness, Learned, Family Conflict, Mentalising, Parenting
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In a Flemish sample of parents of children with psychiatric problems, this study evaluates the effect of a parent group training based on nonviolent resistance on family functioning, parenting variables and mental states of the parents, pre- and post-training.
Detailed description
Nonviolent Resistance (NVR) is an intervention method for families and teams that are suffering from helplessness and hopelessness. By empowering individuals through specific focus points and techniques, they can re-establish their role as authority figures for the child. The child, exhibiting dangerous and/or coercive behavior, can feel reconnected and guided.
Previous research has shown that parents score higher on General family functioning, Affective reactions and affective involvement, and Role definitions, but not Behavioral control, Problem solving and Communication. Positive effects were visible at a follow up moment, three months later. Parents reported significantly lower on anxiety for the aggression of their child, the self-efficiency about parental capacities and received social support. General parenting stress diminished significantly. A control group showed no such significant changes.
Participants with specific problems and waiting to be admitted in the residential ward at the study location can receive pre-care, in the form of a parental group training based on NVR. In six two weekly sessions, combined with intermediate telephone support and home assignments, parents are involved in important parent-child-oriented aspects.
This study will evaluate the effect of the training in a Flemish sample, focusing on family functioning, parenting variables and reflective functioning of the parents, pre- and post-training. T1 is at the time between invitation to participate and the first session; T2 is in the first week after the last session (T1 + 12 to 14 weeks); T3 is at three months after the last session; T4 is at six months after the last session.
The following primary outcomes are expected after the parent group:
- More behavior and mental states pointing towards NVR
- More use of adequate emotion regulation
- Less behavioral problems in the child
Secondary outcomes are expected, according to previous research measuring indirect effects of NVR treatment
- More adequate attunement to child
- More cohesion and structure in the family
- More adequate parenting behavior
- Less stress and burdening for parents
The investigators also expect parents with a more secure attachment style to benefit more (T2) and longer (T3 and T4) from the training.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- - parents of child on the waiting list or already admitted for help in the child psychiatric clinic at the study location, with specific parental stress related to helplessness
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Parents engage in the NVR training of the child psychiatric clinic at the study location for at least 5 out of 6 training sessions
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- insufficient understanding of Dutch/Flemish language
- simultaneously following a different parent group treatment, external to the study location
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nonviolent ResistanceSix two weekly sessions of two hours, based on nonviolent resistance Questionnaires pre and post intervention | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline mean scores in four domains of Nonviolent Resistance as measured with the Parental Anchoring Scale (Flemish version)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
The Parental Anchoring Questionnaire (Flemish version = OAFS) measures Presence, Self-Control, Social Support, and Structure, on a 7-point scale. High scores mean more Nonviolent Resistance.
Change from baseline mean scores in child behavior as measured with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
The CBCL is a general questionnaire measuring internalizing and externalizing behavior of the child as perceived by the parents, using a 3-point scale. High scores mean more problems.
Change from baseline mean scores in emotion regulation as measured with the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
The ERQ measures Reappraisal and Suppression as two distinct mechanisms to deal with emotional problems. Reappraisal is related more with healthy coping. A 7-point scale leads to scores pointing to high Reappraisal and high Suppression.
4 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline mean scores in attunement to the child as measured with the Parental Reflective Functioning Scale (PRFQ)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in family functioning as measured with the Questionnaire for Family Functioning (VGFO)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in parental burden as measured with the Parental Burden Questionnaire (OBVL)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Change from baseline mean scores in parental behavior as measured with the Short Scale for Parental Behavior (VSOG)
Time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2021.
- BackgroundSherman, E. (2018). Group-Based Nonviolent Resistance Program: Development of a Short-Term Intervention and Preliminary Assessment of Its Feasibility and Acceptance. Tel Aviv University, Master Thesis
- Background: PubMed 27292182Omer H, Lebowitz ER. Nonviolent Resistance: Helping Caregivers Reduce Problematic Behaviors in Children and Adolescents. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Oct;42(4):688-700. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12168. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
- Results publicationKiliçarslan, S. (2019). The Effect of the Non-violent Resistance Program for the Parents of Children with Violent Behaviors. Kastamonu Education, 27(2), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2691
- Results publicationKiliçarslani, S., Ördem, S., Taltekin, A. & Ardiç, R. (2019). The Effect of Non-Violent Resistance Program on Family Relationships and Parentship Perceptions of Parents. PAU Journal of Education, 45, 211-234. doi: 10.9779/PUJE.2018.230
- Results publication: PubMed 33528659Schorr-Sapir I, Gershy N, Apter A, Omer H. Parent training in non-violent resistance for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a controlled outcome study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;31(6):929-938. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01723-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 25907660Van Holen F, Vanderfaeillie J, Omer H. Adaptation and Evaluation of a Nonviolent Resistance Intervention for Foster Parents: A Progress Report. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Apr;42(2):256-71. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12125. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Helplessness, Learned
Not yet recruiting
Interactive Nature-Based Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety, Low Mood, and Feelings of Helplessness in Hospitalized Older Adults With Chronic Illness (Zenctuary VR+)
Psychological Distress, Chronic Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bart Colson, MA principal investigator
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Helplessness, Learned and Family Conflict, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bart Colson, MA (003224776072, bart.colson@uzbrussel.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline mean scores in four domains of Nonviolent Resistance as measured with the Parental Anchoring Scale (Flemish version) (time frame: T1 baseline = 1 to 2 weeks before first session; T2 = T1 + 12 to 14 weeks; T3 = T2 + three months; T4 = T2 + six months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05086328, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2021.