Amputation; Traumatic, HandNCT05012657
Validation of Point Partial User Needs With Partial Finger Amputees
A study testing Point Partial in people with Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, run by Point Designs at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Partial system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial finger amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
- What is being tested?
- Point Partial
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Nov 2020to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Partial finger amputees with partial absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
- Fluent in English
- Individuals aged 18 or greater
- Patients may present with either fused or mobile MCP joints.
Who cannot join
- Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon OT evaluation
- Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Point Designs
Lafayette, Colorado, 80026
About this study
The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Partial system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial finger amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.
- Conditions
- Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
- Being tested
- Point Partial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Point PartialDevice
The Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical partial digits and mounting brackets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prosthesis | Experimental | Patient is temporarily fit with Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system Receives: Device: Point Partial |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test
User wears Point Partial(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be comfortable for a full day's use. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (8 hours)
VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test
User flexes and extends the Point Partial(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag
User lifts a 25 lb. bag with Point Partial(s) (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer
User grips a hammer with Point Partial(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test
User releases Point Partial(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be releasable while performing active grasps. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test
User positions Point Partial(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test
User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh throughout day without failed extension (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test
User grips a 5 lb. cylindrical smooth object using Point Partial(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have high grip surface friction. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test
User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a pronounced fingernail. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test
User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robustly attached to mounting system. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Measured: Day 1 (8 hours)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2021
- Study start3 Nov 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Amputation; Traumatic, HandStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Point Designs
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05012657
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 299089
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of Point Partial User Needs With Partial Finger Amputees
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05012657
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 299089
- Conditions
- Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Point DesignsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Study start
- 3 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Partial system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial finger amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prosthesis | Experimental | Device: Point PartialPatient is temporarily fit with Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Partial finger amputees with partial absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
- Fluent in English
- Individuals aged 18 or greater
- Patients may present with either fused or mobile MCP joints.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon OT evaluation
- Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Point PartialThe Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical partial digits and mounting brackets | Device | Prosthesis |
Primary outcome
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (8 hours)
User wears Point Partial(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be comfortable for a full day's use. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User flexes and extends the Point Partial(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User lifts a 25 lb. bag with Point Partial(s) (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User grips a hammer with Point Partial(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User releases Point Partial(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be releasable while performing active grasps. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User positions Point Partial(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh throughout day without failed extension (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User grips a 5 lb. cylindrical smooth object using Point Partial(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have high grip surface friction. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a pronounced fingernail. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test
Time frame: Day 1 (8 hours)
User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robustly attached to mounting system. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
Not yet recruiting
To Evaluate the Clinical Impact of the Point Powered System
Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
Recruiting
To Assess the Utility of the Point Mini in a Clinical Take-home Study
Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, Amputation, Congenital
RecruitingPhase 2
Human Upper Extremity Allotransplantation
Amputation, Traumatic, Wounds and Injuries
RecruitingObservational study
Human Upper Extremity Allotransplantation: F/U Protocol
Amputation, Traumatic, Wounds and Injury
RecruitingPhase 4
Prospective Study on the Role of Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Following Digital Replantation and Revascularization
Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Point Partial in people with Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, run by Point Designs at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test (time frame: Day 1 (8 hours)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2024.