AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral Cavernous MalformationPhase 2SYCAMORENCT05085561

The Symptomatic Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Trial of REC-994

A Phase 2 study testing REC-994 in people with Cerebral Cavernous Malformation, run by Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 15 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a two-part, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of REC-994 (200 mg and 400 mg) compared to placebo in participants with symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Cavernous Malformation
What is being tested?
REC-994
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
62 participants
Where
15 sitesUnited States
Study dates
17 Mar 2022to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older with anatomic CCM lesions demonstrated by brain MRI
  • Have symptomatic CCM
  • Have provided written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Have not participated in a clinical trial utilizing an investigational agent within 28 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer) prior to Screening

Who cannot join

  • Symptoms deemed by the study Investigator to be caused exclusively by irreversible neuronal damage from prior stroke or neurosurgical instrumentation
  • History of cranial irradiation or surgical/radiosurgical treatment of the primary symptomatic CCM lesion
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Be unable or unwilling to participate in MRI assessments (e.g., claustrophobia, metal implant or implanted cardiac pacemaker)
  • Liver dysfunction or active liver disease as defined by baseline serum transaminases >2x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Have moderately or severely impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60ml/min) or active renal disease or have previously received a kidney transplant
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Have had a previous diagnosis of skeletal muscle disorders (myopathy) of any cause or have a baseline creatine kinase level > 5x ULN
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormality
  • Have had an intracerebral hemorrhage within 3 months of screening or any brain surgery within 6 months of screening (not including the primary symptomatic CCM lesion)

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 1 country.

15 sites in 1 country

United States15 sites
  • Emory

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-8855

  • University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

  • Lyerly Neurosurgery

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207-8202

  • UCLA

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10027

  • Stanford University

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Xenoscience Inc

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85004

  • University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260

  • Cleveland Clinic Florida

    Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34987

  • Valley Hospital

    Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450

  • University of Rochester Medical Center

    Rochester, New York, 14642

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Two-Part Study of REC-994 in the Treatment of Adults With Symptomatic Cerebral Cavernous Malformation (CCM); Part 1: A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Two Doses of REC-994; Part 2: A Long-Term Blinded Extension Clinical Trial to Evaluate Long-Term Safety Tolerability and Efficacy of REC-994

This is a two-part, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of REC-994 (200 mg and 400 mg) compared to placebo in participants with symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM).

Read the detailed description

Part 1: Participants will receive treatment over a period of 12 months. Part 2: Optional long-term extension (LTE) for participants completing Part 1 and who are eligible for extended treatment with REC-994.

Being tested
REC-994, Placebo
Keywords
Cerebral Cavernous Malformation, CCM
Medical subject headings
Hemangioma, Cavernous, Central Nervous System

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • REC-994Drug

    REC-994 200 mg tablets

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo Tablets

Study groups in NCT05085561
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
REC-994 200 mgExperimentalParticipants received REC-994 200 milligrams (mg) orally once daily (QD) (1 200 mg REC-994 tablet, 1 matching placebo tablet)
Receives: Drug: REC-994; Drug: Placebo
REC-994 400 mgExperimentalParticipants received REC-994 400 mg orally QD (2 200 mg REC-994 tablets)
Receives: Drug: REC-994
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received matching placebo orally QD (2 matching placebo tablets)
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE was the development of an undesirable medical condition or the deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered causally related to the product. TEAES which include treatment related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, treatment-related serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and treatment-related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation are reported. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section

    Measured: Up to a maximum of 1201 days

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12

    The mRS is used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered an acute stroke. The mRS score was calculated from a 6-point scale runs from 0-5, corresponding to no symptoms at all (0) to severe (5). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 was analyzed by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

  2. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12

    The SMSS questionnaire is a self-assessment tool consists of 12 critical neurologic items, each assessed on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all affected) to 6 (total limitation). The total score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 was analyzed by MMRM method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

  3. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12

    The CCM-HI is a novel patient-reported outcome to assess overall symptom burden across 20 domains. The total CCM-HI score was calculated as a weighted sum of subscale scores, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden. Subscale scores were derived by multiplying individual item responses (scored 0-4) by predefined weights and summing within each subscale. Each subscale score is then multiplied by a corresponding scaling factor. The weighted subscale scores were summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 were analyzed by MMRM method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

  4. Part 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12

    The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. The model included the CGI-I score at each visit as the dependent variable, with corresponding baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Measured: Month 12

  5. Part 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12

    The PGI is a 7-point scale that requires the participant to assess how much their own illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and was rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. The model included the PGI-I score at each visit as the dependent variable, with corresponding baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Measured: Month 12

  6. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 12

    Number of monthly seizures was calculated during each analysis window as follows: (number of observed seizures in each interval/number of days with seizure diary entry during each interval) x 30. Change from Baseline over monthly intervals was reported with a negative change indicating a reduction in the number of seizures.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

  7. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12

    Number of monthly headaches was calculated during each analysis window as follows: (number of observed headaches in each interval/number of days with headache diary entry during each interval) x 30. Change from Baseline over monthly intervals was reported with a negative change indicating a reduction in the number of seizures.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 12

  8. Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic Events

    MRI and/or CT scan were used to confirm evidence of symptomatic cerebral hemorrhagic events.

    Measured: Up to a maximum 1201 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2021
  2. Study start17 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05085561
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC-994-201
Acronym
SYCAMORE
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
8 Oct 2021
Last updated
22 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing REC-994 in people with Cerebral Cavernous Malformation, run by Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 15 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Oct 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (time frame: Up to a maximum of 1201 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in