Rectal CancerCCHOWWNCT05000697
Chemoradiation and Consolidation Chemotherapy With or Without Oxaliplatin for Distal Rectal Cancer and Watch and Wait
A study testing Oxaliplatin and 5FU in people with Rectal Cancer and Consolidation, run by Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz at 24 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) has been considered the preferred initial treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer. Advantages of this approach include improved local control after radical surgery but also the opportunity for organ preserving strategies (Watch and Wait - WW). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Cancer, Consolidation
- What is being tested?
- Oxaliplatin and 5FU
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2021to Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years;
- ECOG 0-2 or KPS≥70;
- Primary rectal adenocarcinoma (biopsy confirmed) within the reach of digital rectal examination (at least lower tip/border) by the attending colorectal surgeon;
- Endoscopic documentation;
- Abdominal and chest CT scans showing no evidence of metastatic disease;
- High-resolution magnetic resonance images performed at either 1.5T or 3.0T system using a phased array surface coil with: sagittal T2 images including the anal verge and the sacrum; axial oblique T2 weighted images acquired in a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the rectal wall guided by the sagittal images; coronal images acquired in parallel to the anal canal plane. Small field of view (16-18cm), 3mm section thickness, increased matrix size and increased number of signal averages are required;
Show all 12Show fewer
- Radiological defining criteria (centralized):
- Lower edge of tumor at the level (max. 1cm distance) or below the anorectal ring defined at sagittal or coronal views;
- mrT2, mrT3 (any subclassification)
- mrN0-1 (≤3 radiologically positive lymph nodes)
- mrEMVI: any status
- mrMRF: any status
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- ECOG ≥3 or KPS<70
- Unwilling to consent
- Metastatic disease (any kind; internal iliac and obturator nodes are considered local disease and not metastatic disease and therefore will not be considered as exclusion criteria)
- mrT4 or mrN2
- Previous pelvic irradiation
Show all 9Show fewer
- Baseline neuropathy
- Receiving treatment of other anti-cancer drug or methods
- Presence of uncontrolled life threatening diseases
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
24 sites in 3 countries
Brazil18 sites, 18 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Felicio Rocho
Belo Horizonte, 30110-934
Fabio Lopez Queiroz, fabiolopesq@hotmail.com
Fabio Lopez Queiroz
- Recruiting
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu
Botucatu, 18607-741
Marcela Maria Silvino Craveiro
Marcela Maria Silvino Craveiro
- Recruiting
Complexo de Saude São João de Deus - Divinopolis
Divinópolis, 35500-227
Fabio Henrique de Oliveira, fabioho84@gmail.com
Fabio Henrique de Oliveira
- Recruiting
Hospital das Clinicas de Passo Fundo
Passo Fundo, 99010-260
Miguel Dutra Schmitz, mdudaschmitz@gmail.com
Miguel Dutra Schmitz
- Recruiting
Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, 90020-090
Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja, azambujadb@gmail.com
Daniel de Barcellos Azambuja
- Recruiting
Hospital das Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, 90035-903
Daniel de Carvalho Damin, damin@terra.com.br
Daniel de Carvalho Damin
- Recruiting
União Brasileira de Educação e Assistencia - PUC-RS - Campus POA
Porto Alegre, 90160-092
Gabriel Prolla, gabriel.prolla@gmail.com
Gabriel Prolla
- Recruiting
Hospital Militar de Area de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, 90440-191
Fabricio Marcondes, procto@hmapa.eb.mil.br
Fabricio Marcondes
- Recruiting
Centro Gaucho Integrado de Oncologia, hematologia, ensino e pesquisa
Porto Alegre
Rafael Dutra Vila, rafaeldutravila@gmail.com
Rafael Dutra Vila
- Recruiting
Instituto Nacional do Cancer Jose Alencar Gomes da Silva - INCA
Rio de Janeiro, 20230-130
Marcus Vinicius Motta Valadão da Silva, drmarcusvaladao@gmail.com
Marcus Vinicius Motta Valadão da Silva
- Recruiting
Ensino e Terapia de Inovação Clínica AMO
Salvador
Anelisa Kruschewsky Coutinho Araujo, coutinhoanelisa@gmail.com
Anelisa Kruchewsky Coutinho Araujo
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria
Santa Maria, 97150-900
Maurício Fraga da Silva, mauricio.f.silva@ufsm.br
Mauricio Fraga da Silva
- Recruiting
Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01327-001
Rodrigo O Perez, Dr, +551138871757, roperez@haoc.com.br
- Recruiting
Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa
São Paulo, 01323-001
Fabio Roberto Kater, fabiorobertokater@gmail.com
Fabio Roberto Kater
- Recruiting
Associação Beneficente Síria - Hospital do Coração
São Paulo, 04005-000
Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, pedroluiz_uson@hotmail.com
Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior
- Recruiting
Centro Paulista de Oncologia - CPO
São Paulo, 04538-132
Renata D'Alpino Peixoto, renatadalpino@gmail.com
Renata D'Alpino Peixoto
- Recruiting
Hospital Primavera
São Paulo, 05059-060
Michel Fabiano Silva Alves, michelfsalves@gmail.com
Michel Fabiano Silva Alves
- Recruiting
COT - Centro Oncológico do Triângulo S.A.
Uberlândia
Marcia Rachel da Fonseca, marcia.fonseca@medicos.oncoclinicas.com
Marcia Rachel da Fonseca
Argentina5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, C1199CABA
Gustavo Rossi, gustavo.rossi@hospitalitaliano.org.ar
Gustavo Rossi
- Recruiting
Hospital Ramos Mejia: Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Jose Maria Ramos Mejia
Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
Adrian Mattacheo, amattacheo@gmail.com
Adrian Mattacheo
- Recruiting
Hospital de Gastroenterologia Udaondo Ciudad de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, C1264AAACABA
Soledad Iseas, soledad.iseas@gmail.com
Soledad Iseas
- Recruiting
Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires - Asociacion Civil
Buenos Aires, C1280AEB
Maria Dolores Daneri, danerimd@gmail.com
Maria Dolores Daneri
- Recruiting
Hospital Curruca: Superintendencia de Bienestar Policia Federal Argentina
Buenos Aires, C1437JCP
Julio Lococo, Jllococo@yahoo.com
Julio Lococo
Uruguay1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Médica Uruguaya Coorporación de Asistencia Médica
Montevideo, 11600
Marcelo Viola, mviolam@gmail.com
Marcelo Viola
About this study
Official title: Chemoradiation and Consolidation Chemotherapy With or Without Oxaliplatin for Distal Rectal Cancer and Watch and Wait. A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. (CCHOWW)
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) has been considered the preferred initial treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer. Advantages of this approach include improved local control after radical surgery but also the opportunity for organ preserving strategies (Watch and Wait - WW). Consolidation chemotherapy (cCT) regimens using fluoropyrimidine-based with or without oxaliplatin following nCRT have demonstrated to increase complete response and organ preservation rates among these patients. However, the benefit of adding oxaliplatin to cCt compared to fluoropyrimidine alone regimens in terms of primary tumor response remains unclear. Since oxaliplatin-treatment may be associated with considerable toxicity, it becomes imperative to understand the benefit of its incorporation into standard cCT regimens in terms of primary tumor response. The aim of the present trial is to compare the outcomes of 2 different cCT regimens following nCRT (fluoropyrimidine-alone versus fluoropyrimidine+oxaliplatin) for patients with distal rectal cancer.
Methods: In this multi-centre study, patients with magnetic resonance-defined distal rectal tumors will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive long-course chemoradiation (54Gy) followed by cCT with fluoropyrimidine alone versus fluoropyrimidine+oxaliplatin. Magnetic resonance (MR) will be analyzed centrally prior to patient inclusion and randomization. mrT2-3N0-1 tumor located no more than 1cm above the anorectal ring determined by sagittal views on MR will be eligible for the study. Tumor response will be assessed after 12 weeks from radiotherapy (RT) completion. Patients with clinical complete response (clinical, endoscopic and radiological) will be enrolled in an organ-preservation program (WW). The primary endpoint of this trial is decision to organ-preservation surveillance (WW) at 18 weeks from RT completion.
Discussion: Long-course nCRT with cCT is associated with improved complete response rates and may be a very attractive alternative to increase the chances for organ-preservation strategies. Fluoropyrimidine-based cCT with or without oxaliplatin has never been investigated in the setting of a randomized trial to compare clinical response rates and the possibility of organ-preservation. The outcomes of this study may significantly impact clinical practice of patients with distal rectal cancer interested in organ-preservation.
Read the detailed description
Patients and Methods
Patients with distal rectal cancer will be eligible for the study after initial clinical, endoscopic and radiological assessment. At this point, patients will be offered to participate in the study and after informed consent, randomized to control or experimental arms as follows.
Endpoints
Primary endpoint: Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response achieved at 18 weeks from last date of radiation using clinical (DRE), endoscopic and radiological criteria (mrTRG grade) or near-complete clinical response (no progressive disease clinically, endoscopically or radiologically)
Definition of clinical complete response (cCR) available below and at the discretion of the attending surgeon.
Definition of radiological complete response as described below (centralized).
Patients will be counted as event if at 18 weeks the decision is to interrupt Watch and Wait and proceed to surgery (any kind) because of overt incomplete clinical response. In order to standardize assessment of response and reduce inter-observer variability, the decision to continue on Watch and Wait (or not) will be at the discretion of the central committee during central revision of studies.
Secondary endpoints:
- Surgery-free survival at 3 years
- TME-free survival at 3 years
- Distant metastases free survival at 3 years
- Local regrowth-free survival at 3 years
- Colostomy-free survival at 3 years
Definitions
Definition of cCR:
- Endoscopic: white scar, teleangiectasia, absence of ulceration and/or mass 6
- Clinical: no irregularity, firm area with minor induration6
- Radiological: mrTRG1: fibrosis with low signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images replacing the primary tumor; no restricted diffusion on diffusion weighted images; no nodes with border irregularity or mixed signal intensity; no extramural vascular invasion23-26
Definition of near-complete response:
- Endoscopic: residual tumor size ≤2cm (or reduction of ≥70% original tumor volume/size) 4,27,28
- Clinical: only superficial ulceration or minor (questionable) irregularities of the mucosal/rectal wall
- Radiological: mrTRG2 predominant fibrosis with low signal with foci of intermediate tumor signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images with or without restricted diffusion; mrTRG1: fibrosis with low signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images replacing the primary tumor with restricted diffusion; no nodes with border irregularity or mixed signal intensity; no extramural vascular invasion 27
Central Committee
The central committee is multidisciplinary group of surgeons, medical oncologists and radiologists previously appointed at the beginning of the recruitment of patients and with previous experience with organ preservation.2, 21 This group of specialist will be responsible to assess the baseline staging and define if the patients fulfill all the inclusion/exclusion criteria prior to randomization. The committee will also be responsible to evaluate the endoscopic and radiological tumor re-assessment studies at 12 and 18 weeks from radiation completion. The definition to continue on the Watch and Wait pathway or not will be at the discretion of this committee.
Technical aspects of assessment tests:
Suggested MR protocol:
1.5T - FRFSE; TR/TE: 3300/120 (ms); slice thickness/gap: 3.0/0; Matrix: 256 x 256; NSA 8) 3.0T - FRFSE; TR/TE: 8000/150 (ms); slice thickness/gap: 3.0/0; Matrix: 288 x 288; NSA 5) DWI - inclusion of a high b-value of at least 800
Suggested Endoscopic assessment:
Endoscopic assessment using a flexible scope (gastroscope preferred for retroflexion); direct endoscopic and retroflexion view of the primary tumor/scar; endoscopic biopsies at discretion of participating center.
Radiotherapy
Preoperative radiotherapy will be delivered on a linear accelerator in prone or supine position, preferably with full bladder. The use of a belly board is allowed. Isocentric 3 or 4 fields, as well as an IMRT technique is allowed, as long as all beams are treated on a daily basis. The dose distribution and calculation should be performed on CT or MRI and specified according to the ICRU 50 guidelines.
Dose specification: All patients will receive 25 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy up to a total dose of 45 Gy to the pelvic field including the tumor bed with a margin and the regional lymph nodes. A field reduction after 45 Gy is recommended up to 54 Gy. The last 5 fractions will then be given to the tumor bed with a margin.
Target volume:
Pelvic CTV
- The primary tumor
- Mesorectum: Distally, only lymph nodes or tumor deposits up to 4 cm are included. For tumors in lower rectum this means that the entire mesorectum down to the pelvic floor is included.
- Presacral nodes and nodes along the rectal superior artery: Since local recurrences are very unusual above S1 - S2, lymph nodes above this level should not be included unless there are signs of radiologically positive lymph nodes presacrally. If this is the case, the cranial limit of CTV should be at least 1 cm above the most cranial radiologically positive lymph node.
- Lateral lymph node stations: Until they reach the level of the obturator canal Internal iliac artery up to the bifurcation from the external iliac artery. The cranial border for the CTV is in most cases just below the bifurcation of the internal and external iliac arteries. In most patients this is at the level of S1 - S2.
- Ischio-rectal fossa and the anal canal: Included in pelvic CTV only if the tumor grows into the levators or down into the anal canal.
- Lymph nodes along the external iliac artery: Included if the tumor grows into anterior organs like the prostate, urinary bladder, cervix, vagina or uterus to such an extent that the external nodes are at risk for metastases.
Boost GTV:
GTV is the visible primary tumor and radiologically positive lymph nodes.
CTV boost:
GTV boost plus a margin of 2 cm within the same anatomical compartment as the tumour is in, for the dose of 45 Gy, also around radiologically engaged lymph nodes.
PTV:
The above description relates to the CTV. A PTV should normally be defined and includes CTV and internal target volume (ITV) and a margin necessary for the setup. These margins are depending upon several factors that are related to the equipment at each radiotherapy center.
Chemotherapy Protocols
Concomitant chemotherapy:
Concomitant capecitabine: 825mg/m2 bid on the radiotherapy days only
Consolidation chemotherapy:
- Consolidation capecitabine (alone): 1000mg/m2 bid, for 14 days, in a 3 week cycle, for 4 cycles
- Consolidation options with oxaliplatin:
2.1. mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 plus Leucovorin 400mg/m2 on a concomitant 2 hours infusion. 5FU 400mg/m2 on a bolus infusion, followed by 5FU 2400mg/m2 in 46 hours infusion, every 2 weeks, for 6 cycles 2.2. CAPOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 on a 2 hours infusion. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid daily, for 14 days, starting on the evening of the oxaliplatin infusion. Repeat every 3 weeks, for 4 cycles
Assessment of Response
Assessment of response will be performed at 12 weeks (and 18 weeks from last date of radiation therapy if cCR or near-complete response is detected at 12 weeks). All patients will undergo endoscopic reassessment, DRE and high-resolution MR. Endoscopic biopsies will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon/endoscopist.
Patients with complete or near-complete clinical response at 12 weeks will be recommended reassessment at 18 weeks from RT. Patients with clinically overt incomplete clinical response at 12 or 18 weeks will be referred to immediate radical surgery.
Randomization
Individuals will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the two groups (control and experimental) using a permuted block design with a random block size of 4, 6, and 8. (1-3) A randomization list will be generated electronically using appropriate software immediately after being considered eligible.
Protocol Blinding
Patients and attending physicians will not be blinded to the treatment arm randomized for each patient. However, as a strategy to reduce investigator's expectations and reduce inherent bias, the central committee will be blinded to the treatment arm. It is expected that blinding the central committee, who will be responsible for assessing the primary endpoint, any bias related to the investigator's expectation about the treatment arm and the chances of Watch and Wait will be nulled.
Sample size calculation
The primary endpoint (decision to WW due to cCR/near CR) was observed in 55% and 85% at 12 weeks (in contrast to the 18 weeks used in the present trial) among patients with early cT3 and cT2 rectal cancer respectively.29 In this study, there was a distribution of 66% of cT3 and 33% cT2. Therefore, response rates appear to be highly dependent on exact T-stage distribution. Considering the expected inclusion of more advanced disease (late mrT3 or even mrT4 rectal cancers) the investigators expect 40% cCR/near-CR in the control arm. A similar difference 60% versus 40% was achieved in the preliminary report of the outcomes of the OPRA trial. This difference in TME-free survival at 3 years was statistically significant favoring patients undergoing nCRT with cCT in comparison to nCRT preceded by induction chemotherapy (both regimens incorporating oxaliplatin). In this setting, if experimental results in ≥60% cCR/near-CR, the study will be considered POSITIVE. The incorporation of oxaliplatin to a consolidation CRT regimen that results in ≥20% increase in cCR/near-CR exceeds the potential disadvantages of treatment-related toxicity.
The investigators will assume that the primary outcome will occur in 40% of individuals in control group and 60% in the experimental group, which corresponds to an absolute difference in proportions of 20%. It is estimated that a sample of 194 (97 per group) provides 80% statistical power to detect this difference at a significance level of 5% using the Chi-square test and assuming a two-sided significance hypothesis and considering a 1:1 allocation. The estimated dropout rate is 10% in each group, so it is expected to include 216 individuals (108 per group). The sample size calculation was performed using SAS 9.4 (PROC POWER procedure).
Time-table
Patient accrual: 2 years and 6 months Patient/institution/year: 5-6 (20 institutions: 100-120/year - 2 years n=200-240)
Interim analysis:
If the arm of two drugs during consolidation shows ≥25% response rate after 72 patients, study will be interrupted (efficacy). If the arm of two drugs shows less than 5% response rate after 72 patients, the study will be interrupted.
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer, Consolidation
- Being tested
- Oxaliplatin, 5FU
- Keywords
- Rectal cancer, Consolidation Chemotherapy, Complete Response, Watch and Wait
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms, Pathologic Complete Response
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OxaliplatinDrug
Also called 5FU + Oxaliplatin
Patients will receive 5FU + Oxaliplatin during the consolidation chemotherapy after long course chemoradiation
5FUDrug
Patients will receive 5FU during the consolidation chemotherapy after long course chemoradiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - 5FU + Oxaliplatin | Experimental | 1) RT (54Gy) plus daily concomitant capecitabine 825mg/m2 bid, followed by mFOLFOX6 or XELOX for 4 cycles (12 weeks), starting 1 week after radiotherapy ended; Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: 5FU |
| Arm 2 - 5FU Only | Active comparator | 2) RT (54Gy) plus daily concomitant capecitabine 825mg/m2 bid, followed by capecitabine 2000mg/m2/day for 14 days in a 21 days cycle for 4 cycles (12 weeks), starting 1 week after radiotherapy ended; Receives: Drug: 5FU |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response
Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response achieved at 18 weeks from last date of radiation using clinical (DRE), endoscopic and radiological criteria (mrTRG grade) or near-complete clinical response (no progressive disease clinically, endoscopically or radiologically)
Measured: 18 weeks from last date of radiation
Secondary outcomes (5)
Surgery-free survival at 3 years
Investigate the risk of being surgery-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm
Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation
Total Mesorectal Excision-free survival at 3 years
Investigate the risk of being total mesorectal excision-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm
Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation
Distant metastases free survival at 3 years
Investigate the risk of being distant metastases-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm
Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation
Local regrowth-free survival at 3 years
Investigate the risk of being local regrowth-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm
Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation
Colostomy-free survival at 3 years
Investigate the risk of being colostomy-free after 3 years from radiation completion according to the treatment arm
Measured: 3 years from last date of radiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2021
- Study start14 Jul 2021
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Individuals will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the two groups using a permuted block design with a random block size of 4, 6, and 8. (1-3) A randomization list will be generated electronically using appropriate software immediately after being considered eligible.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rodrigo Oliva Perez, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
- Investigators
- Rodrigo O Perez, Dr, Principal investigator, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05000697
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 46102621.3.1001.0070
- Acronym
- CCHOWW
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Habr-Gama A, Sao Juliao GP, Ortega CD, Vailati BB, Araujo S, Jorge T, Sabbaga J, Rossi GL, D'Alpino R, Kater FR, Aguilar PB, Mattacheo A, Perez RO; Latin American Rectal Cancer Consortium (LARCC). A multi-centre randomized controlled trial investigating Consolidation Chemotherapy with and without oxaliplatin in distal rectal cancer and Watch & Wait. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10984-2.
PubMed 37316784
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chemoradiation and Consolidation Chemotherapy With or Without Oxaliplatin for Distal Rectal Cancer and Watch and Wait. A Multi-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. (CCHOWW)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05000697
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CCHOWW / 46102621.3.1001.0070
- Conditions
- Rectal Cancer, Consolidation
- Keywords
- Rectal cancer, Consolidation Chemotherapy, Complete Response, Watch and Wait
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo CruzUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) has been considered the preferred initial treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer. Advantages of this approach include improved local control after radical surgery but also the opportunity for organ preserving strategies (Watch and Wait - WW). Consolidation chemotherapy (cCT) regimens using fluoropyrimidine-based with or without oxaliplatin following nCRT have demonstrated to increase complete response and organ preservation rates among these patients. However, the benefit of adding oxaliplatin to cCt compared to fluoropyrimidine alone regimens in terms of primary tumor response remains unclear. Since oxaliplatin-treatment may be associated with considerable toxicity, it becomes imperative to understand the benefit of its incorporation into standard cCT regimens in terms of primary tumor response. The aim of the present trial is to compare the outcomes of 2 different cCT regimens following nCRT (fluoropyrimidine-alone versus fluoropyrimidine+oxaliplatin) for patients with distal rectal cancer.
Methods: In this multi-centre study, patients with magnetic resonance-defined distal rectal tumors will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive long-course chemoradiation (54Gy) followed by cCT with fluoropyrimidine alone versus fluoropyrimidine+oxaliplatin. Magnetic resonance (MR) will be analyzed centrally prior to patient inclusion and randomization. mrT2-3N0-1 tumor located no more than 1cm above the anorectal ring determined by sagittal views on MR will be eligible for the study. Tumor response will be assessed after 12 weeks from radiotherapy (RT) completion. Patients with clinical complete response (clinical, endoscopic and radiological) will be enrolled in an organ-preservation program (WW). The primary endpoint of this trial is decision to organ-preservation surveillance (WW) at 18 weeks from RT completion.
Discussion: Long-course nCRT with cCT is associated with improved complete response rates and may be a very attractive alternative to increase the chances for organ-preservation strategies. Fluoropyrimidine-based cCT with or without oxaliplatin has never been investigated in the setting of a randomized trial to compare clinical response rates and the possibility of organ-preservation. The outcomes of this study may significantly impact clinical practice of patients with distal rectal cancer interested in organ-preservation.
Detailed description
Patients and Methods
Patients with distal rectal cancer will be eligible for the study after initial clinical, endoscopic and radiological assessment. At this point, patients will be offered to participate in the study and after informed consent, randomized to control or experimental arms as follows.
Endpoints
Primary endpoint: Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response achieved at 18 weeks from last date of radiation using clinical (DRE), endoscopic and radiological criteria (mrTRG grade) or near-complete clinical response (no progressive disease clinically, endoscopically or radiologically)
Definition of clinical complete response (cCR) available below and at the discretion of the attending surgeon.
Definition of radiological complete response as described below (centralized).
Patients will be counted as event if at 18 weeks the decision is to interrupt Watch and Wait and proceed to surgery (any kind) because of overt incomplete clinical response. In order to standardize assessment of response and reduce inter-observer variability, the decision to continue on Watch and Wait (or not) will be at the discretion of the central committee during central revision of studies.
Secondary endpoints:
- Surgery-free survival at 3 years
- TME-free survival at 3 years
- Distant metastases free survival at 3 years
- Local regrowth-free survival at 3 years
- Colostomy-free survival at 3 years
Definitions
Definition of cCR:
- Endoscopic: white scar, teleangiectasia, absence of ulceration and/or mass 6
- Clinical: no irregularity, firm area with minor induration6
- Radiological: mrTRG1: fibrosis with low signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images replacing the primary tumor; no restricted diffusion on diffusion weighted images; no nodes with border irregularity or mixed signal intensity; no extramural vascular invasion23-26
Definition of near-complete response:
- Endoscopic: residual tumor size ≤2cm (or reduction of ≥70% original tumor volume/size) 4,27,28
- Clinical: only superficial ulceration or minor (questionable) irregularities of the mucosal/rectal wall
- Radiological: mrTRG2 predominant fibrosis with low signal with foci of intermediate tumor signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images with or without restricted diffusion; mrTRG1: fibrosis with low signal intensity seen on T2 weighted images replacing the primary tumor with restricted diffusion; no nodes with border irregularity or mixed signal intensity; no extramural vascular invasion 27
Central Committee
The central committee is multidisciplinary group of surgeons, medical oncologists and radiologists previously appointed at the beginning of the recruitment of patients and with previous experience with organ preservation.2, 21 This group of specialist will be responsible to assess the baseline staging and define if the patients fulfill all the inclusion/exclusion criteria prior to randomization. The committee will also be responsible to evaluate the endoscopic and radiological tumor re-assessment studies at 12 and 18 weeks from radiation completion. The definition to continue on the Watch and Wait pathway or not will be at the discretion of this committee.
Technical aspects of assessment tests:
Suggested MR protocol:
1.5T - FRFSE; TR/TE: 3300/120 (ms); slice thickness/gap: 3.0/0; Matrix: 256 x 256; NSA 8) 3.0T - FRFSE; TR/TE: 8000/150 (ms); slice thickness/gap: 3.0/0; Matrix: 288 x 288; NSA 5) DWI - inclusion of a high b-value of at least 800
Suggested Endoscopic assessment:
Endoscopic assessment using a flexible scope (gastroscope preferred for retroflexion); direct endoscopic and retroflexion view of the primary tumor/scar; endoscopic biopsies at discretion of participating center.
Radiotherapy
Preoperative radiotherapy will be delivered on a linear accelerator in prone or supine position, preferably with full bladder. The use of a belly board is allowed. Isocentric 3 or 4 fields, as well as an IMRT technique is allowed, as long as all beams are treated on a daily basis. The dose distribution and calculation should be performed on CT or MRI and specified according to the ICRU 50 guidelines.
Dose specification: All patients will receive 25 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy up to a total dose of 45 Gy to the pelvic field including the tumor bed with a margin and the regional lymph nodes. A field reduction after 45 Gy is recommended up to 54 Gy. The last 5 fractions will then be given to the tumor bed with a margin.
Target volume:
Pelvic CTV
- The primary tumor
- Mesorectum: Distally, only lymph nodes or tumor deposits up to 4 cm are included. For tumors in lower rectum this means that the entire mesorectum down to the pelvic floor is included.
- Presacral nodes and nodes along the rectal superior artery: Since local recurrences are very unusual above S1 - S2, lymph nodes above this level should not be included unless there are signs of radiologically positive lymph nodes presacrally. If this is the case, the cranial limit of CTV should be at least 1 cm above the most cranial radiologically positive lymph node.
- Lateral lymph node stations: Until they reach the level of the obturator canal Internal iliac artery up to the bifurcation from the external iliac artery. The cranial border for the CTV is in most cases just below the bifurcation of the internal and external iliac arteries. In most patients this is at the level of S1 - S2.
- Ischio-rectal fossa and the anal canal: Included in pelvic CTV only if the tumor grows into the levators or down into the anal canal.
- Lymph nodes along the external iliac artery: Included if the tumor grows into anterior organs like the prostate, urinary bladder, cervix, vagina or uterus to such an extent that the external nodes are at risk for metastases.
Boost GTV:
GTV is the visible primary tumor and radiologically positive lymph nodes.
CTV boost:
GTV boost plus a margin of 2 cm within the same anatomical compartment as the tumour is in, for the dose of 45 Gy, also around radiologically engaged lymph nodes.
PTV:
The above description relates to the CTV. A PTV should normally be defined and includes CTV and internal target volume (ITV) and a margin necessary for the setup. These margins are depending upon several factors that are related to the equipment at each radiotherapy center.
Chemotherapy Protocols
Concomitant chemotherapy:
Concomitant capecitabine: 825mg/m2 bid on the radiotherapy days only
Consolidation chemotherapy:
- Consolidation capecitabine (alone): 1000mg/m2 bid, for 14 days, in a 3 week cycle, for 4 cycles
- Consolidation options with oxaliplatin:
2.1. mFOLFOX6: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 plus Leucovorin 400mg/m2 on a concomitant 2 hours infusion. 5FU 400mg/m2 on a bolus infusion, followed by 5FU 2400mg/m2 in 46 hours infusion, every 2 weeks, for 6 cycles 2.2. CAPOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 on a 2 hours infusion. Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid daily, for 14 days, starting on the evening of the oxaliplatin infusion. Repeat every 3 weeks, for 4 cycles
Assessment of Response
Assessment of response will be performed at 12 weeks (and 18 weeks from last date of radiation therapy if cCR or near-complete response is detected at 12 weeks). All patients will undergo endoscopic reassessment, DRE and high-resolution MR. Endoscopic biopsies will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon/endoscopist.
Patients with complete or near-complete clinical response at 12 weeks will be recommended reassessment at 18 weeks from RT. Patients with clinically overt incomplete clinical response at 12 or 18 weeks will be referred to immediate radical surgery.
Randomization
Individuals will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the two groups (control and experimental) using a permuted block design with a random block size of 4, 6, and 8. (1-3) A randomization list will be generated electronically using appropriate software immediately after being considered eligible.
Protocol Blinding
Patients and attending physicians will not be blinded to the treatment arm randomized for each patient. However, as a strategy to reduce investigator's expectations and reduce inherent bias, the central committee will be blinded to the treatment arm. It is expected that blinding the central committee, who will be responsible for assessing the primary endpoint, any bias related to the investigator's expectation about the treatment arm and the chances of Watch and Wait will be nulled.
Sample size calculation
The primary endpoint (decision to WW due to cCR/near CR) was observed in 55% and 85% at 12 weeks (in contrast to the 18 weeks used in the present trial) among patients with early cT3 and cT2 rectal cancer respectively.29 In this study, there was a distribution of 66% of cT3 and 33% cT2. Therefore, response rates appear to be highly dependent on exact T-stage distribution. Considering the expected inclusion of more advanced disease (late mrT3 or even mrT4 rectal cancers) the investigators expect 40% cCR/near-CR in the control arm. A similar difference 60% versus 40% was achieved in the preliminary report of the outcomes of the OPRA trial. This difference in TME-free survival at 3 years was statistically significant favoring patients undergoing nCRT with cCT in comparison to nCRT preceded by induction chemotherapy (both regimens incorporating oxaliplatin). In this setting, if experimental results in ≥60% cCR/near-CR, the study will be considered POSITIVE. The incorporation of oxaliplatin to a consolidation CRT regimen that results in ≥20% increase in cCR/near-CR exceeds the potential disadvantages of treatment-related toxicity.
The investigators will assume that the primary outcome will occur in 40% of individuals in control group and 60% in the experimental group, which corresponds to an absolute difference in proportions of 20%. It is estimated that a sample of 194 (97 per group) provides 80% statistical power to detect this difference at a significance level of 5% using the Chi-square test and assuming a two-sided significance hypothesis and considering a 1:1 allocation. The estimated dropout rate is 10% in each group, so it is expected to include 216 individuals (108 per group). The sample size calculation was performed using SAS 9.4 (PROC POWER procedure).
Time-table
Patient accrual: 2 years and 6 months Patient/institution/year: 5-6 (20 institutions: 100-120/year - 2 years n=200-240)
Interim analysis:
If the arm of two drugs during consolidation shows ≥25% response rate after 72 patients, study will be interrupted (efficacy). If the arm of two drugs shows less than 5% response rate after 72 patients, the study will be interrupted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Individuals will be randomized and allocated at a 1:1 ratio to the two groups using a permuted block design with a random block size of 4, 6, and 8. (1-3) A randomization list will be generated electronically using appropriate software immediately after being considered eligible.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - 5FU + Oxaliplatin | Experimental | Drug: Oxaliplatin, Drug: 5FU1) RT (54Gy) plus daily concomitant capecitabine 825mg/m2 bid, followed by mFOLFOX6 or XELOX for 4 cycles (12 weeks), starting 1 week after radiotherapy ended; |
| Arm 2 - 5FU Only | Active comparator | Drug: 5FU2) RT (54Gy) plus daily concomitant capecitabine 825mg/m2 bid, followed by capecitabine 2000mg/m2/day for 14 days in a 21 days cycle for 4 cycles (12 weeks), starting 1 week after radiotherapy ended; |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Age ≥18 years;
- ECOG 0-2 or KPS≥70;
- Primary rectal adenocarcinoma (biopsy confirmed) within the reach of digital rectal examination (at least lower tip/border) by the attending colorectal surgeon;
- Endoscopic documentation;
- Abdominal and chest CT scans showing no evidence of metastatic disease;
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnancy
- ECOG ≥3 or KPS<70
- Unwilling to consent
- Metastatic disease (any kind; internal iliac and obturator nodes are considered local disease and not metastatic disease and therefore will not be considered as exclusion criteria)
- mrT4 or mrN2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OxaliplatinAlso: 5FU + OxaliplatinPatients will receive 5FU + Oxaliplatin during the consolidation chemotherapy after long course chemoradiation | Drug | Arm 1 - 5FU + Oxaliplatin |
| 5FUPatients will receive 5FU during the consolidation chemotherapy after long course chemoradiation | Drug | Arm 1 - 5FU + Oxaliplatin, Arm 2 - 5FU Only |
Primary outcome
Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response
Time frame: 18 weeks from last date of radiation
Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response achieved at 18 weeks from last date of radiation using clinical (DRE), endoscopic and radiological criteria (mrTRG grade) or near-complete clinical response (no progressive disease clinically, endoscopically or radiologically)
5 secondary outcomes
Surgery-free survival at 3 years
Time frame: 3 years from last date of radiation
Total Mesorectal Excision-free survival at 3 years
Time frame: 3 years from last date of radiation
Distant metastases free survival at 3 years
Time frame: 3 years from last date of radiation
Local regrowth-free survival at 3 years
Time frame: 3 years from last date of radiation
Colostomy-free survival at 3 years
Time frame: 3 years from last date of radiation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37316784Habr-Gama A, Sao Juliao GP, Ortega CD, Vailati BB, Araujo S, Jorge T, Sabbaga J, Rossi GL, D'Alpino R, Kater FR, Aguilar PB, Mattacheo A, Perez RO; Latin American Rectal Cancer Consortium (LARCC). A multi-centre randomized controlled trial investigating Consolidation Chemotherapy with and without oxaliplatin in distal rectal cancer and Watch & Wait. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10984-2.
Related trials for Rectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rodrigo O Perez, Dr principal investigator
Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
24 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Oxaliplatin and 5FU in people with Rectal Cancer and Consolidation, run by Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz at 24 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rodrigo O Perez, Dr (+551138871757, roperez@haoc.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Decision to Watch and Wait due to clinical complete response (time frame: 18 weeks from last date of radiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05000697, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2024.