AzTrials
AzTrials

AgedNCT05016089

Simplified Pilates Training in Older Adults in Hong Kong

A study testing The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme in people with Aged, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to examine the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong to reduce the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) of Hong Kong's older adults who might be prone to falling. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aged
What is being tested?
The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Oct 2021to 31 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age 65 or above;
  • score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).

Who cannot join

  • total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C);
  • presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit;
  • presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training;
  • inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thomson Wong, PhD, BScPT contact

(852)27666717

thomson.wong@polyu.edu.hk

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hong Kong

    Thomson Wong, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy of a Simplified Pilates Exercise Training in Reducing the Risk of Falling in Hong Kong's Older Adults: A Wait-list Randomised Controlled Trial

This study aims to examine the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong to reduce the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) of Hong Kong's older adults who might be prone to falling. It is hypothesized that a simplified Pilates exercise programme is efficacious in reducing the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) in Hong Kong's older adults who are at a medium to high risk of falling. There is no updated research that has specifically investigated an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme and no research investigated it in Hong Kong as well. Therefore, this study is novel and important in investigating the efficacy of an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme in Hong Kong's older population specifically developed for reducing the risk of falls. It could increase the intelligent choices of efficacious and easy-to-comply-with fall prevention exercise programmes (the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme) for older adults and reduce the impact of falls in the older population. The more the choices of simple and efficacious fall prevention programmes that are available for older adults, the more likely it is that they will be interested in complying with the programme. Consequently, this research could provide evidence of Pilates being used in fall prevention of older adults locally and globally.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme (developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong in our completed pilot study) by comparing it with the wait-list control.

A total of 60 older adults will be recruited from different collaborating community elderly and rehabilitation centres in Hong Kong using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria will be the following: (1) age 65 or above and (2) score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). The exclusion criteria will be the following: (1) total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C), (2) presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit, (3) presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training, and (4) inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.

The participants (N = 60) will be randomly assigned using concealed block randomisation by an independent person through a sealed and opaque envelope system to either the simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG; n = 30) or the wait-list control group (WLCG; n = 30). A computerised random-number generator will be utilised to prepare an allocation schedule. The participants in the SPEG will partake in exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. All the training sessions will be conducted in Hong Kong by two experienced and certified Pilates trainers under the supervision of a registered physiotherapist. The participants in the SPEG will practise the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme. The WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between.

To examine the efficacy of the exercise programme, the participants of both the SPEG and WLCG will undergo two assessment sessions before training at baseline (T0) and just after the completion of all the exercise sessions (T1). In the baseline assessment (T0), a structural questionnaire will be used to ask the participants for their demographic information, detailed information regarding any previous falls, detailed medical history, use of prescribed drugs, social history, and socio-economic status. Following this, a series of assessments will be conducted to examine their balance ability, which will be measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS; primary outcome measure), and other physical and psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measures) in the two assessment sessions (T0 \& T1). Any adverse events will be reported and tracked. Participants will also be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between T0 and T1 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls (secondary outcome measure) will then be collected at T1.

Balance ability (primary outcome measure) will be assessed using the BBS. Regarding the other physical fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), flexibility will be measured using the 'sit-and-reach' (S\&R) test. A functional gait and balance assessment will be conducted using the POMA and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests.

On the other hand, for the assessment of the psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), the MMSE-C will be used as a screening tool to examine the preliminary cognitive function at the beginning of training. Depression levels will be assessed using the Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C). Anxiety levels will be measured using the valid and reliable Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC). The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)] will be utilised to assess the fear of falling. The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)] will be used to evaluate balance confidence.

Conditions
Aged
Being tested
The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme
Keywords
Efficacy, Simplified Pilates, Wait-list control, Falls prevention, Older adults, Risk of falling, Fall risk factors, Hong Kong

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programmeOther

    The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme was developed by a group of experienced Pilates and rehabilitation experts from our completed pilot work.

Study groups in NCT05016089
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG)ExperimentalThe participants in the SPEG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions.
Receives: Other: The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme
Wait-list control group (WLCG)OtherThe participants in the WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions.
Receives: Other: The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Baseline Balance Ability

    Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Change from Baseline Balance Ability at 12 weeks

    Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Baseline Flexibility

    Sit-and-reach (S\&R) test

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Change from Baseline Flexibility at 12 weeks

    Sit-and-reach (S\&R) test

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment

    The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)

    Measured: Day 0

  4. Change from Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment at 12 weeks

    The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Baseline Functional Gait Assessment

    Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests

    Measured: Day 0

  6. Change from Baseline Functional Gait Assessment at 12 weeks

    Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests

    Measured: Week 12

  7. Preliminary Cognitive Function

    The Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C)

    Measured: Day 0

  8. Baseline Depression Levels

    The Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C)

    Measured: Day 0

  9. Change from Baseline Depression Levels at 12 weeks

    The Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C)

    Measured: Week 12

  10. Baseline Anxiety Levels

    The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC)

    Measured: Day 0

  11. Change from Baseline Anxiety Levels at 12 weeks

    The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC)

    Measured: Week 12

  12. Baseline Fear of Falling

    The Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)]

    Measured: Day 0

  13. Change from Baseline Fear of Falling at 12 weeks

    The Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)]

    Measured: Week 12

  14. Baseline Balance Confidence

    The Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)]

    Measured: Day 0

  15. Change from Baseline Balance Confidence at 12 weeks

    The Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)]

    Measured: Week 12

  16. Frequency of falls

    Participants will be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between Day 0 and Week 12 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls will be collected at Week 12.

    Measured: Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A randomised, controlled (wait-list control), and two-armed trial.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05016089
Sponsor's protocol ID
18191091
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
11 Aug 2021
Last updated
21 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme in people with Aged, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Thomson Wong, PhD, BScPT ((852)27666717, thomson.wong@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Baseline Balance Ability (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in