AzTrials
AzTrials

Analgesia Obtained With a Local Wound Infiltration of LidocainBSCPB_BlockNCT04993521

Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy.

A study testing Block type in people with Analgesia Obtained With a Local Wound Infiltration of Lidocain and Analgesia Obtained With a Ultrasound Guided Cervical Plexus Block Using Lidocain, run by University Hospital, Linkoeping at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study compared the efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) versus local wound infiltration (LWI) regarding the postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Block type
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
1 Feb 2019to 15 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA I-II, and were scheduled for total thyroidectomy
  • -

Who cannot join

  • documented allergy to study's intervention, moderate-to-severe obesity, > 1st-degree heart block, chronic pulmonary or cardiac diseases, hepatic or renal dysfunction, and/or coagulopathies.
  • All patients were required to fill the informed consent before enrollment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Linköping University Hospital

    Linköping, 58185

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

The present study compared the efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) versus local wound infiltration (LWI) regarding the postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy

Read the detailed description

We performed a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial that recruited patients undergoing total thyroidectomy at the Suez Canal University Hospital during the period between February 2019 and January 2021. Patients were eligible if they were older than 20 years, had an American Association of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) level of I-II, and were scheduled for total thyroidectomy. We excluded patients with documented allergies to the study's intervention materials, moderate-to-severe obesity, > 1st-degree heart block, chronic pulmonary or cardiac diseases, hepatic or renal dysfunction, and/or coagulopathies. All patients were required to fill out informed consent before enrollment.

Eligible patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive BSCPB or LWI using the computer software program (www. Randmizer.org) and allocation sequences were done using opaque, closed envelopes. The BSCPB group received BSCBP (after general anaesthesia but before the start of surgery) from two syringes containing ropivacaine 0.5 % and LWI with saline. The LWI group received LWI with ropivacaine 0.5% and the BSCPB from two syringes containing saline.

The primary outcome of the present study was postoperative opioid consumption in the first postoperative day. The secondary outcomes included the total intraoperative fentanyl and isoflurane consumption, time to first required analgesic, and VAS during the first 24 hours postoperatively.

Being tested
Block type
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Block typeProcedure or surgery

    Also called Ultrasound guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus nerve block

    Regular block type

Study groups in NCT04993521
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB)Active comparatorAnalgesia obtained by a ultrasound guided cervical plexus block using lidocain
Receives: Procedure: Block type
local wound infiltration (LWI)Active comparatorAnalgesia obtained by local wound infiltration of lidocain
Receives: Procedure: Block type

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postoperative opioid consumption in the first postoperative day

    postoperative opioid consumption in the first postoperative day in milligrams

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. total intraoperative fentanyl (mg) and isoflurane consumption (ml)

    total intraoperative fentanyl and isoflurane consumption in micrograms and ml

    Measured: 6 hours

  2. time to first required analgesic

    time to first required analgesic

    Measured: 6 hours

  3. VAS (10 cm; range): Pain average (VAS) for the first 24 hours postoperatively

    VAS (10 cm; range) Pain average (VAS) for the first 24 hours postoperatively

    Measured: every 6 hours until 24 hours postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion15 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A Randomized Controlled Study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04993521
Sponsor's protocol ID
BSCPB_Block
Acronym
BSCPB_Block
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
10 Jun 2021
Last updated
6 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Can be shared on reasonable terms

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Block type in people with Analgesia Obtained With a Local Wound Infiltration of Lidocain and Analgesia Obtained With a Ultrasound Guided Cervical Plexus Block Using Lidocain, run by University Hospital, Linkoeping at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postoperative opioid consumption in the first postoperative day (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in