Asthma in ChildrenPhase 2COPSACvitdNCT05043116
High-dose Vitamin D Supplement for the Prevention of Acute Asthma-like Symptoms in Preschool Children
A Phase 2 study testing Cholecalciferol D3 in people with Asthma in Children, run by Copenhagen Studies on Asthma in Childhood at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
To investigate whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children (1-5 years of age), with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 71 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma in Children
- What is being tested?
- Cholecalciferol D3
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2022to 1 Oct 2031
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 71 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- The study population consists of children in the age group 1-5 years admitted to a pediatric ward, due to an acute episode with asthma-like symptoms. An acute asthma-like episode will be defined as annoying coughing, wheezing (wheezing or wheezing in connection with exhalation) and / or dyspnoea, which affects the child's well-being and requires hospitalization in a pediatric ward. Participation in the study requires that the child is in or has been in treatment with SABA, as monotherapy, or in combination with ICS, and possibly also in combination with LTRA in accordance with the Danish guidelines
Who cannot join
- The child is hospitalized with pneumonia
- The child's daily intake of vitamin D supplementation is> 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day).
- The child is given a combination of vitamin and dietary supplements containing vitamin D, thus the daily recommended dose is exceeded, as 2400 IU / day (~ 60 μg / day) is accepted for children aged 1-4 years, as everyone here is recommended to take 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day) by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority.
- The baby has been exclusively breastfed for the past 6 months.
- The child is malnourished
- for children> 2 years of age whose age-specific BMI is less than the 3rd percentile.
Show all 11Show fewer
- for children <2 years, whose weight or height in relation to age is less than the 3rd percentile.
- The child is a newly arrived refugee or immigrant from regions with a high risk of rickets.
- The child has other chronic lung diseases.
- The child is diagnosed with other conditions such as chronic lung disease, impaired renal function, neurological or psychiatric disorders, congenital or documented acquired QT prolongation, clinically relevant bradycardia, cardiac arrhythmia or severe heart failure and / or hepatic impairment.
- The child is being treated with medication that alters calcium or vitamin D absorption / metabolism.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Copenhagen
Gentofte Municipality, Gentofte, 2820
Klaus Bønnelykke, MD, PhD, +45 38677360, kb@copsac.com
Ulrik Ralfkiaer, MSc, PhD, +4538674164, administration@dbac.dk
About this study
Official title: High-dose Vitamin D Supplement for the Prevention of Acute Asthma-like Symptoms in Preschool Children - a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
To investigate whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children (1-5 years of age), with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms.
Read the detailed description
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways with a variable, reversible airway obstruction and hyper-reactivity in the airways. The disease results in intermittent episodes with asthma-like symptoms such as difficulty breathing with wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness and coughing. These episodes occur in connection with upper respiratory tract infections, physical activity and can be triggered by airborne allergens and by high particle load in the environment, including pollutants and tobacco smoke. The prevalence of asthma has more than doubled in the Western world, as well as in the societies that have embraced the Western world in recent decades. Currently, half of younger children experience asthma-like symptoms, 20% have recurrent symptoms, and by school age, 10% of children are diagnosed with asthma. Asthma and asthma-like symptoms are currently the primary cause of chronic use of medication and hospitalization of younger children, and have a major negative impact on children and their families, and also carry a significant socio-economic burden on society.
Preschool children who suffer from asthma and asthma-like symptoms have the highest rate of acute visits to a child's clinic compared to older children with asthma, and one in three requires real hospitalization in this regard. Most acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms in younger children are triggered by viral or bacterial upper respiratory tract infections, which are associated with poorer response to oral corticosteroids (OCS). OCS is currently one of the few options for the treatment of exacerbations in younger children (tertiary prevention). Preventive inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as monotherapy or with the addition of oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) is effective in achieving daily symptom control in preschool children with asthma and asthma-like symptoms (secondary prevention). However, up to 50% still experience acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms that require OCS treatment and / or hospitalization. At present, there are no official clinical guidelines describing step-up treatment with regard to to improve secondary prevention; in particular, there is a lack of intervention opportunities with regard to to reduce the high morbidity associated with acute asthma-like symptoms, which is therefore a major deficiency in the clinical management of this age group of vulnerable children.
Previous trials with vitamin D supplements A systematic review with 2016 meta-analysis, involving randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of vitamin D supplementation for patients with asthma, showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the rate of acute exacerbations requiring OCS by 36% (relative rate (RR) 0.64, 658 adults / 22 preschool children) and acute visits to child reception or real hospitalizations with 61% (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 664 adults / 277 school children / 22 preschool children). As there are few RCTs, and in these there is an under-representation of preschool children, great heterogeneity in vitamin D dose and concomitant ICS therapy, there was not enough power in the meta-analysis to examine subgroup differences, especially among younger children. It is therefore still unclear about patient characteristics such as age, baseline level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), genetic variations in vitamin D metabolism and / or treatment characteristics such as vitamin D treatment plan, including e.g. use of bolus versus no bolus, duration of treatment and form of administration influence the extent of the positive effect of vitamin D on acute asthma-like symptoms.
Pediatric RCTs have subsequently been performed, but none that have included preschool children. Currently, there are 7 published pediatric studies with relatively few included trial participants (n = 22-430). In the currently published RCTs, there is only one where the included children are of preschool age, which is a pilot study on the safety of vitamin D treatment of acute viral-induced asthma (DIVA). In the DIVA pilot study, 22 preschool children were randomized to an oral bolus of vitamin D of 100,000 international units (IU) (~ 250 μg) plus 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day) for 6 months or placebo. The treatment was safe and resulted in significantly increased serum 25OHD to a level> 75 nmol / L. However, the study did not have enough power to show a difference in acute doctor visits based on acute asthma-like symptoms. Apart from the so-called DIVA RCT (NCT03365687), there are no other registered RCTs regarding vitamin D supplementation for preschool children with acute asthma-like symptoms registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Therefore, there is a need for a study that includes preschoolers who have enough power to show whether vitamin D supplementation improves the secondary prevention of acute asthma-like symptoms by reducing the number of exacerbations and the need for OCS and / or hospitalization, independent of baseline serum 25OHD levels.
Potential mechanisms of vitamin D in acute asthma-like symptoms It is important to investigate the potential mechanisms of action of the possible protective role of vitamin D against acute asthma-like symptoms. These may be dependent on specific asthma phenotypes where vitamin D supplementation is more effective. A subgroup analysis from a 2017 meta-analysis of individual participant data from 25 RCTs showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the risk of acute upper respiratory tract infections by 40% (OR 0.60; 513 children) in a group of children aged 1- Sixteen years. This may suggest that vitamin D supplementation in particular may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children, with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms. Vitamin D coordinates the functions of the immune system both by inducing and by inhibiting inflammation as well as by modulating inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects of the cells of the immune system. In most tissues exposed to infection or an allergen, the expression of the enzyme CYP27B1, which converts 25OHD to the active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, is induced. The active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which regulates the transcription of many genes, including several associated with the smooth muscle cells of the bronchi, which may explain the observed association between serum 25OHD and airway reactivity. A study involving a similar patient group of infants with acute asthma symptoms found that gene expression was associated with vitamin D levels and was a predictor of later asthma, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D plays a role in asthma at this age and that gene Expression can be an important biomarker for the effect of treatment. An immunomodulatory and synergistic effect of vitamin D on ICS treatment response and thus on airway inflammation may also be present, which is supported by observational studies.
Bone health status improves when serum 25OHD is> 75 nmol / L, which is equivalent to sufficient vitamin D status. However, the 25OHD threshold for optimal immunological, anti-inflammatory and respiratory function is unknown, but it is likely to be higher. In addition, genetic variation in the GC gene, which encodes vitamin D binding protein, plays a role in the level of 25OHD in the blood, which thus plays a role in the amount of vitamin D available in the target tissue. Research into vitamin D levels and the impact of immunological and inflammatory processes will increase the understanding of the mechanisms of action on acute asthma-like symptoms.
- Conditions
- Asthma in Children
- Being tested
- Cholecalciferol D3, Oral placebo suspension
- Keywords
- Wheeze, Infections, Vitamin D
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Sounds, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cholecalciferol D3Dietary supplement
Also called Vitamin D from Apovit, Denmark
2000 IU of Vitamin D provided as oral suspension for one year
Oral placebo suspensionOther
Oral suspension with no active substance tasting like the active supplement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | Active comparator | Dietary supplement: 2000 IU Vitamin D3 daily dose (oral suspension) for one year. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol D3 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Oral suspension with no active substance, identical to the active suspension for one year. Receives: Other: Oral placebo suspension |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of acute exacerbations
The primary objective of this double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial is to determine whether an oral daily dose of 2000 IU (~ 50 μg) of vitamin D administered for a total of 12 months versus placebo leads to: Decrease in the number of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms that require treatment with OCS and / or lead to hospitalization / treatment at a pediatric clinic.
This in children aged 1-5 years with a medical history with asthma-like symptoms, and is in or has received treatment with SABA as monotherapy, or in combination ICS and possibly also LTRA.
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (32)
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, time to first acute exacerbation
Change in time (days) to first acute exacerbation with asthma-like symptoms requiring OCS and / or hospitalization / treatment at a pediatric ward.
Measured: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, duration of symptoms
Change of the duration (days) of symptoms / hospitalization.
Measured: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, need for medical treatment
Change in the need for medical treatment during exacerbations, including SABA, short-acting anticholinergic inhalations (SAMA) and OCS.
Measured: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, daily symptom burden
Change in the daily symptom burden between exacerbations.
Measured: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, step-down of preventive treatment
Is the intervention associated with successful step-down of preventive medical asthma treatment.
Measured: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, calcium levels in blood
This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant:
- Hypo-calcemia (defined as total β-calcium below 2.20 mmol / l after correction for albumin)
- Hyper-calcemia (defined as total β-calcium above 2.55 mmol / l after correction for albumin)
Measured: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, calcium levels in urine
This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant:
● Hyper-calciuri as defined by Ca/creatinine-ratio in urine with a value above 1,0 mmol/mmol
Measured: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, serum 25OHD level
This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant serum 25OHD> 250 nmol / L.
Measured: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, Adverse Events
This study also aims to examine the safety profile of vitamin D intervention. This is done by examining group differences in the proportion of children with clinically significant incidence(s) of Adverse Events.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, baseline 25OHD
Analyzing baseline serum 25OHD (mol / L).
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in VDR
Analyzing genetic variation of the Vitamin D Receptor gene (VDR).
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in VDBP
Analyzing genetic variation of the Vitamin D Binding Protein gene (VDBP).
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, expression levels of genes involved in the vitamin D metabolism
Analyzing expression in vitamin D metabolism related to VDR and Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) and other relevant candidates in the vitamin D processing pathway.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, expression levels of asthma-related genes
Analyzing expression levels in known asthma-related genes, e.g. 17q21 and other relevant genes.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in asthma-related genes
Analyzing genetic variation in known asthma-related genes, e.g. 17q21 and other relevant genes.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory microbiome, conventional culture
Alpha- and beta Diversity of gut microbiota using conventional culturing assays.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory microbiome
Alpha- and beta diversity of gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory virus detection
Alpha- and beta diversity of vira using targeted q-PCR.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, blood eosinophilocyte counts
Measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts for inhalation allergens.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, total-IgE
The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the respiratory immune profile at the time of inclusion. Atopic status by measuring total-IgE for inhalation allergens.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, specific-IgE
The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the respiratory immune profile at the time of inclusion.
● Atopic status by measuring specific-IgE levels for inhalation allergens.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, atopic status, measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts
The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the atopic status by measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts, for inhalation allergens.
Measured: One year
Exploratory outcomes, atopic status, total-IgE and specific-IgE levels
The study also aims to examine a wide range of exploratory outcomes to gain insight into the mechanisms of action behind the effects of vitamin D supplementation and possible effect modification, which can help identify children with particularly high effects of treatment, by analyzing the atopic status by measuring total-IgE and specific-IgE levels for inhalation allergens.
Measured: One year
COVID-19 risk and Vitamin-D
Does the vitamin-D intervention decrease the risk of COVID-19 infection, as determined by PCR test.
Measured: One year
COVID-19 symptom burden and Vitamin-D
Does D-vitamin supplementation change the symptom burden (in number of days) of COVID-19 infection, as determined by PCR test.
Measured: One year
COVID-19 infection length and Vitamin-D
Does D-vitamin supplementation change length (number of days) of COVID-19 infection, as determined by PCR test.
Measured: One year
Daycare absence
Does D-vitamin supplementation change number of days absent from daycare.
Measured: One year
Health economic benefits
Does D-vitamin supplementation change the number of days parents need to stay home to look after their children when they are absent from daycare.
Measured: One year
Remission since inclusion
Does D-vitamin supplementation increase the remission rate after one year?
Measured: One Year
Severity based on number of prescriptions
Does D-vitamin supplementation decrease the number of prescriptions after one year
Measured: One year
Severity based on number of step-up treatments
Does D-vitamin supplementation decrease the number of step-up treatments (stronger topical or biological treatment) after one year
Measured: One year
Effect on AD remission and severity after 1 year of vitamin D supplementation
- AD remission or a decline in severity by investigating number of prescriptions during the 1-year study period and 2) potential change of treatment steps i.e. from biological treatment or strong topical steroids to less potent steroids.
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2022
- Primary completion16 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Asthma in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen Studies on Asthma in Childhood
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bo Chawes, MD, DMSc, Principal investigator, chawes@copsac.com
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05043116
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-20066827
- Acronym
- COPSACvitd
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 21 May 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kyvsgaard JN, Ralfkiaer U, Folsgaard N, Jensen TM, Hesselberg LM, Schoos AM, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H, Stokholm J, Chawes B. Azithromycin and high-dose vitamin D for treatment and prevention of asthma-like episodes in hospitalised preschool children: study protocol for a combined double-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e054762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054762.
PubMed 35418427
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High-dose Vitamin D Supplement for the Prevention of Acute Asthma-like Symptoms in Preschool Children - a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05043116
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COPSACvitd / H-20066827
- Conditions
- Asthma in Children
- Keywords
- Wheeze, Infections, Vitamin D
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen Studies on Asthma in ChildhoodUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children (1-5 years of age), with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms.
Detailed description
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways with a variable, reversible airway obstruction and hyper-reactivity in the airways. The disease results in intermittent episodes with asthma-like symptoms such as difficulty breathing with wheezing, dyspnoea, chest tightness and coughing. These episodes occur in connection with upper respiratory tract infections, physical activity and can be triggered by airborne allergens and by high particle load in the environment, including pollutants and tobacco smoke. The prevalence of asthma has more than doubled in the Western world, as well as in the societies that have embraced the Western world in recent decades. Currently, half of younger children experience asthma-like symptoms, 20% have recurrent symptoms, and by school age, 10% of children are diagnosed with asthma. Asthma and asthma-like symptoms are currently the primary cause of chronic use of medication and hospitalization of younger children, and have a major negative impact on children and their families, and also carry a significant socio-economic burden on society.
Preschool children who suffer from asthma and asthma-like symptoms have the highest rate of acute visits to a child's clinic compared to older children with asthma, and one in three requires real hospitalization in this regard. Most acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms in younger children are triggered by viral or bacterial upper respiratory tract infections, which are associated with poorer response to oral corticosteroids (OCS). OCS is currently one of the few options for the treatment of exacerbations in younger children (tertiary prevention). Preventive inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as monotherapy or with the addition of oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) is effective in achieving daily symptom control in preschool children with asthma and asthma-like symptoms (secondary prevention). However, up to 50% still experience acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms that require OCS treatment and / or hospitalization. At present, there are no official clinical guidelines describing step-up treatment with regard to to improve secondary prevention; in particular, there is a lack of intervention opportunities with regard to to reduce the high morbidity associated with acute asthma-like symptoms, which is therefore a major deficiency in the clinical management of this age group of vulnerable children.
Previous trials with vitamin D supplements A systematic review with 2016 meta-analysis, involving randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of vitamin D supplementation for patients with asthma, showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the rate of acute exacerbations requiring OCS by 36% (relative rate (RR) 0.64, 658 adults / 22 preschool children) and acute visits to child reception or real hospitalizations with 61% (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 664 adults / 277 school children / 22 preschool children). As there are few RCTs, and in these there is an under-representation of preschool children, great heterogeneity in vitamin D dose and concomitant ICS therapy, there was not enough power in the meta-analysis to examine subgroup differences, especially among younger children. It is therefore still unclear about patient characteristics such as age, baseline level of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), genetic variations in vitamin D metabolism and / or treatment characteristics such as vitamin D treatment plan, including e.g. use of bolus versus no bolus, duration of treatment and form of administration influence the extent of the positive effect of vitamin D on acute asthma-like symptoms.
Pediatric RCTs have subsequently been performed, but none that have included preschool children. Currently, there are 7 published pediatric studies with relatively few included trial participants (n = 22-430). In the currently published RCTs, there is only one where the included children are of preschool age, which is a pilot study on the safety of vitamin D treatment of acute viral-induced asthma (DIVA). In the DIVA pilot study, 22 preschool children were randomized to an oral bolus of vitamin D of 100,000 international units (IU) (~ 250 μg) plus 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day) for 6 months or placebo. The treatment was safe and resulted in significantly increased serum 25OHD to a level> 75 nmol / L. However, the study did not have enough power to show a difference in acute doctor visits based on acute asthma-like symptoms. Apart from the so-called DIVA RCT (NCT03365687), there are no other registered RCTs regarding vitamin D supplementation for preschool children with acute asthma-like symptoms registered on clinicaltrials.gov. Therefore, there is a need for a study that includes preschoolers who have enough power to show whether vitamin D supplementation improves the secondary prevention of acute asthma-like symptoms by reducing the number of exacerbations and the need for OCS and / or hospitalization, independent of baseline serum 25OHD levels.
Potential mechanisms of vitamin D in acute asthma-like symptoms It is important to investigate the potential mechanisms of action of the possible protective role of vitamin D against acute asthma-like symptoms. These may be dependent on specific asthma phenotypes where vitamin D supplementation is more effective. A subgroup analysis from a 2017 meta-analysis of individual participant data from 25 RCTs showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the risk of acute upper respiratory tract infections by 40% (OR 0.60; 513 children) in a group of children aged 1- Sixteen years. This may suggest that vitamin D supplementation in particular may have a beneficial effect on secondary prevention in preschool children, with respiratory infections being the primary cause of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms. Vitamin D coordinates the functions of the immune system both by inducing and by inhibiting inflammation as well as by modulating inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects of the cells of the immune system. In most tissues exposed to infection or an allergen, the expression of the enzyme CYP27B1, which converts 25OHD to the active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, is induced. The active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which regulates the transcription of many genes, including several associated with the smooth muscle cells of the bronchi, which may explain the observed association between serum 25OHD and airway reactivity. A study involving a similar patient group of infants with acute asthma symptoms found that gene expression was associated with vitamin D levels and was a predictor of later asthma, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D plays a role in asthma at this age and that gene Expression can be an important biomarker for the effect of treatment. An immunomodulatory and synergistic effect of vitamin D on ICS treatment response and thus on airway inflammation may also be present, which is supported by observational studies.
Bone health status improves when serum 25OHD is> 75 nmol / L, which is equivalent to sufficient vitamin D status. However, the 25OHD threshold for optimal immunological, anti-inflammatory and respiratory function is unknown, but it is likely to be higher. In addition, genetic variation in the GC gene, which encodes vitamin D binding protein, plays a role in the level of 25OHD in the blood, which thus plays a role in the amount of vitamin D available in the target tissue. Research into vitamin D levels and the impact of immunological and inflammatory processes will increase the understanding of the mechanisms of action on acute asthma-like symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Cholecalciferol D3Dietary supplement: 2000 IU Vitamin D3 daily dose (oral suspension) for one year. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Oral placebo suspensionOral suspension with no active substance, identical to the active suspension for one year. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 71 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The study population consists of children in the age group 1-5 years admitted to a pediatric ward, due to an acute episode with asthma-like symptoms. An acute asthma-like episode will be defined as annoying coughing, wheezing (wheezing or wheezing in connection with exhalation) and / or dyspnoea, which affects the child's well-being and requires hospitalization in a pediatric ward. Participation in the study requires that the child is in or has been in treatment with SABA, as monotherapy, or in combination with ICS, and possibly also in combination with LTRA in accordance with the Danish guidelines
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- The child is hospitalized with pneumonia
- The child's daily intake of vitamin D supplementation is> 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day).
- The child is given a combination of vitamin and dietary supplements containing vitamin D, thus the daily recommended dose is exceeded, as 2400 IU / day (~ 60 μg / day) is accepted for children aged 1-4 years, as everyone here is recommended to take 400 IU / day (~ 10 μg / day) by the Danish Health and Medicines Authority.
- The baby has been exclusively breastfed for the past 6 months.
- The child is malnourished
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cholecalciferol D3Also: Vitamin D from Apovit, Denmark2000 IU of Vitamin D provided as oral suspension for one year | Dietary supplement | Vitamin D |
| Oral placebo suspensionOral suspension with no active substance tasting like the active supplement. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of acute exacerbations
Time frame: One year
The primary objective of this double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial is to determine whether an oral daily dose of 2000 IU (~ 50 μg) of vitamin D administered for a total of 12 months versus placebo leads to: Decrease in the number of acute exacerbations with asthma-like symptoms that require treatment with OCS and / or lead to hospitalization / treatment at a pediatric clinic. This in children aged 1-5 years with a medical history with asthma-like symptoms, and is in or has received treatment with SABA as monotherapy, or in combination ICS and possibly also LTRA.
32 secondary outcomes
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, time to first acute exacerbation
Time frame: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, duration of symptoms
Time frame: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, need for medical treatment
Time frame: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, daily symptom burden
Time frame: One year
Intervention with vitamin D versus placebo, step-down of preventive treatment
Time frame: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, calcium levels in blood
Time frame: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, calcium levels in urine
Time frame: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, serum 25OHD level
Time frame: One year
Safety profile of vitamin D intervention, Adverse Events
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, baseline 25OHD
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in VDR
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in VDBP
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, expression levels of genes involved in the vitamin D metabolism
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, expression levels of asthma-related genes
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, genetic variation in asthma-related genes
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory microbiome, conventional culture
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory microbiome
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory virus detection
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, blood eosinophilocyte counts
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, total-IgE
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, respiratory immune profile, specific-IgE
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, atopic status, measuring blood eosinophilocyte counts
Time frame: One year
Exploratory outcomes, atopic status, total-IgE and specific-IgE levels
Time frame: One year
COVID-19 risk and Vitamin-D
Time frame: One year
COVID-19 symptom burden and Vitamin-D
Time frame: One year
COVID-19 infection length and Vitamin-D
Time frame: One year
Daycare absence
Time frame: One year
Health economic benefits
Time frame: One year
Remission since inclusion
Time frame: One Year
Severity based on number of prescriptions
Time frame: One year
Severity based on number of step-up treatments
Time frame: One year
Effect on AD remission and severity after 1 year of vitamin D supplementation
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35418427Kyvsgaard JN, Ralfkiaer U, Folsgaard N, Jensen TM, Hesselberg LM, Schoos AM, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H, Stokholm J, Chawes B. Azithromycin and high-dose vitamin D for treatment and prevention of asthma-like episodes in hospitalised preschool children: study protocol for a combined double-blind randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e054762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054762.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthma in Children
Not yet recruiting
Asthma Ctrl SMART Trial
Asthma in Children, Asthma Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Artificially Intelligent Robot Control
Asthma in Children, Artificial Intelligence
Not yet recruiting
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BPAP) for Severe Asthma
Pediatric Asthma, Acute Asthma
Recruiting
Effects of Tele-rehabilitation-Guided Qigong on Children and Adolescents With Asthma
Asthma Childhood
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Investigating Novel Strategies in Pediatric Immune Responses and Microbiome Environment: Comprehensive Lung Disease Investigation in Children.
Lung Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Bo Chawes, MD, DMSc principal investigator
chawes@copsac.com
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cholecalciferol D3 in people with Asthma in Children, run by Copenhagen Studies on Asthma in Childhood at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Klaus Bønnelykke, MD, PhD (+4538677360, kb@copsac.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of acute exacerbations (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05043116, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2025.