AzTrials
AzTrials

Long Bone Non-unionNCT05065684

Effect of rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7 on Long Bone Fractures and Non-unions.

An observational study of Long Bone Non-union, run by University Hospital Muenster.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Delayed fracture healing continues to cause significant patient morbidity and economic burden to society. Biological stimulation of acute fractures and non-unions includes application of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Long Bone Non-union
How many people
150 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2005to Jan 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with an acute fracture or non-union of a long-bone

Who may be able to join

  • Long bone fracture or long bone non-union.
  • Signed informed consent, if required by IRB/EC

Who cannot join

  • Prisoner at date of inclusion

About this study

Delayed fracture healing continues to cause significant patient morbidity and economic burden to society. Biological stimulation of acute fractures and non-unions includes application of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7. However, BMP use continues to be a matter of controversy as literature shows scarce evidence for treatment effectiveness. The aim of this study is to compare acute fractures and non-unions in the long bones humerus, femur and tibia with and without BMP treatment of acute fractures. Furthermore, the investigators want to identify complications and risk factors on union-rate and time to union.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective:

The primary objective is to assess time to union and union rate after rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 application at long bone fractures and non-unions.

Secondary Objective(s):

  • Analysis of secondary complications
  • Analysis of risk factors

Hypothesis and Statistical considerations and estimated enrollment:

The investigators hypothesize that with the use of rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 there will be a faster timer to union and higher union rate compared to no-BMP. Outcomes will be assessed prospectively.

This study is exploratory in nature. Therefore, there is no formal statistical hypothesis and no formal sample size calculation. Approximately 150 long-bone fractures and non-unions are expected.

Data will be analyzed with the use of simple summary statistics. Depending on the volume and quality of the collected data, different statistical analyses will be applied. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to investigate relationships between the different treatment options and the outcomes.

Keywords
Long bone non-union

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05065684
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7patients who have been treated with rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7 for long bone non-union or acute fractures
No-BMPpatients who have been treated with standart care, i.e. non-union resection and autologous bone graft

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Union

    Time to Union in months

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Union-rate

    Union-rate in percentage

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Risk factor analysis

    Clinically relevant retrospective data regarding medical history, co-morbidity, the localization and the outcome will be collected. Comorbidities are listed and categorized as follows: Cardiovascular (peripheral arterial disease, hyperuricemia, coronary artery disease, bleeding disorders, hemophilia A, thrombocytopenia, blood loss anemia), metabolic (diabetes, adiposities, hypertonia, metabolic syndrome, liver disorders, alcoholic liver cirrhosis, alcohol abuse, hypothyroidism, hyperkalemia), neurologic (Parkinson, borderline personality, suicidality, epilepsy, drug abuse, sleep apnea syndrome, status post apoplexy), rheumatologic and allergic (atopic eczema, rheumatoid arthritis, bronchial asthma, chronic bronchitis) and infectious (MRSA, hepatitis A, B and C).

    Measured: 24 months

  2. complications/Adverse Events related to implant or surgery

    complications/Adverse Events related to implant or surgery

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Oct 2021
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Primary completionJan 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05065684
Sponsor's protocol ID
Effect of rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
13 Sep 2021
Last updated
10 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Long Bone Non-union, run by University Hospital Muenster.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Union (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in