Long-term CareNCT05073146
Quality Management of Reablement Service by Professionals in Taiwan: Review and Analysis
An observational study of Long-term Care, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Since the Ministry of Health and Welfare promoted long-term care 2.0 in 2017, it has actively flipped the concept of care. The long-term care professional service added the spirit of self-care, emphasized the dignity and autonomy of the elderly, and provided professional services (including reablement services) to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Long-term Care
- What is being tested?
- interview
- How many people
- 151 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 3 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Model cases (long-term professional service users, hereinafter referred to as professional service users, and their family members or main caregivers) and long-term professional service providers of model cases.
Who may be able to join
- (1) The care management specialist or case manager of the A-level unit (community integrated service center) or the B-level unit (combined service center) judged to be an effective professional service user who has reached the age of 20 (e.g. : Decline in the level of disability, decrease in the number of hours of care required, decrease in the burden of caregivers, etc.) and their family members or main caregivers.
- (2) The cognitive status and language ability of professional service users are acceptable for face-to-face (or video) interviews. If the professional service user is a case where a research team such as a dementia patient determines that the cognitive state cannot be interviewed, it will be replaced by interviewing the long-term professional service experience of the family or the main caregiver.
- (3) Understand the research content and agree to accept the interview.
- (1) The main caregivers of professional service users who have reached the age of 20, and their cognitive and language skills are acceptable for face-to-face (or video) interviews
- (2) Relevant professional service providers (including but not limited to: case managers, care managers, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses, home care service supervisors, caring service supervisor, home service assistants, etc.)
- (3) Understand the research content and agree to accept the interview.
Who cannot join
- N/A
- Caregivers and professionals
- The cognitive status and language ability of the main caregivers in the families of professional service users are not acceptable for face-to-face interviews.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan, 10051
About this study
Since the Ministry of Health and Welfare promoted long-term care 2.0 in 2017, it has actively flipped the concept of care. The long-term care professional service added the spirit of self-care, emphasized the dignity and autonomy of the elderly, and provided professional services (including reablement services) to enhance the individual's ability to live independently. However, the use of professional services may be controversial due to unclear understanding of the purpose and service mode of professional services and lack of preparation, vertical (county and city governments, community integrated service centers (A-level units), long-term care service units, etc.) and horizontal cross-professional cooperation is rare, the effectiveness of professional services is unclear, and issues of service quality management also need attention. Therefore, there is an urgent need to integrate the current implementation content and service personnel qualifications of professional services, improve the knowledge of professional service personnel, strengthen the links between county and city governments, A-level units, and long-term care service units, and improve the quality of professional services.
The purpose of this plan is to set up experts and working groups, revise the professional service manuals, develop long-term professional service operation guidelines, review the long-term professional service payment system, and develop professional service quality management mechanisms to provide reference for policy planning.
Read more
Researchers will achieve their goals through the following methods:
- Establish an interdisciplinary, academic and practical expert working group, professional service manual/operation guide revising group, and hold meetings. Researchers will also review professional service manuals and operational guidelines for the drafts of professional services, and the payment system and the improvement mechanism of service quality, etc.
- Review domestic and foreign documents: four countries including Norway, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Japan. Researchers will compare the long-term care professional service or reablement service models of various countries, and serve as follow-up experts to revise professional service manuals, operating guidelines, and basis for professional service execution and quality management mode.
- Achievement analysis of model cases: based on the extended case method of qualitative research, it is expected to solicit high-quality model long-term care professional service units, and in-depth collection of relevant information on the characteristics, process and results of the case homes and service units of successful cases of long-term professional services, conduct ethnographic research and benchmarking, understand the operation of the domestic model, as a follow-up reference for the various tasks of this project .
- Based on the above-mentioned literature review, model case analysis, expert writing, and multiple meetings, develop a long-term professional service manual/long-term professional service operation guidelines, and propose an amendment draft.
- Suggestions for the review of the payment system for long-term care professional services: methods include the above-mentioned literature review, establishment of an expert group, case visits, analysis of results of typical cases, and discussions on the draft and different payment methods of various care packages and classification of different payment cases, obtain group consensus through the Delphi method, and conduct pros and cons analysis.
- Conduct simulation verification for the service payment method draft and different payment case classifications, visit cases (including cases with different disability levels or characteristics), and analyze the verification results and make recommendations for revision.
- Based on the above literature review, analysis of the results of model cases and discussions at expert meetings, develop professional service quality evaluation and management mechanisms
- Produce public version of long-term professional service manual/long-term professional service operation guide for lecture notes and educational training media, and handle seven sessions of education training in North, Central, South, and East of Taiwan.
- Conditions
- Long-term Care
- Being tested
- interview
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
interviewOther
Starting from the user as an extended starting point, through on-site visits and interviews with relevant personnel, such as personal management, professional service teams, cases, family members, other long-term care service providers (home service assistants), etc., collect relevant information and summarize successful strategies and related elements of long-term professional services (including conditions, demand analysis, service usage, professional team interaction, payment and payment systems, characteristics of case, etc.) of model cases.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score
Collect and analyze participants' Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score.
Measured: 5 months
Multi-Dimensional Assessment Instrument
Collect and analyze participants' Multi-Dimensional Assessment Instrument Score.
Measured: 5 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Extended Case interview feedback (Qualitative Research)
Analyze the number of occurrences of specific words in interview transcript.
Measured: 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion3 Nov 2022
- Study completion3 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Long-term CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05073146
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202106002RINB
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quality Management of Reablement Service by Professionals in Taiwan: Review and Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05073146
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202106002RINB
- Conditions
- Long-term Care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 151 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Since the Ministry of Health and Welfare promoted long-term care 2.0 in 2017, it has actively flipped the concept of care. The long-term care professional service added the spirit of self-care, emphasized the dignity and autonomy of the elderly, and provided professional services (including reablement services) to enhance the individual's ability to live independently. However, the use of professional services may be controversial due to unclear understanding of the purpose and service mode of professional services and lack of preparation, vertical (county and city governments, community integrated service centers (A-level units), long-term care service units, etc.) and horizontal cross-professional cooperation is rare, the effectiveness of professional services is unclear, and issues of service quality management also need attention. Therefore, there is an urgent need to integrate the current implementation content and service personnel qualifications of professional services, improve the knowledge of professional service personnel, strengthen the links between county and city governments, A-level units, and long-term care service units, and improve the quality of professional services.
The purpose of this plan is to set up experts and working groups, revise the professional service manuals, develop long-term professional service operation guidelines, review the long-term professional service payment system, and develop professional service quality management mechanisms to provide reference for policy planning.
Researchers will achieve their goals through the following methods:
- Establish an interdisciplinary, academic and practical expert working group, professional service manual/operation guide revising group, and hold meetings. Researchers will also review professional service manuals and operational guidelines for the drafts of professional services, and the payment system and the improvement mechanism of service quality, etc.
- Review domestic and foreign documents: four countries including Norway, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Japan. Researchers will compare the long-term care professional service or reablement service models of various countries, and serve as follow-up experts to revise professional service manuals, operating guidelines, and basis for professional service execution and quality management mode.
- Achievement analysis of model cases: based on the extended case method of qualitative research, it is expected to solicit high-quality model long-term care professional service units, and in-depth collection of relevant information on the characteristics, process and results of the case homes and service units of successful cases of long-term professional services, conduct ethnographic research and benchmarking, understand the operation of the domestic model, as a follow-up reference for the various tasks of this project .
- Based on the above-mentioned literature review, model case analysis, expert writing, and multiple meetings, develop a long-term professional service manual/long-term professional service operation guidelines, and propose an amendment draft.
- Suggestions for the review of the payment system for long-term care professional services: methods include the above-mentioned literature review, establishment of an expert group, case visits, analysis of results of typical cases, and discussions on the draft and different payment methods of various care packages and classification of different payment cases, obtain group consensus through the Delphi method, and conduct pros and cons analysis.
- Conduct simulation verification for the service payment method draft and different payment case classifications, visit cases (including cases with different disability levels or characteristics), and analyze the verification results and make recommendations for revision.
- Based on the above literature review, analysis of the results of model cases and discussions at expert meetings, develop professional service quality evaluation and management mechanisms
- Produce public version of long-term professional service manual/long-term professional service operation guide for lecture notes and educational training media, and handle seven sessions of education training in North, Central, South, and East of Taiwan.
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Model cases (long-term professional service users, hereinafter referred to as professional service users, and their family members or main caregivers) and long-term professional service providers of model cases.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- (1) The care management specialist or case manager of the A-level unit (community integrated service center) or the B-level unit (combined service center) judged to be an effective professional service user who has reached the age of 20 (e.g. : Decline in the level of disability, decrease in the number of hours of care required, decrease in the burden of caregivers, etc.) and their family members or main caregivers.
- (2) The cognitive status and language ability of professional service users are acceptable for face-to-face (or video) interviews. If the professional service user is a case where a research team such as a dementia patient determines that the cognitive state cannot be interviewed, it will be replaced by interviewing the long-term professional service experience of the family or the main caregiver.
- (3) Understand the research content and agree to accept the interview.
- (1) The main caregivers of professional service users who have reached the age of 20, and their cognitive and language skills are acceptable for face-to-face (or video) interviews
- (2) Relevant professional service providers (including but not limited to: case managers, care managers, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses, home care service supervisors, caring service supervisor, home service assistants, etc.)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- N/A
- Caregivers and professionals
- The cognitive status and language ability of the main caregivers in the families of professional service users are not acceptable for face-to-face interviews.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| interviewStarting from the user as an extended starting point, through on-site visits and interviews with relevant personnel, such as personal management, professional service teams, cases, family members, other long-term care service providers (home service assistants), etc., collect relevant information and summarize successful strategies and related elements of long-term professional services (including conditions, demand analysis, service usage, professional team interaction, payment and payment systems, characteristics of case, etc.) of model cases. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score
Time frame: 5 months
Collect and analyze participants' Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score.
Multi-Dimensional Assessment Instrument
Time frame: 5 months
Collect and analyze participants' Multi-Dimensional Assessment Instrument Score.
1 secondary outcome
Extended Case interview feedback (Qualitative Research)
Time frame: 5 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2023.
Related trials for Long-term Care
RecruitingPhase 2
Pan Tumor Rollover Study
Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Response to Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance With Containment Microbiota Therapy (REACT)
Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Colonization
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Epidemiology of Clostridioides Difficile Infection (CDI) in Long-term Care Facilities, Assessment of Professional Practices Related to CDI Risk Prevention, and Strategies for Improving Care.
Clostridioides Difficile Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Long-term Evaluation and Follow-up Care of Patients Treated With Stem Cell Transplants
Graft-versus-leukemia, Graft vs Host Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study in Adult Patients With Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) to Evaluate How Safe Long-term Treatment With Pozelimab + Cemdisiran Combination Therapy is and How Well it Works
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Long-term Care, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Long-Term Care Case-Mix System Score (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2023.