AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck NeoplasmsF4TNCT04996147

Acute and Long-term Impact of Cancer Treatment on Head and Neck Cancer Patients: FIT4TREATMENT

An observational study of Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by Associacao de Investigacao de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia at 1 site in Portugal.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the 6th most common cancer. Most cases are diagnosed in locally advanced stages, with treatment involving multimodal approach with combinations of radiotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Neoplasms
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
1 Jun 2019to 3 Mar 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Eligible patients had to have more than 18 years, diagnosed with stage III to IVB HNSCC and proposed for primary treatment with curative intent - surgery or induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone. Exclusion criteria was: 1) synchronous tumors or other comorbidities with associated uncontrolled symptoms; 2) inability to provide informed consent; 3) expected inability to fulfil the propose schedule and follow-up.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of locally advanced head and neck cancer (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx), stage III-IVB.
  • Proposed for primary treatment with curative intent - surgery or induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or CRT alone.

Who cannot join

  • Synchronous tumors or other comorbidities with associated uncontrolled symptoms.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Expected inability to fulfil the propose schedule and follow-up.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Portugal1 site
  • Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia / Espinho

    Vila Nova de Gaia

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: Acute and Long-term Impact of Cancer Treatment on Quality-of-life, Physical and Cognitive Function of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the 6th most common cancer. Most cases are diagnosed in locally advanced stages, with treatment involving multimodal approach with combinations of radiotherapy, surgery and chemotherapy. The aggressive nature of HNSCCs and treatment modalities are associated with important acute and late toxicities that often promote temporary or definitive treatment interruption and may compromised the capability to tolerate subsequent treatments. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze the acute and long-term impact of cancer treatment on quality of life, physical and cognitive function of HNSCC patients diagnosed with a locally advanced disease.

Read the detailed description

Potential cases will be identified at the multidisciplinary head and neck group meeting. If the case meets eligibility an informed consent will be presented to the patient. Interested participants will be scheduled for baseline assessment before the beginning of treatment (M0). At the end of CRT patients will be submitted to a second assessment (M1). Follow-up assessments will occur 16th to 18th weeks after the treatment is completed (M2). Patients proposed to surgery or induction chemotherapy will also be submitted to an additional assessment before the beginning of CRT (Mc / Mic).

Keywords
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Acute adverse events, Long-term adverse events, Quality of life, Cognitive function, Physical function
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of life (acute)

    Global quality of life score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)

    Measured: Change of global quality of life score from baseline to the end of treatment

  2. Quality of life (long-term)

    Global quality of life score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)

    Measured: Change of global quality of life score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Fatigue (acute)

    Fatigue score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents high level of symptomatology / problems)

    Measured: Change of fatigue score from baseline to the end of treatment

  2. Fatigue (long-term)

    Fatigue score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents high level of symptomatology / problems)

    Measured: Change of fatigue score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  3. Social functioning (acute)

    Social functioning score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)

    Measured: Change of body mass index from baseline to the end of treatment

  4. Social functioning (long-term)

    Social functioning score evaluated by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (range in score from 0 to 100, high score represents a high level of functioning)

    Measured: Change of body mass index from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  5. Body composition (acute)

    Body mass index, evaluated by bioelectrical impedance (BMI kg/m^2).

    Measured: Change of body mass index from baseline to the end of treatment

  6. Body composition (long-term)

    Body mass index, evaluated by bioelectrical impedance (BMI kg/m^2).

    Measured: Change of body mass index from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  7. Cognitive function (acute)

    Evaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive (MoCA score range between 0 and 30, a score of 26 or over is considered to be normal).

    Measured: Change of MoCA score from baseline to the end of treatment

  8. Cognitive function (long-term)

    Evaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive (MoCA score range between 0 and 30, a score of 26 or over is considered to be normal).

    Measured: Change of MoCA score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  9. Dysphagia (acute)

    Severity of dysphagia assessed by Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score ≥ 3 indicative of dysphagia)

    Measured: Change of EAT-10 score from baseline to the end of treatment

  10. Dysphagia (long-term)

    Severity of dysphagia assessed by Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score ≥ 3 indicative of dysphagia)

    Measured: Change of EAT-10 score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  11. Dysphagia (acute)

    Severity of dysphagia assessed by Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS ranges from 1 to 7)

    Measured: Change of FOIS score from baseline to the end of treatment

  12. Dysphagia (long-term)

    Severity of dysphagia assessed by Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS ranges from 1 to 7)

    Measured: Change of FOIS score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  13. Nutritional status (acute)

    Evaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition).

    Measured: Change of PG-SGA total score from baseline to the end of treatment

  14. Nutritional status (long-term)

    Evaluated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition).

    Measured: Change of PG-SGA total score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  15. Handgrip maximal isometric muscle strength (acute)

    Measured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).

    Measured: Change of muscle strength from baseline to the end of treatment

  16. Handgrip maximal isometric muscle strength (long-term)

    Measured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).

    Measured: Change of muscle strength from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  17. Quadriceps maximal isometric muscle strength (acute)

    Measured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).

    Measured: Change of muscle strength from baseline to the end of treatment

  18. Quadriceps maximal isometric muscle strength (long-term)

    Measured with manual dynamometers (Kgf).

    Measured: Change of muscle strength score from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  19. Sit-to-stand test (acute)

    Sit-to-stand test during 30 seconds

    Measured: Change of repetitions from baseline to the end of treatment

  20. Sit-to-stand test (long-term)

    Sit-to-stand test during 30 seconds

    Measured: Change of repetitions from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  21. Physical function (acute)

    6 minutes walking test (meters).

    Measured: Change of distance from baseline to the end of treatment

  22. Physical function (long-term)

    6 minutes walking test (meters)

    Measured: Change of distance from baseline to 4 months after the treatment is completed

  23. Progression free survival

    Defined as the time from the beginning of treatment to the date of first progression or death (whichever occurs first) and will be censored at last follow-up date if the patient does not have the event. A progression (local, regional or distant) will be assumed accordingly to the imaging evaluation and/or histopathologic confirmation.

    Measured: 2 years follow-up

  24. Overall survival

    Defined as the time from the beginning of treatment to the date of death from any cause, for patients who do not die, it will be censored at their last follow-up date.

    Measured: 2 years follow-up

  25. Capability of tolerating subsequent treatments

    Defined as the proportion of patients that complete the first cycle of the first line palliative chemotherapy after a documented progression (considering all patients with a formal indication).

    Measured: 2 years follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion3 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion3 Mar 2020

Why it stopped: COVID-19 pandemic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04996147
Sponsor's protocol ID
102/2019
Acronym
F4T
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
25 Apr 2021
Last updated
9 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by Associacao de Investigacao de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: COVID-19 pandemic). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of life (acute) (time frame: Change of global quality of life score from baseline to the end of treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in