Lumbar Spinal StenosisNCT05073081
Feasibility of Prehab for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
A study testing Prehab for LSS in people with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Prehabilitation, run by McMaster University at 4 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The literature has shown evidence of the effectiveness of prehabilitation programs on post-operative recovery for musculoskeletal conditions; however, evidence for prehabilitation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is limited. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Prehabilitation
- What is being tested?
- Prehab for LSS
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 37 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Minimum 20 weeks prior to date of LSS surgery
- Older than 55 years of age
- Scheduled for first spinal surgery
- Can read and understanding English, with no significant visual or hearing impairment that would require additional support
Who cannot join
- Known or suspected pathology (e.g., cancer, cauda equina syndrome)
- Unable to engage in exercise due to other comorbidities
- No access to the Internet
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Canada4 sites
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta
University of Alberta
Edmonton
McMaster University
Hamilton
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario
About this study
Official title: Feasibility Testing of a Pre-surgical Rehabilitation (Prehab) Program for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
The literature has shown evidence of the effectiveness of prehabilitation programs on post-operative recovery for musculoskeletal conditions; however, evidence for prehabilitation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is limited. Investigators have found that there is very low to low quality evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions for improving outcomes following lumbar spine surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study will be to determine the feasibility of a prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery, and pilot test the protocol to provide the foundation for future design of a larger, multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common degenerative condition among older adults, and the leading reason older adults aged 65 and older undergo surgery. LSS is characterized by degenerative changes that lead to loss of intervertebral disc spaces, joint thickening, and enfolding of the ligaments surrounding the spine. These degenerative changes may cause compression of lumbosacral nerve roots resulting in the narrowing of central and vertebral canals known as neurogenic claudication (NC). The symptoms of NC include cramping, numbness or tingling, and muscle weakness in the lower back, buttocks, or one or both legs, with symptoms often intensifying with standing and walking.
The majority of individuals undergoing surgery for LSS are post-retirement age, have chronic low back pain, without access to private rehabilitation. This population is often severely deconditioned prior to surgery with weakness and atrophy of the muscles in the back, core, and lower limb. These preoperative factors have been shown to be predictors for postoperative LSS outcomes. Studies have shown evidence of the effectiveness of prehabilitation programs on post-operative recovery for other musculoskeletal conditions such as total knee arthroplasty. However, there appears to be a lack of high-quality evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions in improving outcomes for LSS surgery.
Research Aims:
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of the program of care on a group of patients with LSS undergoing surgery, and determine the feasibility of the protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Methods:
This mixed methods study will include a two-armed, pilot RCT evaluating an 8-week virtual prehabilitation program for participants undergoing LSS surgery, with a longitudinal qualitative study conducted parallel to the pilot RCT. The two groups in the RCT study will be: 1) prehabilitation, and 2) usual care.
Recruitment:
There will be 60 participants recruited from participating spine surgeons in 3 Canadian cities - Hamilton, Edmonton, and Calgary. Participants will be included if 1) they are a minimum 20 weeks prior to their date of surgery, 2) older than 55 years of age, 3) are scheduled for first spine surgery , and 4) are English-speaking. Participants will be excluded if 1) they have a known or suspected pathology (e.g., cancer, cauda equina syndrome), 2) are unable to engage in exercise due to other comorbidities or cognitive issues, and 3) if they do not have access to the Internet.
Interventions:
The 8-week prehabilitation program will be delivered online using synchronous and asynchronous sessions delivered by either a physiotherapist, chiropractor or kinesiologist, with a booster session at 6-weeks post-op. There will be 4 individual exercises sessions (week 1, 2, 4 and 8) delivered synchronously using Zoom or Physitrack in which motivational interviewing and graded activity exercises will be conducted. Participants will also be asked to exercise at least 3 times a week using the asynchronous exercise videos. Participants will receive short online educational videos (3-5 minutes). Educational sessions will include information regarding the importance of exercise, pain education, self-management, exercising despite pain, post-operative expectations, and information regarding their upcoming surgery. The educational sessions will also include two online peer-support groups when they can interact with a patient with a history of LSS surgery.
Participants in the control group will receive usual care for LSS surgery, which will consist of one session with an anesthesiologist, a nurse and access to our online educational videos.
Outcomes:
Outcomes will be evaluated at: baseline (~20 weeks before LSS surgery), immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3 and 12 months post-operatively. Feasibility outcomes are: 1) recruitment rate; 2) patient adherence to the program and attrition rates; 3) acceptability of program content; and 4); acceptability of study procedures and completion of study questionnaires. Patient reported outcomes will be used to inform feasibility, study burden and sample size calculations. These outcomes include: pain and disability, health-related quality of life, psychological measures, and monitoring variables. Ecological Momentary Assessments using activity monitors will be used to evaluate walking ability and daily pain.
Qualitative Methods A longitudinal qualitative study will be conducted parallel to the pilot RCT. We will use purposive sampling to conduct in-depth semi structured interviews at baseline (~20 weeks before LSS surgery), 8-weeks after the intervention, 3 months, and 12 months post-operatively. For the qualitative study, we will aim to recruit 12-15 participants or until saturation is met. The longitudinal qualitative study will assess the barriers and facilitators that influence engagement in prehabilitation, as well as the changes in pain and health that occur over time and how these are related to the program, personal (e.g., sex and gender, age, comorbid health, pain profile) or contextual factors (psychosocial, environmental, health systems).
Analysis:
All analyses will be conducted using STATA 15. Descriptive statistics will be used to report feasibility outcomes, as well as to identify trends in patient-reported outcomes. Qualitative interviews will be analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) informed by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies. Inductive thematic analysis will be used to analyze the data and report the study findings.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Prehabilitation
- Being tested
- Prehab for LSS, Usual Care
- Keywords
- Prehabilitation, Spinal stenosis, Surgery, Exercise therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prehab for LSSOther
The 8-week prehabilitation program will be delivered online by physiotherapists, chiropractors, and kinesiologists through synchronous and asynchronous exercise sessions, along with online educational sessions.
Usual CareOther
Participants in the control group will receive usual care as per surgeons' current practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation | Experimental | The 8-week prehabilitation program will be delivered online using synchronous and asynchronous sessions delivered by either a physiotherapist, chiropractor or kinesiologist. There will be 4 individual exercises sessions delivered synchronously using Zoom or Physitrack in which motivational interviewing and graded activity exercises will be conducted. Participants will also be asked to exercise at least 3 times a week using the asynchronous exercise videos. The exercises will be individualized on participants functional ability and personal goals identified at baseline, with a focus on muscle strengthening, stretching, improving spinal flexibility and stability. There will be a booster session at 6-weeks post-op. Participants will also undergo 5 group educational sessions, which will provide information regarding: goal setting, pain education, self-management, pacing, post-operative expectations, exercise recommendations, and information regarding their upcoming surgery. Receives: Other: Prehab for LSS |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Participants in the control group will receive usual care as per surgeons' current practice. This generally consists of one session with an anesthesiologist, a nurse and access to our online videos. Receives: Other: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Adherence
Measured by patient diary, app-based program
- Proceed with study if 80% of participants attended all 4 exercise sessions
- Proceed with study if 60% of participants report exercise at last 3x/week.
Measured: During the 8-week Intervention
Recruitment Rate
Proceed with study if 50% of eligible participants consent to participate within 4 months
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery
Content Acceptability
Measured using a survey administered at the end of the 8-week intervention
- Proceed with the study if 60% found treatment useful (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
- Proceed with the study if 60% found treatment helpful (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Measured: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks)
Format Acceptability
Measured using a survey administered at the end of the 8-week intervention
- Proceed with the study if 60% found treatment delivery acceptability (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
- Proceed with the study if 60% of participants reported being likely to recommend this treatment (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
- Proceed with the study if 60% reported being likely to use this treatment again (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Measured: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks)
Follow-up
- Proceed with the study if 90% of participants follow-up at the end of the prehab intervention
- Proceed with the study if 85% of participants follow-up at 6 months
- Proceed with the study if 85% of participants follow-up at 12 months
- Proceed with the study if 60% reported being likely to use this treatment again (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Measured: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Burden
Proceed with the study if 60% reported being likely to use this treatment again (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Measured: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks)
Secondary outcomes (9)
The Oswestry Disability Index
Disease specific questionnaire designed to evaluate pain and function in this patient population, using a numerical rating scale.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire - Balance
Disease specific questionnaire designed to evaluate pain and function in this patient population.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
SF-12
12-Item scale to assess the impact of health on quality of life.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Depression scale to monitor the severity of depression; total score from 0-27 with higher scores representing severe depression.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
13-item scale to assess the extent of catastrophic thinking due to low back pain. Total score ranging from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
6-item Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale
6-item scale to evaluate disease related self-efficacy with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy ranging from 0-10.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
11-item scale used to evaluate kinesiophobia and associated anxiety. Scores range from 17-68 with higher scores indicating severe kinesiophobia.
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Total weekly minutes of physical activity (PA) will be captured with a wearable tri-axial accelerometer device (Actiwatch Spectrum Pro Startup, Philips, USA) worn for seven consecutive days. Pain and fatigue will be measured using a 10-point scale with higher scores representing worse pain and fatigue, which will be measured 3 times a day for 7 days.
Measured: During the 8-week Intervention
EQ-5D
Measures five dimensions of patient reported health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression).
Measured: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024
- Study completion30 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lumbar Spinal StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a mixed methods two-armed pilot RCT evaluating an 8-week virtual prehabilitation program for participants undergoing LSS surgery versus usual care. A longitudinal qualitative study will be conducted parallel to the pilot RCT.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Calgary, University of Alberta
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Luciana Macedo, McMaster University
- Investigators
- Luciana G Macedo, PhD, Principal investigator, McMaster UniversityDoug Gross, PhD, Principal investigator, University of AlbertaLisa Carlesso, PhD, Principal investigator, McMaster UniversityKenneth Thomas, MD, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05073081
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Prehab LSS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data may be requested directly to the principal investigator or may be made available upon publication.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility Testing of a Pre-surgical Rehabilitation (Prehab) Program for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05073081
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Prehab LSS
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Prehabilitation
- Keywords
- Prehabilitation, Spinal stenosis, Surgery, Exercise therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 37 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Calgary, University of Alberta
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The literature has shown evidence of the effectiveness of prehabilitation programs on post-operative recovery for musculoskeletal conditions; however, evidence for prehabilitation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is limited. Investigators have found that there is very low to low quality evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions for improving outcomes following lumbar spine surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study will be to determine the feasibility of a prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery, and pilot test the protocol to provide the foundation for future design of a larger, multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Detailed description
Background:
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common degenerative condition among older adults, and the leading reason older adults aged 65 and older undergo surgery. LSS is characterized by degenerative changes that lead to loss of intervertebral disc spaces, joint thickening, and enfolding of the ligaments surrounding the spine. These degenerative changes may cause compression of lumbosacral nerve roots resulting in the narrowing of central and vertebral canals known as neurogenic claudication (NC). The symptoms of NC include cramping, numbness or tingling, and muscle weakness in the lower back, buttocks, or one or both legs, with symptoms often intensifying with standing and walking.
The majority of individuals undergoing surgery for LSS are post-retirement age, have chronic low back pain, without access to private rehabilitation. This population is often severely deconditioned prior to surgery with weakness and atrophy of the muscles in the back, core, and lower limb. These preoperative factors have been shown to be predictors for postoperative LSS outcomes. Studies have shown evidence of the effectiveness of prehabilitation programs on post-operative recovery for other musculoskeletal conditions such as total knee arthroplasty. However, there appears to be a lack of high-quality evidence for the effect of prehabilitation interventions in improving outcomes for LSS surgery.
Research Aims:
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of the program of care on a group of patients with LSS undergoing surgery, and determine the feasibility of the protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Methods:
This mixed methods study will include a two-armed, pilot RCT evaluating an 8-week virtual prehabilitation program for participants undergoing LSS surgery, with a longitudinal qualitative study conducted parallel to the pilot RCT. The two groups in the RCT study will be: 1) prehabilitation, and 2) usual care.
Recruitment:
There will be 60 participants recruited from participating spine surgeons in 3 Canadian cities - Hamilton, Edmonton, and Calgary. Participants will be included if 1) they are a minimum 20 weeks prior to their date of surgery, 2) older than 55 years of age, 3) are scheduled for first spine surgery , and 4) are English-speaking. Participants will be excluded if 1) they have a known or suspected pathology (e.g., cancer, cauda equina syndrome), 2) are unable to engage in exercise due to other comorbidities or cognitive issues, and 3) if they do not have access to the Internet.
Interventions:
The 8-week prehabilitation program will be delivered online using synchronous and asynchronous sessions delivered by either a physiotherapist, chiropractor or kinesiologist, with a booster session at 6-weeks post-op. There will be 4 individual exercises sessions (week 1, 2, 4 and 8) delivered synchronously using Zoom or Physitrack in which motivational interviewing and graded activity exercises will be conducted. Participants will also be asked to exercise at least 3 times a week using the asynchronous exercise videos. Participants will receive short online educational videos (3-5 minutes). Educational sessions will include information regarding the importance of exercise, pain education, self-management, exercising despite pain, post-operative expectations, and information regarding their upcoming surgery. The educational sessions will also include two online peer-support groups when they can interact with a patient with a history of LSS surgery.
Participants in the control group will receive usual care for LSS surgery, which will consist of one session with an anesthesiologist, a nurse and access to our online educational videos.
Outcomes:
Outcomes will be evaluated at: baseline (~20 weeks before LSS surgery), immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3 and 12 months post-operatively. Feasibility outcomes are: 1) recruitment rate; 2) patient adherence to the program and attrition rates; 3) acceptability of program content; and 4); acceptability of study procedures and completion of study questionnaires. Patient reported outcomes will be used to inform feasibility, study burden and sample size calculations. These outcomes include: pain and disability, health-related quality of life, psychological measures, and monitoring variables. Ecological Momentary Assessments using activity monitors will be used to evaluate walking ability and daily pain.
Qualitative Methods A longitudinal qualitative study will be conducted parallel to the pilot RCT. We will use purposive sampling to conduct in-depth semi structured interviews at baseline (~20 weeks before LSS surgery), 8-weeks after the intervention, 3 months, and 12 months post-operatively. For the qualitative study, we will aim to recruit 12-15 participants or until saturation is met. The longitudinal qualitative study will assess the barriers and facilitators that influence engagement in prehabilitation, as well as the changes in pain and health that occur over time and how these are related to the program, personal (e.g., sex and gender, age, comorbid health, pain profile) or contextual factors (psychosocial, environmental, health systems).
Analysis:
All analyses will be conducted using STATA 15. Descriptive statistics will be used to report feasibility outcomes, as well as to identify trends in patient-reported outcomes. Qualitative interviews will be analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) informed by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies. Inductive thematic analysis will be used to analyze the data and report the study findings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a mixed methods two-armed pilot RCT evaluating an 8-week virtual prehabilitation program for participants undergoing LSS surgery versus usual care. A longitudinal qualitative study will be conducted parallel to the pilot RCT.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation | Experimental | Other: Prehab for LSSThe 8-week prehabilitation program will be delivered online using synchronous and asynchronous sessions delivered by either a physiotherapist, chiropractor or kinesiologist. There will be 4 individual exercises sessions delivered synchronously using Zoom or Physitrack in which motivational interviewing and graded activity exercises will be conducted. Participants will also be asked to exercise at least 3 times a week using the asynchronous exercise videos. The exercises will be individualized on participants functional ability and personal goals identified at baseline, with a focus on muscle strengthening, stretching, improving spinal flexibility and stability. There will be a booster session at 6-weeks post-op. Participants will also undergo 5 group educational sessions, which will provide information regarding: goal setting, pain education, self-management, pacing, post-operative expectations, exercise recommendations, and information regarding their upcoming surgery. |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Other: Usual CareParticipants in the control group will receive usual care as per surgeons' current practice. This generally consists of one session with an anesthesiologist, a nurse and access to our online videos. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Minimum 20 weeks prior to date of LSS surgery
- Older than 55 years of age
- Scheduled for first spinal surgery
- Can read and understanding English, with no significant visual or hearing impairment that would require additional support
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Known or suspected pathology (e.g., cancer, cauda equina syndrome)
- Unable to engage in exercise due to other comorbidities
- No access to the Internet
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prehab for LSSThe 8-week prehabilitation program will be delivered online by physiotherapists, chiropractors, and kinesiologists through synchronous and asynchronous exercise sessions, along with online educational sessions. | Other | Prehabilitation |
| Usual CareParticipants in the control group will receive usual care as per surgeons' current practice. | Other | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Patient Adherence
Time frame: During the 8-week Intervention
Measured by patient diary, app-based program 1. Proceed with study if 80% of participants attended all 4 exercise sessions 2. Proceed with study if 60% of participants report exercise at last 3x/week.
Recruitment Rate
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery
Proceed with study if 50% of eligible participants consent to participate within 4 months
Content Acceptability
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks)
Measured using a survey administered at the end of the 8-week intervention 1. Proceed with the study if 60% found treatment useful (>7/10 on a Likert scale) 2. Proceed with the study if 60% found treatment helpful (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Format Acceptability
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks)
Measured using a survey administered at the end of the 8-week intervention 1. Proceed with the study if 60% found treatment delivery acceptability (>7/10 on a Likert scale) 2. Proceed with the study if 60% of participants reported being likely to recommend this treatment (>7/10 on a Likert scale) 3. Proceed with the study if 60% reported being likely to use this treatment again (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Follow-up
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
1. Proceed with the study if 90% of participants follow-up at the end of the prehab intervention 2. Proceed with the study if 85% of participants follow-up at 6 months 3. Proceed with the study if 85% of participants follow-up at 12 months 4. Proceed with the study if 60% reported being likely to use this treatment again (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
Burden
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (8-weeks)
Proceed with the study if 60% reported being likely to use this treatment again (>7/10 on a Likert scale)
9 secondary outcomes
The Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire - Balance
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
SF-12
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
6-item Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Time frame: During the 8-week Intervention
EQ-5D
Time frame: 20 weeks before LSS surgery, immediately after the intervention (8-weeks), 3-, and 12-months post-operatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data may be requested directly to the principal investigator or may be made available upon publication.
Related trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Foraminal Imaging and Symptoms in Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
Recruiting
Post-Market Clinical Study of Functional Motion Outcomes in Subjects Treated With the Minuteman Device
Degenerative Conditions of the Lumbar Spine, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression: A Medicare Claims Study
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Thoracic-Lumbar Arthrodesis- Implanet Jazz
Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis
Recruiting
Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Segment Stenosis
Adjacent Segment Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luciana G Macedo, PhD principal investigator
McMaster University
Doug Gross, PhD principal investigator
University of Alberta
Lisa Carlesso, PhD principal investigator
McMaster University
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prehab for LSS in people with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Prehabilitation, run by McMaster University at 4 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Adherence (time frame: During the 8-week Intervention). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.