AzTrials
AzTrials

Older AdultsNCT05007600

Online Interactive Courses on Loneliness and Quality of Life of Older Adults

A study testing Online Interactive Courses in people with Older Adults, run by Yang Shang-Yu at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: The early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic can be marked as a critical period in human history as it increased loneliness in people's lives. This is particularly true for the older adults who are single, living alone, and suffering from chronic diseases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 88 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Older Adults
What is being tested?
Online Interactive Courses
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
89 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 30 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 88 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • (1) senior residents aged over 60 years, those who were not diagnosed with any cognitive impairment;
  • (2) capable of communicating in Mandarin or Taiwanese; and
  • (3) capable of using smartphones.

Who cannot join

  • (1) participants who could not fully complete the 8-week intervention (or participate in the course for at least three days per week); and
  • (2) those who were incapable of understanding the content of the questionnaire.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Asia Univeraity

    Taichung, WuFeng, 41354

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Investigating the Effectiveness of Online Interactive Courses on Loneliness and Quality of Life of Older Adults in the Community During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study and a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background:

The early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic can be marked as a critical period in human history as it increased loneliness in people's lives. This is particularly true for the older adults who are single, living alone, and suffering from chronic diseases. However, there is insufficient existing research on associated interventions and their effectiveness.

Read more

Objectives:

To investigate the effectiveness of an 8-week online interactive course on the loneliness, depression, social support, and quality of life (QOL) of older adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

This pilot study, also a single-blind randomized controlled trial, collected data from a community in central Taiwan. Participants were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Subsequently, participants in the experimental group received an 8-week intensive (Monday to Friday) online interactive course, whereas those in the control group consumed 8 weeks of unidirectional online video and audio programs (such as from YouTube). Assessments were conducted both before and after the intervention, with the primary outcome being the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA), and secondary outcomes being the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form, the Inventory of Socially Supportive Behavior (ISSB) Scale, and the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale.

Conditions
Older Adults
Being tested
Online Interactive Courses

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Online Interactive CoursesOther

    In the experimental group, after consensus was reached in the expert meeting (consisting of a doctor specializing in occupational therapy, a doctor specializing in nursing, and a doctor specializing in public health), a 5-days-per-week (Monday to Friday) 8-week intensive online interactive course was designed. The course was made accessible to the participants through a social network app (Line) from 12:00 to 20:30.

Study groups in NCT05007600
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
trial groupExperimentalParticipants in the experimental group received an 8-week intensive (Monday to Friday) online interactive course.
Receives: Other: Online Interactive Courses
Control groupNo interventionParticipants in the control group consumed 8 weeks of unidirectional online video and audio programs (such as from YouTube).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA)

    The third version of UCLA compiled by Russel (1996) was used to measure "loneliness." It was translated into Chinese by Chang and Yang (1999) and included 20 questions. Each question was scored on the 4-point Likert Scale, with 1: "I never feel this way," 2: "I rarely feel this way," 3: "I sometimes feel this way," and 4: "I often feel this way." The total score ranged between 20 and 80, and the higher the score, the higher the participant's degree of loneliness. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention UCLA was 0.76 and 0.78, respectively.

    Measured: 10-20 minutes

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-SF)

    Developed by Sheikh and Yesavage (1986), GDS-SF comprises 15 Yes or No questions, with participants scoring 1 if answering "Yes" or 0 if answering "No." The 2-point scale (Yes/No) made the questionnaire easy to complete for the participants. The threshold of the scale was 7 points, with scores larger than 7 indicating a depression status. The total score ranged between 0 and 15, and the higher the score, the higher the degree of depression. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention GDS-SF was 0.81 and 0.82, respectively.

    Measured: 10-20 minutes

  2. Inventory of Socially Supportive Behavior (ISSB) Scale

    Initially developed by Barrera Jr et al. (1981), ISSB was subsequently translated into Chinese and compiled into 8 questions by Ou (2013). The scale consisted of two categories, namely Emotional Support and Tangible Support. The total score of both categories represented the participant's satisfaction with social support. The scale was scored on a 5-point Likert Scale, with 1 representing "Strongly disagree," 2: "Disagree," 3: "Neutral," 4: "Agree," and 5: "Strongly agree." The total score ranged between 8 and 40, and the higher the score, the higher the participant's satisfaction with social support. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention ISSB was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively.

    Measured: 10-20 minutes

  3. WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale

    The questionnaire was composed of questions on QOL formulated by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on the commonality of various cultures. The Taiwanese version of WHOQOL-BREF included 28 questions, each scored on a 5-point Likert Scale. It was composed of four domains, namely, Physical health (7 questions), Psychological health (6 questions), Social relationships (4 questions), and Environment (9 questions). The score of an individual question ranged between 1 and 5, and after conversion, the total score of each domain ranged between 4 and 20. The higher the score, the higher the individual's QOL. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the domains Physical health, Psychological health, Social relationships, and Environment before and after the intervention was 0.82 (0.80), 0.77 (0.79), 0.76 (0.81), and 0.82 (0.84), respectively.

    Measured: 10-20 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
89 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05007600
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRREC-109-088
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
5 Aug 2021
Last updated
16 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Online Interactive Courses in people with Older Adults, run by Yang Shang-Yu at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA) (time frame: 10-20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in