AzTrials
AzTrials

Dupuytren's DiseaseREMEDYNCT05067764

Efficacy of Aponeurectomy on the 2-year Recurrence Rate of Dupuytren's Disease

A study testing Aponeurectomy with grafting and Aponeurectomy alone in people with Dupuytren's Disease, run by Elsan at 2 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dupuytren's disease is a frequent hereditary disease in Northern Europe. It is a degenerative disease affecting the palmar aponeurosis of the hand. It develops a progressive contractile fibrosis which cuts the hypodermic fatty tissue, adheres to the skin and the phalanges, gradually bending the affected rays… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dupuytren's Disease
What is being tested?
Aponeurectomy with grafting and Aponeurectomy alone
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
172 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
29 Sep 2022to 29 Mar 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Carrier of Tubiana stage II-IV Dupuytren's disease on at least one or more rays, not previously operated
  • Indication of a surgery by aponeurectomy
  • Skin pinch of the posterior aspect of the arm of more than 1cm
  • Affiliation to a social security system
  • Patient informed of the study and having given informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Previous surgery of any kind for Dupuytren's disease
  • Involvement on the thumb only
  • Need for a total skin graft or a pedicle flap on all the rays to be treated
  • Active autoimmune disease
  • Previous treatment with collagenase
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Contraindications to MRI (criteria applicable only for patients from the coordinating center, not applicable for other centers)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Institut Aquitain de la Main

    Pessac, 33600

    Elias Sawaya, MD, (0)663420278 ext. +33, esawaya.md@gmail.com

    Charlène PY, CRA, charlene.py@elsan.care

    Recruiting
  • Santé Atlantique ELSAN

    Saint-Herblain, 44800

    Flore-Anne LECOQ, MD, +332 40 95 93 93, recherche.na@elsan.care

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Aponeurectomy Associated With Adipose Tissue Grafting Compared to Aponeurectomy Alone, on the 2-year Recurrence Rate of Dupuytren's Disease (REMEDY).

Dupuytren's disease is a frequent hereditary disease in Northern Europe. It is a degenerative disease affecting the palmar aponeurosis of the hand. It develops a progressive contractile fibrosis which cuts the hypodermic fatty tissue, adheres to the skin and the phalanges, gradually bending the affected rays, resulting in significant functional impotence.

Various medical and surgical treatments are available.

Read the detailed description

Among these treatments, none to date can eliminate recurrences, which are still too frequent.

Open aponeurectomy (consisting of surgical curettage of the fibrotic cords) remains for the moment the reference technique for treating Dupuytren's disease, with recurrences (between 12 and 39%), but less frequent than the needle technique (50 to 85%).

Could the addition of adipose tissue in the resection areas of Dupytren's fibrosis reduce the rate of recurrence (by the inhibitory action of ADCs on myofibroblasts) in addition to reconstructing the hypodermis in the cavity left by the resection of the cords and improving the quality of the scars? The investigators insist on the fact that this is a homotopic and homologous adipose tissue graft, in closed circuit without denaturation or adjuvant products.

Since, to our knowledge, no other team has used "lipofilling" as an adjuvant treatment to the open resection technique of Dupuytren's cords (aponeurectomy), the investigators first conducted a clinical feasibility and safety study on 70 patients between 2012 and 2017 (currently being published by Springer Editions).

The investigators now wish to conduct a prospective comparative study between patients operated by aponeurectomy WITH (experimental group) and WITHOUT (control group) addition of autologous adipose tissue in the resection areas of Dupuytren's cords.

Being tested
Aponeurectomy with grafting, Aponeurectomy alone
Medical subject headings
Dupuytren Contracture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aponeurectomy with graftingProcedure or surgery

    The lipofilling is performed, once the incisions are closed and is performed with the Puregraft® system.

    The fat graft is taken from the posterior, medial and anterior sides of the arm, by skin puncture. Approximately 10 cc are harvested, allowing a reinjection of about 2 cc per digital radius treated. After conditioning, the fat graft is redistributed to the curettage areas through the skin incisions.

  • Aponeurectomy aloneProcedure or surgery

    The patient is installed in dorsal decubitus position and the arm to be treated is anesthetized by axillary block. The procedure is performed in the operating room, respecting all the rules of asepsis and safety in force. A tourniquet is placed on the arm to be treated and inflated to 250mmHg. Broken incisions are then made opposite the cords to be excised, which are located by palpation. Once the noble elements have been identified, the excision of the cords and fibrous nodules can be done as completely as possible. Sometimes an arthrolysis procedure is necessary in order to restore extension to a joint that has been fixed in a flexion position for several years. Skin closure is most often possible by direct suture or by means of local fatty skin flaps. In some cases, the surgeon may use total skin grafts, or directed healing in certain areas where direct skin suture is not possible.

Study groups in NCT05067764
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aponeurectomy with graftingExperimentalThe experimental group evaluates the aponeurectomy associated with adipose tissue grafting.
Receives: Procedure: Aponeurectomy with grafting
Aponeurectomy aloneActive comparatorThe control group evaluates the aponeurectomy alone.
Receives: Procedure: Aponeurectomy alone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 2-year recurrence rate of Dupuytren's disease

    Recurrence being defined as follows: appearance, at 2 years post-op compared to 6 weeks post-op, of a contracture of more than 20 degrees, with palpable cord, on any treated joint.

    Measured: 2 Years after intervention

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. 3-year recurrence rate in both groups

    Recurrence being defined as follows: Appearance of a contracture of more than 20 degrees, with palpable cord, on any treated joint, at 3 years post-op compared to 6 weeks post-op

    Measured: 3 Years after intervention

  2. 5-year recurrence rate in both groups

    Recurrence being defined as follows: Appearance of a contracture of more than 20 degrees, with palpable cord, on any treated joint, at 5 years post-op compared to 6 weeks post-op

    Measured: 5 Years after intervention

  3. Comparison of the appearance of scars in both groups

    Use of questionnaire The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). This questionnaire consists of 2 separate scales of 6 items each (one scale for the observer and one scale for the patient). Each item is evaluated on 10 points. The lowest score is "1" which corresponds to the appearance of normal skin. A score of 10 indicates the greatest deviation from normal skin. The total score for each of the scales is obtained by adding the score for each of the 6 items. This total score can vary between 6 and 60 for each of the scales.

    Measured: 1 Year after intervention

  4. Comparison of the appearance of scars in both groups

    Use of questionnaire The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). This questionnaire consists of 2 separate scales of 6 items each (one scale for the observer and one scale for the patient). Each item is evaluated on 10 points. The lowest score is "1" which corresponds to the appearance of normal skin. A score of 10 indicates the greatest deviation from normal skin. The total score for each of the scales is obtained by adding the score for each of the 6 items. This total score can vary between 6 and 60 for each of the scales.

    Measured: 2 Years after intervention

  5. Comparison of the complication rates in both groups

    Complications are defined as Hematoma, infection, graft lysis, disunion or nerve damage.

    Measured: 1 Week after intervention

  6. Comparison of the complication rates in both groups

    Complications are defined as Hematoma, infection, graft lysis, disunion or nerve damage.

    Measured: 6 Weeks after intervention

  7. Comparison of the rate of occurrence of algodystrophy, regardless of cause

    Collection of information on the occurrence of algodystrophy, considered as Adverse Event of Special Interest.

    Measured: 1 Year after intervention

  8. Comparison of the rate of occurrence of algodystrophy, regardless of cause

    Collection of information on the occurrence of algodystrophy, considered as Adverse Event of Special Interest.

    Measured: 2 Years after intervention

  9. Comparison of the rate of occurrence of algodystrophy, regardless of cause

    Collection of information on the occurrence of algodystrophy, considered as Adverse Event of Special Interest.

    Measured: 3 Years after intervention

  10. Comparison of the rate of occurrence of algodystrophy, regardless of cause

    Collection of information on the occurrence of algodystrophy, considered as Adverse Event of Special Interest.

    Measured: 5 Years after intervention

  11. Comparison of the effect on quality of life in both groups

    Use of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The score consists of 11 questions that assess the function of the upper limb for the gestures of daily life. The final score is between 0 and 100, with 0 corresponding to normal function, and 100 to almost no function.

    Measured: 6 Weeks after intervention

  12. Comparison of the effect on quality of life in both groups

    Use of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The score consists of 11 questions that assess the function of the upper limb for the gestures of daily life. The final score is between 0 and 100, with 0 corresponding to normal function, and 100 to almost no function.

    Measured: 1 Year after intervention

  13. Comparison of the effect on quality of life in both groups

    Use of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The score consists of 11 questions that assess the function of the upper limb for the gestures of daily life. The final score is between 0 and 100, with 0 corresponding to normal function, and 100 to almost no function.

    Measured: 2 Years after intervention

  14. Comparison of the effect on quality of life in both groups

    Use of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The score consists of 11 questions that assess the function of the upper limb for the gestures of daily life. The final score is between 0 and 100, with 0 corresponding to normal function, and 100 to almost no function.

    Measured: 5 Years after intervention

  15. Evaluation of the primary endpoint on the second hand operated on.

    The surgery being done with or without fat according to the treatment of the 1st randomized hand (cross-over scheme).

    Data collection for the second surgery only if it occurs between the 1st hand surgery and the patient's protocol discharge.

    Measured: Within five years after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2021
  2. Study start29 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion29 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Interventional, prospective, therapeutic, comparative, randomized controlled open-label, superiority, multicenter, national study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
172 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05067764
Sponsor's protocol ID
REMEDY
Other IDs
2020-A03214-35
Acronym
REMEDY
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
24 Sep 2021
Last updated
23 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Selles RW, Zhou C, Kan HJ, Wouters RM, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Hovius SER. Percutaneous Aponeurotomy and Lipofilling versus Limited Fasciectomy for Dupuytren's Contracture: 5-Year Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1523-1531. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004982.

    PubMed 30489526
  • Henry M. Dupuytren's disease: current state of the art. Hand (N Y). 2014 Mar;9(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9563-0.

    PubMed 24570630
  • Engstrand C, Krevers B, Nylander G, Kvist J. Hand function and quality of life before and after fasciectomy for Dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jul;39(7):1333-1343.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.029.

    PubMed 24969497
  • Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep;118(3 Suppl):108S-120S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000234610.81672.e7.

    PubMed 16936550
  • Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001 Apr;7(2):211-28. doi: 10.1089/107632701300062859.

    PubMed 11304456
  • Mojallal A, Lequeux C, Shipkov C, Breton P, Foyatier JL, Braye F, Damour O. Improvement of skin quality after fat grafting: clinical observation and an animal study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):765-774. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b17b8f.

    PubMed 19730294
  • Verhoekx JSN, Mudera V, Walbeehm ET, Hovius SER. Adipose-derived stem cells inhibit the contractile myofibroblast in Dupuytren's disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1139-1148. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3bf2b.

    PubMed 23924646
  • Foucher G, Medina J, Navarro R. Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy: complications and results. J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Oct;28(5):427-31. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00013-5.

    PubMed 12954251
  • Kan HJ, Verrijp FW, Hovius SER, van Nieuwenhoven CA; Dupuytren Delphi Group; Selles RW. Recurrence of Dupuytren's contracture: A consensus-based definition. PLoS One. 2017 May 15;12(5):e0164849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164849. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28505187
  • Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.

    PubMed 15866967
  • Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

    PubMed 19297202
  • Sawaya ET, Sommier B, Alet JM, Piechaud PT; REMEDY Study Group; ReSurg; Lecoq FA. Limited fasciectomy with versus without autologous adipose tissue grafting for treatment of Dupuytren's contracture (REMEDY): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08410-4.

    PubMed 39223657

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aponeurectomy with grafting and Aponeurectomy alone in people with Dupuytren's Disease, run by Elsan at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elias SAWAYA, MD ((0)663420278 ext. +33, esawaya.md@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

2-year recurrence rate of Dupuytren's disease (time frame: 2 Years after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05067764, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in