HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant RecipientPhase 4KINETIKNCT04993872
Pharmacokinetics of Calcineurin & mTOR Inhibitors in HIV-1 Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients After Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF
A Phase 4 study testing Biktarvy Tab in people with HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant Recipient, run by Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV (PLWH), with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%, leading to end-stage renal disease 3 to 6 fold more than non-HIV population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant Recipient
- What is being tested?
- Biktarvy Tab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 29 Sep 2022to 1 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 infected patients > 18 years
- Kidney transplant recipient ≥ 3 months
- Receiving calcineurin and/or mTOR inhibitors without change in doses ≥ 4 weeks
- Plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cpml ≥ 6 months (1 blip permitted <200cp/ml)
- eGFR (CKD-EPI) ≥ 30 ml/mn/1.73m2
- Written consent
Show all 9Show fewer
- GSS to BIC/FTC/TAF GSS ≥ 2
- stable antiretroviral regimen for at least 3 months
- Active contraception in potential child-bearing women
Who cannot join
- Allergy or intolerance to one of the following drug or to any of excipients: FTC, TDF, INSTI
- HIV-2 or HIV-1/HIV-2 co-infection
- Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C)
- Patient without health coverage
- Pregnancy and breast-feeding
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
Hopital Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44093
About this study
Official title: Pharmacokinetics of Calcineurin & mTOR Inhibitors in HIV-1 Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients After Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF: a Pilot Study - KINETIK (KIdNEy Transplant bIKtarvy) IMEA 064
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV (PLWH), with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%, leading to end-stage renal disease 3 to 6 fold more than non-HIV population. However kidney transplantation for PLWH has become the first-line therapy for end-stage renal disease, with an enhanced survival benefit compared to remaining on dialysis.
Management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients (HIV-KTR) has historically been problematic because of the potential nephrotoxicity of some antiretroviral drugs and the interactions between calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and ritonavir or cobicistat-boosted containing-ART. The use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a widely recommended nucleotide analogue for the treatment of both HIV and HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection, is restricted in vulnerable kidney population as HIV-KTR due to its major potential toxicity consistent with tubular dysfunction and rarely with a progressive sustained decline in renal function. The optimal long-term ART regimen is not known in HIV-KTR, though it makes intuitive sense to avoid regimens containing TDF, given its potential nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless the potent virological efficacy of TDF both on HIV and HBV and its highest in-vitro barrier to resistance among the Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors makes tenofovir use highly recommended or even essential in HIV/HBV co-infections.
Read more
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and bictegravir (BIC) are 2 novel antiretroviral drug available in HIV treatment in combination with emtricitabine (F) (B/F/TAF):
- TAF is a novel prodrug of tenofovir that may offer improved renal safety over TDF. TAF is more stable in plasma and is metabolized intracellularly by cathepsin A, an enzyme that is highly expressed in lymphoid tissues. Therefore, TAF can achieve higher intracellular levels of the active moiety tenofovir diphosphate, with lower levels of circulating tenofovir when compared with TDF. This more targeted treatment could potentially result in fewer renal and bone complications despite the same clinical efficacy as TDF. TAF was approved for use in PLWH with mild-moderate CKD (eGFR: 30-69 mL/min).
The availability of TAF seems a potential addition to the antiretroviral armamentarium in HIV-KTR. * BIC is a novel second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) has a high in-vitro barrier to resistance and in-vitro activity against most INSTI-resistant variants and has low potential for clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions. BIC has been recently approved by the FDA, in coformulated B/F/TAF for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in antiretroviral naïve subjects and in those with suppressed viremia.
No data are available yet with TAF use in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients as well as with BIC, especially about potential drug-to-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs such as calcineurin \& mTOR inhibitors.
At last simplification to a single tablet regimen (STR) may offer a once-daily option for HIV-KTR who have multiple comorbidities, often requires complex regimens with a high pill burden.
- Being tested
- Biktarvy Tab
- Keywords
- HIV+,,KIDNEY TRANSPLANT, BIKTARVY,cALCINEURIN? mTOR
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biktarvy TabDrug
Multicenter Pilot study aiming to assess the safe use of BIC/FTC/TAF in HIV-KTR, using a single-arm design.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BIC/FTC/TAF | Experimental | Development phase 4: Biktarvy® Receives: Drug: Biktarvy Tab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' blood concentrations after switch to B/F/TAF
Evolution of blood concentration
Measured: Week 2
Secondary outcomes (34)
•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAF
PK of calcineurin and mTOR
Measured: Baseline
•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAF
PK of calcineurin and mTOR
Measured: Week 2
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Plasma levels concentrations
Measured: Week 2,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Plasma levels concentrations
Measured: Week 12,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Plasma levels concentrations
Measured: Week 24,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Plasma levels concentrations
Measured: Week 48
• B/F/TAF plasma levels
B/F/TAF PK
Measured: Week 4
• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)
evolution of mGFR
Measured: Baseline,
• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)
evolution of mGFR
Measured: Week 48
• Change in bone markers
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Measured: Baseline,
• Change in bone mineral density
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Measured: Baseline,
• Change in bone mineral density
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Measured: Week 48
• Change in bone markers
bone markers and bone mineral density evolution
Measured: Week 48
• Incidence of proximal tubulopathy
(hypouricemia, hypophosphatemia, low molecular weight proteinuria, orthoglycemic glycosuria) analysis
Measured: W48
• Incidence of proximal tubulopathy
(hypouricemia, hypophosphatemia, low molecular weight proteinuria, orthoglycemic glycosuria) analysis
Measured: Baseline
• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin C
evolution of eGFR
Measured: Baseline
• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin C
evolution of eGFR
Measured: Week 48
• graft Survival
defined as the necessity to return to dialysis, or death
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
• Change in plasma metabolome
(Indoxyl sulfate, indole-3-acetic acid, Hippuric acid, para-cresol sulfate, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF) analysis
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
• Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events up
adverse event≥3 reported
Measured: baseline to Week48
• Incidence of specific calcineurin inhibitors
histological renal damage performed (if graft biopsy )
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
• Antiretroviral therapy changes during the follow-up through
Antiretroviral therapy changes
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
• Calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changes
Calcineurin \& mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changes
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
• Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL
Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL
Measured: Week 48
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Immunology evolution
Measured: Baseline
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Immunology evolution
Measured: Week 24
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Immunology evolution
Measured: Week 48
• proportion of participants with virological failure
defined as two consecutive HIV RNA VL>50 copies/mL or a HIV RNA >50 copies/mL followed by a study treatment discontinuation"
Measured: Baseline to Week 48
• Change in GSS* after switch to B/F/TAF Genotypic Susceptibility Score (GSS) to B/F/TAF
GSS ≥ 2
Measured: baseline to Week 48
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Measured: Baseline,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Measured: Week12,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Measured: ,Week 24,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Measured: Week36,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
adherence and satisfactory questionnaire
Measured: Week48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2021
- Study start29 Sep 2022
- Primary completion1 Jul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant RecipientStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- INSERM UMR S 1136, Sebastien GALLIEN/Henri Mondor University Hospital- Infectiology Department, THOMAS STEHL/ HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL-Department of Nephrology
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04993872
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMEA 064
- Acronym
- KINETIK
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 25 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pharmacokinetics of Calcineurin & mTOR Inhibitors in HIV-1 Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients After Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF: a Pilot Study - KINETIK (KIdNEy Transplant bIKtarvy) IMEA 064
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04993872
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KINETIK / IMEA 064
- Keywords
- HIV+,,KIDNEY TRANSPLANT, BIKTARVY,cALCINEURIN? mTOR
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'BaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- INSERM UMR S 1136, Sebastien GALLIEN/Henri Mondor University Hospital- Infectiology Department, THOMAS STEHL/ HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL-Department of Nephrology
- Study start
- 29 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV (PLWH), with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%, leading to end-stage renal disease 3 to 6 fold more than non-HIV population. However kidney transplantation for PLWH has become the first-line therapy for end-stage renal disease, with an enhanced survival benefit compared to remaining on dialysis.
Management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients (HIV-KTR) has historically been problematic because of the potential nephrotoxicity of some antiretroviral drugs and the interactions between calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and ritonavir or cobicistat-boosted containing-ART. The use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a widely recommended nucleotide analogue for the treatment of both HIV and HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection, is restricted in vulnerable kidney population as HIV-KTR due to its major potential toxicity consistent with tubular dysfunction and rarely with a progressive sustained decline in renal function. The optimal long-term ART regimen is not known in HIV-KTR, though it makes intuitive sense to avoid regimens containing TDF, given its potential nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless the potent virological efficacy of TDF both on HIV and HBV and its highest in-vitro barrier to resistance among the Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors makes tenofovir use highly recommended or even essential in HIV/HBV co-infections.
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and bictegravir (BIC) are 2 novel antiretroviral drug available in HIV treatment in combination with emtricitabine (F) (B/F/TAF):
- TAF is a novel prodrug of tenofovir that may offer improved renal safety over TDF. TAF is more stable in plasma and is metabolized intracellularly by cathepsin A, an enzyme that is highly expressed in lymphoid tissues. Therefore, TAF can achieve higher intracellular levels of the active moiety tenofovir diphosphate, with lower levels of circulating tenofovir when compared with TDF. This more targeted treatment could potentially result in fewer renal and bone complications despite the same clinical efficacy as TDF. TAF was approved for use in PLWH with mild-moderate CKD (eGFR: 30-69 mL/min).
The availability of TAF seems a potential addition to the antiretroviral armamentarium in HIV-KTR. * BIC is a novel second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) has a high in-vitro barrier to resistance and in-vitro activity against most INSTI-resistant variants and has low potential for clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions. BIC has been recently approved by the FDA, in coformulated B/F/TAF for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in antiretroviral naïve subjects and in those with suppressed viremia.
No data are available yet with TAF use in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients as well as with BIC, especially about potential drug-to-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs such as calcineurin \& mTOR inhibitors.
At last simplification to a single tablet regimen (STR) may offer a once-daily option for HIV-KTR who have multiple comorbidities, often requires complex regimens with a high pill burden.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BIC/FTC/TAF | Experimental | Drug: Biktarvy TabDevelopment phase 4: Biktarvy® |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- HIV-1 infected patients > 18 years
- Kidney transplant recipient ≥ 3 months
- Receiving calcineurin and/or mTOR inhibitors without change in doses ≥ 4 weeks
- Plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cpml ≥ 6 months (1 blip permitted <200cp/ml)
- eGFR (CKD-EPI) ≥ 30 ml/mn/1.73m2
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Allergy or intolerance to one of the following drug or to any of excipients: FTC, TDF, INSTI
- HIV-2 or HIV-1/HIV-2 co-infection
- Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C)
- Patient without health coverage
- Pregnancy and breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biktarvy TabMulticenter Pilot study aiming to assess the safe use of BIC/FTC/TAF in HIV-KTR, using a single-arm design. | Drug | BIC/FTC/TAF |
Primary outcome
Change in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' blood concentrations after switch to B/F/TAF
Time frame: Week 2
Evolution of blood concentration
34 secondary outcomes
•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAF
Time frame: Baseline
•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAF
Time frame: Week 2
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time frame: Week 2,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time frame: Week 12,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time frame: Week 24,
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors
Time frame: Week 48
• B/F/TAF plasma levels
Time frame: Week 4
• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)
Time frame: Baseline,
• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)
Time frame: Week 48
• Change in bone markers
Time frame: Baseline,
• Change in bone mineral density
Time frame: Baseline,
• Change in bone mineral density
Time frame: Week 48
• Change in bone markers
Time frame: Week 48
• Incidence of proximal tubulopathy
Time frame: W48
• Incidence of proximal tubulopathy
Time frame: Baseline
• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin C
Time frame: Baseline
• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin C
Time frame: Week 48
• graft Survival
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
• Change in plasma metabolome
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
• Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events up
Time frame: baseline to Week48
• Incidence of specific calcineurin inhibitors
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
• Antiretroviral therapy changes during the follow-up through
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
• Calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changes
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
• Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL
Time frame: Week 48
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Time frame: Baseline
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Time frame: Week 24
• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8
Time frame: Week 48
• proportion of participants with virological failure
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
• Change in GSS* after switch to B/F/TAF Genotypic Susceptibility Score (GSS) to B/F/TAF
Time frame: baseline to Week 48
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: Week12,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: ,Week 24,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: Week36,
• Adherence, HIV Treatment Satisfaction
Time frame: Week48
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2023.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Biktarvy Tab in people with HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant Recipient, run by Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' blood concentrations after switch to B/F/TAF (time frame: Week 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2023.